Curaçao license read this before trusting it

[Hector]

Just a quick warning for anyone browsing or considering new casinos:

If you ever come across a license like this, issued by the Curaçao Gaming Control Board, please stop and think. Don’t deposit. Don’t register. One day you might remember this post… and regret ignoring it.
These licenses offer players zero protection in real disputes. The operators often hide behind them to avoid accountability. No proper supervision. No transparent enforcement.
A trusted regulator should work for the players, not the casinos. The Swiss authority (ESBK), for instance, is public, neutral, and reports directly to the Department of Justice. That’s how it should be everywhere.
Just sharing this so others don’t have to learn it the hard way.

Same author who reported irregularities in a licensed live roulette game last week. I’m just trying to raise awareness before others get hurt too.

 

[dunover]

Just a quick warning for anyone browsing or considering new casinos:





If you ever come across a license like this, issued by the Curaçao Gaming Control Board, please stop and think. Don’t deposit. Don’t register. One day you might remember this post… and regret ignoring it.
These licenses offer players zero protection in real disputes. The operators often hide behind them to avoid accountability. No proper supervision. No transparent enforcement.
A trusted regulator should work for the players, not the casinos. The Swiss authority (ESBK), for instance, is public, neutral, and reports directly to the Department of Justice. That’s how it should be everywhere.
Just sharing this so others don’t have to learn it the hard way.

Same author who reported irregularities in a licensed live roulette game last week. I’m just trying to raise awareness before others get hurt too.





Opción 2 (más


View attachment 208754

I thought you were here to lodge complaints about dodgy live games.

Now you almost accuse our top-rated casino of wrongdoing, and recommend nobody plays there, contrary to the experience of players on this forum.

Read the rules of this forum please. We are not here to indulge personal agendas of malcontents.

Interesting you accidentally pasted a bit of Spanish language into your post.

Yes, it's a very weak jurisdiction but equally as important is the conduct of the casino holding the license.

Any more of this and we will have to review your status here - and that's done by us humans and not AI.

 

[Hector]

I thought you were here to lodge complaints about dodgy live games.

Now you almost accuse our top-rated casino of wrongdoing, and recommend nobody plays there, contrary to the experience of players on this forum.

Read the rules of this forum please. We are not here to indulge personal agendas of malcontents.

Interesting you accidentally pasted a bit of Spanish language into your post.

Yes, it's a very weak jurisdiction but equally as important is the conduct of the casino holding the license.

Any more of this and we will have to review your status here - and that's done by us humans and not AI.

I only shared a general warning based on publicly available facts regarding a weak license, without targeting any specific operator.
If that is interpreted as a “personal agenda” or a reason for moderation, then it raises questions about whether the forum is protecting players or defending other interests.
My intention has always been to contribute constructively and raise awareness about issues that could affect players in the long term. If expressing concerns backed by real information is considered unacceptable, and my account must be removed because of it, then so be it — but I stand by what I said.

 

[maxd]

I only shared a general warning based on publicly available facts regarding a weak license, without targeting any specific operator. ...

That is false. You specifically posted a particular casino’s license number — and name — before later removing it. That is not a “general warning”, that is a specific attack. Per usual you are “truth challenged” here, as you have been elsewhere on Casinomeister.

- Max

 

[dunover]

I only shared a general warning based on publicly available facts regarding a weak license, without targeting any specific operator.
If that is interpreted as a “personal agenda” or a reason for moderation, then it raises questions about whether the forum is protecting players or defending other interests.
My intention has always been to contribute constructively and raise awareness about issues that could affect players in the long term. If expressing concerns backed by real information is considered unacceptable, and my account must be removed because of it, then so be it — but I stand by what I said.

It's hardly news to us that Curacao is a weak jurisdiction - look and search the forum and you'll see numerous threads about it, with the moderators putting the boot in too.

Although you edited it out, it seems strange you used the top-rated site here as an example...and you say you weren't tagerting any specific operator. OK.

I think a site that has called out more casino misbehaviour than any other, while recovering millions in disputes over the years for players has firmly established its player protection credentials! By the way, much of that has come from sites with proper jurisdictions.

Some of what you say may be factual, although the game irregularity affair we have only your word for, and before you arrived we've had tens of posters over the years implying they have some king of secret knowledge and saying they have 'proof' of such things whether dodgy stats, events or patterns, with one thing in common: nothing is ever proved and is shot down under scrutiny.

I think it would have been a better plan of action to share this great revelation after it was proven by a third party - as I said, the readers here have heard it all before!

As they all know Curacao licenses are paper tigers. And have done for years.

 

[Hector]

It's hardly news to us that Curacao is a weak jurisdiction - look and search the forum and you'll see numerous threads about it, with the moderators putting the boot in too.

Although you edited it out, it seems strange you used the top-rated site here as an example...and you say you weren't tagerting any specific operator. OK.

I think a site that has called out more casino misbehaviour than any other, while recovering millions in disputes over the years for players has firmly established its player protection credentials! By the way, much of that has come from sites with proper jurisdictions.

Some of what you say may be factual, although the game irregularity affair we have only your word for, and before you arrived we've had tens of posters over the years implying they have some king of secret knowledge and saying they have 'proof' of such things whether dodgy stats, events or patterns, with one thing in common: nothing is ever proved and is shot down under scrutiny.

I think it would have been a better plan of action to share this great revelation after it was proven by a third party - as I said, the readers here have heard it all before!

As they all know Curacao licenses are paper tigers. And have done for years.

Hi dunover,
I appreciate your response and understand the importance of keeping the forum focused and free from personal agendas. However, I’d like to clarify that I’m not speaking based on assumptions or empty words.
If you check your direct messages, you’ll find that you once contacted me (perhaps as part of a mass message), and I actually replied by sharing detailed evidence and videos regarding the issue I’m now raising publicly. I never received a reply — but this shows that I’ve tried to follow a responsible and discreet path before posting anything here.
Regarding the image I initially shared: I later edited it because my intention was simply to provide an example of the license type, not to directly incriminate any specific operator. My warning was general, based on publicly known facts about licensing oversight — not a personal attack.
I truly respect the work this forum has done over the years to defend players. My only goal is to contribute constructively by raising awareness of potential technical issues that could affect users in the long term.

Thanks again for taking the time to respond.

 

[mulven]

There are good and bad sites on most licences, its all about the sites themselves.

Worse "licences" like anjouan or curacao will still have good sites, its just the ratio of bad to good will much higher

There are good casinos with no licence at all, although those can probably be counted on one hand.

People need to exercise critical thinking when signing up to new casinos and do their research.

Affiliate marketers buying your email and spamming you with emails where they make it look like they are the casino asking you to sign up is probably a leading cause for people mindlessly signing up to dodgy sites. People need to think before they spin imo.

 

[Hector]

There are good and bad sites on most licences, its all about the sites themselves.

Worse "licences" like anjouan or curacao will still have good sites, its just the ratio of bad to good will much higher

There are good casinos with no licence at all, although those can probably be counted on one hand.

People need to exercise critical thinking when signing up to new casinos and do their research.

Affiliate marketers buying your email and spamming you with emails where they make it look like they are the casino asking you to sign up is probably a leading cause for people mindlessly signing up to dodgy sites. People need to think before they spin imo.

I completely agree that critical thinking and research are key — and that not every site under a weak license is necessarily malicious. But that’s precisely why awareness is needed. Players often don’t have the tools to identify risks, and the ‘bad-to-good’ ratio you mentioned becomes a trap when protections are minimal and oversight is weak. My post is just meant to encourage people to think twice before trusting those licenses, especially when problems arise and there’s no regulator truly holding anyone accountable.”