1. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies .This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy.Find out more.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Follow Casinomeister on Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Casinomeister.us US Residents Click here! |  Svenska Svenska | 
Dismiss Notice

Poll:Best Screenshot of the Month?



Candidates Revealed...Cast your vote!.
Dismiss Notice
REGISTER NOW!! Why? Because you can't do diddly squat without having been registered!

At the moment you have limited access to view most discussions: you can't make contact with thousands of fellow players, affiliates, casino reps, and all sorts of other riff-raff.

Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join Casinomeister here!

Card Player interview with Fahrenkopf a good read

Discussion in 'Casino Industry Discussion' started by jetset, Dec 14, 2006.

    Dec 14, 2006
  1. jetset

    jetset Ueber Meister CAG

    Occupation:
    Senior Partner, InfoPowa News Service
    Location:
    Earth
    THIS ONE IS WORTH READING

    CardPlayer's interview with AGA's Fahrenkopf gives great insights into the politics behind online gambling banning attempts

    The political manouevres that US legislators have resorted to over the years always makes fascinating, and occasionally infuriating reading and this week the respected Card Player.com site is carrying a two part interview with the American Gaming Association's CEO Frank Fahrenkopf.

    The first part of the conversation is up now, and gives a biog on Fahrenkopf followed by an interesting exploration of the history of US banning attempts.

    Fahrenkopf explains that, In the Republican Party, the religious right think its a sin to gamble, and they feel an obligation to stop everyone from sinning. Some very liberal Democrats dont think people are smart enough to protect themselves, so the government has to parent its citizens. Its an odd marriage.

    Fahrenkopf thinks that in order to understand the landscape of online gambling, one must start with the 1961 Wire Act, whereby Congress enacted a law that had to do with using the telephone to place sports bets.

    Although the Bush and Clinton administrations have both taken the unique position that the Wire Act is broad enough to cover all forms of online betting, the courts disagree. The 5th Circuit ruled that the Wire Act deals only with sports betting.

    Fahrenkopf thinks that the case was never taken to the Supreme Court because it is clear that the high court would rule the same.

    The influential executive goes on to give behind-the-door political insight into the debates and events leading to the current situation, illustrating that the would-be nemesis of online gambling, Senator Jon Kyl has been a central figure for over 11 years. Here's just one example:

    They concluded that they couldnt do anything about it. So, they gave the issue to Senator Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), who wrote a bill 11 years ago that made it a felony to place bets online! The Senate Judiciary said no way. Were not going to make it a crime when a guy comes home from work, puts his feet up on his couch, and bets 20 bucks on a game."

    Tomorrow, Card Player will publish the second part of the interview to explore how the UIGE Act came to be. Both parts make fascinating reading, and you can access them at You must register/login in order to see the link.
     
    2 people like this.

Share This Page