external image

MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT: APCW HAS MERGED

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Location
FL
Dear members and guests,

It is with a great deal of optimism that I would like to officially announce the acquisition of the APCW by the Casino City Group. Many of you may know Casino City as a leader of information and news for the online gaming industry, but they also manage the Gambling Portal Webmaster Association (GPWA.org) and Rolling Good Times News (RGT Online). They are one of the largest and most successful online gaming organizations in the industry.

This announcement explains my extensive travel recently, as Casino City has had me busy so far! LOL! There will also be big changes coming to the APCW, as the Casino City Group will pour many of it's resources into creating a site that will better serve it's members. This includes a total site redesign, better video equipment and production, faster access to breaking industry news and information, increased funding to re-establish an aggressive quality control and auditing program for casinos and affiliate programs, and a staff to handle the operational aspects that previously overwhelmed the two of us who ran the entire site on our own.

My title will change from APCW Administrator to APCW Executive Director and I will still produce videos and have a dynamic impact on what APCW does, with the cooperation of Casino City's CEO Michael Corfman. Anthony remains on staff and will head the new Auditing Program, and additional Casino City staff will help fill in the positions missing for so long.

We thank you for your support and look forward to delivering a more committed, aggressive, and efficient APCW to better serve our members and the industry. Please be patient over the next few weeks as websites are moved around and re-built, and email and phone services are re-routed.

Thanks!

Here's to our future!

:lolup:

copy an pasted from the APCW site

Cindy
 
Um, let's be fair here.

I don't see GPWA.org or Casino City advertising for any shoddy rogue casinos. Michael Corfman is a stand up guy who I've known for years and has done a hell of a lot for this industry. We are pretty much on the same sheet of music when it comes to doing the right thing.

I can see where the flack is directed at J.Todd because - like it or not - he can be rather outspoken. Well, that's just the way it is.

As for the Gambling Wages issue, I think I mentioned some time ago that each online entity (Casinomeister, CAP, GPWA, APCW...) should work independently when it comes to providing ANY casino outfit a chance to redeem itself. J.Todd gave Gambling Wages a chance, and they did it. I gave the Virtual Casino Group a few chances, and they didn't. J. Todd is not privy to the private correspondence I've had with numerous employees and ex-employees of the Virtual Casino group, nor is he privy to the details of the loads of complaints that have come through me. And neither does Gambling Wages - in fact, I don't think I've ever been in contact with Gambling Wages - nor have I pursued them either.

The bottom line is, there are complaints that are unresolved - and the casino is aware of most of these. It would be unfair to both the APCW and Gambling Wages to chastise them for not taking action on these complaints since these are player/casino matters. GW is merely the marketing arm of some of these casino. If Gambling Wages wants to tackle some of these, they know where to find me :D

And I'm sure they are aware of the player who is owed about $1.5 million. There is just nothing they can do about it because their pockets aren't that deep.

I see this merger as a good thing.
 
I can see where the flack is directed at J.Todd because - like it or not - he can be rather outspoken. Well, that's just the way it is.

Don't know a thing about the GPWA, and to be brutally honest, I don't really care that much. If you say they advertise okay casinos, I'll take your word for it.

As to the J.Todd comment....the way it is? The way it is Bryan, is that he doesn't mind posting his crappy YouTube videos here USING this forum to promote Gambling Wages and their ripoff joints, and sucking in more unsuspecting players. But.....when I try to post a linkback to this SAME forum, and tell people to use the search function here, to find out the truth on Coolcat, Club Player, POC and Cirrus....I'm told I'm an idiot, and that my posts are unintelligent. Is that the kind of outspoken you mean? I have another word for it...but I'm afraid I'd be on "vacation" if I used it. Seems to me that outspokeness and free speech only work ONE way with that guy....and that is his way or no way. THAT'S the way it is, IMO.

EDIT: Thought I'd go glance really quick at GPWA.org and Casino City, never been to either. Main page of GPWA, Chipleader is a Silver member. Chipleader of the Absolute Poker/Ultimate Bet notoriety. And main page of Casino City? Third casino down the right hand side.....Joyland Casino, third MOST popular casino in fact. Oh, and #61 on their "list" of online casinos? You betcha.....CIRRUS!!

Now I'll thank Winbig for his post. I didn't want to do that if he was posting erroneous info re: being about the money. But Chipleader and Joyland is enough for me to say yeah.....it's about the money.
 
OK, Bryan..............if fair is the operative word, let's be fair.

Is it fair for any affiliate to promote any casino in the Virtual group? It is not a secret, nor should it be, that the Virtual casino group has a very tacky way of doing business. And while we are being fair.............what about the players who deposit and play there because of the affiliates who now believe the group has turned over (another) new leaf and can be trusted to pay winners? And what about the casinos in the Virtual group who are not in Gambling Wages? Is it fair to expect players will magically know that GW casinos are ok but non-GW casinos (even though in the Virtual group) are still rogue?

The idea that the player must research a casino before depositing and playing is understood. However, when affiliates promote them (and give an "all clear") it seems unfair to expect a player to do further research to uncover any "bottom-line" motivated scheme............either between GW and APCW (or whatever they are calling themselves today) or anyone else similarily motivated.

This site seems to do ok without promoting rogues. Can't foresee any circumstance that would force you to change that Bryan.
 
The bottom line is, there are complaints that are unresolved - and the casino is aware of most of these. It would be unfair to both the APCW and Gambling Wages to chastise them for not taking action on these complaints since these are player/casino matters. GW is merely the marketing arm of some of these casinos.

Sorry, I'm really not trying to be dense...nor confrontational on purpose. But what is the difference if they are the marketing arm, or the casinos themselves? Does the money from player's pockets not all go into the same coffers? So it's okay for webmasters to advertise these shitholes, cause the affiliate program is okay, and beneficial to affiliates? But it's NOT okay for players to play there?

Honestly Bryan, what is the distinction? Gambling Wages is the mouth (one of them) that feeds the monster known as Virtual Group Casinos. To say they are MERELY the marketing arm? You've lost me now.

Obviously I understand the difference between an affiliate program and a casino...but the casino would have a whole lot harder time surviving without the affy program and all the unscrupulous affiliates feeding them fresh (unsuspecting) meat on a daily basis.

I knew there was a reason I have tried to stay out of these APCW/GW/JTodd threads. :rolleyes:
 
What I mean by marketing arm is that the aff program is usually separate from the casino. In other words, the aff program is not privy to what is happening at the casino level.

In this situation, I have no idea how these people are organized at the moment. Whether they are in the same office (as they once were), or somewhere down the hall. IMO it's the casino managers and their supervisors that call the shots. Aff managers usually just try to clean up the mess laid behind so they can go on their way to be successful at what they do.

It was mentioned that some players that went through the APCW and GW weren't paid? (besides mysticjoz) - direct them to the PAB section (or this thread) and Max and I will review their cases.
 
What I mean by marketing arm is that the aff program is usually separate from the casino. In other words, the aff program is not privy to what is happening at the casino level.
Shouldn't they try to find out? Like if the first dozen hits for the name of the casino on google are complaints about not paying, then shouldn't the marketing people suspect that something is wrong with the casino? Or is it like advertising cigarettes, it is OK as long as you have some doubt that they increase the chance of cancer, heart disease, etc?
 
In this situation, I have no idea how these people are organized at the moment. Whether they are in the same office (as they once were), or somewhere down the hall.

I don't know too much about these guys since I wouldn't deal with them, but I do recall an ex-affiliate manager of theirs saying at a conference that she managed to get the owners to seperate the two entities completely and they were in totally different locations (same city). This was however some time ago, over a year. Dunno what may be the situation today...

Yes, affiliate programs feed the casino, of course. But whether they have any influence on the casino's dealing or not varies a lot. Some smaller operations work tightly together, others are completely seperate businesses that do not interact at all. In some cases different branches of the marketing arm do not even interact, such as affiliate programs and media buyers (ad buyers).

So, trying to go through an affiliate program to solve player issues is hit and miss, depending on the structure.

I think that's what Bryan was trying to say, correct me if I am wrong.

Trying to fix player issues through an aff program is often barking up the wrong tree, although the trees grow in the same forest.

As far as the gambling wages issue goes, I have no idea how much reach gambling wages may or may not have had concering casino issues. I strongly doubt they are able to see the casino records, they would have to go by what the casino tells them.

Just my thoughts based on what I see in the industry in general.
 
This industry has a deeply flawed business model IMO. I have never understood why players should trust affiliates when the affiliates are getting paid by the casino's. It is a trait that I have noticed on here quite a lot - some folk are pretty naive and way too trusting! Do not trust affiliates folks. You will only ever get half the story.

What this industry needs is more websites based on the model of paid advertising and an independent assessment. The affiliate model belongs back in the dot com boom. This is the age of the Webmaster - a legitimate business that is not dependent on players revenue streams for a living.
 
This industry has a deeply flawed business model IMO. I have never understood why players should trust affiliates when the affiliates are getting paid by the casino's. It is a trait that I have noticed on here quite a lot - some folk are pretty naive and way too trusting! Do not trust affiliates folks. You will only ever get half the story.

Uh, there's nothing flawed with the business model. You CANNOT group all affiliate programs/casinos as one. Just because there's a few bad apples doesn't mean they ALL are.

FYI, there ARE great affiliates out there, and you most definitely get ALL of the story from them. I'm sure they'll be here soon to say their piece; but I can confirm that you've just given them a slap in the face, including the owner of this site!

I hope you're ready for the shitstorm that you just created.

Also, what's so flawed about the business model? I guess all travel agents are evil as well, because they are basically an affiliate for airlines, cruise ships, hotels, etc.
 
What this industry needs is more websites based on the model of paid advertising and an independent assessment. The affiliate model belongs back in the dot com boom. This is the age of the Webmaster - a legitimate business that is not dependent on players revenue streams for a living.

Win, you may want to read Diamond Geezer's post again. In the paragraph I quoted, he is describing Casinomeister/Bryan to a tee. Bryan has stressed more than once, that he is really not an affiliate, but a webmaster. And I think if you ask him, you'll find that most of his advertising on here is paid for ie. media buy, and not on the affiliate model. That's a guess, but it's the way I've always assumed it is done here.

FTR, I'm no fan of the affiliate model either. Yes, there are good affiliates, but unfortunately in eight years of online gaming, I've found that the bad ones outweigh the good, by a good margin.

Go punch in online casinos/gambling into Google, and search some of the sites that come up on the first couple of pages. I think you'll find that many of them promote what the "good guys" consider to be rogue casinos, especially Virtual and all their clones. It's a losing battle, especially when you have webmasters such as JTodd/APCW, who "did" have some credibility, now supporting shitholes like the Gambling Wages casinos.
 
True.....

I will retract my statement about how it applies to Bryan, but it's still a kick in the balls to all of the great affiliates out there.

Absolutely agreed Win. :thumbsup:

Unfortunately there's just too few of them. The ones that I do consider ethical and good, are for the most part the ones who contribute to this forum, and who do make the effort to keep up on current player issues. There are just way too many who throw up a website, sign up for every affy program out there, and toss up a million banners, without doing a lick of research.

Or...the ones who do know better, but just don't care who they promote, as long as the affy program treats them right. Those are the ones I REALLY have a problem with.
 
As long as there are players who either click on bad affiliate sites or/and spam mail, and as long as there are players who will not support quality sites, you will have a whole lot of crappy affiliate sites.

Affiliates survive only if people click on their links.

It is up to players to weed out the bad by ignoring them, there will always be people online trying to make a quick buck who could care less about the mess they create. That's not unique to this industry either.

There will also always be good people who spend all their time gathering information to make your life easier.

If you think a site is crap, please don't click on anything there, and it will die a slow death.

If you would like to see a site in existance tomorrow, you do need to support it with clicks or it will also die.

Whether the site is selling ad space or uses the affiliate model or, most common among the bigger information sites, uses both, they all need clicks to survive.

No clicks, no site. No clicks, no spammers. It's all in your hands.
 
I will post as an affiliate here. If anything will help APCW right now it will be Casino City/GPWA. I hold the GPWA seals on my sites and take them very seriously. I uphold the affiliate seal of approval that I try to do business in an ethical manner.
I questioned the apcw merge within the GPWA. I trust in the GPWA that the recent events will stop now. Meaning that there will be no more bashing and bad words/videos from the APCW. However, with the recent events, if the gpwa and the apcw merge did not value me as an affiliate, I will remove the GPWA seal from my sites. That's all I can say and I hope you take it as face value from an affiliate that is trying really hard.

All I can say is that this will never be the case again with JTodd under GPWA.
 
Actually, I don't think that the way advertisers are paid has any bearing to advertising scruples or business ethics - be it rev share, CPA, flat fees, or sexual favors. Advertising is advertising, and most of the webmasters I know take this seriously.

To be fair - the APCW has been producing webcasts for quite some time now. He has scrutinized crooked US politicians, stupid gaming laws, and exposed a number of affiliate programs that were screwing their webmasters. We shouldn't lose sight of this.

GW approached the APCW (not the other way around) because they wanted to wipe the slate clean. J.Todd stuck his neck out to try and get some players paid - evidently he did. So that's good for him - and everyone involved to include these players.

This reminds me of when I removed Crystal Palace from the rogue section, or when I gave the Virtual Group a second and third chance. Some people when ballistic, and I had a hard time getting them to see the big picture. And I felt it was only fair to give someone a chance to make good. In most situations, it's been a positive experience; sometimes it goes pear-shaped.

Also, these things are never ending. Who's to say that in a few weeks or a few months, J.Todd may find out he's been duped. You never know. We all deserve to approach these matters within our own perspectives.
 
Last edited:
This acquisition is a good move in my view. Whilst I realise there are several programs who sponsor the GPWA which I personally wouldn't touch with Simmo!'s let alone mine.

Michael Corfman has always been up front about the 'Certified Programs' on the GPWA. I know because I have asked him about this in person.

In the fact that they are sponsors and are not certified. This is very important to remember

By being listed on the GPWA, it allows an avenue for affiliates and affiliate programs to communicate with each other, should problems arise. This is a good thing IMO.

Casino City is a directory of all gambling operations and thus lists pretty much every online casino going.

The APCW and JTodd have done some sterling work for the industry in the last year or so and this should not be overlooked. By now being part of the Casino City Group however, this should ensure any outbursts which may cause offence, hit the cutting room floor so to speak in the future.
 
I always believe in transparancy. Should players be interested in reading they can do so here:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


There is also disruption in the affiliate world. This is what affiliates are about. There is nothing like the truth.

I hadn't seen that. Interesting!

Thanks for the link.
 
I always believe in transparancy. Should players be interested in reading they can do so here:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


There is also disruption in the affiliate world. This is what affiliates are about. There is nothing like the truth.
Oh, my. :eek2:
 
EDIT: Thought I'd go glance really quick at GPWA.org and Casino City, never been to either. Main page of GPWA, Chipleader is a Silver member. Chipleader of the Absolute Poker/Ultimate Bet notoriety. And main page of Casino City? Third casino down the right hand side.....Joyland Casino, third MOST popular casino in fact. Oh, and #61 on their "list" of online casinos? You betcha.....CIRRUS!!
Pina, I totally agree with everything you've posted in this thread. I'm all for giving people second chances, but not third or fourth ones... :mad:

When I first heard people recommending Casino City as a top portal I went & had a look & could not believe what I was seeing! The place is littered with 'rogues'.
The way GPWA advertise reputable places makes me want to vomit, so you can imagine how I felt when I saw that sickening GW video...

IMO they are just 'selling out' to make a few extra bucks (realistically a few hundred thousand extra bucks) which personally I think is a bad thing for everyone in this industry.

Talking of CIRRUS and selling out - what's with the banners at the bottom of the pages at WOL...? :what:

Each of us has our own opinions on who is rogue & who is OK, who is good & who is bad. No-one has the right to tell someone else what to do, but as Dominique said, it is down to each individual webmaster & player to decide who to support & who to avoid, and make your clicks (or non-clicks) count! :thumbsup:

KK
 
I was thinking something similar when I clicked on that link also. It was a bit more colourful though. :D

Bloody hell...I have zip knowledge of the background to this bitter dispute, but it's really not pleasant to see this sort of internecine strife going on in an important part of the industry imo.
 
Bloody hell...I have zip knowledge of the background to this bitter dispute, but it's really not pleasant to see this sort of internecine strife going on in an important part of the industry imo.

I am disappointed, but alas not surprised. It's all about the $ JetSet.

I have posted the following on the thread in the GPWA:

You were even in Barcelona this year where you tampered with and ultimately stole the JV agreement we had with APCW.

Aha. Lou has shed light as to the reasons behind the banning of Michael and JTodd from Cap. Surely Lou of all people should realise business is business. After all isn't that the message KWBlue was given when CAP launched their T&C alerts yesterday.

I have to say from my own personal dealings with Michael on the few occassions I have had the pleasure of meeting him. He has been nothing but up front and honest. To the extent that he will openly admit that the affiliate programs on the GPWA are sponsors and are not certified.

I have been out of the game pretty much for a year up until a few months back due to personal reasons. Coming back to all this crap is ridiculous. We are in the same industry. However it looks like someone is more concerned about their own $ than the good of the industry as a whole.
 
If you think a site is crap, please don't click on anything there, and it will die a slow death.

No clicks, no site. No clicks, no spammers. It's all in your hands.

In theory Dom, I agree with you. Unfortunately, the truth is that most players don't even know what an affiliate is. They don't realize that when they click on a banner, that affiliate gets a percentage of their losses for life, or a flat fee for them signing up. While I always harp on affiliates who don't do any homework prior to throwing up banners....to be fair, I'll say that not near enough players do their homework either. Most of them just decide they'd like to play online, and go looking for a big, juicy signup bonus, n/d bonus, or a pretty banner to click on.

They don't know who the good casinos/bad casinos are, and thus have no clue about what constitutes a good site or a bad one. And these are exactly the people that unscrupulous affiliates and casinos like Virtual want. They don't want educated folks who understand the industry. They want fresh meat who don't have a clue what's going on.

Actually, I don't think that the way advertisers are paid has any bearing to advertising scruples or business ethics - be it rev share, CPA, flat fees, or sexual favors. Advertising is advertising, and most of the webmasters I know take this seriously.

Also, these things are never ending. Who's to say that in a few weeks or a few months, J.Todd may find out he's been duped. You never know. We all deserve to approach these matters within our own perspectives.

Bryan, I also agree that there isn't alot of difference in "how" an affiliate/webmaster earns their money. The major one though is....if a webmaster pulls a banner/advertising from his site, the money is cut off. If he is just an affiliate and does the same, in most cases, he will still collect his percentage of losses on players he has under him thus far.

Perfect example is the Jackpot Factory Inspirational stories debacle. I think you pulled their banners within a couple of days of that whole story breaking, and I would guess that means you no longer collected any revenue from them for that time. If you were an affiliate, you would have still been collecting your monthly commission, banners or no banners.

It may not mean alot, but it does mean something. The fact that you were willing to cut off a source of revenue for yourself, lends credibility to you, and to this site. That's a personal opinion. Maybe not everyone sees it that way.

Bottom line though (and this is not directed at you personally, but an overview), once someone earns their living from this, and depends on it to feed their family.....it cannot help but colour their opinions on certain matters. It is very hard to be totally impartial when it is your livelihood.

What I would really like to see someday, is a site similar to this one, an info site.....with NO advertising. No banners, no clickable links to any casinos. Just info. I doubt it will ever happen, but in a perfect world and all...ya know.

The balance you've tried to accomplish here isn't perfect, but it's pretty good...and by industry standard, it's tops. I realize you put alot of work into this site, and what you do for players far outweighs what anyone else does. And yes, there are other affiliates as well who go above and beyond.

I find some of the best affiliates are the ones who read this forum, and ones similar to it. Ones who at least try to educate themselves and keep up on current player issues. Off the top of my head Lots0, Swampwitch and her partner Sorrelltop, Webzcas, Dominique, bb1webs (though he doesn't come round here much), Kasino King, Simmo...and probably others, but that's just who popped into my head. Mojo as well, even though she advertised Virtual, she was willing to listen to people, and still is. There's more, but that's a short list and who popped into my head.

The downside is that if I go to Google, and type in Online Casinos, what I will get back is almost a complete listing of all rogue casinos/websites out there. How is the unsuspecting newbie supposed to know what's good and what isn't? Most only ever find this site once they've encountered a problem.

In re: JTodd, if he ever wakes up and comes to his senses, he's going to have quite a few apologies to make. And yes, he made his mark by touting freedom for U.S. players, and outlining stupid government policy, etc. Funny though.....that freedom doesn't seem to apply to others when it comes to freedom of speech, only to himself.

But it pisses me off to no end that while you make a video yesterday, once again telling people not to play at Virtual, and that there's been 27 warnings in eight years.....he's out there telling everyone that all is hunky dory, and all player issues have been resolved....which is an outright lie.

I always believe in transparancy. Should players be interested in reading they can do so here:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


There is also disruption in the affiliate world. This is what affiliates are about. There is nothing like the truth.

Like I said before, I know squat about the GPWA, but having seen their "list" of casinos, I'm less than impressed. Sponsors, certified programs...what's the difference? If you're advertising for rogues, and collecting money from it...you are obviously more interested in money than the good of the industry, and the PLAYER. While it may be slim pickings as far as really good casinos go, why is it necesary to advertise for places such as Virtual? I would have to assume that the money must be really good.

As to the CAP situation, no surprise there. If you dare say a word there about any of the programs they certify....out the door you go. And what is their certification? You'd think it would mean an upstanding program that represents an upstanding casino or group, right? Wrong. It's about who can pay the monthly fee that CAP charges to become certified. It's got zero to do with credibility or reputation. The list of certified programs there is a complete joke. While they may treat their affiliates right, the product they offer to the player is way sub-standard. There is no criteria these programs have to meet, as it pertains to the player....you know, the one who pays the bills.

People keep telling me that we should all try to get along, that's the only way to change things. And to have open discussion, amongst players and affiliates. Someone should tell some affiliates that...to actually consider the player before signing up for a new affy program and throwing up a banner on their site.

These are the questions an affiliate should ask themselves before going into business with a new program:

- Is the casino they represent reputable?
- Do they pay the player in a timely manner?
- Are their bonus terms player friendly and easy to understand?
- Do they have good support staff/phone support/live chat?
- Is there a history of player complaints, and how were these dealt with?

If there are negatives in any of those things, then don't offer them to a player. Pretty simple to me. But unfortunately, when you read CAP, what you see is more of this:

- How much rev share/CPA do they offer?
- Do they bundle?
- Do they have a monthly negative carryover?
- Will I get paid on time every month?

Totally ass backwards, and until EVERYONE starts putting the player first and above all else, this industry will never be right.

If I were an affiliate and had the choice to promote a 32Red type of casino at a 20% commission rate, or a Virtual clone at a 40% commission rate...I'd take the 32Red product everytime, and tell Virtual to kiss off. How many affiliates will do that. I've even heard some affiliates say they wouldn't promote 32Red, because they didn't care for their affiliate program. My God!! So what you offer to the player means nothing then? It truly boggles my mind.

As to the GPWA, if they at the very least offer free speech and open discussion of issues there, I guess that's a start. I still doubt that my opinions would be welcomed with open arms.

Dom, I'm sorry if some of the stuff about CAP offends you...it's just an opinion, mine. Honestly, I don't know how you stand it there...because you don't seem to be the "standard" type of affiliate they represent.

As to the banning stuff, like I said, not surprising. I figure I'd last maybe a day there. At least here, I'm fairly confident that Bryan will allow me to have my say, without banning me. Even if my opinion is totally off the wall, and not in agreement with anyone...as long as I don't get personal with anyone, or use derogatory names, I think I'm allowed to say what I want here. Try that at CAP, and see what happens.

Pina, I totally agree with everything you've posted in this thread. I'm all for giving people second chances, but not third or fourth ones... :mad:

When I first heard people recommending Casino City as a top portal I went & had a look & could not believe what I was seeing! The place is littered with 'rogues'.
The way GPWA advertise reputable places makes me want to vomit, so you can imagine how I felt when I saw that sickening GW video...

IMO they are just 'selling out' to make a few extra bucks (realistically a few hundred thousand extra bucks) which personally I think is a bad thing for everyone in this industry.

Talking of CIRRUS and selling out - what's with the banners at the bottom of the pages at WOL...? :what:

Thank you KK, and I'm with you. Some of it actually does nauseate me. I have sworn I am not going to watch any more of those videos. All they do is make me feel sick, and make my blood boil. It is indeed a sellout, I don't care how anyone "spins" it. It's about the money....almost always is.

As to WOL...gawd, don't tell me they have Cirrus banners now too? Simply unreal. Is this the only place that I can come now where I won't see some Virtual banner flashing in my face?

It's all about the $ JetSet.

Isn't it always Webz? What was the Jackpot Factory stuff about? Money. What was the Microgaming White Label stuff about? Money. Why do most affiliates get into this business in the first place? To better the industry and provide a safe playing environment for the player? NO. It's about the money. Always has been, and always will be. Again, obviously...there are exceptions, so don't everyone jump on me at once.

One final thing to the affiliates who continue to promote the Virtual Group, and justify it by saying "my players have no problems, and enjoy playing there. I've never had one player with any issues there." My answer to you is....how the hell do you know? More than likely the majority of people who signed up to a Virtual shithole from you, don't even have a clue which site they downloaded from. Again, most don't even know what an affiliate is. So, how would you possibly expect them to come back to you, and air a player grievance? What happens is that they end up at this site, or a similar one, begging for someone to help them....cause they've been ripped off. That excuse doesn't fly, because your players don't even know they are your players most of the time. Chances are they aren't coming to you for help, they're coming here. And you know what? They didn't open their Virtual account through THIS site. Think about that next time you throw up a Virtual banner.
 
Last edited:
I feel privileged... I have been banned from CAP, GWPA and the APCW... for years now.

Bryan is the only one who will put up with me... :thumbsup:

After my Oh so public CAP banning by the professor for disagreeing with him about 888.com, I thought they (888.com) were a Rogue outfit because of things most players would never be aware of.

The owner of CAP, the professor (Lou Fabiano), did not like the fact I disagreed with him and he was so classy that he used the info I used to register at CAP with to look up my credit report and some other personal information about me and then publish some of my personal info in public here at CM and on his own forum (the personal info of mine here at CM was removed) The Professor even went so far as to try to contact the "Owner" of my home to tell them I was running an illegal gambling operation on their property... The joke was on the professor though... I own my own home and I live in a State where online Gambling is not illegal... Then the professor even called my local Sheriff's Office to "Inform" on me for being involved with online gambling... But like I said, Online Gambling is not illegal in my State, besides the Sheriff is my Cousin...

CAP a real classy outfit... NOT!

In my opinion, the business of online gambling would be far far better off without any of the four, CAP, GWPA. APCW or Casino City involved.

There is name for people that will do anything for money... "Whore"
 
Last edited:
Admin Warning: Flaming

Let's tone things down please:

1. General Posting Rules:

1.1 - No "Flaming": Please do not post any messages that harass, insult, belittle, threaten or flame another member or guest. Abusive behavior will not be tolerated and your account may be suspended. Please refrain from potty mouth language.


Lou is a member of this message board and should be given the respect like any other member. This is a discussion about the APCW merging with the GPWA - not a bash fest. Thank you.
 
Let's tone things down please:

1. General Posting Rules:

1.1 - No "Flaming": Please do not post any messages that harass, insult, belittle, threaten or flame another member or guest. Abusive behavior will not be tolerated and your account may be suspended. Please refrain from potty mouth language.


Lou is a member of this message board and should be given the respect like any other member. This is a discussion about the APCW merging with the GPWA - not a bash fest. Thank you.

I removed the references to "Fat Lou" as that may have been a little over the top... But the rest is true.

People should know what kind of a person they are dealing with at CAP.
 
In theory Dom, I agree with you. Unfortunately, the truth is that most players don't even know what an affiliate is. They don't realize that when they click on a banner, that affiliate gets a percentage of their losses for life, or a flat fee for them signing up.

That is why forums like this one are so very important! BTW there are other payment options for affiliates too, % of deposit, % of wagering etc. Different casinos offer different types of reimbursement.

The major one though is....if a webmaster pulls a banner/advertising from his site, the money is cut off. If he is just an affiliate and does the same, in most cases, he will still collect his percentage of losses on players he has under him thus far.

In theory. Many affiliates have a rude awakening when they realize that a crook is a crook is a crook, and low and behold, that crooked casino won't pay their comissions. What goes around defintely comes around in that scenario.

It is very hard to be totally impartial when it is your livelihood.

Darn right. And any business owner worth their salt knows that the customer is king. If an affiliate is not partial to the player, they won't last long.

The thing is that there are hundreds of sites going up every day that are built by newcomers who don't know sh!# from shinola (just type online casino into google and look at the number of results), and these are visited by equally uninformed players. Most of these sites are extremely short lived, but there are always new ones to take their place.

Like with everything else, information is vital, and thank god there are places that do grow to have some reach thanks to players who support the effort these places make to distribute information.

What I would really like to see someday, is a site similar to this one, an info site.....with NO advertising. No banners, no clickable links to any casinos. Just info. I doubt it will ever happen, but in a perfect world and all...ya know.

That would have to be a very rich person who can afford to work full time for free and pay several others a salary to help. Most people don't realize how much work goes into a decent site.


These are the questions an affiliate should ask themselves before going into business with a new program:

- Is the casino they represent reputable?
- Do they pay the player in a timely manner?
- Are their bonus terms player friendly and easy to understand?
- Do they have good support staff/phone support/live chat?
- Is there a history of player complaints, and how were these dealt with?

If there are negatives in any of those things, then don't offer them to a player. Pretty simple to me. But unfortunately, when you read CAP, what you see is more of this:

- How much rev share/CPA do they offer?
- Do they bundle?
- Do they have a monthly negative carryover?
- Will I get paid on time every month?

Totally ass backwards, and until EVERYONE starts putting the player first and above all else, this industry will never be right.


All the above matters, if an affiliate fails to pay attention to all of it they fail. Affiliates need to spend a good amount of time on RESEARCH! IMO players should go to a site because it has done the research for them and saves them time and - yes- money they would have lost to crooks otherwise, as well as a bunch of headaches.

I think it's a bit unreasonable to expect any one place to provide all possibly applicable information needed to present a clean site that is able to survive.

CAP has it's purpose, it is for affiliates what Meister is for players, a way to reach out to reps and get things fixed. Don't think for a minute that affiliates don't get screwed every bit as much as players do. You are dealing with the same outfits in the same industry. Getting paid is a major, major issue for affiliates and many times payments are late (or never arrive) and there are no groceries on the table because of it.

CAP could not possibly compete with Meister and provide the fresh, unbiased and blunt feedback players give here. Nor should it. CAP and Meister are two places with totally different knowledge bases and that is good just the way it is. Reps, operators and affiliates alike need to come to meister regularly to see whats going on.

If I were an affiliate and had the choice to promote a 32Red type of casino at a 20% commission rate, or a Virtual clone at a 40% commission rate...I'd take the 32Red product everytime, and tell Virtual to kiss off.

Smart decision every way you look at it. The affiliate who chooses the crappy casino with the high comission will never see that player again. The affiliate who chooses the good casino with the lower comission will have a happy player coming back again and again and end up making more money in the long run. Promoting crooks is not only immoral, it's also stupid.

Dom, I'm sorry if some of the stuff about CAP offends you...it's just an opinion, mine. Honestly, I don't know how you stand it there...because you don't seem to be the "standard" type of affiliate they represent.

No offense taken at all. I have been a volunteer moderator at CAP for some 7years. Affiliates need a place to get the business information they need, and they need a place that offers them recourse when affiliate programs don't keep their end of the bargain. Same as players need Meister to stand up for them.

As to the banning stuff, like I said, not surprising.

I wasn't going to comment on that, but - deja vue all over again. Before Michael's time, GPWA was on a banning streak and banned Meister, greedygirl, Jtodd, the Professor, Dean Ing (one of the original founders) and yours truly, just to name a few that are still around today.

I agree in general that people who insult and attack others on a message board should be banned. There is no need and no excuse for that. I disagree with bannings for political, business or personal reasons.

That's all I have to say about all of that. Luckily I am just a volunteer and have no hand in banning anyone. So I will graciously sidestep the issue and just say one thing:

We all need each other to make this industry a good place for all. Let's help each other and not infight - infighting leads to self destruction.

So, and now I am going downstairs and play some slots. My last day in Vegas today...
 
Win, you may want to read Diamond Geezer's post again. In the paragraph I quoted, he is describing Casinomeister/Bryan to a tee. Bryan has stressed more than once, that he is really not an affiliate, but a webmaster. And I think if you ask him, you'll find that most of his advertising on here is paid for ie. media buy, and not on the affiliate model. That's a guess, but it's the way I've always assumed it is done here.

FTR, I'm no fan of the affiliate model either. Yes, there are good affiliates, but unfortunately in eight years of online gaming, I've found that the bad ones outweigh the good, by a good margin.

Go punch in online casinos/gambling into Google, and search some of the sites that come up on the first couple of pages. I think you'll find that many of them promote what the "good guys" consider to be rogue casinos, especially Virtual and all their clones. It's a losing battle, especially when you have webmasters such as JTodd/APCW, who "did" have some credibility, now supporting shitholes like the Gambling Wages casinos.


Thanks Pina that is exactly what I did mean. Infact it was me who called Bryan an affiliate a while back and he did put me right on that one :thumbsup:.

I am not saying all affiliates are bad but that the business model is not good. It is only natural that many affiliates are going to end up promoting casino's that offer them the biggest incentives. I don't blame the affiliates so much as the big companies for using the system in the first place.

I have always thought that when a big reputable company like William Hill or Intercasino allows themselves to be advertised on affiliate sites that also promote rogue casino's they are adding a lot of legitimacy to the rogues. Players will go to the affiliate site and see these reputable brands and then see the rogues and they think 'well if this casino is alongside Intercasino I guess they must be ok'. IMO it gives the rogues a lot more credibility in the eyes of the player when they see them like this. I mean if you were making Mercedes cars you wouldn't want to sell them down at the cheap second hand car lot would you? You would either want your own site or to be on a site with companies of a similar standing. You see this in real life when the Mercedes dealership will often be nearby a Jaguar or a Lexus for example.

So I don't blame the affiliates but the industry. I have never blamed an affiliate for when I haven't been paid by a casino because if a casino is determined not to pay there is not a great deal affiliates can do about it. As we see day after day. It is great when they do help but you can't expect it as such because you don't have a contract with the affiliate like you would at a travel agent's.

I think the root casue of a lot of the problems lies with the big companies. If they got their act together and controlled their brands better the rogues would struggle to get the publicity they need.
 
A great post Dom... Too bad your not running CAP... It might really be an asset to the business instead of promoting all those "bad" casinos to unwary and uninformed web masters.

Dom let me ask you a question...

If like you say CAP is really about helping affiliates and if like you say promoting Rogue Casinos is really bad for affiliates...
Why does CAP promote so many "Rogue" casino programs to new webmasters?

(I don't think anyone buys the old... "keeping lines of communication open" bit anymore. It just does not make sense.)
 
Bryan, you were banned? LMAOOOO...what for? I thought that special privilege was reserved for people like Lots0 and myself. :laugh:

Oh...and I'd like to know which casino group/affy program has offered you sexual favours for advertising space? I'm taking notes in case I open up another site. :smilewink:

That was a good post Dom, and we agree on quite a bit, especially the part about players also needing to be more proactive and do their homework, BEFORE donating their money to a casino.

Lots0, glad you removed that reference...as to the rest of it....all I will/can say is.....WOW!! Sorry you had to go through that.
 
I have always thought that when a big reputable company like William Hill or Intercasino allows themselves to be advertised on affiliate sites that also promote rogue casino's they are adding a lot of legitimacy to the rogues. Players will go to the affiliate site and see these reputable brands and then see the rogues and they think 'well if this casino is alongside Intercasino I guess they must be ok'. IMO it gives the rogues a lot more credibility in the eyes of the player when they see them like this. I mean if you were making Mercedes cars you wouldn't want to sell them down at the cheap second hand car lot would you? You would either want your own site or to be on a site with companies of a similar standing. You see this in real life when the Mercedes dealership will often be nearby a Jaguar or a Lexus for example.

I think the root casue of a lot of the problems lies with the big companies. If they got their act together and controlled their brands better the rogues would struggle to get the publicity they need.

Excellent post Diamond, and excellent points!! You seem to have a pretty good grasp of all this. And the luxury car analogy? Spot on!! :thumbsup:
 
A great post Dom... Too bad your not running CAP... It might really be an asset to the business instead of promoting all those "bad" casinos to unwary and uninformed web masters.

Dom let me ask you a question...

If like you say CAP is really about helping affiliates and if like you say promoting Rogue Casinos is really bad for affiliates...
Why does CAP promote so many "Rogue" casino programs to new webmasters?

(I don't think anyone buys the old... "keeping lines of communication open" bit anymore. It just does not make sense.)

Ok, one more post but the slots are calling me... I can hear the ca-ching, ca-ching reverberating in my brain..... :p

I can't speak for CAP, I am a volunteer and have no hand in any decisions whatsoever. Nor do I want to, I have my own business to take care of and work 7 days a week as it is.

I don't see CAP as a place that sorts out casinos and declares them rogue, I see Meister as that.

Different places, different functions.

CAP is there to mediate and facilitate communication between affiliate programs and affiliates. CAP does screen to a point, like you will never see a futurebet place there. But this is not the purpose of CAP.

I wouldn't promote everyone who has a presence on CAP. They are there because they have agreed to keep communications open and respond to affiliate complaints, not because they adhere to guidelines you or me would like to see enforced.

Affiliates don't start out at CAP either, they often find it after their sites are up and they are not getting paid by casino xyz, just the same as Meister. Affiliates learn the hard way, just like players.

Sometimes I see player complaints here and I want to scream: "Then why did you play there in the first place, you knew they were bloody rogue!"

Same at CAP. Why would an affiliate promote a known rogue and expect payments? DUH!

For these people, a line of communication is needed too. So I do buy the "lines of communication" argument.

Over the years CAP has fixed many, many problems. For individual webmasters and for the community at large.

The aff programs at CAP are accredited - and it means that you can approach them for solutions. It doesn't mean that they are necessarily recommended. It means they are willing to respond to complaints, like the reps here at Meister.

Affiliates need to WORK to make a good site. They need to do their own RESEARCH. There is no silver platter telling anyone who is rogue and who isn't. My own experiences with my own player feedback is not always the same as I see here. Some places Meister declares rogue are well loved and have a good record with my players. Others I see as ok here, and I get nothing but complaints about them. Others yet we can all agree on - they are rogue, rogue, rogue.

I don't see it as CAP's job to keep sorting that. CAP is there to faciliate communications and get things fixed and affiliates paid.

Individual affiliates need to get off their butts and do their homework, just like any other business owner.

Sites serve different purposes. For instance, casinocity is a directory. It lives up to its function if everything that exists is in there. Your phone directory doesn't exclude Joe the plummer (couldn't resist :)) because he always leaves a godawful mess behind. Joe the plummer is there because he has a phone number.

No one site can fill the function of sorting all the aspects in this industry. Sites have niches they apply to. Everyone, player, affiliate, webmaster or whatever entity in this industry has to read and learn and form opinions and make decisions.
 
get out the stain remover

Dominique said:
I think it's a bit unreasonable to expect any one place to provide all possibly applicable information needed to present a clean site that is able to survive.


I agree that it would be impossible to investigate every casino/gaming group to ensure a clean site. Able to survive? Now, there is the crux ...the bottom line of any and every business, whether it is online or land based.
The online gaming industry polices itself for the most part with no absolute regulative standards that are not conceived, approved and implemented by the industry itself. What actual recourse does a player have if they feel cheated or abused by a sites moody and self serving policies? Is their only course of action to "eat" the loss and not click on a link that will lead them to any affiliated gaming sites? Perhaps to report their experience in a forum or review site and risk being called a "disgruntled" player or a whiner until it happens to many more people? Lets see...Who is the most experienced overall? The average online player or the mega moolah mugs whose bottom line is the generation of outrageous and consistent revenue?
Any affiliate that knowingly promotes and supports even ONE known rogue site is a threat to the online security and fairness of hundreds of players.
My question is...Why are these corrupt and suspicious sites even operating so openly and with the backing of many affiliates and huge gaming groups? The single word that comes to my mind is "profit". Everyone wants a piece of the pie, and all the excuses and disclaimers in the universe can not change the fact that you are either part of the problem or part of the solution.
Blame the uninformed player for clicking on a link that feeds corruption? I think not! Unless a person is a masochist and enjoys being abused and humiliated by some anonymous money monger, why would anyone knowingly click on a link that would result in that?
It is the people that proclaim advocacy for players and promote a site as reputable are the ones that need to accept accountability for the everlasting corruption and trickery that is so alive and well in the industry.Players are asked to "do their homework" by checking out a sites credibility and history, what excuses an affiliate from that? Too many fingers in too many pies to make that reasonable?
And now to the merger of the apcw with the gpwa.I do not see it as a merger in the sense of a cooperative bargain, but a buyout of the apcw, which may be very productive and positive if it serves to prevent an abuse of trust brought on by greed and self importance that was demonstrated by JTodds steamy union with Gambling Wages.
The declaration made by Mr.JTodd on utube did not imply that specific issues would be settled or they were being investigated, he clearly stated they were resolved with the intended implication that money due was paid!. A bold faced lie cooked up to present an historically corrupt site with' a "new leaf" pemise of fairness to draw in trusting players. Those of you who are owed funds may not choose to view that alliance of apcw and Gambling Wages as one of hope and opportunity (humbly presented by JTodd) for GW to redeem itself in the face of such a decietful beginning presentation.
This is what players are given to make decisions about where to deposit and who to rely on, so how can a player be blamed for clicking a link that does not actually merit trust? The ultimate result is buck passing and excuses among all those who stand to profit from affiliate schemes.
Lacking any true regulation or oversight, the gaming industry would benefit in the long run by promoting a scrupulous effort to eradicate the seedier groups/brands that cause deterioration in the trust and reliability factor.
 
????
Some places Meister declares rogue are well loved and have a good record with my players.

Your players? Are they the only ones that matter to you? I respect your right to run your business in the way you see fit, but I feel if one player is cheated, whether they sign up at BPU or not, I will take the time to help however I can. If I can't help, I will do my best to find someone who can. This is a players Industry... without them no one makes a living.

I may be narrow minded (have been called worse at times) but what I see is if the affiliates and webmasters who go to such great lengths to support EACH OTHER, would come together with their "pull" within the industry, this online gambling Industry could clean itself up!

The reason CAP banned and ridiculed our admin is because he asked them to remove a proven rogue cheater site. The reason we were banned from APCW is because he didn't like our views of his choice to back GW asnd we pulled his seal. No biggie, we stand for what we believe in no matter what the cost.

IMO Casinomeister has a lock on being THE forum for help with casino complaints. I believe they do a wonderful job and do not have nor want access to any of their private records. But when CM deems a casino site rogue, those who are learned enough to frequent forums listen!

There are more banner farms out there than one can shake a stick at. Does no one but BPU see that those of you with power CAN make these problems like Gambling Wages, 123BingoOnline, Bingo-Knights among many others go away?

Is it unthinkable to lose a few dollars in the beginning to build to many more dollars coming from players trust in the future? All you have to do is review documentation and facts of a site who has many complaints, make your decision and stop promoting them!

Webmasters and affiliates take care of each other. Some go above and beyond to help players. In the long run what I see are happy, trusting players = more revenue.

No one has to be "the boss" but common goals to clean it up would be so terrific. And it is not like it isn't needed. Sadly, money talks louder than good intentions.
 
????


Does no one but BPU see that those of you with power CAN make these problems like Gambling Wages, 123BingoOnline, Bingo-Knights among many others go away?

What power?

My power lies in kicking places that treat my visitors badly off my site. If they want to do business with me, they know they have to do well by the people I refer. That is my power, and I use it.

Beyond that I have no power. I can only control what happens through my site. I can't control the internet.

Bryan runs a watchdog site and he doesn't deal through marketing arms, he deals directly with operators. That is a totally different thing and my site links to Casinomeister and refers people in need of such assistance.

And even Bryan knows there are places out there that are so rogue that they are impossible to deal with, even for him.

A search for online casinos brings up 4,380,000 results. No one can control or unify all these. No one knows who owns all these. No one can contact them. Hundreds of them go bankrupt every day and disappear, and hundreds of new ones appear.

It is a myth that all affiliates make a ton of money. Most of them spend months building sites and never see a penny.

If you want to go after bad affiliates, I suggest you learn what "blackhatters" are and start a campaign to scour the search results for them and report them to google. They make up the majority of crappy sites that are profitable, and they do it by violating google's rules to get ranked high enough to be visible. They generate thousands of crappy sites and only need a few clicks per site to end up making money. They are the bane of the industry and you will likely get support from everyone if you ferret them out. And I mean everyone, players, affiliates, and most gambling establishments.

Once identified, they can be reported to google as well as the gambling places. And they can be gotten rid of. It will take you a little time and effort on your part to learn what they are currently using to cheat in google, and then to hunt them down. But - it can be done and I have turned in a bunch of these guys myself over the years.

Just search for "blackhat seo" to learn more.

That would be a constructive thing to do for you that gets results.

But, this is off topic.
 
Posted by Casinomeister:



Are you not a member of the CAP forum? :what:

I've read your posts there... ;)
Then I should rephrase that - I swore I wouldn't take an active role in any organization. I joined the CAP forum after they had voted Casinomeister as the Best Casino Affiliate 2008. (Odd since I'm not much of an "affiliate" and I wasn't a member either.) But maybe not so odd since I work hard at what I do and try to do the best job possible. It was my webmaster peers who voted for me and who support Casinomeister. So the award was a really nice thing and I thought is was only appropriate to join and say thanks.

I've posted two or three times since then concerning warnings for affiliates. Many of whom are members of this forum as well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top