Interesting and indepth analysis of Sandy Hook from a Law enforcement veteran.

[Seventh777]

Rather than clutter the gun debate thread with this, I thought it best to give it it's own thread. Amazing what people can achieve if they have the resources I.e law enforcement technology, photo / video editing experts etc........







Instead of the cookie cutter "He is writing a book, has a hidden agenda, has a gripe with Obama because he stole his dinner money at school (in Kenya lol)", how about - we leave the character assassination approach outside please, and counter argue his points.

 

[Nifty29]

Well, as skiny has said, people don't have 90 mins to listen to some radio show that is hosted by a dyed in the wool conspiracy theorist. Its obvious that she is, as she states in the first 2 mins that she isn't (dead giveaway), and she mentions JFK and the Gulf of Tonkin in that time too.

Still, I pressed on for a few more minutes, until the first discussion began about the government version of the SH shooting being a cover-up etc.

The first point made by the "expert", who says he makes his living from the firearms industry, is that Adam Lanza did not exist. Yup, that's right, he's a fictional character invented by the same people who secretly laid tonnes of explosives under the WTC to make them collapse.

I just turned it off after that.

How is anyone expected to take this crap seriously?

CTers need to find a different tack than providing days and days worth of hour long videos to get their point across. The whole "you can't dispute me because you didn't watch the 96 hours of videos" doesn't wash. I think you know that nobody is going to devote their life to watching all this stuff, so it is a convenient screen to hide behind.

Imo this belongs in the gun debate thread, but I understand why you didn't post it there.

 

[LaHutti]

Well, as skiny has said, people don't have 90 mins to listen to some radio show that is hosted by a dyed in the wool conspiracy theorist. Its obvious that she is, as she states in the first 2 mins that she isn't (dead giveaway), and she mentions JFK and the Gulf of Tonkin in that time too.

Still, I pressed on for a few more minutes, until the first discussion began about the government version of the SH shooting being a cover-up etc.

The first point made by the "expert", who says he makes his living from the firearms industry, is that Adam Lanza did not exist. Yup, that's right, he's a fictional character invented by the same people who secretly laid tonnes of explosives under the WTC to make them collapse.

I just turned it off after that.

How is anyone expected to take this crap seriously?

CTers need to find a different tack than providing days and days worth of hour long videos to get their point across. The whole "you can't dispute me because you didn't watch the 96 hours of videos" doesn't wash. I think you know that nobody is going to devote their life to watching all this stuff, so it is a convenient screen to hide behind.

Imo this belongs in the gun debate thread, but I understand why you didn't post it there.

'nuff said, and I fully agree.

 

[Seventh777]

And now it takes another turn, as more and more people are finally coming to terms with staged events like this, enter the get out of jail free card, these attacks bear glaring similarities to terrorist attacks state the army.....

Discussions with members of the senior military community, operations and intelligence personnel, regarding Sandy Hook and other recent “lone gunman events” has led to startling revelations. The US Army has recognized a pattern of terrorist activity in several of the recent mass shootings, based on timing, type of target, control of media, lost evidence, poor investigations, a pattern that shows signs of the involvement of a military type operation against “soft targets” in the US.

So, are the army being scapegoats knowing this one is so piss poor regarding conflicting stories, it will finally be exposed as a hoax, but the perps, were the Muslims again.

There's reasons he claimed Lanza didn't exist, as I stated in my OP this guy has a solid background including law enforcement, so he used all the channels he could to find some History on Lanza, including......

“When Adam Lanza moved on to middle school and then to high school, his cumulative folder (a student’s records) should have followed him. And so should have information about any special accommodations to which he would have had a legal right under IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Act). If Adam Lanza was a gifted student, it would also have been noted in his cumulative folder and he would have also had the right for “special accommodations” throughout his school career.”

He could find no History of him whatsoever. I could go on and state many more abnormalities but it's pointless, as we all know who the real culprits were now......

Anyhow, case closed, it was the those pesky Muslims again.

I did notice however that the guy in that radio interview extinguished career stands for nothing.

I don't need a convenient screen to hide behind, no matter what your views are of CT's in general or Mike Powers, he brings to the table points that - have been completely overlooked, misinformed / disinformed and blatantly lied about, this is what's open to debate, now I could quite easily say that your government like stand on CT's is a convenient screen for you to hide behind in sidestepping a counter argument for all the points raised by Powers.

If we really are all nutjobs, disproving our CT's should be a walk in the park courtesy of real factual evidence enforcing our counter arguments, when this fails, plan `B`.