healthcare for the old

kauphy

Meister Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Location
az
Rec'd this from a good friend of ours in Corpus who was diagnosed with cancer last year. See what his doctor is saying....

Wednesday, I was at the doctor whom I have been going to since we moved down here (he is the one who discovered my cancer). I have to get a very expensive shot every 3 months ($3000) that is designed to keep the PSA down and help to prevent a recurrence of the cancer. Has some uncomfortable side effects, and I was questioning the need to continue with it, which he assured me was necessary. He then asked how old I was, and when I replied 70, he said that if this legislation goes through as intended by the powers that be, that I probably would not be able to get it next year, as that would be money better spent on someone else with greater longevity. I would be referred to someone to "counsel" me.

I asked him why the AMA had recently endorsed the plan. He replied that only about 15% of the nation's doctors were members of AMA, and most of them were not really on the front lines of doctorhood but in some other areas of medicine. He said he was a member, but would not be after this membership year.

This man got part of his training in London, and practiced in Canada for 16 years before coming to the US, and he has no use for socialized medicine, regardless of how you wrap it, or what kind of bow to put on it. He said that we have a shortfall of around 400,000 doctors at the present time, and many of today's doctors are of the baby boomer generation who are nearing retirement and/or will decide to hang it up rather than deal with the results this is sure to bring.

Scary, my friends. The picture for our age group is not pretty in Obamaland.

SENIOR DEATH WARRANTS:

In England no one over 59 can receive heart repairs or stents or bypass because it is not covered as being too expensive and not needed.

Obama wants to have a healthcare system just like Canada's and England's. I got this today and am sending it on. If Obama's plans in other areas don't scare you, this should. Please do not let Obama sign senior death warrants.

Everybody that is on this mailing list is either a senior citizen, is getting close or knows somebody that is.

Most of you know by now that the Senate version (at least) of the "stimulus" bill includes provisions for extensive rationing of health care for senior citizens. The author of this part of the bill, former senator and tax evader, Tom Daschle was credited today by Bloomberg with the following statement:

Bloomberg: Daschle says "health-care reform will not be pain free. Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them."

If this does not sufficiently raise your ire, just remember that our esteemed Senators and Congressmen have their own healthcare plan that is first dollar or very low co-pay which they are guaranteed for the remainder of their lives. Nor are they subject to this new law if it passes.

Please use the power of the Internet to get this message out. Talk it up at the grassroots level. We have an election coming up in less than a year. And we have the ability to address and reverse the dangerous direction the Obama administration and its allies have begun and in the interim, we can make their lives miserable. Let's do this!

If you disagree, do nothing.
 
It's the death panels. They are REAL - NOT IMAGINARY like the health care opponents tried to make you think. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Die grandma and grand pa! Die die die!!!! Hahahahahahahaha!

C'mon kauphy. Get real. The only entities that have any say, whatsoever, over whether or not the individual you mention gets his shots is his insurance company (supplemental, if any) and Medicare. And if you think, for one second, that anyone with any hope for any political future is going to f with the seniors of this country over anything even approaching the severity of the scenario you're describing is to be thinking totally outside the box of reality. Medicare, if anything, will try to reduce the amount of totally unnecessary treatments prescribed by doctors for no other reason than to cover their asses, liability-wise, to help cut costs only if they can do so without the elderly forming a huge AARP mob and lighting the torches.

A certain nut bag senator in your state who had once been a proponent for health care reform has flipped his lid on issues he deems critical to the success of his own, self-destructed political career. Keep that in mind and, for god's sake, turn off FOX TV and Rush Limbaugh and get a newspaper like the Washington Post or try the BBC for impartial news reporting for a change.
 
Rec'd this from a good friend of ours in Corpus who was diagnosed with cancer last year. See what his doctor is saying....

Wednesday, I was at the doctor whom I have been going to since we moved down here (he is the one who discovered my cancer). I have to get a very expensive shot every 3 months ($3000) that is designed to keep the PSA down and help to prevent a recurrence of the cancer. Has some uncomfortable side effects, and I was questioning the need to continue with it, which he assured me was necessary. He then asked how old I was, and when I replied 70, he said that if this legislation goes through as intended by the powers that be, that I probably would not be able to get it next year, as that would be money better spent on someone else with greater longevity. I would be referred to someone to "counsel" me.

I asked him why the AMA had recently endorsed the plan. He replied that only about 15% of the nation's doctors were members of AMA, and most of them were not really on the front lines of doctorhood but in some other areas of medicine. He said he was a member, but would not be after this membership year.

This man got part of his training in London, and practiced in Canada for 16 years before coming to the US, and he has no use for socialized medicine, regardless of how you wrap it, or what kind of bow to put on it. He said that we have a shortfall of around 400,000 doctors at the present time, and many of today's doctors are of the baby boomer generation who are nearing retirement and/or will decide to hang it up rather than deal with the results this is sure to bring.

Scary, my friends. The picture for our age group is not pretty in Obamaland.

SENIOR DEATH WARRANTS:

In England no one over 59 can receive heart repairs or stents or bypass because it is not covered as being too expensive and not needed.

Obama wants to have a healthcare system just like Canada's and England's. I got this today and am sending it on. If Obama's plans in other areas don't scare you, this should. Please do not let Obama sign senior death warrants.

Everybody that is on this mailing list is either a senior citizen, is getting close or knows somebody that is.

Most of you know by now that the Senate version (at least) of the "stimulus" bill includes provisions for extensive rationing of health care for senior citizens. The author of this part of the bill, former senator and tax evader, Tom Daschle was credited today by Bloomberg with the following statement:

Bloomberg: Daschle says "health-care reform will not be pain free. Seniors should be more accepting of the conditions that come with age instead of treating them."

If this does not sufficiently raise your ire, just remember that our esteemed Senators and Congressmen have their own healthcare plan that is first dollar or very low co-pay which they are guaranteed for the remainder of their lives. Nor are they subject to this new law if it passes.

Please use the power of the Internet to get this message out. Talk it up at the grassroots level. We have an election coming up in less than a year. And we have the ability to address and reverse the dangerous direction the Obama administration and its allies have begun and in the interim, we can make their lives miserable. Let's do this!

If you disagree, do nothing.

Tom Daschle is a fool and an idiot not to mention extremely short sighted. I don't know of one doctor that agreed with the plan.:eek2:
 
Rec'd this from a good friend of ours in Corpus who was diagnosed with cancer last year. See what his doctor is saying....

No. No you didn't. Why do you post something like this without mentioning that it's NOT an email from a friend to you, but a widely circulated false meme?

You know, all you had to do was Google the first couple of sentences to find that this thing is posted on every small-time wingnut site..and that the content has been picked apart by, among others, Snopes, DailyKos, and this guy....
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


I've always thought it amusing that conservatives accuse the left of voting with their emotions...yet here we have another example of fear ruling the right, without facts.
 
It's the death panels. They are REAL - NOT IMAGINARY like the health care opponents tried to make you think. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Die grandma and grand pa! Die die die!!!! Hahahahahahahaha!

C'mon kauphy. Get real. The only entities that have any say, whatsoever, over whether or not the individual you mention gets his shots is his insurance company (supplemental, if any) and Medicare. And if you think, for one second, that anyone with any hope for any political future is going to f with the seniors of this country over anything even approaching the severity of the scenario you're describing is to be thinking totally outside the box of reality. Medicare, if anything, will try to reduce the amount of totally unnecessary treatments prescribed by doctors for no other reason than to cover their asses, liability-wise, to help cut costs only if they can do so without the elderly forming a huge AARP mob and lighting the torches.

A certain nut bag senator in your state who had once been a proponent for health care reform has flipped his lid on issues he deems critical to the success of his own, self-destructed political career. Keep that in mind and, for god's sake, turn off FOX TV and Rush Limbaugh and get a newspaper like the Washington Post or try the BBC for impartial news reporting for a change.

you know i like you and everything. but i also can see your one of the ones that don,t see whats going on until it hits you over your head or until it hits home and you or one of your love ones r told 2 bad. i have a older mom and stepdad and weather you think something is wrong with what the goverments doing or not i do. so i guess i,m not only fighting for my mom and dad and son who is disbaled and is being told he won,t have medical caz he is special needs( by the way if you don,t belive me on this one read the healthcare bill page 354 sec 1177 and then come back on here and laugh) oh wait maybe you should read the bill anyway before you poo-poo me and laugh at what i belive is a goverment take over of everything we as americans hold dear. but i guess me and more then half the american people r also fighting for people like you who can,t see beyond their own little world. good luck hoping that we r wrong and i do hope the last laugh is with you and not me so that i can be wrong and this will all turn out as you think it will. but i don,t think so. p.s i don,t watch t.v so sorrie thats not where i get my info as i said before maybe you should try reading the bill.
 
No. No you didn't. Why do you post something like this without mentioning that it's NOT an email from a friend to you, but a widely circulated false meme?

You know, all you had to do was Google the first couple of sentences to find that this thing is posted on every small-time wingnut site..and that the content has been picked apart by, among others, Snopes, DailyKos, and this guy....
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


I've always thought it amusing that conservatives accuse the left of voting with their emotions...yet here we have another example of fear ruling the right, without facts.

swampwitch to each his own then don,t read them. that will slove that promble won,t it. and by the way it was sent to me from a family menber not something i just got off the internet.
 
swampwitch to each his own then don,t read them. that will slove that promble won,t it. and by the way it was sent to me from a family menber not something i just got off the internet.

You didn't bother to say that the email was NOT about someone you know, but rather a much-forwarded email...whose author is unknown.

And even though you might not want to admit it, Casinomeister is not only for tea-bagger propaganda. You post false memes and factually challenged nonsense, and I have as much right to comment on it as you do to post it. If you only want agreement with the things you say, then go post at FOX Nation.
 
You didn't bother to say that the email was NOT about someone you know, but rather a much-forwarded email...whose author is unknown.

And even though you might not want to admit it, Casinomeister is not only for tea-bagger propaganda. You post false memes and factually challenged nonsense, and I have as much right to comment on it as you do to post it. If you only want agreement with the things you say, then go post at FOX Nation.

no thats fine. and i,ll post where i want to as i said before this was sent to me from a family member and i did goggle it and what i pull up was that yes some of it can be ? but not all of it. some of it does lay with the truth weather you guys want it to or not. and who the hell said anything about the teabaggers and why is it that if someone like the teabaggers go against anything some peolpe have to go as low as name calling and things like that? and if you don,t know if i,m a teabagger why is it tea-bag propaganda? maybe its just my view on things. well anyway with that being said you all have a nice day watching t.v news that only tell you half the story or only what they want you to hear.:D and this came out of obamas own mouth ( BETTER TO TAKE THE PAINKILLER THEN THE TREATMENT EVEN ABOUT HIS OWN GANDMOTHER)
 
you know i like you and everything. but i also can see your one of the ones that don,t see whats going on until it hits you over your head or until it hits home and you or one of your love ones r told 2 bad. i have a older mom and stepdad and ...

My mom's 93 and not in the greatest health. I really think you're wrong and, furthermore, you and your loved ones will benefit from health care reform as much as anyone.

First of all, there is no government take over of anything. Health insurance will still come from insurance companies but here are the main benefits of the health care bill:

- Insurance companies will no longer be allowed to deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions.

- Insurance companies will no longer be able to arbitrarily cancel policies just because people get sick.

- 36 million uninsured people will now be able to buy health insurance.

These are big deals. 10s of thousands of Americans die every year because they don't have health insurance because they had pre existing conditions or were wrongfully dropped by their insurance company over bullshit or because they couldn't afford insurance. The insurance companies and the politicians who are supported by the insurance companies have fought this for 40 years. They have done and said anything to keep this from happening. They finally lost. We won. You, me, and a shitload a other people. Is there a lot of bullshit in the bill that needs to get hammered out? Of course! All big legislation is full of it. If this turns to shit I'll eat a bug and you can pick the bug, kauphy. I'm not poo-pooing or laughing at you. I'm just sayin.

And kauphy, if there was any threat of what you started this thread to warn people about, you could have got a real situation from someone you actually knew and not that tired BS story about the shots and the powers that be and referred to a counselor story thats been circulating for 5 months.

Why are you so against healthcare reform? What is it about insurance companies being made to play fair and people who need insurance being able to get it do you find so threatening?
 
My mom's 93 and not in the greatest health. I really think you're wrong and, furthermore, you and your loved ones will benefit from health care reform as much as anyone.

First of all, there is no government take over of anything. Health insurance will still come from insurance companies but here are the main benefits of the health care bill:

- Insurance companies will no longer be allowed to deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions.

- Insurance companies will no longer be able to arbitrarily cancel policies just because people get sick.

- 36 million uninsured people will now be able to buy health insurance.

These are big deals. 10s of thousands of Americans die every year because they don't have health insurance because they had pre existing conditions or were wrongfully dropped by their insurance company over bullshit or because they couldn't afford insurance. The insurance companies and the politicians who are supported by the insurance companies have fought this for 40 years. They have done and said anything to keep this from happening. They finally lost. We won. You, me, and a shitload a other people. Is there a lot of bullshit in the bill that needs to get hammered out? Of course! All big legislation is full of it. If this turns to shit I'll eat a bug and you can pick the bug, kauphy. I'm not poo-pooing or laughing at you. I'm just sayin.

And kauphy, if there was any threat of what you started this thread to warn people about, you could have got a real situation from someone you actually knew and not that tired BS story about the shots and the powers that be and referred to a counselor story thats been circulating for 5 months.

Why are you so against healthcare reform? What is it about insurance companies being made to play fair and people who need insurance being able to get it do you find so threatening?

hey i,m not against healthcare bern. i,m against the way the goverment did it and i,m against how much its going to cost and i,m against them saying well we will have to pass it for you to find out whats in it. as you can tell from my other tread i know we needed health reform but not what they gave us. have you read the bill? and if so have you gotten to page 354 sec 1177 where it states that the goverment will restrict enrollment of special needs people? i thought this bill was for everyone even the people that don,t belong here? but i guess its not for the ones who can,t stand up for themselfs? i have never belived that an insurance com should be able to drop you caz you got sick i know they do but yes that pisses me off 2 and no one should be able to tell a child that has a pre-existing cond no we will not cover you but you do know from what i have read this 2 will not kick in until 2014. obama said that he is trying to work on that but we will see what happens. it is a proven fact that this will rise taxes and mark my words maybe not all but some health insurances will rise their prices more then what they r already have. yes i know that letter has been around but as i said before some of it can be ? but not all of it is false there lays within it some truth. but take it for what it is. i,m not hurting you or swampwitch or anyone eles for that matter posting on here. this is what i belive that the goverment is taking more and more and that will leave less and less of r freedom and if we don,t stop it now when we do all wake up there will be nothing lift for us to fight for. and any way i,m in one of those 36 states that r going to let its people vote on weather or not we want it. so maybe theres hope that my son will still have his healthcare after nov. p.s i,m going to pick a real nasty bug for you to eat. i have a ? for you bern why did they not just start over when the american people said they did not want obamacare? it seems to me that it was a power thing and they wanted to be the ones who could pound their chest and say we won. and if it so good why did they make themselfs exepmt from having to carrie it? the american people will not forget come nov that we were not listen to. i think we should make them take a pay cut so they can help pay for this thing and then we would see how fast they back off and say no no no its always good if someone eles is paying for it. i think we should kick them all out the dem and the rep and obama and send some everyday people up there who woll really listen.
 
Last edited:
have you read the bill? and if so have you gotten to page 354 sec 1177 where it states that the goverment will restrict enrollment of special needs people?

Here is the bill and why don't you read page 354 section 1177. There is no section 1177 on that page and no page near it and page 354 has nothing to do with children.

If you were actually concerned with the bill and special needs children you would have made an informed decision by reading it. I downloaded the whole bill and while it's time consuming it's a very informative and a insightful read.

Also don't people who like the bill count? There is 47% against and 44% for the bill.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
 
Page 354 Sec 1177: The Govt will RESTRICT enrollment of( 'special needs people) i copyed this off the page and i do care alot seeing my baby is special needs. and yes i did read it i don,t know where you looked but i found it with no promble. and i have read it well i guess they count as much as people who don,t like it.
 
Page 354 Sec 1177: The Govt will RESTRICT enrollment of( 'special needs people) i copyed this off the page and i do care alot seeing my baby is special needs. and yes i did read it i don,t know where you looked but i found it with no promble. and i have read it well i guess they count as much as people who don,t like it.

I personally went through the entire PDF version of H.R. 3590. First of all, no SEC. 1177 exists. Secondly, I read every reference to "special needs" that exists (over 25 instances) and NOWHERE, IS THERE ONE, SINGLE, SOLITARY MENTION OF ANY RESTRICTION REGARDING PEOPLE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS in any way, shape or form. On the contrary, every possible measure is spelled out to ensure that people with special needs are properly identified so that they may be treated only by properly trained medical professionals, specifically those with specialized training as to be expert in the understanding and care of patients with special needs without limitations or restrictions to required specialized care due to possible, added costs.

What restrictions there were preventing people with special needs from receiving adequate health care before this bill passed were dictated by the insurance companies. A power they can no longer excercise, thanks to the passing of this bill.

Here's the link to the PDF version of the bill:

Link Removed (invalid URL)

and in the box at the top, dead center, where it says "find", just type "special needs" there and every place "special needs" appears in the bill will be in a list that opens in a window on the left.

You got an old draft of the bill, kauphy? lol The link I posted is the bill "as passed"
 
I personally went through the entire PDF version of H.R. 3590. First of all, no SEC. 1177 exists. Secondly, I read every reference to "special needs" that exists (over 25 instances) and not only are there NO RESTRICTIONS for anyone with special needs stipulated anywhere in the bill in any way shape or form. On the contrary, every possible measure is spelled out to ensure that people with special needs are properly identified so that they may be treated only by properly trained medical professionals, specifically those with specialized training to be expert in the understanding and care of patients with special needs and not to be limited or restricted to specialized care due to possible added costs.

What restrictions there were preventing people with special needs from receiving adequate health care before this bill passed were dictated by the insurance companies. A power this bill has stripped them of.

Here's the link to the PDF version of the bill:

Link Removed (invalid URL)

and in the box at the top, dead center, where it says "find", just type "special needs" there and every place "special needs" appears in the bill will be in a list that opens in a window on the left.

Your playin' us kauphy. I just don't understand why.
o.k guys heres the low down on what i found caz nobody belived me i went from site to site. it was in the bill the one i read and it was on page 354 sec 1177 but i just now found this Pg 354 Sec 1177 — Government will RESTRICT enrollment of Special needs people! Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned. so the one i read was the old bill the bill is called h.r 3590 and this was in it. if you don,t belive me then just goggle health sec 1177 and click on various e-mails about the healthcare bill. i was not wrong and it was under investigation. and just because they say it was not put into this one does not make me feel any better. as it seems all of us were right. just for some odd reason i got ahold of what they r saying is the old bill. again if you do not belive me then goggle it health sec 1177 and click on various e-mails about the healthcare bill.
 
o.k guys heres the low down on what i found caz nobody belived me i went from site to site. it was in the bill the one i read and it was on page 354 sec 1177 but i just now found this Pg 354 Sec 1177 — Government will RESTRICT enrollment of Special needs people! Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned. so the one i read was the old bill the bill is called h.r 3590 and this was in it. if you don,t belive me then just goggle health sec 1177 and click on various e-mails about the healthcare bill. i was not wrong and it was under investigation. and just because they say it was not put into this one does not make me feel any better. as it seems all of us were right. just for some odd reason i got ahold of what they r saying is the old bill. again if you do not belive me then goggle it health sec 1177 and click on various e-mails about the healthcare bill.

Of course I believe you. LOL I ain't mad at ya, kauphy! The only way your statement could even start to make sense was because you had quoted an earlier version of the bill. I figured that out. The link in my last post is H.R. 3590 "as passed".

Believe me, there's plenty a crap in there to get upset about but be glad that one of them isn't that special needs patients are gonna be dicked around.

Here:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


read about a real nice 84 year senator who's been trying to get this passed for 50 years. He's got nothing to gain by any of it except that now he knows that a lot of people aren't going to die because they couldn't get health insurance. Maybe you'll feel better.
 
o.k here is the bill i had and it is in there

Various eRumors about the proposed Health Care Bill


Summary of the eRumor:
Several emails circulating about the Obama administration's proposed Universal Health Care bill.

The Truth:
Update 03/22/10- Many eRumors and opinions are still circulating about the Health Care Reform Bill or HR-3200 which was abandoned for a new bill 1990 page bill HR-3962 titled the "Affordable Health Care for America Act."

On December 24, 2009 the Senate passed the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" by a yea-nay vote of 60-39. The House version of the 2409 page bill is HR-3590. On the afternoon of March 18, 2010 Congress announced that the House posted an additional package, HR-4872 - Reconciliation Act of 2010, that contains 153 pages of fixes to the Healthcare bill. On March 21, 2010, Congress passed the two bills.

The current Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act HR-3590 and the Reconciliation Act of 2010HR-4872 can be viewed on the Thomas Library site:



Click for HR-3590 Click for HR-4872



HR-3200 eRumor

There are many questions being raised about President Obama's new proposed health care bill and we will try to answer them. The bill was introduced to Congress as the "America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009" or H.R. 3200 on July 14, 2009. The Bill was sponsored by Representative John D. Dingell of the15th district of Michigan. According to the Thomas Library of Congress the bill was "referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Education and Labor, Oversight and Government Reform, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned."

As of July 28, 2009, The Thomas Library reports, "Latest Major Action: 7/21/2009 House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held." The status of this bill and text can be found at the Thomas Library by searching the bill number H.R. 3200. Click for Thomas Library.

Some of the emails circulated about the proposed legislation may, at times, be quoting previous versions of the bill.

Mandatory end of life counseling every five years to instruct patients how to determine ways to end suffering- Truth! & Fiction! To be excluded by the Senate!

On August 13, 2009 the Associated Press reported that, "Key senators are excluding a provision on end-of-life care from health overhaul legislation after language in a House bill caused a furor." Click for article

Betsy McCaughey, a former New York Lt. Governor and conservative health activist, was interviewed on July 16, 2009 on the of former Senator and Presidential candidate Fred Thompson.

In the interview she stated that page 425 of the health care bill said that everyone on Social Security & Medicare would have to undergo mandatory counseling every five years to determine ways to end their suffering. The counseling would be more frequent in the case of a terminal illness.

McCaughhey’s comments dovetailed with several statements from critics of the health care legislation who claimed that the same portion of the bill could be used to promote euthanasia. House minority Leader John Boehner and Republican Policy Committee Chairman Thaddeus McCotter said that such concerns were valid. They are quoted by LifeNews.com as saying, that the measure “could create a slippery slope for a more permissive environment for euthanasia, mercy-killing, and physican-assisted suicide because it does not clearly exclude counseling about the supposed benefits of killing oneself.”

The Vice President of AARP, John Rother, disagrees. He said the bill does not, in his view, create a problem of euthanasia. He said that under the bill, Medicare would be required to cover the consultations for the first time but does not mandate that people get end-of-life consultation. He said that any consultation would be with the patient, the doctor or nurse practitioner---not a government bureaucrat.

Pages 424 to 434 in the proposed healthcare bill discusses Advance Care Planning and the mandatory consultation is to discuss end of life services such as hospice care and living wills. Click for Fred Thompson interview.



Another eRumor originated by the American Family Association warns of Rationing and Euthanasia - Disputed! and Fiction!

Don Wildmon of the American Family Association (eRumor example #3) warned that Health Care Bill this could be the next next step towards euthanasia. Assisted suicide and euthanasia are not mentioned in the text of the bill and differ greatly from hospice care. Both private medical insurance policies and the proposed Universal Health Care plan have set limitations of coverage and deductibles could be be defined as the "rationing" of benefits.



Another eRumor includes a long list of concerns from the organization Family Security Matters. (eRumor Example #2)

Pg 22 of the HC Bill mandates the Government will audit books of all employers that self insure. - A Matter of Interpretation!

The text of the bill reads, "The Commissioner, in coordination with the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Labor Secretary of Labor, shall conduct a study of the large group insured and self-insured employer health care markets." There is no mention of audits.


Pg 30 Sec 123 of HC bill — a Government committee (good luck with that!) will decide what treatments/benefits a person may receive. - Fiction!

The text of the bill reads" IN GENERAL.—There is established a private-public advisory committee which shall be a panel of medical and other experts to be known as the Health Benefits Advisory Committee to recommend covered benefits and essential, enhanced, and premium plans." There is no mention of treatment procedures or policies.


Pg 29 lines 4-16 in the HC bill — YOUR HEALTHCARE WILL BE RATIONED! (they call it allocated) -Disputed!

Rationing could be defined as the controlled distribution of resources and goods or services.

This section of the bill deal with cost sharing and co-payments and annual limitations, The text of the bill says, "The cost-sharing incurred under the essential benefits package with respect to an individual (or family) for a year does not exceed the applicable level specified in subparagraph." It is then defined as $5,000 per individual and $10,000 per family each year.

The setting of co-payments and coverage limitations is a standard procedure for all medical health plans.


Pg 42 of HC Bill — The Health Choices Commissioner will choose your HC Benefits for you. - Truth!

According to the text of the bill, the commissioner's duties include the establishment and enforcement of "qualified health benefits plan standards". The list of his duties also includes the "establishment and operation of a Health Insurance Exchange" and accountability.


PG 50 Section 152 in HC bill — HC will be provided to ALL non US citizens, illegal or otherwise. - Disputed!

There is no provision to check for citizenship prior to receiving health services even though there are the provisions:.

Section 152 is a discrimination clause that basically said that all health services "covered by this Act shall be provided without regard to personal characteristics extraneous to the provision of high quality health care or related services." Citizenship is not mentioned.

Section 246 on page 143 under the heading of "NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS" said, "Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States."




Pg 58 HC Bill — Government will have real-time access to individual's finances and a National ID Health Card will be issued!- Truth! and Fiction!

Under the heading of "STANDARDS FOR FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSACTIONS", this section is for a "real-time (or near realtime) determination of an individual’s financial responsibility at the point of service and, to the extent possible, prior to service, including whether the individual is eligible for a specific service with a specific physician at a specific facility, which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identification card" Co-payments which need to be collected are part of the plan and it also appears that the new health plan is designed to work with insurance supplement programs. There is no mention in the bill that personal finance records would be collected.


Pg 59 HC Bill lines 21-24 Government will have direct access to your bank accts for election funds transfer. -A Matter of Interpretation!

This falls under the heading of "STANDARDS FOR FINANCIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSACTIONS" the bill says,"enable electronic funds transfers, in order to allow automated reconciliation with the related health care payment and remittance advice." The text of the bill is not clear if the electronic funds transfers means between the patient and the health care provider.


PG 65 Sec 164 is a payoff subsidized plan for retirees and their families in Unions & community organizations (read: ACORN).-Fiction!

Section 164 deals with "REINSURANCE PROGRAM FOR RETIREES" and says, "Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish a temporary reinsurance program (in this section referred to as the ‘‘reinsurance program’’) to provide reimbursement to assist participating employment-based plans with the cost of providing health benefits to retirees and to eligible spouses, surviving spouses and dependents of such retirees." Unions and community organizations (such as ACORN) do not appear to be singled out in the text of the bill. Also, non union private business that offer retirement plans and benefits for employees exist in the country.


Pg 72 Lines 8-14 Government will create an HC Exchange to bring private HC plans under Government control. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


PG 91 Lines 4-7 HC Bill — Government mandates linguistic appropriate services. Example — Translators for illegal aliens. - Truth! & Fiction!

The text of the bill read, "CULTURALLY AND LINGUISTICALLY APPROPRIATE SERVICES AND COMMUNICATIONS.—The entity shall provide for culturally and linguistically appropriate communication and health services." Translations Services will be provided for those who do not speak English. Section 246 on page 143 under the heading of "NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS" said, "Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States." This means no benefits provided to illegal aliens.


Pg 95 HC Bill Lines 8-18 The Government will use groups, i.e. ACORN & Americorps, to sign up individuals for Government HC plan. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


PG 85 Line 7 HC Bill — Specifics of Benefit Levels for Plans. AARP members — your Health care WILL be rationed. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


PG 102 Lines 12-18 HC Bill — Medicaid Eligible Individuals will be automatically enrolled in Medicaid. No choice. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


pg 124 lines 24-25 HC No company can sue Government on price fixing. No "judicial review" against Government Monopoly. Still under investigation


pg 127 Lines 1-16 HC Bill — Doctors/ AMA — The Government will tell YOU what you can earn. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


Pg 145 Line 15-17 An Employer MUST auto enroll employees into public option plan. NO CHOICE, if he does not have employee insurance -plus he is taxed up to 8%. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


Pg 126 Lines 22-25 Employers MUST pay for HC for part time employees AND their families. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


Pg 170 Lines 1-3 HC Bill Any NONRESIDENT Alien is exempt from individual taxes. (Americans will pay.) Truth! & Fiction!

Under the heading of PART VIII—HEALTH CARE RELATED TAXES SUBPART A. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE. and ‘‘Subpart A—Tax on Individuals Without Acceptable Health Care Coverage." There will be a tax imposed of 2.5% of adjusted income on individuals who do not medical health coverage that is deemed acceptable by the plan.

A non resident alien can be defined as a foreigner living and working in the United States on a nonimmigrant visa.

If their income is effectively connected with a trade or business in the United States, non resident aliens are subject to same taxation as any US citizen, according to the US Internal Revenue Service. According text of the bill non resident aliens are not subject to the 2.5% of adjusted income tax. The text of the bill does not indicate that non resident aliens are eligible for benefits.


Pg 195 HC Bill -officers & employees of HC Admin (the GOVERNMENT) will have access to ALL Americans' finances and personal records. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


PG 203 Line 14-15 HC — "The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as a tax" , Yes, it actually says that!! Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


Pg 239 Line 14-24 HC Bill Government will reduce physician services for Medicaid. Seniors, low income, poor affected. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


Pg 241 Line 6-8 HC Bill — Doctors — doesn't matter what specialty — will all be paid the same. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


PG 253 Line 10-18 Government sets value of Doctor's time, professional judgment, etc. Literally, value of humans. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


PG 265 Sec 1131 Government mandates & controls productivity for private HC industries. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


Pg 317 L 13-20 OMG!! PROHIBITION on ownership/investment. Government tells Doctors what/how much they can own. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


Pg 317-318 lines 21-25,1-3 PROHIBITION on expansion — Government will mandate hospitals cannot expand. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


Pg 354 Sec 1177 — Government will RESTRICT enrollment of Special needs people! Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


PG 425 Lines 4-12 Government mandates Advance Care Planning Consultations. Think Senior Citizens end of life prodding. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


PG 425 Lines 22-25, 426 Lines 1-3 Government provides approved list of end of life resources, guiding you in how to die. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


PG 427 Lines 15-24 Government mandates program for orders for end of life. The Government has a say in how your life ends. Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


PG 429 Lines 10-12 "advanced care consultation" may include an ORDER for end of life plans. AN ORDER from the Government to end a life! Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned


Page 472 Lines 14-17 PAYMENT TO COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATION. 1 monthly payment to a community-based organization. (Like ACORN?) Was under investigation at the time the bill as abandoned





Click of Family Security Matters article.

The ‘‘America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009’’ bill is 1019 pages long and can be viewed with Adobe Reader at:

Click for text of HR-3200l.



O.K THIS WILL TELL YOU WHAT WAS IN THE BILL AND WHAT IS TRUE AND WHAT IS NOT. THEY NEVER SAID THEY TOOK IT OUT OF THE BILL THAT PASSED BUT I HOPE FOR THE SAKE OF MY SON AND ALL THE REST THEY DID.
 
Sen John Dingell has introduced the same affordable health care bill at the start of every congress every year since 194? or 195?. His dad did too.

These right wing rich bastids are not you're friends, kauphy. Why would they be? What they're good at is telling you lies that health care reform is bad and will do in you're loved ones and get you pissed off and defensive. They don't give a shit about health care reform except that the insurance companies who financed their political careers expected them to stop at nothing to kill that bill. And they have for 40+ years.

John McCain doesn't need health care reform - WE do! But he'd rather use millions of dollars from the insurance companies than milllions of his wife's dollars to get re-elected.

Where do you think all those eRumors and old drafts of the health care bill come from and why? Supporters of health care reform don't have to lie. They're not for it to get anything out of it, personally. The Republicans will fight everything Obama proposes, tooth and nail, the hell to whether or not it's good for the country. They call themselves "patriots" to make people think that anyone against them isn't a patriot. It's sick! They don't give a shit about the country! So there's a recession! Good! The longer people suffer, the better for them. And they won't lift a finger to back anything that will help end the recession. They're RICH! They aren't having a recession. WE are! LOL
 
Sen John Dingell has introduced the same affordable health care bill at the start of every congress every year since 194? or 195?. His dad did too.

These right wing rich bastids are not you're friends, kauphy. Why would they be? What they're good at is telling you lies that health care reform is bad and will do in you're loved ones and get you pissed off and defensive. They don't give a shit about health care reform except that the insurance companies who financed their political careers expected them to stop at nothing to kill that bill. And they have for 40+ years.

John McCain doesn't need health care reform - WE do! But he'd rather use millions of dollars from the insurance companies than milllions of his wife's dollars to get re-elected.

Where do you think all those eRumors and old drafts of the health care bill come from and why? Supporters of health care reform don't have to lie. They're not for it to get anything out of it, personally. The Republicans will fight everything Obama proposes, tooth and nail, the hell to whether or not it's good for the country. They call themselves "patriots" to make people think that anyone against them isn't a patriot. It's sick! They don't give a shit about the country! So there's a recession! Good! The longer people suffer, the better for them. And they won't lift a finger to back anything that will help end the recession. They're RICH! They aren't having a recession. WE are! LOL

you know bern. i told you before i,m not against healthcare reform and you talk about the rep which no i,m not one of but the dem don,t give a shit about us eather. and as i asked you before if it is so good why did they exempt themselfs from it you think if it was that good then they would,nt mind being on it. and anyway any bill that you have to lie and cheat and give kickbacks and twist peoples arms to get pass is not a good bill if it had been then all the dems would have been on borad and that just was,nt the case.does,nt that send up a red flag to anyone when they have to bribe their own party to pass a bill. that just it bern we r having a recession and where do you think they r going to come up with the money to pay for this bill? us the people who r not rich as you said. i told you if they had to take a pay cut and put their money where their ass is then you know damn well this would not have pass but because they r not paying for it then its o.k. well anyway we will all agree to disagree right:D and i,m going to bed caz i,m sick and my babys keep me on my toes so trying to get better as i chase them around lol. good night all. p.s oh by the way i,m keeping my eyes open for a nice nasty bug if ur right i,ll eat a nightcrawler deal?
 
you know bern. i told you before i,m not against healthcare reform and you talk about the rep which no i,m not one of but the dem don,t give a shit about us eather. and as i asked you before if it is so good why did they exempt themselfs from it you think if it was that good then they would,nt mind being on it. and anyway any bill that you have to lie and cheat and give kickbacks and twist peoples arms to get pass is not a good bill if it had been then all the dems would have been on borad and that just was,nt the case.does,nt that send up a red flag to anyone when they have to bribe their own party to pass a bill. that just it bern we r having a recession and where do you think they r going to come up with the money to pay for this bill? us the people who r not rich as you said. i told you if they had to take a pay cut and put their money where their ass is then you know damn well this would not have pass but because they r not paying for it then its o.k. well anyway we will all agree to disagree right:D and i,m going to bed caz i,m sick and my babys keep me on my toes so trying to get better as i chase them around lol. good night all. p.s oh by the way i,m keeping my eyes open for a nice nasty bug if ur right i,ll eat a nightcrawler deal?

Members of congress have government health care insurance like all government officials. Many wanted to just make it available to everyone. That was the single payer system that friends of the insurance companies called socialized health care that would take away our freedom.

There are some very conservative Democrats. The southern democrats were the fiercest opponents of civil rights in the 60s and most switched parties after civil rights passed. Some democrats are right-to-lifers so they were against anything that might funnel tax dollars to be used for abortions. But they were appeased by double-triple language in the Bill plus a special edict by Obama that spelled out, very clearly - no federal tax dollars for abortions in the bill.

Insurance companies don't just contribute to the political campaigns of Republicans. They need Dems on their side, too. Blanche Lincoln, Dem AR, threatened a filibuster against the public pay option during the health care reform debate. Ben Nelson, Dem NE, watched his approval rating drop to 40% due to his role in becoming the 60th and deciding vote for cloture on healthcare reform legislation. Mary Landrieu, Dem LA, is probably the most conservative dem on the planet. And that rat-bastard, judas, Joe Lieberman, was a democrat before he turnedcoat. Of those four, only Blanche Lincoln is up for re-election in November. Over their careers, Nelson and Lincoln have each received a half million each from the Insurance Lobby, Lieberman over a million.

I don't think as much lying was done to pass the bill as was done to prevent it from passing - were talking over 40 years. And no major legislation has ever passed with ease. Who said it should? This country wasn't founded because it was easy. The founding fathers didn't agree on practically anything, as a group. And no bill is poured in concrete. Compromises were made and arms were twisted to get it passed. Now that it's law, it is going to go through many changes as time goes by.

Look at Medicare. Ask the senior citizens you know what they think of it. Ask them if they'd rather not have it. Then check out this propaganda against Medicare 4 years before it passed:



Sounds pretty bad huh? That's Medicare he's talking about.

Nightcrawler? That aint so bad....no tobassco or ketchup allowed tho! LOL
 
Last edited by a moderator:
there is a whole forum of people from countries with socialized healthcare systems, perhaps some can post their real life experiences as the media here in the USA is hugely agenda driven.
 
You are living in LaLa land...... the only thing good about this bill

Members of congress have government health care insurance like all government officials. Many wanted to just make it available to everyone. That was the single payer system that friends of the insurance companies called socialized health care that would take away our freedom.

There are some very conservative Democrats. The southern democrats were the fiercest opponents of civil rights in the 60s and most switched parties after civil rights passed. Some democrats are right-to-lifers so they were against anything that might funnel tax dollars to be used for abortions. But they were appeased by double-triple language in the Bill plus a special edict by Obama that spelled out, very clearly - no federal tax dollars for abortions in the bill.

Insurance companies don't just contribute to the political campaigns of Republicans. They need Dems on their side, too. Blanche Lincoln, Dem AR, threatened a filibuster against the public pay option during the health care reform debate. Ben Nelson, Dem NE, watched his approval rating drop to 40% due to his role in becoming the 60th and deciding vote for cloture on healthcare reform legislation. Mary Landrieu, Dem LA, is probably the most conservative dem on the planet. And that rat-bastard, judas, Joe Lieberman, was a democrat before he turnedcoat. Of those four, only Blanche Lincoln is up for re-election in November. Over their careers, Nelson and Lincoln have each received a half million each from the Insurance Lobby, Lieberman over a million.

I don't think as much lying was done to pass the bill as was done to prevent it from passing - were talking over 40 years. And no major legislation has ever passed with ease. Who said it should? This country wasn't founded because it was easy. The founding fathers didn't agree on practically anything, as a group. And no bill is poured in concrete. Compromises were made and arms were twisted to get it passed. Now that it's law, it is going to go through many changes as time goes by.

Look at Medicare. Ask the senior citizens you know what they think of it. Ask them if they'd rather not have it. Then check out this propaganda against Medicare 4 years before it passed:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Sounds pretty bad huh? That's Medicare he's talking about.

Nightcrawler? That aint so bad....no tobassco or ketchup allowed tho! LOL

Please read my post titled "obama continued lies about health reform".
My post is regarding only one of the lies, but it is a big one that will effect our economy more than any other Legislation passed so far.
The say that "closing the donut hole" takes effect immediately, but the only immediate effect is giving each senior that "qualifies" approx.$225.00 this year toward their prescriptions, wow! that will probably cover 1 prescription for a month or two. Then "closing the donut hole" slowwwwwly phases in. Instead of doing what I and the Republicans believed would help immediately; enacting "Health INSURANCE reforms" in one piece of Legislation that would have had bipartisan support; they chose to create more government offices, jobs, oversight, increased taxes, individual mandates and electronic health record mandates that basically they will tax us for until 2014 at which time the majority of us MIGHT see some type of finanacial benefit. But, CBO warns that due to the coverage that the Goverment will require, i.e. policy provisions; many will see increased premiums rather than decreased premiums.
Unfortunately, those that are not in the Medical field or related businesses cannot understand the full negative impact of this Bill. I would be happy to answer any specific questions anyone might have.

Please ask me as I will point you to information that is accurate and will provide answers to questions you may have.
 
Please read my post titled "obama continued lies about health reform".
My post is regarding only one of the lies, but it is a big one that will effect our economy more than any other Legislation passed so far.
The say that "closing the donut hole" takes effect immediately, but the only immediate effect is giving each senior that "qualifies" approx.$225.00 this year toward their prescriptions, wow! that will probably cover 1 prescription for a month or two. Then "closing the donut hole" slowwwwwly phases in. Instead of doing what I and the Republicans believed would help immediately; enacting "Health INSURANCE reforms" in one piece of Legislation that would have had bipartisan support; they chose to create more government offices, jobs, oversight, increased taxes, individual mandates and electronic health record mandates that basically they will tax us for until 2014 at which time the majority of us MIGHT see some type of finanacial benefit. But, CBO warns that due to the coverage that the Goverment will require, i.e. policy provisions; many will see increased premiums rather than decreased premiums.
Unfortunately, those that are not in the Medical field or related businesses cannot understand the full negative impact of this Bill. I would be happy to answer any specific questions anyone might have.

Please ask me as I will point you to information that is accurate and will provide answers to questions you may have.

yes i just read something about the CBO saying that(Yesterday, the head of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO),Douglas Elmendorf, said our nation's budget deficits are"unsustainable' and "can't be solved through minor changes.") what i think and u notice that i said what i think will happen is people will only get healthcare when they need it seeing they can,t be turned away and then when they don,t they will drop it and pay the 600 and something$ a year caz its cheaper that way. so they will have more money going out then coming in and it will cause the health care companys to implode and then the goverment being the great and helpfull people that they r will step in like they have with everything eles and take over all of it. and bern they passed a bill so they would not have to have the same kind of healthcare that they r trying to shove on us its call the kennedy bill why did they do that if it so good. and no i don,t agree there was more lieing on obama,reid and polask part more backroom deals more behind closed doors and more arm twisting with them then with anyone. i so agree that the taxspayers should not have to pay for people to kill babys yes i,m one of them there pro-lifers if ur going to sleep around then u should pay to kill them urself. i,m so against that its not funny. this was also in what i read.(--The five-month total is larger than any YEAR inAmerican history prior to 2009.) so i guess that is saying something about what obama is doing IS LARGER THEN ANY YEAR PRIOR TO 2009. which means it did,nt get this bad until he took office. but i guess we will all see in the end.
 
And.......

Kauphy, Eakin actually said this right after the Bill passed. Just about all members of Congress would have voted yes for the "insurance reforms" as they did when they passed the legislation that took away the Health Insurance Companies expemption under the Sherman Act and other legislation that protected them from price-fixing. The reason I and the minority in Congress disapprove of the non-insurance reforms and regulations is that those provisions are what will increase the Fed. Governments intrusion into how healthcare is delivered and will increase the number of Federal Departments, employees, allow government to recieve patients private health information, mandate costly regulations that doctors and other providers must follow and "cook-book" medical care.

The simple fact is that the legislation the CBO scored that showed it to reduce the deficit, included revenue from increased SS taxes, savings due to reform of Student loans. But the CBO pointed out that if both of these forms of revenue are used to fund social security and pay for low-income student loans, the deficit from the Health Reform Bill will increase and also will increase the federal debt because we will have to borrow money and increase taxes to cover the additional discretionary spending that will be required to pay for all the new governemnt programs the bill creates AND pay to the subsidies of premiums for those that can not afforder health care insurance on their own.
 
..many will see increased premiums rather than decreased premiums...Unfortunately, those that are not in the Medical field or related businesses cannot understand the full negative impact of this Bill. I would be happy to answer any specific questions anyone might have...

I don't doubt it. And since the Republicans will have the oval office, along with the house and senate majorities as a reault, they can fix it up any way they want. If it doesn't pan out as you say, I'm certain there will be plenty of other collateral effects, some unforseen and negative in nature. Hopefully, the necessary fixes will be implemented as they become evident.

I don't think the version of the bill, as passed, resembles anyone's original vision, though, there are those quick to spin it, otherwise.

It's too bad, as it turns out, that measures that would get the uninsured coverege, end the unfair, predatory practices of insurances companies, control spiraling health care costs and uncomplicate the maze of insurance claims procedures, couldn't have been passed more simply and with bi-partisanship.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top