Malware to Blame in Supermarket Data Breach

bb28

Dormant Account
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Location
US
Malware to blame in supermarket data breach
Posted by Michelle Meyers |

It turns out malware had somehow found its way onto a Maine-based supermarket chain's servers, which led to the security breach announced earlier this month compromising up to 4.2 million credit cards.
Hannford logo

Citing a letter the Hannaford grocer sent to Massachusetts regulators, The Boston Globe on Friday reported the malicious software intercepted data from customers as they paid with plastic at checkout counters and sent data overseas.

The malware was installed on computer servers at each of the 300-some stores operated by Hannaford and its partners, the Globe reported.

The company is continuing its investigation into how the malware may have placed on the servers. The Secret Service, meanwhile is conducting its own investigation.

The breach appears to be one of the first in which credit card numbers were stolen while the information was in transit, or at the point-of-sale. One of a growing number of sophisticated attacks, it illustrates vulnerabilities in the communication between cash registers and branch servers, as Neal Krawetz of Hacker Factor Solutions has warned in research (PDF).

That mode is in contrast to attacks on databases, the method used to compromise 45.7 million accounts over a two-year period in a data breach of customer records at TJX Companies, the operator of T.J. Maxx and Marshalls retail chains.

InformationWeek's Andrew Conry adds that Hannaford, in addition to the breach, as two related class-action lawsuits on its hands alleging negligence in maintaining customer security. And he suggests that there might be some truth to the claims, noting that Hannaford should have noticed that "internal servers were transmitting outside the network to a strange IP. This should've raised flags somewhere--server logs, IDS logs, firewall logs."

I'll second Conry's conclusion: "In any case, the whole mess should be very instructional to retailers everywhere," particularly in light of Friday's news of attacks on top Web sites like USAToday.com, Target.com, ABCNews.com, Walmart.com, and of a data breach at Antioch University in Ohio.
 
Although slow, you really have to love the security of ATM and POS machines that still use a phone line and dial up to the bank|processor....

Yes, they're hard to find, but still around. A lot of the smaller mom&pop stores still have them. :thumbsup:
 
What I want to know is how they passed all security checks WHILE this crap was going on. (See relevent posts in Cyber Crime thread.)
 
Update:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


1 hour, 59 minutes ago

PORTLAND, Maine - Hannaford Bros. Co. said Tuesday it is spending millions of dollars to enhance the security of its data network following a massive security breach that exposed up to 4.2 million credit and debit card numbers to fraud.

It was during the card approval process that customer accounts at grocery stores in the Northeast and Florida were compromised from Dec. 7 to March 10. That exposure occurred even though the company met the latest standards for data security.

Company officials said Tuesday that the new measures include encryption of all card numbers during the entire time they are within the supermarket chain's data network. Hannaford also said it has installed a "24/7-managed security monitoring and detection service" from IBM to detect intrusions.

Hannaford President and CEO Ron Hodge apologized ...
 
i wish the criminals would ever get in trouble. i'm not saying there's no fault on the part of the store, but does that mean that stealing satellite signals is the satellite company's fault for letting someone else look at the transmitted data? i dunno, it just seems like if there were no bad people then we wouldn't have to worry about and invest in our own security like we do. :thumbsup:
 
i wish the criminals would ever get in trouble. i'm not saying there's no fault on the part of the store, but does that mean that stealing satellite signals is the satellite company's fault for letting someone else look at the transmitted data? i dunno, it just seems like if there were no bad people then we wouldn't have to worry about and invest in our own security like we do. :thumbsup:


I agree. I want heads to roll. Bring back the public hangings... I want these thieving @ssholes locked up and tarred and feathered. That includes any hacker that steals information along with those that put spyware and adware on personal computers.
 
as for satellite signals and wireless internet, i think they should be free. if it's intangible and permeates like the air we breathe, it should not belong to anybody. the telecom companies do own the wires, but if it goes through the air it should be free for the taking.

what is the skinny on that google thing, they cut a cheque implying to buy a monopoly on wireless or something, and in ponying up triggered some kind of escape clause to make it free or something? anyone know what i'm talking about? i saw a five-second mention on "attack of the show" but couldn't surmise what the story is.

i feel communications (particularly phone and internet) should be free, or at least an essential service provided at a rate comparable to sponsoring a foreign child, ie less than the price of a cup of coffee [per day]. mind, a cup of coffee doesn't come cheap anymore either.

:thumbsup:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Click here for Red Cherry Casino

Meister Ratings

Back
Top