1. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
  2. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. You can find out more by following.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Sister site to Casino Max launches

    Roaring 21 has just launched - sister casino to Casino Max, and they have a special promotion for you!! .They are in the Baptism by Fire - you can check them out here: Roaring 21 BBF and special promo.


    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

drip feed bonuses

Discussion in 'Online Casinos' started by razormedia, Jul 20, 2004.

    Jul 20, 2004
  1. razormedia

    razormedia Dormant account

    what are your views on drip feed bonuses?

    Ie. we pay $x after you stake $y, then we pay $z after you stake $p etc etc.

    Does anyone think they're any good or can they not be compared to bonuses that are given simultaneously but are non withdrawable until g has been staked.

    thoughts ?
     
  2. Jul 20, 2004
  3. hhcfreebie

    hhcfreebie Dormant account

    Occupation:
    research
    Location:
    USA
    Interesting idea.
    I myself would prefer drip feed bonuses, if I can withdraw anytime during the process without any attached wager requirement.
    Of course, it also depends on the bonus structure. If you are a casino owner, you might want to pay a small fees to promotion designers such as the wizard. Bad bonus structure won't attract anyone while too-good-to-be-true bonuses will make broke. :D
     
  4. Jul 20, 2004
  5. jpm

    jpm Dormant account

    Well this is kind of how the FL bonuses work. You have to wager your stake at least 1x before you get the bonus and you are free to withdraw the stake and any winnings before you get the bonus. Then only the bonus money has strings attached. I somewhat prefer that.
     
  6. Jul 21, 2004
  7. razormedia

    razormedia Dormant account

    it would work as such:

    when you deposit money, you are give a real account with your deposit in (lets say 100). then after wagering (for example) 500, you would get 20 bonus, after wagering another 500, you would get another 20 bonus etc.

    this would carry on until the bonus matched your inital deposit and there would be no strings on the bonus, it would be instantly withdrawable.
     
  8. Jul 21, 2004
  9. dominique

    dominique Dormant account

    Occupation:
    webmistress
    Location:
    The Boonies
    I would absolutely love to see this for the many first time players I see. They get very confused with wagering requirements, and they don't want to read them (and don't), and they don't want to count hands or keep track of wagering. They just want to play what they like and not be told what they can and cannot play.

    For them, your plan sounds really great. Simple, no limitations, play whatever you like, withdraw whenever you like.

    It would cut out almost all the first time player complaints I get.
     
  10. Jul 22, 2004
  11. razormedia

    razormedia Dormant account

    thanks for the input, we'll bear it in mind.
     

Share This Page