From reuters about vaccines 11 mar 2020:
Behind the scenes, scientists and medical experts are concerned that rushing a vaccine could end up worsening the infection in some patients rather than preventing it.
Studies have suggested that coronavirus vaccines carry the risk of what is known as vaccine enhancement, where instead of protecting against infection, the vaccine can actually make the disease worse when a vaccinated person is infected with the virus. The mechanism that causes that risk is not fully understood and is one of the stumbling blocks that has prevented the successful development of a coronavirus vaccine.
Normally, researchers would take months to test for the possibility of vaccine enhancement in animals. Given the urgency to stem the spread of the new coronavirus, some drugmakers are moving straight into small-scale human tests, without waiting for the completion of such animal tests.
“I understand the importance of accelerating timelines for vaccines in general, but from everything I know, this is not the vaccine to be doing it with,” Dr Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, told Reuters.
Hotez worked on development of a vaccine for SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome), the coronavirus behind a major 2003 outbreak, and found that some vaccinated animals developed more severe disease compared with unvaccinated animals when they were exposed to the virus.
“There is a risk of immune enhancement,” said Hotez. “The way you reduce that risk is first you show it does not occur in laboratory animals.”
Hotez testified last week before the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space and Technology about the need for sustained funding for vaccine research.
There remains no vaccine for any of the new coronaviruses that have caused outbreaks in the past 20 years.
----------
So I wonder why they're so confident there can be one for this variant? Apparently the coronavirus family mutate a lot which causes problems for the vaccine makers, and why there's never been a vaccine for the common cold.
I'm not keen on mandatory vaccines, how are you going to enforce that on healthy adults, and I don't trust bill gates much either, and he seems to be the main man when it comes to world wide vaccine programs/plans.
from robert f. kennedy jr's twitter:
Public health advocates around the world accuse Gates of steering WHO’s agenda away from projects proven to curb infectious diseases: clean water, hygiene, nutrition + economic development + serves Gates philosophy that good health only comes in a syringe.
View attachment 127886
^ just a thought, no need for any vaccine fans to be angry, generally speaking the body's own immune system doesn't do too bad a job, having bill and melinda try to improve on nature doesn't really fill me with hope more trepidation.
"
The Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (
) program of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was launched in mid-2005 as a "Learning Initiative", and became a full-fledged program under the Global Development Division in early 2010.
The foundation has since 2005 undertaken a wide range of efforts in the WASH sector involving research, experimentation, reflection,
, and field implementation. In 2009, the foundation decided to refocus its WASH effort mainly on
services for the poor, using non-piped sanitation services (i.e. without the use of
),
and less on
. This was because the sanitation sector was generally receiving less attention from other
and from governments, and because the foundation believed it had the potential to make a real difference through strategic investments.
In mid 2011, the foundation announced in its new "Water, Sanitation, Hygiene Strategy Overview" that its funding now focuses primarily on sanitation, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, because access to
is lowest in those regions.
Their grant-making focus has been since 2011 on sanitation science and technology ("transformative technologies"), delivery models at scale, urban sanitation markets, building demand for sanitation,
as well as policy, advocacy and communications.
In mid 2011, the foundation stated that they had committed more than $265 million to the water, sanitation, and hygiene sector over the past five years, i.e. since about 2006.
For the time period of about 2008 to mid-2015, all grants awarded to water, sanitation and hygiene projects totaled a value of around $650 million, according to the publicly available grant database.
"
Clean water, hygiene, nutrition + economic development is pretty much the main points of what the Gates foundation have been, and are doing.
But since vaccines are involved (and has been since 2000, nothing new) that makes him some sort of vaccine-forcing boogeyman?
Sure, the bodys immune system is not bad at what its doing.
But whats so wrong with "improving on nature" as you called it.
Thats what basically all medicine and alot of other things are, right?
So if we find a medicine preventing things like parkinson, alzheimers etc we should not use it because its nature wants us to to have those diseases?
People with bad eyesight should stop using lenses and glasses because nature wants them to have shitty vision.