North Korea and US politics

Status
Not open for further replies.
Alan Jones seems to be either going by old outdated information, or is just downright lying.
The case about "meaningful access" is not active (they lost) and the claims about dominion are just false.
And anyone can check this for themselves if they dont trust AP.

“Dominion is a company that’s owned by another company called Smartmatic through an intermediary company named Indra,” Giuliani told Fox Business host Lou Dobbs in an interview on Nov. 12. “Dominion is a Canadian company but all of its software is Smartmatic software.”

Dominion, for one, is not a Canadian company. It has been majority owned since 2018 by Staple Street Capital, a New York private equity firm. And both Dominion and Smartmatic have issued statements saying Smartmatic neither owns Dominion nor provides it with any software or equipment."

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Last edited:
Time for Pence to step up and use the 25th amendment maybe?
Trump keeps spewing the same lies over and over, and the only ones losing out are the American people.
If he spent a fraction of the time he does tweeting on actually doing stuff he would probably have been re-elected-

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.






No! He might give a pardon to Trump. I need my birthday to be perfect on inauguartion day. I want Trump to get dragged out of the WH kicking and screaming.
 
No! He might give a pardon to Trump. I need my birthday to be perfect on inauguartion day. I want Trump to get dragged out of the WH kicking and screaming.
I think he will go into hiding long before that.
He will never admit he lost, there will be no concession speech.
He will keep twittering like he does now and get banned for spreading qanon conspiracies and misinformation.
Then without the daily tantrums, the world will forget about Trump after a few weeks.

And they all lived happily ever after.
all except one.
 
I think he will go into hiding long before that.
He will never admit he lost, there will be no concession speech.
He will keep twittering like he does now and get banned for spreading qanon conspiracies and misinformation.
Then without the daily tantrums, the world will forget about Trump after a few weeks.

And they all lived happily ever after.
all except one.

I wonder if 2021 will be less dramatic...no Brexit to worry about, no Trump and vaccines are coming. I might even reach lvl21 on Videoslots which is a major accomplishment for me! (why the hell that one level takes an eternity to complete?)
 
I wonder if 2021 will be less dramatic...no Brexit to worry about, no Trump and vaccines are coming. I might even reach lvl21 on Videoslots which is a major accomplishment for me! (why the hell that one level takes an eternity to complete?)
I actually reached lvl21 like a month ago, took a couple of years with my lowrolling.
Lets hope your reward is better than mine.
My reward?

ddd.gif
ggg.gif
 
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


A Democratic Michigan State Representative-elect doxxed the chairwoman of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers on a public Zoom meeting on Tuesday, revealing where her children attend school and claiming that she was enabling racism by refusing to certify the Wayne County Election.


This is not the right way to carry on, because discrepancies are popping up, for example, georgia found a flashdrive with 2,500 odd votes that hadn't been added; if somebody in this role has doubts they should be able to act accordingly with no fear of reprisals either to them or their family.
 
Last edited:
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


A Democratic Michigan State Representative-elect doxxed the chairwoman of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers on a public Zoom meeting on Tuesday, revealing where her children attend school and claiming that she was enabling racism by refusing to certify the Wayne County Election.


This is not the right way to carry on, because discrepancies are popping up, for example, georgia found a flashdrive with 2,500 odd votes that hadn't been added; if somebody in this role has doubts they should be able to act accordingly with no fear of reprisals to them or their family.

a) You really think someone would threat someone's kids over a public zoom call like that?
b) There's exactly one high school where Monica Palmer lives so can easily say that her kids will probably go to that school.
c) The amount of times you're right about something is pretty close to 0. Doesn't that get tiring? Or are you trying to get hired by Q? And I don't mean by Star Trek's omnipotent Q. I mean Q who is probably some anarchist troll who laughs his ass off when seeing how stupid things people actually believe in.

Can you like once in your life try to be right about something and not spread some fake bullshit because you really hate liberals just like Tucker?
 
a) You really think someone would threat someone's kids over a public zoom call like that?
b) There's exactly one high school where Monica Palmer lives so can easily say that her kids will probably go to that school.
c) The amount of times you're right about something is pretty close to 0. Doesn't that get tiring? Or are you trying to get hired by Q? And I don't mean by Star Trek's omnipotent Q. I mean Q who is probably some anarchist troll who laughs his ass off when seeing how stupid things people actually believe in.

Can you like once in your life try to be right about something and not spread some fake bullshit because you really hate liberals just like Tucker?
Easy tiger,
pretty sure mack is nothing but a gentleman in his replies to you.. No need act the big man towards the bottom, it really doesn’t suit you.
 
a) You really think someone would threat someone's kids over a public zoom call like that?
b) There's exactly one high school where Monica Palmer lives so can easily say that her kids will probably go to that school.
c) The amount of times you're right about something is pretty close to 0. Doesn't that get tiring? Or are you trying to get hired by Q? And I don't mean by Star Trek's omnipotent Q. I mean Q who is probably some anarchist troll who laughs his ass off when seeing how stupid things people actually believe in.

Can you like once in your life try to be right about something and not spread some fake bullshit because you really hate liberals just like Tucker?

That's a nice reply isn't it...would the general public know where Mrs Palmer lives? Besides, there was no need to mention her children in any case, especially while accusing her of enabling racism. It's as clear as day in the video, he states:

"You, Ms. Monica Palmer from Grosse Pointe Woods, which has a history of racism, are deciding to enable and continue to perpetuate the racist history of this country and I want you to think about what that means for your kids "
 
Easy tiger,
pretty sure mack is nothing but a gentleman in his replies to you.. No need act the big man towards the bottom, it really doesn’t suit you.

I'm getting pissed by the amount of bullshit that mack keeps spreading. He's smart enough...he has shown that earlier but still he keeps spreading this same kind of crap all the time. I want him to use his intellect for something constructive for once.
 
That's a nice reply isn't it...would the general public know where Mrs Palmer lives? Besides, there was no need to mention her children in any case, especially while accusing her of enabling racism. It's as clear as day in the video, he states:

"You, Ms. Monica Palmer from Grosse Pointe Woods, which has a history of racism, are deciding to enable and continue to perpetuate the racist history of this country and I want you to think about what that means for your kids "

And that video suddenly ends there. Don't you want to see what actually was said? And not just end it there without showing the full context?
If that guy actually had made a threat...don't you think he'd be arrested by now?
 
And that video suddenly ends there. Don't you want to see what actually was said? And not just end it there without showing the full context?
If that guy actually had made a threat...don't you think he'd be arrested by now?

That's bad enough for me, not all threats are explicitly worded there is such a thing as implied, you could say it's a warning that her actions will have repercussions for her children, he doesn't have to say he will be the one carrying out any harm.

This is a forum, that was an article on the federalist site I feel I am at liberty to link to, without carrying out some DIY fact check; you can watch through that zoom conference if you like and put up some quotes to dispute the article?
 
That's bad enough for me, not all threats are explicitly worded there is such a thing as implied, you could say it's a warning that her actions will have repercussions for her children, he doesn't have to say he will be the one carrying out any harm.

This is a forum, that was an article on the federalist site I feel I am at liberty to link to, without carrying out some DIY fact check; you can watch through that zoom conference if you like and put up some quotes to dispute the article?

I've tried to find the whole call but it doesn't seem to be anywhere. But since this is The Federalist and the guy isn't white...you know he's gonna get plenty of death threats from racists. And for what? For a video that's edited to suit your bs propaganda that keeps dividing the country. The same thing that Trump and Fox has done for 4 years. That kind of thing disgusts me.
 
I've tried to find the whole call but it doesn't seem to be anywhere. But since this is The Federalist and the guy isn't white...you know he's gonna get plenty of death threats from racists. And for what? For a video that's edited to suit your bs propaganda that keeps dividing the country. The same thing that Trump and Fox has done for 4 years. That kind of thing disgusts me.

He shouldn't even mention her children, it has nothing to do with them whether she certifies the vote or not, as per her role.

It's no more edited than a direct quote? I think I did see a reply from him somewhere, saying that he doesn't even know what doxxing is. :rolleyes:

But to me, it was strange how quickly the officials changed their minds yesterday, when they must have thought the issues through before

" Shortly after Aiyash’s verbal attack, both Republican board members changed their votes to certify the election."
 
I've just found his twitter account, he is actively involved in politics [state rep-elect -whatever that means] how is this not incendiary and likely to cause these officials potential harm. Vorcirion you talk about causing division, but I guess you are fine with these kinds of accusations?




I'm fine with those accusations if they are right. Facts matter to me unlike to you.


Coming from Hartmann's public facebook photos for example.
 
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


A Democratic Michigan State Representative-elect doxxed the chairwoman of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers on a public Zoom meeting on Tuesday, revealing where her children attend school and claiming that she was enabling racism by refusing to certify the Wayne County Election.


This is not the right way to carry on, because discrepancies are popping up, for example, georgia found a flashdrive with 2,500 odd votes that hadn't been added; if somebody in this role has doubts they should be able to act accordingly with no fear of reprisals either to them or their family.

Yes, they were found in a deep red county. They forgot to enter them after a water pipe burst or something like that if I remember correctly. It's not like some demmies kept them hidden :laugh:
 
I'm fine with those accusations if they are right. Facts matter to me unlike to you.


Coming from Hartmann's public facebook photos for example.


What about mrs palmer, have you got some explosive memes linked to her?

BTW have you checked all of Joe's old speeches and actions etc...and didn't his VP kamala accuse him of something ?
 
That's a nice reply isn't it...would the general public know where Mrs Palmer lives? Besides, there was no need to mention her children in any case, especially while accusing her of enabling racism. It's as clear as day in the video, he states:

"You, Ms. Monica Palmer from Grosse Pointe Woods, which has a history of racism, are deciding to enable and continue to perpetuate the racist history of this country and I want you to think about what that means for your kids "

I don't think it's that hard to find where Ms. Monica Palmer hails from. A simple google on her name and her Facebook profile pops up, see for yourself.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
What about mrs palmer, have you got some explosive memes linked to her?

BTW have you checked all of Joe's old speeches and actions etc...and didn't his VP kamala accuse him of something ?

BTW have you checked all of Trump's speeches? Plenty of material there too. Don't know what Joe or Trump has anything to do with this one though. But it's your whataboutism again.
Those two wanted to certify all other places in their county except Detroit. Why is that?
 
It was posted by cncas2123, scroll back to the previous page and you'll see it. :)
Bloody outrageous @cncas2123 has used a fine English band to attempt to smear our saviours name...

I’ll let this one slip however as always thought Cheryl baker (the blonde singer) was a beautiful lady back In the day.
 
That's bad enough for me, not all threats are explicitly worded there is such a thing as implied, you could say it's a warning that her actions will have repercussions for her children, he doesn't have to say he will be the one carrying out any harm.

This is a forum, that was an article on the federalist site I feel I am at liberty to link to, without carrying out some DIY fact check; you can watch through that zoom conference if you like and put up some quotes to dispute the article?
if you listen to the entire tirade. You would see it wasn’t a threat. More of a moral issue. He was saying that she will have to live with the knowledge that she will be seen as a racist and her kids would have to bear that cross with her.

but yes go ahead. It was a threat.
 
if you listen to the entire tirade. You would see it wasn’t a threat. More of a moral issue. He was saying that she will have to live with the knowledge that she will be seen as a racist and her kids would have to bear that cross with her.

but yes go ahead. It was a threat.
Sadly racist/racism now has lost its true meaning due to being weaponised by all parties on the left of the spectrum.

that in itself I find morally offensive, not to mention ironically racist..,
 
if you listen to the entire tirade. You would see it wasn’t a threat. More of a moral issue. He was saying that she will have to live with the knowledge that she will be seen as a racist and her kids would have to bear that cross with her.

but yes go ahead. It was a threat.

I don't know all the ins and outs of the counties in detroit, that side of the argument etc.., but her kids being mentioned was an instant red flag for me.

He may not have intended it to be sinister, but in this day and age with angry/violent protesters turning up at people's homes, picketing them, it is very foolish to start mentioning locations.

To quote your view "He was saying that she will have to live with the knowledge that she will be seen as a racist" and yet he still condemned her as a racist on twitter after she reversed her decision.

And any parent, in that official's boots, would think twice with fear once their kids were being brought into it, so I can only conclude that was his real objective as he got more desperate to influence her decision and the outcome.

[sorry edited this, but wanted to get my thoughts clear on it]
 
Last edited:
I don't know all the ins and outs of the counties in detroit, that side of the argument etc.., but her kids being mentioned was an instant red flag for me.

He may not have intended it to be sinister, but in this day and age with angry/violent protesters turning up at people's homes, picketing them, it is very foolish to start mentioning locations.

And any parent, in that official's boots, would think twice with fear once their kids were being brought into it, I can only conclude that was his purpose.
Its all public information that anyone can find at any time.
Want to guess if it was him or her posting the video online?
=)

Before being posted, it was seen by the people taking part in the zoom call.
So who is putting the kids in danger now again?

Not that i think the kids are in any danger whatsoever.
 
Its all public information that anyone can find at any time.
Want to guess if it was him or her posting the video online?
=)

Before being posted, it was seen by the people taking part in the zoom call.
So who is putting the kids in danger now again?

Not that i think the kids are in any danger whatsoever.

Is the full video available anywhere?
Because the snippets ive seen are so clearly cut to push a certain message.
Would be nice to see the full video.

I don't know :laugh: I saw a vid link, started to try to watch it but the length was over 2hrs! [There was another dem man having a rant and getting aerated.]

In any other time it could be a normal type of point (for an idealistic democrat) to make in a political debate, but these days it will be seen by some as an instruction to attack, that's really my beef, what it could lead to, and it's not right for officials to have to face that in their decision making.

In this day and age I don't see why 4k cameras can't film up close and watch every thing that happens in the voting halls etc.. sometimes in the uk a minister walks up the road, carrying some sheets of paper, and the press cameras can zoom in to read any handwriting, even when upside down.
 
I don't know :laugh: I saw a vid link, started to try to watch it but the length was over 2hrs! [There was another dem man having a rant and getting aerated.]

In any other time it could be a normal type of point (for an idealistic democrat) to make in a political debate, but these days it will be seen by some as an instruction to attack, that's really my beef, what it could lead to, and it's not right for officials to have to face that in their decision making.

In this day and age I don't see why 4k cameras can't film up close and watch every thing that happens in the voting halls etc.. sometimes in the uk a minister walks up the road, carrying some sheets of paper, and the press cameras can zoom in to read any handwriting, even when upside down.
Yeah, but the thing is the video was not seen by anyone, before she released it.
Other than the people in the zoom call of course.

If she wanted to file criminal charges or anything she could just give the video to the police/courts.
But she wanted to play the victim card by releasing snippets of a conversation, pushing a narrative.
If she thought even for a second that the information in the video could put her kids in danger, she would have to be a truly horrible person to release it, right?

So either she did not perceive it as a threat which makes most sense, or she thinks pushing the narrative shes trying to push is worth putting her kids in danger.
Because making the video public serves no purpose other than fueling the hatred, which seems to be the purpose since they only show snippets of a conversation to paint their picture.
 
Yeah, but the thing is the video was not seen by anyone, before she released it.
Other than the people in the zoom call of course.

If she wanted to file criminal charges or anything she could just give the video to the police/courts.
But she wanted to play the victim card by releasing snippets of a conversation, pushing a narrative.
If she thought even for a second that the information in the video could put her kids in danger, she would have to be a truly horrible person to release it, right?

So either she did not perceive it as a threat which makes most sense, or she thinks pushing the narrative shes trying to push is worth putting her kids in danger.
Because making the video public serves no purpose other than fueling the hatred, which seems to be the purpose since they only show snippets of a conversation to paint their picture.

I think it was live streamed on facebook or something for the constituents to watch, so am not sure it was her releasing the video or not, I agree she should've gone to the police if she felt threatened or her kids were now at risk.

You don't get two chances if someone decides to go psycho, seen too many videos to know people cannot afford to be complacent in the US from the possibility of an attack when someone has lost the plot.
 
I think it was live streamed on facebook or something for the constituents to watch, so am not sure it was her releasing the video or not, I agree she should've gone to the police if she felt threatened or her kids were now at risk.

You don't get two chances if someone decides to go psycho, seen too many videos to know people cannot afford to be complacent in the US from the possibility of an attack when someone has lost the plot.
I honestly dont think it sounds like a threat tho, even with the video being cute.
And would probably sound even less like one if they included the whole video, or atleast the whole back&fort discussion/argument they were having.

I dont think it sounded like "I KNOW WHERE YOU AND YOUR KIDS LIVE, WATCH YOUR BACK"
but that is the message that is being spread around now.
They are trying to make a hen out of a feather imo.

You guys have that saying over in the uk? I know about the "making a mountain out of a molehill, much ado about nothing, making a song and dance etc"
But im not sure ive ever seen hen out of a feather being used.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top