What you have said is completely true. I self excluded following a gambling spree after some personal problems. Without going into too much detail I lost my mum and we were very close (I am an only child) and I was never a drinker/smoker/drug user so I went online and started playing(in a way I don't really want to put this as I don't want people feeling sorry or sympathetic towards me as everyone goes through losses - I am just explaining my actions as some people seem to think it is fishy) I then saw that it was getting addictive so I self excluded from as many online casinos as possible. I thought that I would then be protected for the maximum period (5 years) and after this I would have forgot about playing anyway. A few months later, me and my partner split up and then to try and divert my thoughts and attention I had a lapse and managed to open an account (after it was blocked and then I was invited back to play). Of course i may have had a little problem but it was compulsive as on both occasions I stopped straight away. I have all my bank statements for the past 10 years if any court wanted to check them to see that I haven't gambled all my life or every day/week for several years. There was a little flirt with it so I thought I would be responsible and self exclude. There was a gap for the reasons I have explained and the reason why I did not raise a complaint straight away is what you have said - I didn't know the rules and regulations until it came up in conversation with a friend of mine who had the knowledge. That's why there is a gap. And this is the genuine reason. Whether people believe it or not is another thing and it is all based on opinion. The emails I have are facts however. It's nice to know that there are people on here who actually consider the facts rather than presume it was done in bad faith!
do not let people get in your head.
and specially the ones so righteous the they like to throw the first stone cause they think they know better.