I guess I did not say it correctly or did a good job getting my point across on this poll. The payouts to players (RTP) is being affected by these randoms (I read this somewhere I believe) and that is why we have so many disgruntled players, having to play with a bigger bankroll to accomodate the higher randoms.
If you do not play to win , then I believe you are lying to yourselves. Why else do you complain about the games not payouing out as they used to?? I play to win and HAVE FUN, but that cannot be done anymore because the casinos have tightened up on the RTP to allow for larger Randoms...am I repeating myself here??
So, this poll is not just for the randoms, it is for the overall play and if you would rather have smaller randoms with more play or RTP vs the larger randoms with less RTP.
I guess maybe I didn't get it across correctly since there are a few that did not understand...and thought it was about chasing randoms..it is not, it is about what the casinos have done to the games to reflect the larger jackpots and hurting the little guy in all of this.
.
Couldn't agree with you more, I too think the RJ's are affecting the overall play and return. What I would really like to see at these RTG casinos is some multiline slots with no RJ attached to them.
Why in the heck does every single one have to have a Random Jackpot anyways?!
Give us some multiline slots without the RJ and lets see how they play.
The randoms are NOT dependent on bet size per se.
Think of your national or local state lottery;
If you buy one $1 ticket you have 1 chance to win the jackpot.
If you bought TEN $1 tickets you have spent 10 x more, but now have 10 chances to win the jackpot.
RTG slots are exactly the same - the more "tickets" you buy, the more chance you have of winning.
So one $10 spin is 10 x more likely to win the jackpot than one $1 spin.
But TEN $1 spins have the exact same chance as ONE $10 spin.
You get the same number of chances for your total spend regardless of individual bet sizes.
Get it now?
Uh yeah, but I will ignore the subtle insinuation that I'm an idiot, it wasn't the point I was trying to make. My point was the amount played should not increase of decrease the odds one way or another, but that's just my way of thinking it should be.
The real issue as Silc has stated, is the fact that even having the Randoms, especially the monsterous ones are seriously affecting the overall return and length of sessions a player now experiences compared to a few years ago.
And like I stated above, I would rather RTG would make some mulitline slots available to the playing public with no RJ attached to it. To bad that wasn't on the vote listing, I would have voted for it as well.