Slotmachine
Dormant account
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2004
- Location
- US
Phyngster, amazingly good and important post. I hope you stick around, you provide an angle not often seen here. A look behind the curtain if you will.
That pretty much sums up what I've been suspecting all along.
Yes, the problem with playing intelligently is that after those couple of chances you're banned, and soon you'll be banned from all casinos...The casinos claim that they like winners, but in reality they only like the sporadic slots winners, especially progressives, who they can promote on their pages. The flip side of the coin is, those sporadic slot winners represent a lot of regular slot losers and addicts.
Very interesting (albeit anecdotal) statistic. If true, it suggests that Casinos are in the business of sucking the addicts dry, throwing them away and enticing new victims by way of big signup bonuses and other flashy stuff. Then someone actually wins with the bonus, they become persona non grata. What a win-win for the casino, and lose-lose for the player, indeed.
This is all making me much more sympathetic to the "bonus-abusers". I hate sign-up bonuses, they are the result of greed both ways, and cause most of the problems for the casinos and players. Just look at the forums, >90% of the complaints and bad publicity are the result of such bonuses. Why would I sympathize with the bonus-abusers then? Because I hope they abuse the sign-up bonus system to death and then go away .
I want to play at a casino that gives generous comps to loyal players, and rewards the biggest losers with extra cashbacks, instead of focusing their attention on the sign-up bonuses, and giving the biggest winners extra prizes. To me, a generous comps program is a much more tempting reason to sign up with a casino than a one-off sign-up bonus.
To take this thought a bit further, into utopia-land: The perfect casino would settle for the profits guaranteed by the house edge. For each player that signs up, they would have a tete-a-tete and set up wagering limits based on that person's monthly income, agree on a comps %, monitor that the player is not spending too much time gambling. The player would be happy in knowing that the casino is out to get 5% of his wagers, and for that they would provide him with exciting games and the possibility of big wins, would give him some of his cash back if he is unlucky, would not let him get carried away with his gambling and get into trouble, because the limit had been set beforehand.
*SNAP*
Ok, let's just get the good comps program...
Cheers,
SM
phynqster said:Three reasons, GREED GREED GREED. A casino is a built in profit center, either on land or over the internet. Just open your doors and collect the money. But some casino owners want it all, and do what it take to try and increase profit by doing things that are not the normal rules.
That pretty much sums up what I've been suspecting all along.
The problem is the majority of the depositers I came across did not play correct. They were addicted gamblers and just wanted to play. The were not really looking to win, they just wanted to play, so the bigger the bonus the longer they would play. If you were an intelligent gambler and looking to "WIN", than you got your couple of chances untill I would label you an "advantage" player.
Yes, the problem with playing intelligently is that after those couple of chances you're banned, and soon you'll be banned from all casinos...The casinos claim that they like winners, but in reality they only like the sporadic slots winners, especially progressives, who they can promote on their pages. The flip side of the coin is, those sporadic slot winners represent a lot of regular slot losers and addicts.
Pretty much a win win for the casino. So some casinos go for win than grinding out a constant profit. I saw thousand of players play, and I would say that less than 1% ever left money in their balance over night, they would play every penny till they were at a zero balance or would cash out.
Very interesting (albeit anecdotal) statistic. If true, it suggests that Casinos are in the business of sucking the addicts dry, throwing them away and enticing new victims by way of big signup bonuses and other flashy stuff. Then someone actually wins with the bonus, they become persona non grata. What a win-win for the casino, and lose-lose for the player, indeed.
This is all making me much more sympathetic to the "bonus-abusers". I hate sign-up bonuses, they are the result of greed both ways, and cause most of the problems for the casinos and players. Just look at the forums, >90% of the complaints and bad publicity are the result of such bonuses. Why would I sympathize with the bonus-abusers then? Because I hope they abuse the sign-up bonus system to death and then go away .
I want to play at a casino that gives generous comps to loyal players, and rewards the biggest losers with extra cashbacks, instead of focusing their attention on the sign-up bonuses, and giving the biggest winners extra prizes. To me, a generous comps program is a much more tempting reason to sign up with a casino than a one-off sign-up bonus.
To take this thought a bit further, into utopia-land: The perfect casino would settle for the profits guaranteed by the house edge. For each player that signs up, they would have a tete-a-tete and set up wagering limits based on that person's monthly income, agree on a comps %, monitor that the player is not spending too much time gambling. The player would be happy in knowing that the casino is out to get 5% of his wagers, and for that they would provide him with exciting games and the possibility of big wins, would give him some of his cash back if he is unlucky, would not let him get carried away with his gambling and get into trouble, because the limit had been set beforehand.
*SNAP*
Ok, let's just get the good comps program...
Cheers,
SM