Captain Cooks Bonus Terms

Cooks

I agree...I have never had to wait more than 15 minutes to get a reply.....

I totally suck at keeping track of how much I wagered so I always go check...did you know they had a site that tells you that....there should be a link in the email you received when you registered your bonus account!

John, just to let you know....I think Cap Cooks rocks....and you will continue to get my deposits!
 
Stanford said:
The hoopla as you put it is because this is the *only* casino on the net and maybe in the entire universe to assess wagering requirements on winnings. Can you think of any other?

The Aztec Riches, Music Hall etc. group of casinos used to have a truly "evil" bonus account, which as well as having an enormous (and unstated) wagering requirement in the bonus account made you wager any "winnings" from there as well.

They've now changed over to just asking you to wager your original deposit in the real account. I don't think it's that shocking that a casino which has a bonus account asks you to wager money transferred from there, though it does make it much less appealing & is a liability if you have a big win.

I agree this bonus system is terrible for any "recreational" players out there, but then the sad truth is that recreational players almost always lose their deposits anyway...
 
Cooks

I am going to say one last thing....I could post and post until I am blue in the face but if people have made their mind up...it won't do any good.


In my opinion, whether "recreational" or not.....if you gamble...you risk your money....

It is my opinion that if you are willing to deposit your money into a casino...you have to be willing to accept any terms the casino has....if you gamble....you have to face the fact that you are not going to win as often as you like....and you are not always going to meet the terms....but that is a risk you are willing to take or else you would not be depositing, correct?

If you don't agree with the terms....or you feel cheated....don't spend your money.....it is as simple as that.
 
captain cooks and casino kingdom

hi8 everybody,

first i like to say.. i live in europe/ austria...sooo please excuse my english
i didnt understand everything what is posted here.. but i like to say something
i am very happy that i am a player at CCC and CK
they have the best support i have ever seen.
second is...even i understood what i have to do to be a vip
and i think it is really not hard to send an e-mail to the casinos to ask if somebody is already a vip.
this are the first casinos where i play always a long time if i deposit..
i already cashed out big
i could cash out much more...lolll
but i am also a little bit crazy...lollll
i feel really like a vip at these 2 casinos..
they are always very nice....they give out a lot of bonuses.
and i love this system with the bonusaccounts..even i would not need it anymore since i am vip
because now as vip i dont need to playthrough the bonus

i hope everybody understands my english
and finally i like to say
this 2 casinos will always have my support
i love them!
:) :) :)
 
Why

I am sorry...but that is just rude....

I thought this was a forum where I could come and defend a casino that I felt was being wronged....

Just because I am a first poster does not mean I don't have an opinion....

You were never a first time poster.....I only come here every so often....i just happened to see this post and stated my opinion.....
 
Riffle72 said:
Just because I am a first poster does not mean I don't have an opinion....
Quite right too - you keep posting! I sometimes get a poor reaction to my opinions, but having different opinions & discussing them is what makes this forum so great! :thumbsup:

I'm sure Vesuvio will reply to your post in person, but I suspect his comment was made because it's VERY unusual to get quite so many people all saying that a casino is 'fantastic, brilliant, totally fair' etc. all at once.
I have to agree with him there!

I also agree with your comments about gambling with your own funds. Too many here seem to be obsessed with just squeezing as much bonus money out of the casino's with minimum risk. That's not what I personally call gambling. (Watch for the reaction to that statement!). My biggest fear is this will eventually lead to the end of the best bonuses, leaving us just scraps to pick at. :(

Isn't there some saying about bitting the hand that feeds you....
_
 
Last edited:
For what it's worth, I understand both sides of this. I love CCC, but hate high wag. reqs. :D
To me this seems to be a big communication problem. The VIP statement on CCC's site is "Players are required to deposit a minimum of $600 and wager at least 50,000 casino credits in their deposit account."
Also goes on to say, email them about becoming a VIP, etc. The problem is, is that if CCC is sending out emails to players telling them that they have become VIP's, some might not get the emails due to spam filters.

Now if you're depositing a few hundred $$, especially after reading the VIP statement on the CCC site, wouldn't it occur to you to find out if you've become a VIP? IMO, I'd be emailing them to find out.
We should all know by now to check everything out with bonuses these days, and if I'm going to have to wager extra, you better be damn sure I'm going to find out why before one cent get's spent.

John: One question I have about the VIP terms: Let's say someone deposits $600, but doesn't wager the 50,000. Does that person still become a VIP because of the deposit alone?
That is one thing that might be causing the confusion.

I hope this gets straightened out for all involved, I hate to see a casino I love get badmouthed, and I do understand the confusion of the player. Taking what's been said in this thread, maybe it will help all involved to work to get problems like this solved, and the fact that John has come here shows that he is interested in players opinions & problems.

Btw, KasinoKing: Damn, that must've been one hell of a ride! ;)
 
reply

In defence of Our crew member Belle her reply to Trick was accurate and tho' a mistake was made, it's perfectly understandable.
The player makes no mention of playing thru wagering requirments on his deposit(only his Bonus) in his email to her. As I understand something of the process involved here, I would say that she may have assumed this player was indeed referring to a withdrawal from his Competition Account, as the player was indeed still engaged in play in that particular account.In which case her reply is correct and proper.
Her reply was quite accurate given the circumstances here. If our crew were to be 100% accurate and correct, considering the multitude of languages, terminology and attitudes they deal with in a normal shift , I myself would be extremely proud.
JohnD
Integrity Casinos
 
answer

Hi Medusa,
This statment is a guide to our players.The way it reads back a few posts with "nothing less will suffice"attached is in no way it's intended drift. I'm not sure where this came from but I'm certain that it's not on our website. Regardless, to give our New Players some idea of what is required to attain VIP Player rateing, we needed numbers, we couldn't just say....prove to us that you are genuinly treating our sites as entertainment and not involved in outright profiteering from every single generous Bonus you receive.
They are the numbers we used, there's no time frame attached forcing people to race out and bung $600 into our coffers. Our competition Accounts are there to facilitate developments of our Player Rewards Program (down the track) for the benefit of our players. Those of you who participate in the use of these accounts would be aware of the increased level of promotions available to you already.
One perception that needs to go to sleep is the idea that we have put wagering requirments on winnings. This is not the case, funds from Competition Accounts do not become winnings until wagering has been met. Wagering for VIP players is less because these players have already proven that they are using our sites appropriatly.We surely need some safeguards against some of the highly organised groups out there that are spoiling Promotions for many deserving Players.
JohnD
Integrity Casinos
 
I do understand that, and yes steps are needed to weed out bonus abusing. Other than stating some long draw out statement on the site regarding the VIP status of a player, perhaps in the future use something that would let the player know for sure if they are VIPs or not.
Stupid Example #1: A message stating that the've reached VIP status when they login to the casino, be it a popup like the message of the day, or stated in the cashier when they go to deposit.

I'm just trying to suggest things that both players and you John, would both be able to work with so situations like these don't happen. :)
 
willy said:
I'm just curious and would like to ask Clayman something . During the 5000 wagering in your competition Account you mention above, did you not check anytime to see how much you had wagered ?

Hi willy. Your presence here is always very welcome and much appreciated, at least by me.

I probably did not make myself clear. Prior to my most recent deposit in late Sep, I had wagered lifetime with Capt Cooks $5200 and made $400 in purchases thru July 2003. I did not play again until last month.
When I made my purchase and set up the bonus account for the first time, I assumed I was a non-VIP based on the terms of your website that seemed very clear and gave me no hint that it was merely a "guideline", as I now know. So when I made my purchase I was willing to do the wagering under the terms of being a non-VIP. So I was expecting to wager deposit*35+bonus*70+winnings-on-bonus*35.
It was only during the course of playing that I used your call-back to ask some questions on other matters. During the course of the conversation, the CSR told me I was a VIP. I asked him how he reconciled the definition on the website to my play but he did not know. Frankly, I didn't believe him until I got paid after completing the wagering under "VIP" terms. Of course it was a very pleasant surprise since it saved me $20,000 in wagering I was assuming I would be playing.

I really believe there are lots of players that actually read all the T&C, assume they are a non-VIP and wager accordingly, as I almost did myself except for the pure luck of an off-topic comment. I can only assume that is the way you want it.

I guess only you know the criteria that were applied to me to award me VIP status but, obviously wagering $5200 and purchasing $400 is alot less than wagering $50,000 and purchasing $600. If I e-mailed you guys would you be able to tell me when that status was bestowed upon me? Just curious. The CSR seemed to think if one made any purchase at all, as opposed to only using the free chip, he was a VIP because it shows a willingness to risk your own money.

Even today, after completing the most recent deal, I have wagered $7600 in my bonus account and $8700 in my real account lifetime. After my last purchase, I have now made only $500 in lifetime purchases.

Also I have never received an e-mail that mentions "VIP" in any way that I know of. Although most I delete quickly knowing the non-vip wagering requirements make most deals unplayable to me.

Personally I think Capt Cooks would be more of a "transparent" organisation if you just changed that one little area of your definition of a VIP. I'm not asking you to state exact criteria, quite the contrary. Since you can't now say "We will automatically inform you when you become a VIP", say something like, "Lots of our players become VIP's. E-mail us and ask." until your system actually works.

Your reliance on e-mail offers to inform players that they are a VIP seems a bit weak to me, especially since, now that I know I'm a VIP, none of the offers say they are for a VIP. When you think about why would they - it sounds as if the offers are open to all players but just that the wagering requirements differ depending on whether you are VIP or non-VIP.

BTW, I liked your bonus page. When I had played my bonus*35, it transferred the bonus and winnings no problem. I certainly couldn't figure out how it arrived at the allowed amount of transfer during the course of the deal and neither could the CSR. My best guess it was calculated the transfer based on 10X non-VIP terms. Not that I care because I could transfer all when I had wagered enough.

And I've always found your CS to be responsive and actually able to answer the question asked. Unlike so many other outfits that it's like they didn't even read your-email. I even like that you have no 800 number, figuring it saves you money you can pass on to the players!

Thanks for your time here.
 
willy said:
Arbster.....I'm stunned matey. "A couple of hours" to get back to you? Jeepers, this is not the music to my ears. Our crew are ever mindful of the task at hand ...and that is to provide prompt, excellent professional and curteous replies to inquiries from our valued Players. I would hope that you had encountered a speedier response than this as our player managment protocol provides for something more akin to 10 ( to 20) minutes.
Heh ... my expectations have been lowered by some of your counterparts in the industry.

It's probably fair to say that a couple of hours is the slowest response I've had from the casino side of the business - the poker side can be a little more "rickety" when the "poker gurus" are out. This probably tempered my estimate.
 
First of all, its nice to see Willy here for Cooks and all this conversation. Well done.

I would like to note that when I started this thread there was no complaint. I posted in another section and it was moved here. I posted a critque and a recommendation that recreational players shop around. This casino offers a poor deal.

I make this distinction between poor deal and dishonesty. I feel safe with Cook/Kingdom, I just dont know why anyone would play there. I do think they are walking a fine line as the bonus terms are not totally transparent.

Clayman said:

So, I guess my suggestion is that, before you deposit, just e-mail and ask them what your status is. You may likely discover that you are a VIP!

I tried that at Cook and Kingdom. At one I had received an offer that had VIP in the code. I emailed and asked if this meant I was VIP I received no answer. The other I just blindly asked and got a quick response. The CSR said I was close but unfortunately could not tell me how close. No transparency here.

Vesuvio said:

The Aztec Riches, Music Hall etc. group of casinos used to have a truly "evil" bonus account, which as well as having an enormous (and unstated) wagering requirement in the bonus account made you wager any "winnings" from there as well.

Aztec Riches was dishonest at that time and I dont use the word lightly. The fact is they would not tell a player how much of his winnings could transfer. And they could change the transfer rate at will. There is a good thread about this at SpearMaster.

But today, the bonus account is just fine. All terms are defined and they dont calculate wagering requirements on winnings. If someone else employs this god awful practice, please let me know. They deserve a bad critique as well. When this is done a player cannot really gage how much he will play there is loss of transparency.

Rifle said:

If you don't agree with the terms....or you feel cheated....don't spend your money.....it is as simple as that.

Which was the point of my post. This may be the worse terms of any MicroGaming Casino. Players who like to play without a bonus may enjoy the fine customer service. Otherwise, they shouldnt waste their time.

CasinoMeister said:

I second the notion. It's no more suspicious than long-time posters chiming in stating that they like CCC.

I think it is fair to look to motive. I note all these posters are involved in forums or a Webmaster so one wonders if they are related in some way or if they are defensive because of affiliate connections. It may surprise you that some affiliates are not as player oriented as you are and not as careful in applying standards.

It doesnt matter, though. The point they make that Cook/Kingdom has had very good customer service is not disputed and certainly a factor for a player to consider my own missing inquiry not withstanding.

Medusa said:

I hope this gets straightened out for all involved, I hate to see a casino I love get badmouthed, and I do understand the confusion of the player. Taking what's been said in this thread, maybe it will help all involved to work to get problems like this solved, and the fact that John has come here shows that he is interested in players opinions & problems.

John coming here is an outstanding reflection. I agree with you.

I dont know if the term bad mouthing applies. I think we have accurately described the practice. You and Clayman have accurately suggested that player status as VIP is hazy and hence the bonus terms also hazy. I think those are very good points and think constructive criticism is perhaps a better term.

Willy said:

One perception that needs to go to sleep is the idea that we have put wagering requirments on winnings. This is not the case, funds from Competition Accounts do not become winnings until wagering has been met.

This statement is a little Clintonesque. Winnings has a common meaning and we should stick to it here. When a player hits a royal flush he has won. When he completes his wagering requirements he can withdraw. What your casinos do is calculate those wagering requirements on the players winnings. If he hits a royal, he has to wager more a lot more.

As far as I know, you are the only casino that defines players wagering requirement based on how much he has won. I think my critique is fair as I think those comments commending you for discussing this and those praising your customer service are also fair. And I agree with those comments.

Imho,
Stanford.
 
Guys, sorry for the "first time posters" comment. I was in a bit of rush to go out so didn't have time to qualify it. It's great to have new posters and this board really is friendly and welcoming.

It did seem a bit of a strange coincidence to have three or four first time posters enthusiastically supporting a casino, but it probably is just a coincidence! (and I know that a lot of people out there have good reason to feel positive about Captain Cooks, myself included ;))
 
willy said:
One perception that needs to go to sleep is the idea that we have put wagering requirements on winnings. This is not the case, funds from Competition Accounts do not become winnings until wagering has been met.
Is this a deliberate attempt to confuse people, or be vague?
Where did 'Competition account' come from? What is it??? :confused:
There is a 'bonus' account, and a 'real' account. Or have you changed it in the last 3-4 weeks?
When I signed up recently, the T&C's definitely said I have to wager the amount transfered from my bonus to my real account x10 (or x35).
In other words, as many have said above, I had to meet WR on my winnings.
Your T&C's still say that today. So why are you posting that this is not the case?
:confused:
 
Is this a deliberate attempt to confuse people, or be vague?
Where did 'Competition account' come from? What is it???



I don't think John is trying to confuse people, I understand what he means by "competition" account, it is the same thing as "bonus account", just because he calls it something different does not mean he is being vague at all.

Maybe that is how the staff at the casino refer to the bonus account, I don't know but I do understand it is one and the same.

I come here all the time and never post either, but I did feel like I should say something here about the casino because I am a very happy customer.
 
willy said:
Arbster.....I'm stunned matey. "A couple of hours" to get back to you? Jeepers, this is not the music to my ears. Our crew are ever mindful of the task at hand ...and that is to provide prompt, excellent professional and curteous replies to inquiries from our valued Players. I would hope that you had encountered a speedier response than this as our player managment protocol provides for something more akin to 10 ( to 20) minutes. Perhaps ..it's possible that you may have had the misfortune of popping a question when I myself was on watch? I'm known to be considerably more rikkety on the keyboard than the bulk of our hardy Call Center crew members. I do try hard tho'.
JohnD,
Integrity Casinos


In the past this was certainly true. Last night I emailed support and I was surprise today that I still haven't heard from them! Oh well! I guess your 10 to 20 minutes translate to 12 hours or more for our time here on earth. :)
 
vixen said:
The other good thing about a bonus account is you can watch your casino play and see when you have met the wager requirement. I look for alot of Micro casinos to follow in this bonus account idea.
I am capable of following my play in my real account, I am also very happy with the bonus money in my real account, and I hope that this idea does not spread. I admit that it would be useful to have something in the cashier that shows how much WR you have.
 
GrandMaster said:
I am capable of following my play in my real account, I am also very happy with the bonus money in my real account, and I hope that this idea does not spread. I admit that it would be useful to have something in the cashier that shows how much WR you have.

I agree with all that! I don't like separate accounts and I too can keep track of my own wagered amount but if the cashier has something to show the exact WR done, that would be nice. :)

So please don't you dare make every MG casino use bonus account! :icon_evil
 
reply

I'm not certain that I'll be able to address all of the issues put to me but I'll do my derndest. Clayman, I'm unsure of protocols to follow here, but I'll certainly check into your mysteriously acquired VIP status for you. Rather than post my email address here, if at all possible, you could get it from Bryan or if you were to email The Captain and just request your email be forwarded to me....that would work also.
It's certainly not the case that any deposit that shows you are willing to risk your own funds(I think that's how it's described) qualifies a player as a VIP. We do have a formula for this process, but in some instances, particularly with older accounts, other factors could be taken into account at times. I know this is vague, but rest assured my friend, I will reply to your issue, to you personally, in detail ,when I am able to access the required information from your good self.(account number is good enough)
I have to own up to some "foreign emotion" at the suggestion of some deliberate deception on our part to trick players into wagering more than the required amount. Our VIP players are sent regular promotions and as mentioned earlier the promotions are coded to indicate that the email contains a VIP only invited promotion.
Certainly this is inadequite, we are , as stated ,working on automated systems to deal with this.Currently we invite all and sundry to email us as to their Player Status or if they feel that they are deserving for other reasons, of VIP status.


Stanford, thanks for your thoughts and insights as well. There is much from this "debate" that will be carried abroad and not the least some of your commentry. I'd like to challenge your opinions on the matter of winnings being the sum of amounts transferred from Competition to Deposit Accounts.This may or may not be a matter of terminology but the idea that we set wagering conditions based on how much a player has won is a largely overstated .I certainly agree with you Stanford, that "winnings" has a common meaning. But....why should we apply it here in the context alluded to? For some players (VIP's) credits transferred from Competition Accounts to Deposit Accounts are indeed a different entity to those transferred by non VIP players.The whole debate then turns back to if (or not) a player is a VIP. I'm not personally involved in our efforts to develop the entire Player Rating system, but I do defend our right to retain inbuilt protection from abuse of our generosity.
For the minority who don't yet have VIP status or who have not been classified as VIP Players for other reasons, to free any of these funds up for withdrawal from the Casino, it's a requirment that transferred funds are also factored into wagering. This effects only those who don't have VIP Player status.
It's a difficult concept, for some more than others, but Players who use our Competition Accounts and accept the benefits of these accounts are easily able to access information on what is required of them before you turn your credits into withdrawals.
I don't want to again defend our motives for structuring these accounts this way, I think everybody would have absorbed that info by now.
It's a different kind of challenge. We provide you with Casino funds to embark on the challenge and we set the terms and conditions required to be met prior to withdrawing . For us to provide this opportunity to our VIP players is not extraordinary.If however,we were to provide this opportunity to every player regardless of their history or motives for accepting Bonus funds from the casino ... would be a disaster.Within days we would be forced to withdraw our offer. The groups and individuals we are protecting ourselves from are organised and ruthless with their endeavours and the fact that every genuine player seeking entertainment with the possability of rewards... is effected by their behaviour is a reality.
The statment that there isn't a great advantage here for recreational players may well be true... unless that particular player wants to be the recipient of more than usual Bonus Credits on the small amount of deposits made, in which case, if they have no history with us they are required to provide said history before they are able to take full advantage of our Competition Accounts.This doesn't mean they can't and don't win ever.
As I said earlier, the system won't please everybody, the bulk of our players seem to be happy that we are at least directing some energies towards providing a better quality product for their enjoyment.
I didn't want to ramble here, I wanted to address your legitimate concerns. I hope I have done that.
Thanks again to you All
JohnD
Integrity Casinos
 
To Willy/John

Hi John,

Many thanks for coming here and exchanging ideas.

I'd like to challenge your opinions on the matter of winnings being the sum of amounts transferred from Competition to Deposit Accounts.This may or may not be a matter of terminology but the idea that we set wagering conditions based on how much a player has won is a largely overstated .I certainly agree with you Stanford, that "winnings" has a common meaning. But....why should we apply it here in the context alluded to?

You have to apply the common meaning because it makes no sense not to do that. That you segregate the bonus into a separate account is a distinction with limited difference. A win is still a win. With some casinos a win wont change the wagering requirement. However, with Cook a win in the bonus account does change the wagering requirements.

Let me tell you I speak from personal experience. I won in the bonus account, and then had a ton of wagering to do. It detracts from the enjoyment. Others here have had the same thing happen. The point of my post was to warn players so that they could play under better conditions. There are better conditions elsewhere.

For some players (VIP's) credits transferred from Competition Accounts to Deposit Accounts are indeed a different entity to those transferred by non VIP players.The whole debate then turns back to if (or not) a player is a VIP.

Sure. If we were all VIPs then it wouldnt matter. That doesnt alter my review however. I think you would agree with me that the system can be overly burdensome for a new player and consequently my conclusion that they play without the bonus or go elsewhere is justified.

I'm not personally involved in our efforts to develop the entire Player Rating system, but I do defend our right to retain inbuilt protection from abuse of our generosity.

If you have a program that increases your traffic substantially it will be because it has value. If it has value, some sophisticated player is going to figure out how to profit from it. You can make the bonus so burdensome that no sophisticated player will bother and you will also get fewer non-sophisticated players.

Players who use our Competition Accounts and accept the benefits of these accounts are easily able to access information on what is required of them before you turn your credits into withdrawals.

I agree. The point of my review was to highlight this burden because it is unique in the industry. And to point out that they should avoid such promotions in favor of promotions that dont penalize them for being lucky.

We provide you with Casino funds to embark on the challenge and we set the terms and conditions required to be met prior to withdrawing . For us to provide this opportunity to our VIP players is not extraordinary.If however,we were to provide this opportunity to every player regardless of their history or motives for accepting Bonus funds from the casino ... would be a disaster.Within days we would be forced to withdraw our offer. The groups and individuals we are protecting ourselves from are organised and ruthless with their endeavours and the fact that every genuine player seeking entertainment with the possability of rewards... is effected by their behaviour is a reality.

This isnt something we as players need to be concerned with. As I said in another thread, the Bellagio cost a lot of money to build. They build it to attract players. We as players are not concerned. Internet casinos dont have that plant cost but they have to attract players as well. They use various promotional systems. We as players should not be concerned that this is a cost to your business. There are many other places to play that have good customer service without assessing wagering requirements on winnings.

Having advised various businesses, I am however intrigued by the problem you pose. You have a mix problem. If you design your promotional system for maximum revenues, you will have leakage to sophisticated players. To maximize net revenues you will have some mix of tilt players, sophisticated players and all those in between. Maybe your VIP package gives you a good mix I have no idea. I cant imagine that your non VIP package does. I suspect you lose players.

I appreciate the exchange and wish others would join in a dialogue as you have done. I think some sophisticated players benefit you in ways you have not considered but that is a discussion for another time. I wish you good fortune.

Stanford.
 
reply

Hi again mate. From a player perspective, I certainly would be concerned that the behaviour of sections of the community were diminishing rewards and forcing a nigh rediculous metamorphosis on institutions where I sought entertainment and value. But that's me, I've certainly taken aboard some of the points you have made. In reality all of these type of issues are fully discussed and researched prior to any changes we make. I'm definatly a more enlightened character since partaking in this discussion tho'.
"With some casinos a win wont change the wagering requirement. However, with Cook a win in the bonus account does change the wagering requirements"
This is only the case for non VIP players, and to my mind the winning factor is relative. You may have bigger wagering requirments, but you still have a stack of credits won from a Bonus awarded to you. I think that in a lot of cases , there is actually a limit on how much you can withdraw from winnings with Bonus credits.
You say also that your review was educating players to the fact that there are better conditions to play under out there and to shop around. I certainly agree with this, not everybody is going to feel comfortable with even the idea of Competition Accounts. This is something we ourselves considered very seriously, but, to us, these accounts are a innovation....they are the platform for the main thrust of our Player comfort enhancment.All of the other features are still there, you don't have to utalise Competition Accounts, you can have one single account if that's the preference and still receive great Bonus rewards.
Of coarse this reduces the number and amount of promotions available to Players who choose this route, but we haven't had too many complaints yet regarding this. So.....it's really just another option, for our players to consider and chance their form on.
"Sure. If we were all VIPs then it wouldnt matter. That doesnt alter my review however. I think you would agree with me that the system can be overly burdensome for a new player and consequently my conclusion that they play without the bonus or go elsewhere is justified"
You do make some very good points my friend, I feel tho', that there's a tendency at times to make a killer concluding statment,without considering the full detail of the preceeding statments. Because the system may be burdensome for a new player initially, to me, doesn't mean that in the long run they won't be recipient of the ultimate benifits of that system and should not persevere and ask the necessary questions.
The best indicater, I feel, is exactly as you say, "if the systen has any value, it will increase traffic to our sites.
I mean no disrespect with my ruminations (above), people would be crazy to ignore the voice of experienced respected reviewers, of coarse I'd much prefer that yours was a glowing full tilt tribute to our endeavours, but I'm still happy with where we stand right now, you have allowed my responses to your concerns, there has been a great no vitriol discussion and anybody with any concerns remaining is still able to seek and receive answers.
Thanks to you all again.
JohnD
Integrity Casinos
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top