Pokerstars, Absolutepoker, Ub and Fulltilt Seized By Doj

Sir, Mister Obama kept the DOJ of the previous admin because of GB Cuba... anything is possible, even if he leaves office. I have taken this to the highest possible places. It doesn't look good and this isn't news.

Chekov was indicted under HLS. So the paper is available only to Senators, not Congressmen
This really is news


Patriot Act shows its teeth
 
One of the mroe worrying aspects is that ICANN is clearly controlled by the US Gov. Which means the Internet is controlled by the US Gov. Now they have shown that thy can simply take down any website they don't want US citizens to see, it's a huge statement that basically says "we control the Internet now".

It's basically the same censorship that China employ but money motivated rather than morally motivated.
This is the most worrying thing. The US government can take what it wants, whenever it wants...which brings to mind - why didn't they confiscate wikileaks.org?? The org site is registered in San Mateo - the com site is still with Godaddy.

There was a massive amount of rhetoric coming from Washington D.C. about how the Wikileaks' founder was a "terrorist" since he was aiding and abetting terrorism with the information that he had published. Wikileaks.org is still up and running.

Is online poker more threatening than the publication of classified documents? Standing on the outside looking in, it would seem so. Where are the priorities?

As always, the Feds are showing their true colors. It seems that if money is involved, they move.
 
Well, they just got lucky cause the "boy wonder" opened up and told all he knew.

Poker Stars just partnered with Wynn Vegas, I am sure Wynn is none to happy about this.
That was a brief partnership :(

Steve Wynn Cuts Ties With Embattled Online Poker Site, PokerStars

LAS VEGAS, April 15, 2011—Wynn Resorts, Limited announced today that it terminated its alliance with PokerStars, the online poker company. The decision was reached as a result of the indictment unsealed by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York....
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Crikey I go away for a few days and this all kicks off.

It's the US players who will lose out in the end. 2 reputable companies now being dragged through a law suit for providing a service which is clearly in demand.

Can't play Poker but can carry a gun whilst shopping for groceries...insane policies
 
According to Full Tilt's press release, they haven't done anything wrong. Poker is a skill game so (I guess) it's not unlawful:
Full Tilt Poker Supports Poker Players And Its Chief Executive
Full Tilt Poker


Dublin Ireland (April 15, 2011)- Full Tilt Poker is saddened by today’s charges against its CEO Raymond Bitar and offers its full support to Mr. Bitar and Nelson Burtnick.

Online poker is a game of skill enjoyed by tens of millions of people in the United States and across the world. And, Full Tilt Poker remains as committed as ever to preserving the rights of those players to play the game they love online.

Mr. Bitar and Full Tilt Poker believe online poker is legal – a position also taken by some of the best legal minds in the United States. Full Tilt Poker is, and has always been committed to preserving the integrity of the game and abiding by the law.

“I am surprised and disappointed by the government’s decision to bring these charges. I look forward to Mr. Burtnick’s and my exoneration,” said Mr. Bitar.

Unfortunately, as a result of this action, Full Tilt Poker has decided that it must suspend “real money” play in the United States until this case is resolved. However, Full Tilt Poker will continue to provide peer-to-peer online poker services outside of the United States.

Presumably, we're looking at a court battle over this. Unlike when David Caruthers, CEO of BetonSports, was arrested, he was thrown to the wolves. His company (as far as I can remember) removed him as the CEO - and that was that. I think the same happened to Peter Dicks from Sportingbet.

It looks as though Fulltilt is going to put up a fight.
 
Nobody has addressed why this happened and everyone on here just states it all revolves around money.The Gov't clearly stated in the UIGEA that people in the U.S. can no longer gamble on the internet. This was why MG closed its doors to the U.S. etc.. Most poker sites went ahead and closed their doors doors to the U.S. as well. Most notably Partypoker which lost tons of business by doing this. Lucky for them they would rather stay out of jail than make money off people from the U.S. Full Tilt and the other sites blatantly said F*** the U.S. Gov't, we want to make money and poker is a "SKILL" game, whereby they went ahead and allowed U.S. customers to deposit and play arguing poker is a game of skill and not gambling. I think this is a strange argument because nobody can control the outcome of what is to come. Sure you can get pocket aces and know you have the best hand, but this does not mean you will win. There is also different amounts of luck on the various games of poker that can be played, and the limits people choose to play. I would love to see someone try to argue 1 cent 2 cent poker is a game of skill when seated against a table full of monkeys or bots. there was actually a monkey that was trained to play poker, and could play a pretty decent game, but this does not change the variance associated and luck of the draw in the game. If there was no luck in poker, it would be an extremely boring game and nobody would even play. The excitement people get when sweating the river card, is what has made poker become such a great game, and got tons of viewers to watch on T.V. I can atest to level of luck associated in poker because I played professionally for many years and made hundreds of thousands playing poker in live games and tournaments. I can not even begin to tell you how many times I had a 97-98 percent chance to win a hand and lost. Sure, in the longrun you can argue that you will win if you play correctly, and I do agree with that. However, it is not just a skill game and there lies the problem. It is a luck and skill game!! obviously skill plays more importantly in the equation than does luck.

Getting back to the poker sites, you use to be able to use your bank debit card to play and than they stopped allowing that and decided it was too risky. This too was what pokerstars did etc.. Than they moved to echeck and some other online processors to allow U.S. customers to play. This can be looked at in 2 viewpoints. The first being that these sites love all of us from the U.S. so much, that they have our best interests in mind, and just want us to be able to play america's favorite past-time in the comfort of our own homes. The second viewpoint is that they simply wanted to make money and the majority of poker players are from the U.S. Don't get me wrong, I love poker and think it should be legal to play online and I think these sites took a shot in the dark hoping that they would get their point across.

Nonetheless these sites did indeed break the law by allowing people to deposit and play, by accepting deposits claiming ti be something they were not. The fact they had to call themselves a golf company to get the deposit to go through, shows they new what they were doing was indeed against the law and nonetheless still did it. It can be argued that they did it for US.. the players in the U.S. And if that is the actual reason they did it, then I respect what they did, but it still shouldn't have been done.

There are at least 20 more sites I know of that allow people to buy in and play by accepting payments and claiming they are a computer company, pet store, bowling alley etc.. All of these sites are wonderful to play at and it is shame this has happened. But this still does not change the fact, that all these sites are fraudently tricking banks into allowing us to deposit.

Just for the record I would like to state that I love pokerstars and also full tilt poker. I have many friends that have made a living playing at these sites and it is horrible this has happened. I too use to play poker online all the time until the UIGEA came about. The minute that happened I probably played at most 10 times and only bought in for about $10.00 per deposit. I use to play the 100-200 limit games on stars and won tons of money before the UIGEA went into place.

The bottom line is that if you live in the U.S. you have to play at your own risk, and anything can happen at any time. It does not just revolve around our Gov't being greedy. They are trying to protect people in the U.S. from these companies. Do I think these sites should be excluded from the U.S.?? NO WAY.. I think all the sites should be legal including MG etc... I think this whole thing has blown out of proportion and I also think all these poker sites may have screwed us in the longrun by trying to find loopholes for U.S. players to play, instead of letting time be the dictator of what would.

With all of this in mind, i have to say I salute 3dice casino for there stringent honest casino. They were the first casino that told me the reasons they do not allow U.S. customers to use a visa card, and stated they would NEVER call themselves a pet shop, just to allow U.S. customers to buy in and play. Thank you 3dice casino for being 100% trustworthy and not putting yourselves in the situation that about 20 more casinos I can think of are about to go through. One last thing, if you live in the U.S. and play on bodog or any betonsoft site.. get your money out immediately. All bet on soft sites and also bodog claim to be something they are not in order to allow U.S. customers to buy-in. For what it is worth, i hope my post has opened everyone's eyes and gave people another vantage point besides just flaming theGov't.:thumbsup:
 
Has anyone actually won a court case yet by using the whole 'Poker is a game of skill' defence? The Gutshot club lost a court battle a few years back by using this line to avoid paying for a gambling license, but they got knocked back.

The fact is, the result of a Poker game relies heavily on the cards drawn. How many times do you see 2 people go heads up pre-flop on a final table...that's luck and nothing to do with skill.
 
Has anyone actually won a court case yet by using the whole 'Poker is a game of skill' defence? The Gutshot club lost a court battle a few years back by using this line to avoid paying for a gambling license, but they got knocked back.

The fact is, the result of a Poker game relies heavily on the cards drawn. How many times do you see 2 people go heads up pre-flop on a final table...that's luck and nothing to do with skill.


I do not think anyone has won a case claiming it is based on skill. I know there was a big case in Vegas but I do not remember the case. The main skill in poker comes from knowing which cards to play. There are many factors that apply to skill in poker including, things like hand selection, pot odds, knowing your outs, tells, knowing your opponents etc. However, a lot of these factors play heavily in No-Limit holdem and not as heavily in limit. There all also different skill factors for every variance of poker and also every limit played. I mean, look at pot odds for example. If you are playing 1 cent - 2 cent poker and everyone sees the flop in hold'em 100% of the time, than any hand you are dealt should be played to see the flop. Even playing 2-7 would grant you proper pot odds in a game like that, whereby the game has become based 100% on luck and the skill is gone. Now we have a problem in this situation, because it has become a gambling game. The better example would be when everyone is all-in pre-flop without looking at their cards, just for fun of course. I have done that before and i am sure other people have as well. Everyone knows that is a crapshoot and just fun, but it has become a gamble. I remember a few times doing this in one table satellites when a tournament was going to start soon and everyone agreed to move all-in on the first hand. Anyways, I am off to bed...
 
I don't believe the poker companies are relying solely on the skill vs. chance argument in contesting the legality of online poker in the United States.

My understanding is that their legal advice goes far deeper than that, and is concerned with the confused federal law situation in the United States, where the DoJ's opinion that the pastime is illegal is repeatedly questioned - often by politicians and the states themselves.

And because persons arrested under laws like the UIGEA are probably scared out of their wits that they are the subject of a US federal investigation, such cases are almost always resolved in plea bargain deals which usually require the accused to agree to share information with the federal authorities. Cases are rarely if ever tested before an independent judiciary to develop a definitive set of case law precedents.

The DoJ has used its opinion to deploy intimidatory tactics in discouraging internet gambling related businesses on a number of occasions - one example being their 'advisory' letters to US publications claiming that accepting online gambling advertising might be illegal and implying that such publications could be held accountable. That resulted in the loss of millions of dollars worth of advertising revenues.

Even the US banking system has queried the vague definition of what constitutes 'illegal gambling' in the UIGEA, and that goes back again to the lack of precision in the drafting (a widely criticised element in the UIGEA) and the very nature of US laws that have been claimed to ban internet gambling with inequitable carve outs for the online activities of US companies involved in horse racing and fantasy sports (read Goodlatte et al)

This inequitable approach has seen the US lose disputes with Antigua in the World Trade Organisation, leading to embarrassing abrogations of previously accepted international obligations, too.

If the big poker companies do decide to fight this all the way it could well result in decisions that force US lawmakers into developing clearer and more equitable laws...but that could be a double edged sword.

I still have the gut feel that we are going to see legalised online gambling - or at least legalised online poker - at some stage and at the federal level. There are enough powerful US gambling companies interested in that sort of outcome to make it possible, albeit in a manner that protects said companies' business interests.

Regarding the Peter Dicks issue, this was another legitimate British businessman detained in the US a few weeks after David Carruthers was arrested in transit.

In Dicks's case it was on a warrant issued by Louisiana which claimed that Sportingbet was breaking its gambling laws. Dicks was the non-executive chairman of the company on a visit unrelated to gambling to New York when he was arrested at John F. Kennedy International Airport in 2006.

Fortunately for Dicks, a request that he be extradited to Louisiana was not granted by the NY governor at the time, George Pataki, and the businessman was allowed to return to the UK.

Dicks then resigned his chairmanship in the interests of his other business commitments.

Some months later, Sportingbet placated Louisiana by paying a $400,000 fine, and all charges against both Dicks and the company were dropped.

Sportingbet also no longer accepted bets from the United States.

Two years later - in 2008 - Dicks was re-appointed non-executive chairman.

Regarding the seizure of the .com domains of Pokerstars et al, these sites have since switched to .eu internet addresses. However, the validity of the rights of the US government and for that matter ICAAN to arbitrarily carry out these actions will be the subject of argument - probably before a US law court. Presumably the DoJ obtained a court order for the seizures; I haven't seen any reference so far to what court granted such an order.

The position of the poker sites may be weakened by the gravity of these charges, which are mainly concerned with underhanded methods of doing business by deception and bank fraud.

I guess the defence argument will be that such conduct remains rooted in the whole legality question, with the poker sites claiming that their expert legal advice from US law firms has been that the legality issue remains at worst a grey area and at best that online poker is, in fact, legal.

It's certainly going to be an interesting debate as this major industry event unfolds.
 
The DoJ has used its opinion to deploy intimidatory tactics in discouraging internet gambling related businesses on a number of occasions - one example being their 'advisory' letters to US publications claiming that accepting online gambling advertising might be illegal and implying that such publications could be held accountable. That resulted in the loss of millions of dollars worth of advertising revenues.

Doesn't all the top sites advertise heavily during the televised games? I haven't watched any poker on TV in a long time.
 
Nobody has addressed why this happened and everyone on here just states it all revolves around money.The Gov't clearly stated in the UIGEA that people in the U.S. can no longer gamble on the internet. This was why MG closed its doors to the U.S. etc........


No one has addressed it as no one can produce a specific law that states poker and/or slots gambling on the internet is illegal. The UIGEA makes it illegal for financial instituions to process monies for UNLAWFUL internet gambling. If there is no specific law, what's illegal??

The old exisiting law against sports betting by 'wire' still seems to be what the Feds hold dear... that's why, IMHO, up till now, the majority of 'convictions' and 'seizures' (extortion) have revolved around off shore sites taking sports bets.

Well, now the DOJ is strutting their stuff and has gone after the big boys... I hope to heaven they don't just roll over (like all the others) and pay off.
 
This example of the sort of intimidatory tactics used by the DoJ goes back a few years when they were trying to discourage print publications in the United States from carrying internet gambling advertisements.

Although the basis for their initiative was solely their opinion that online gambling is illegal in terms of the Wire Act, they were successful in achieving the cencellation of a significant number of advertising contracts worth many millions of dollars merely by writing to the owners/managers and telling them that they might be committing an offence by carrying adverts for activities that may be illegal.

The moral of the story being that if you've got the biggest gun in town and a confident approach, very few will have the temerity to resist your 'requests' or 'advisories'.
 
No one has addressed it as no one can produce a specific law that states poker and/or slots gambling on the internet is illegal. The UIGEA makes it illegal for financial instituions to process monies for UNLAWFUL internet gambling. If there is no specific law, what's illegal??

The old exisiting law against sports betting by 'wire' still seems to be what the Feds hold dear... that's why, IMHO, up till now, the majority of 'convictions' and 'seizures' (extortion) have revolved around off shore sites taking sports bets.

Well, now the DOJ is strutting their stuff and has gone after the big boys... I hope to heaven they don't just roll over (like all the others) and pay off.

The fact that there is NO federal law against playing poker.... means that the DOJ IS breaking the Law, by overstepping their authority.

The DOJ is and has been enforcing a law that does not exist.

The people running the DOJ need to be brought to task for their illegal actions.
 
One of the USA residents that was indicted has entered his plea.


You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
By Jonathan Stempel Jonathan Stempel – 55 mins ago
NEW YORK (Reuters) – An Illinois man pleaded not guilty on Monday to charges he helped three popular online poker websites trick banks into illegally processing payments from U.S. customers.

Bradley Franzen entered his plea before U.S. Magistrate Judge Frank Maas in Manhattan federal court. Prosecutors had accused Franzen of operating an illegal gambling business and conspiracies to commit bank fraud and money laundering.

Franzen, 41, was among 11 people charged on Friday, when U.S. authorities seized the Internet domain names for Absolute Poker, Full Tilt Poker and PokerStars. These seizures effectively shut down their online gambling businesses, which are based outside the United States.

The case may test whether a 2006 U.S. federal law, which prohibits
.....
 
I just saw a Pokerstars.com commercial on Norwegian TV. Bit odd that these commercials are still being broadcasted on TV here.

I mean, probably not the best idea to lead people to that site now. New customers may become a bit skeptical with the FBI warning :rolleyes:
 
When you click on the link you provided it gives you ideas on who to write to. One of the links was to the DOJ facebook page.. There is some good reading there!!!! Haven't been this entertained in awhile. It's so bad they started editing posts.. :D:D

Go America tell them off!!! But I doubt the important people are reading that facebook page there to busy making sure us Americans are living a life that they have chosen! One they have deemed to be moral and acceptable. Hell I can't smoke, can't gamble but hey I can still buy the gun!!!!

WTG GLAD THERE WATCHING MY BACK (NOT)

I say everyone who plays cards mails a deck to the white house----- maybe then they will get the idea of what we want!!!
If not at least the politicians have some cards to play with there since they made it legal in there state....... still blows my mind - not good for us but hey they can do it..

ok done with rant have a great day!!!!
 
I say everyone who plays cards mails a deck to the white house----- maybe then they will get the idea of what we want!!!
If not at least the politicians have some cards to play with there since they made it legal in there state....... still blows my mind - not good for us but hey they can do it..

:thumbsup:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I say everyone who plays cards mails a deck to the white house----- maybe then they will get the idea of what we want!!!
If not at least the politicians have some cards to play with there since they made it legal in there state....... still blows my mind - not good for us but hey they can do it..

This is actually the best call to action I've heard so far. I say we do it. If enough people got involved it would become it's own news story, fomenting additional debate about the case. Good idea!
 
I have two decks of these really crappy cards that I got free, they only have numbers on one end of them, I think I will send them those!
 
Find a date we decide on and mail all cards on that date so we know they will hit the white house at the same time

have every person sign the deck with give us back our poker sites!!! If its good enough for washington it should be good enough for us / I say we mail to our state capitals on the same day as well and really cause a fury
 
Last edited:
why not advertise?

I just saw a Pokerstars.com commercial on Norwegian TV. Bit odd that these commercials are still being broadcasted on TV here.

I mean, probably not the best idea to lead people to that site now. New customers may become a bit skeptical with the FBI warning :rolleyes:

What does the FBI warning have to do with players in Norway? The site is up and running for everyone outside of the USA. There are 150k+ players at any given time.

The sites were not shut down. DoJ indicted people involved with sites and processors and poker sites in turn stopped allowing US players.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top