Corporate Governance of the United States Explained.

[ed skull murphy]

Ed'll be extremely easy to spot in the hustle and bustle of the next Meistermeet.

View attachment 92766

You're a funny guy!

Actually, aluminium foil doesn't work so well, you need a copper helmet with an earthing braid.

I think it was Alan Watt who I heard say that cave paintings had been discovered with depictions of people wearing such a helmet, so it is possible that planet earth has been through this cycle before, possibly preceding the great flood, written about in the bible..

 

[paul7388]

Some parents might find it useful to know that their children are being brainwashed by harmful mind control techniques, whenever they view a Disney cartoon of movie.

Well Goatwack turned out ok.

Oh wait a minute maybe you are right

 

[ed skull murphy]

If someone's going to say Bambi's mum wasn't shot but rather it was a false flag and she was whisked off somewhere to fool us, well....

that's my childhood ruined

No it's a bit more subtle than that, there are hidden subliminal suggestions within the films, intended to sexualise the children viewing, for example.

 

[slotplayer]

From an outsider's perspective, the media portrayal of the U.S is terrible, either linked to Trump himself or the montages of college loons screaming at the sky and the like, and the ludicrous social changes taking place there.

I'm sure the media is doing their best to divide people and create narratives, and right now America is at a low ebb, or so it seems.

The media here is a total comedy show now. "ludicrous" that's a good word to describe the social changes.

Trump makes his own bed.

 

[goatwack]

No it's a bit more subtle than that, there are hidden subliminal suggestions within the films, intended to sexualise the children viewing, for example.

Yes, I remember watching a piece on that, either on t'telly or Youtube, I forget which. Some of it seemed quite credible

 

[Steviedoo]

I see all the usual suspects are getting the wrong end of the stick, as usual. It's to be expected.

Oh ed.
I see you’ve learned something from the last time you posted your theories and got yourself banned.
You’re being nice to us.
Thank you for that.

 

[ternur]

I see you are a lawyer, are you a freemason? Not that I expect you to answer that honestly, because you would be duty bound not to.

I'm not a skilled, unrestrained worker who builds by laying units of substantial material (such as stone or brick). Just your regular odd fellow.

 

[ed skull murphy]

Two things that are revered here by many in the USA is the US Constitution and the American flag.

The founding fathers were British land owning gentry and freemasons, they created that document to protect their own interests and the interests of their ilk. There are so many get out clauses in the constitution, that any government can sidestep it, and often does. I'm sorry if this comes across as harsh, but the constitution is not there for the benefit of the common man.

If you want to excercise your rights, you should study up on the common law, which trumps everything, if it is done correctly. Karl Lentz is your man for that.

The US flag is based on the flag of the Virginia Company, I believe, a subsidiary of the British East India Company. In other words, 'the corporation'.

 

[ed skull murphy]

I'm not a skilled, unrestrained worker who builds by laying units of substantial material (such as stone or brick). Just your regular odd fellow.

No, that's a stonemason.

Trust a lawyer to give misleading reply.

 

[mack341]

The founding fathers were British land owning gentry and freemasons, they created that document to protect their own interests and the interests of their ilk. There are so many get out clauses in the constitution, that any government can sidestep it, and often does. I'm sorry if this comes across as harsh, but the constitution is not there for the benefit of the common man.

If you want to excercise your rights, you should study up on the common law, which trumps everything, if it is done correctly. Karl Lentz is your man for that.

The US flag is based on the flag of the Virginia Company, I believe, a subsidiary of the British East India Company. In other words, 'the corporation'.

I think though Ed, on balance the US constitution must mean americans are freer than us brits, however I think there are a number of people in america who are concerned the constitution is being sidelined by the 2 main political parties hence the tea party movement. Like UKIP here, I believe the tea party is attacked and ridiculed by the mainstream media rather than debated logically.

It is amazing how complex Law is, judges and lawyers can argue for days over the meaning of 1 paragraph, no offence to ternur but freemasonry is popular here amongst our legal profession. Apparently 'In their initiation to the first degree, they swear to have their tongues torn out by the root and buried in the sand at low water mark if they reveal masonic secrets.'

 

[ed skull murphy]

I think though Ed, on balance the US constitution must mean americans are freer than us brits

Well I believe that Americans had at least a few decades of comparative freedom between independence until around 1830, when the corporation made it's move (some say 1871).

Americans can be free again by rescinding all of the contracts that they have signed with the federal government and the IRS, but that would involve giving up certain benefits and is not something to be taken lightly. A grasp of common law and contract law is essential before embarking on something like this. Better to rescind contracts for the things you can live without, while retaining or rewriting the contracts for the things that you need.

 

[slotplayer]

The founding fathers were British land owning gentry and freemasons, they created that document to protect their own interests and the interests of their ilk. There are so many get out clauses in the constitution, that any government can sidestep it, and often does. I'm sorry if this comes across as harsh, but the constitution is not there for the benefit of the common man.

If you want to excercise your rights, you should study up on the common law, which trumps everything, if it is done correctly. Karl Lentz is your man for that.

The US flag is based on the flag of the Virginia Company, I believe, a subsidiary of the British East India Company. In other words, 'the corporation'.

Everything is not a conspiracy.

We have the Supreme court to interrupt and decide if an issue is constitutional or not.
They just ruled on the travel ban, the wedding cake baker and union dues.

This Carl Lentz? I'll pass.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[ed skull murphy]

From Gus's website, about Karl Lentz:

but ‘i’ did and continue to believe there’s much to learn from

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[Janek12]

I don't care what you think. Starting a thread about the USA like you did, with some video about how our country is/was run and you are not even from the USA? Plus, pretty much saying we have no idea about our own country is run, is an insult. Why? If not to denigrate our intelligence, why do it at all? And no, so far you haven't had a lot of "interest" in this topic. Or they are just not interested in YOUR and your videos opinions.

Worry about "Albion"!

This is one of the reasons why people who do not live in the USA worry about the USA:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[mack341]

This is one of the reasons why people who do not live in the USA worry about the USA:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Just to add though, Bush and Obama were very busy at it as well. I don't think Trump is particularly orchestrating it but has left the decision making to the military/pentagon, basically abdicating personal responsibility whereas if he doesn't agree with it he should bring it to a halt, but he would most likely get impeached or worse.

Edit: just read the whole article and it does cover bush and obama's propensity to drop bombs. Its an excellent article written by an american.

 

[ed skull murphy]

This is one of the reasons why people who do not live in the USA worry about the USA:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Nice piece, makes plenty of important points but I don't believe there is a problem with 'global warming', nor do I believe that Dubya is an idiot.

'It’s not about Bush, even though he has the intelligence of boiled cabbage.'

Good actor, amusing entertainer, certainly. Grandson of Aleister Crowley, most definitely. But unintelligent? Nah.

 

[Janek12]

Just to add though, Bush and Obama were very busy at it as well. I don't think Trump is particularly orchestrating it but has left the decision making to the military/pentagon, basically abdicating personal responsibility whereas if he doesn't agree with it he should bring it to a halt, but he would most likely get impeached or worse.

Yes, I believe Trump does not personally have much to do with it; he is just a New York playboy, a replaceable buffoon who is complicit in it. When he was in Czechoslovakia to attend the funeral of his father-in-law (Ivana Trump's father), still during the socialist regime, in the 1980s, the local state secret police interrogated Ivana Trump and some other people around Donald Trump. As early as that, she mentioned that Donald Trump expected to be elected president in 1996. It is allegedly on record in the files of the secret police.
As we now know, eventually, Clinton was elected instead of him (Trump was still a Democrat then, unless I am mistaken). What I find interesting is that this shows for how long he had been groomed to become a president. The powers behind the stage saw fit to have him elected many years later... His personality probably fits better their current plans...

These are the numbers of bombs for Bush's and Obama's administrations:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

 

[mack341]

Yes, I believe Trump does not personally have much to do with it; he is just a New York playboy, a replaceable buffoon who is complicit in it. When he was in Czechoslovakia to attend the funeral of his father-in-law (Ivana Trump's father), still during the socialist regime, in the 1980s, the local state secret police interrogated Ivana Trump and some other people around Donald Trump. As early as that, she mentioned that Donald Trump expected to be elected president in 1996. It is allegedly on record in the files of the secret police.
As we now know, eventually, Clinton was elected instead of him (Trump was still a Democrat then, unless I am mistaken). What I find interesting is that this shows for how long he had been groomed to become a president. The powers behind the stage saw fit to have him elected many years later... His personality probably fits better their current plans...

These are the numbers of bombs for Bush's and Obama's administrations:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

The only thing is going by the amount of slating he gets from the media [ putting aside fox tv ] the elite don't like or trust Trump and I think would have preferred hillary the warmonger. When he did order bombs to be dropped on Syria, the democrat media suddenly loved him, make of that what you will.

I think when he was younger he looked a bit more odd with greasy lank hair, his appearance has improved and he looks a bit more statesmen like now.

 

[ed skull murphy]

the elite don't like or trust Trump and I think would have preferred hillary the warmonger.

I'm not so sure, Mack, I think they realised that Clinton would be a liability, especially after the blatant rigging of the primaries that went on, and again when she started having fits on camera or passing out in public.

Plus I believe that Trump is sufficiently compromised that I don't think he would dare to cross the establishment, they could completely ruin and disgrace him in a heartbeat.

 

[Janek12]

The only thing is going by the amount of slating he gets from the media [ putting aside fox tv ] the elite don't like or trust Trump and I think would have preferred hillary the warmonger. When he did order bombs to be dropped on Syria, the democrat media suddenly loved him, make of that what you will.

I personally do not think there is really an "elitist" united front in the media against Trump. I think there is so much to objectively dislike about Trump that for the powers behind the stage, he is a welcomed scapegoat and distraction. He takes up so much attention that there is less capacity, in terms of time and energy, for people to concentrate on other, actual and technical issues. And a lot of people (naturally, especially older people who can better compare these times with the past) are sincerely horrified to see the decline in the class and culture of everything; it is not all Trump's fault, of course, it is the "spirit of the times"; but they associate it with Trump; it is so much easier and simpler to pin it on a single man .

And I do not buy into the division into Democrats and Republicans at all. I think this is just a facade for the public, which has been falling apart for some time already. The war and foreign policies have obviously been the same over the last several decades regardless of whether Democrats or Republicans were in the White House or had a majority wherever...

 

[ed skull murphy]

it is so much easier and simpler to pin it on a single man .

It's easy to change the bird cage liner every four to five years.

The only reason we have democratic elections is to prevent the peasants from revolting every five years, which is what they used to do before getting the vote.

But of course you are correct, our elected representatives have very little say in how the country is run, in fact, from day one, they will be bombarded with lucrative offers from, for example, the Israeli lobby, and also sat down and told of the consequences of going against the political grain, and how that might not be such a good idea. Not to mention the 'honey traps'.

 

[slotplayer]

I've heard it dozens of times by tv media panels both cnn and fox during the past 3 presidents. Mind you these are not a bunch of ex-military people but people that worked in various White House administrations in different rolls.

They all say the same thing, none of the presidents like war/bombing, but then they get in office and read those pdb's (presidential daily briefings)

How did this one work out?

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

As far as the comedian goes, I have no reason to doubt him but searched around for a more familiar "main stream" source but could not find one.

However, I'm not surprised the Pentagon can't account for 21 Trillion dollars but I disagree that we can't fathom trillions. The US GDP hit 1 trillion in 1970 and the word trillion has been used ever since so we're (people who pay attention to it that is) all used to hearing it.

But now you know why we don't want to pay any higher taxes, the way they piss through it.

I've also been wondering why there are no terrorist attacks recently. If you know let me know.

I've heard same argument a few times, but I can't help thinking that if the US reduced its military more ruthless nations would rise to super power dominance. Swap the US military might with that of NK.

I don't think the Utopian vision of world peace will emerge. Could be wrong though.

notice the date in the top right.

 

[mack341]

I've heard it dozens of times by tv media panels both cnn and fox during the past 3 presidents. Mind you these are not a bunch of ex-military people but people that worked in various White House administrations in different rolls.

They all say the same thing, none of the presidents like war/bombing, but then they get in office and read those pdb's (presidential daily briefings)

How did this one work out?

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

As far as the comedian goes, I have no reason to doubt him but searched around for a more familiar "main stream" source but could not find one.

However, I'm not surprised the Pentagon can't account for 21 Trillion dollars but I disagree that we can't fathom trillions. The US GDP hit 1 trillion in 1970 and the word trillion has been used ever since so we're (people who pay attention to it that is) all used to hearing it.

But now you know why we don't want to pay any higher taxes, the way they piss through it.

I've also been wondering why there are no terrorist attacks recently. If you know let me know.

I've heard same argument a few times, but I can't help thinking that if the US reduced its military more ruthless nations would rise to super power dominance. Swap the US military might with that of NK.

I don't think the Utopian vision of world peace will emerge. Could be wrong though.

notice the date in the top right.

very interesting interview, just shows Trump is consistent, his views 31 years ago are the same today. His right about the money they spend all round the world, but doesn't seem to understand that the idea behind it is to have global power and countries reliant on the US.

Geopolitical control and influence is never going to come cost free but he sees things through a business man's eyes with a focus on profit and loss, he knows financially a Government is basically a big corporation and can't run bankrupt year after year, borrowing more and more money.

He seems to be trying to address the US debt by reducing the trade deficit [using tariffs] and try to get other countries to pay for their own defence [or pay america to defend them].

 

[nikantw]

This is one of the reasons why people who do not live in the USA worry about the USA:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Best part, (not about bombs):

"and humans are dealing with climate change like adults rather than burying our heads in the sand while trying to convince ourselves that the sand around our heads isn’t getting really, really hot"


Lol, that is exactly what we do about climate change. Although extreme whether events are happening more and more often and the climate is changing everywhere

 

[ed skull murphy]

Best part, (not about bombs):

"and humans are dealing with climate change like adults rather than burying our heads in the sand while trying to convince ourselves that the sand around our heads isn’t getting really, really hot"


Lol, that is exactly what we do about climate change. Although extreme whether events are happening more and more often and the climate is changing everywhere

But Nik, this kind of weather is cyclical, human involvement has very little to do with it; the very hot summers and very cold winters we are experiencing at the moment are linked to the closer proximity of the moon to our planet at this time... and increased solar flare activity, it has absolutely bugger all to do with carbon dioxide; that is just a revenue generating con.