^^ Interesting perspective on things as always VWM. Watching this thread with interest, awaiting further information from Max's side before I judge the situation too much. IMPO, if a casino accomodates a player's request to increase their deposit limits does not mean they should then be liable if that player goes on to lose their funds. The player requested said increase/s. Just because they cannot control their urge to gamble does not mean they should get back ( any of ) their losses. Again, JMO.
I had not considered the case of a casino voiding winning or losses due to self exclusion at another casino! maybe they were owned by the same opearator but i would have thought it would need to be clarified in their T&C that self exclusion at another Casino could result in voided winnings and sounds unfair.
IMHO Once the gambling event has taken place Win or Lose, Lax Responsible Gaming or not then neither the player or the casino should have any rights to reversal after the fact, this is the whole concept of gambling, i do though believe that if a Casino is proven to be consistently lax on Responsible gaming they need to be labelled as such to help bring them into line.
As for the deposit limits issue, Responsible gaming limits are placed by players so that when they get an uncontrollable urge to gamble there is a safeguard to protect them and casino's need to respect these safeguards.
Great Thread!
Al