- Joined
- Jun 3, 2013
- Location
- Dún Dealgan
Why stupid robby b*stard ^^
Nah not you mate..
Why stupid robby b*stard ^^
Is that officially classed as ‘the ‘harry seal of approval’ lolI did 10 bonus buys in a row at 337x bet. Only once did i not end up in profit.
Don't know if that is indicative, but it played rather well.
Step up the streamers lol.This is actually shocking for my (admittedly very small) sample. 20% of them gave a tiny profit of less than 10% of the cost, 80% either paid a half or quarter of it.
As Harry said, the results are better on the insane buy-in. So when word spreads that this is the case, you have players who are going to be suckered in to frankly stupid stakes. IMO the lower-end buy-in is a totally facile proposition and should be avoided always.
Nah not you mate..
Totally agree.Why do these slots get approved...337x stake!!!!!! Insane and stupid as f*ck...
What is this slot provider thinking, it is just ridiculous that this kind of buy ins make it through all the regulations...
Responsible gaming out of the window...
Maybe add the anonymous gamblers telephone number on the pay table of this slot...
Stupid robbing b*stards.
Interesting slot!
The difference in the purchase for 10 and 18 spins is nearly 6.5 times.
For 10 spins you pay x52 but for 18 x337. So it means for 8 additional spins you pay x285.
Does anyone have a link where this can be played in demo?
Thanks
Casumo
The jackpots are fixed for your slot, like WMS' Wishing You Fortune, but they do rise as you play so obviously a small amount of your RTP is included in them. They are paid on the top symbol being scattered in the bonus or base game, naturally more likely in the feature. I can't be assed to go back into again, I think it's 16 or 18+ in view (which you'll need the reel rows to be sufficient for too) to get the gold. Could be 20, I dunno offhand.
Hm, so does that mean that you're basically sacrificing a small amount of RTP that you "contribute" to those jackpots until you hit them? Looks like that might be a few % left on the table if you never hit a good feature. Not really a fan of that type of design, tempts you to keep playing until you get your "contributions" back. Since that's all that it really is, you're paying 2-4% per spin to those jackpots and then when you finally hit them it's just your own money being returned.
They could just as well have made those scatter payouts at a slightly higher than base price and kept the same RTP if they wanted, but seems like a way to lock you into playing.
My ears are burning - did someone somewhere mention my name...?As Harry said, the results are better on the insane buy-in. So when word spreads that this is the case, you have players who are going to be suckered in to frankly stupid stakes...
??? Have I missed something?My ears are burning - did someone somewhere mention my name...?
KK
Fair play - you definitely lost me there. Did I mention you in the video?Evidently
KK
I didn't know your name was FrankMy ears are burning - did someone somewhere mention my name...?
KK
YepI didn't know your name was Frank
Yep
Dunover wrote it wrong, it should be written: Frank Lee
KK
Yup, 4 buy-ins @0,60 stake (202 per feature) and managed to lose over 400. Worst one paid 14€.
Stay away from me, you evil machine. I think it's planning to take over the World