My BJ max is still $100. And I'm 99% sure Enzo didn't change any of my limits.
Winbig, if you were playing with a bonus (with WRs you didn't complete) in your last session, the sign on the BJ table will say $50 until your next deposit (or bonus without WRs).
I did have a bonus in play from a small tournament win, but when my balance hit $0, the WR were canceled and no longer show up in the cashier. I sort of doubt that it wouldn't update until my next deposit, but we'll see.
And about changing limits for certain customers. I don't see anything wrong with that.
Yes, and no. If they lower limits
without telling somebody, then it's wrong. For instance, if bet sizes were increased/decreased at
any casino without them telling me, I have an issue with it. In this day and age, it takes no time to send a blanket e-mail letting everyone know about what was changed and why. Casinos do this for promotions all the time, so why can't they do the same for a
major change in betting limits?
It's bad practice to change something and let the players figure it out for themselves, and if they were to send everyone an email letting us know what was going on, we wouldn't even be having this discussion.
There are high rollers out there who don't find playing $5 per spin very appealing. Eg. at ladbrokes you can play 10000 per game in BJ if you're a VIP. They don't want to do this for everyone, probably because it would be too risky. They want to know their customers first. And theres also the fact that casinos need a reserve (money in the bank
) for the games they're offering. They need to be able to pay out quickly and hassle free even to those super lucky players.
Its called running a responsible business.
True, but we're talking about $100 vs $50 here, not thousands at a time.
Whenever you see a casino offering $100 slot spins (RTG) with $4000 max payout per week (40x max bet!!) you know they don't have the reserve they should have. They are relying on fresh deposits to pay out the following week(s). They should, however, have funds in a seperate reserve account to pay the lucky winner who hits 2000x bet on $100 spin! And if they can't do that, they should lower their limits!
This is also true, but under-funding isn't always the case. IIRC, Nash had a similar experience semi-high-rolling at TIV, and they adjusted the max cashout per week/month for him. While still being somewhat low in comparison to deposits/bet sizes, it was still increased.
All in all, 3Dice is still good in my book, simply for the fact that their customer service is among the best as far as online casinos go, and they payout quickly, even to USA residents. As with my last withdrawal, it only took 4 days to get a money order from them that I was able to cash
immediately upon receipt. This is unheard of for Americans, in this day and age. I wish more casinos were like this.
You just have to be extremely lucky and have discipline to manage you bankroll to offset the losses in high variance games to be able to cashout.
)
