external image

New Slot Announcement Bonanza by Big Time Gaming

Not sure how people can think Bonanza is high variance, it's really quite low. What it does have is potential to give some huge wins but their effect on rtp is tiny since they are so rare. Almost all of the rtp comes from small to medium wins, there is a reason people choose to play this game for wagering.
Dunno about that. Bonanza gives lots of small wins but still drains your balance to feed the bonus (which never comes).

DOA also spits out lots of small wins and I wouldn't call that low variance either :cool:
 
Last edited:
Read our BTG review and find out where to play BTG slots
The difference is the really big wins on DoA come a LOT more often than on Bonanza so they make up a much larger portion of the RTP. I just think a lot of the complaints about this game come down to people expecting it to be something it isn't. If you play it expecting it to be a nice high variance slot that will quite 'often' give 1000x wins, you will get frustrated because they pretty much don't happen. It's pretty much Starburst with a progressive jackpot, low variance base game and even most bonuses are in the 5-100x range, it's just that it has potential to pay ridiculous amounts.
 
Just hit this, gold at 117,000 ways and of course missing 1 diamond to boot! Also no balance left so on min bet.:rolleyes:

cold.webp
 
Here's my take on Bonanza.

PLEASE NOTE - There is a commentary maths error at 26m57s and 28m11s, the correct figure is £9,600,000 and not £9,960,000. I only noticed this after I'd finished editing the video together, rendered it out, and kicked off the upload. (Small sherries had been consumed at the time of filming.)



Great vid Choppers. But then again, I expected nothing less. :thumbsup:

I would love to see your video takes on the other BTG games. They would make for great viewing.
 
28 spins to see the D this morning :eek2:
Was on 12x with 5 spins left, then.......
5 dead spins.
92x bet win.
Oh how you toil and suffer JD.

The other day I lost count of how many sets of 100 spins I done on autoplay, but I'd estimate about 1700. With over £120 lost on minimum bets too, I gave up in the end cos it was going to go on all night otherwise.

So I'll light a candle and say a prayer for your 5 lost free spins :p
 
Well Last night was a odd one. After 2356 spins without a D it dropped, Not a biggy x66.6 (yep that 666 as arrived again) But it was what happened next that makes Bonanza the game it really is.
Spin 1 Gold = X126.3
Spin 2 Gol
Spin 3 Gold = X73
Spin 4 Gold =x724

So 5 spins 4 golds Unreal on a slot that hardly shows a D
 
Well Last night was a odd one. After 2356 spins without a D it dropped, Not a biggy x66.6 (yep that 666 as arrived again) But it was what happened next that makes Bonanza the game it really is.
Spin 1 Gold = X126.3
Spin 2 Gol
Spin 3 Gold = X73
Spin 4 Gold =x724

So 5 spins 4 golds Unreal on a slot that hardly shows a D
Nice 1 but there you have it the best proof I have ever seen that slots are not random.Given the accumulative odds of that happening would be harder than impossible to achieve.
 
Well Last night was a odd one. After 2356 spins without a D it dropped, Not a biggy x66.6 (yep that 666 as arrived again) But it was what happened next that makes Bonanza the game it really is.
Spin 1 Gold = X126.3
Spin 2 Gol
Spin 3 Gold = X73
Spin 4 Gold =x724

So 5 spins 4 golds Unreal on a slot that hardly shows a D

Now it will cost you 8000 spins until you see the D
 
Good thing about last 2 nights on this slot, is i finally put a deposit limit on all my accounts.

Max £20 a day. Worse thing about this game is the ease of constantly redepositing over and over without realising those £5 deposits soon total up to 100+
 
Oh how you toil and suffer JD.

The other day I lost count of how many sets of 100 spins I done on autoplay, but I'd estimate about 1700. With over £120 lost on minimum bets too, I gave up in the end cos it was going to go on all night otherwise.

So I'll light a candle and say a prayer for your 5 lost free spins :p


This is the weird thing I can't grasp with this slot. If I play any other slot all night it is IMPOSSIBLE not to trigger a bonus. But this game it feels like it targets certain accounts. I had one two days ago I had it running in background for like 12 hours straight, I triggered about one bonus in 6 hours, then pop on here and see people triggering bonuses galore. I know it sounds bat shit crazy but I swear their are certain days you can play this till you drop dead and it won't chuck a bonus at you. And like you, you can easily lose 100/200 at min stakes at min deposit before nights over. The randomness doesn't feel random and when you do have a ok win(god forbid) it turns off like a light switch.

Also people say the base game is great, it is and can be, but what they fail to mention is 100 spins later it can take 70% of that win and put you right back at same spot, and thats another running theme.

£1 balance win upto £12 back down to £4 back upto £18....now you think oh nice a decent balance at min stakes to hit a bonus round...........200 spins later its gone!
 
Nice 1 but there you have it the best proof I have ever seen that slots are not random.Given the accumulative odds of that happening would be harder than impossible to achieve.

That's about the dumbest thing you've said in this thread. And it beats out a lot of stiff competition. 4 bonuses in the space of 5 spins is about as random as it gets.
 
Here's my take on Bonanza.

PLEASE NOTE - There is a commentary maths error at 26m57s and 28m11s, the correct figure is £9,600,000 and not £9,960,000. I only noticed this after I'd finished editing the video together, rendered it out, and kicked off the upload. (Small sherries had been consumed at the time of filming.)


Try Danger High Voltage much better
 
That's about the dumbest thing you've said in this thread. And it beats out a lot of stiff competition. 4 bonuses in the space of 5 spins is about as random as it gets.

i Dont think its dumb at all , lets see the odds of this happening , penny for your thoughts , compensated rings a bell here.
 
The difference is the really big wins on DoA come a LOT more often than on Bonanza so they make up a much larger portion of the RTP. I just think a lot of the complaints about this game come down to people expecting it to be something it isn't. If you play it expecting it to be a nice high variance slot that will quite 'often' give 1000x wins, you will get frustrated because they pretty much don't happen. It's pretty much Starburst with a progressive jackpot, low variance base game and even most bonuses are in the 5-100x range, it's just that it has potential to pay ridiculous amounts.

The way I see it:

DoA is a low variance base game with a bonus that pays either nothing or everything, with medium wins in fs being almost as rare as the really big wins.
Bonanza is a low variance base game with a bonus that pays nothing to everything and anything in between, with medium wins being significantly more common than really big wins.
Obviously all those medium wins in Bonanza have to be paid for somehow and that happens at the expense of the frequency for really big wins.
So where DoA may throw up a really big win every 150000 spins Bananza will only do so once every 50 million spins.
(yes I made up that 150000 and 50 million on the spot to illustrate a point)
 
I always seemed to get the bonus rounds in close succession when the wins were not worth the bother, got two retriggers the last time I played making for 22 spins and most of them were dead - what is the point?

I am absolutely baffled by my game play on Videoslots, thousands and thousands of spins on Bonanza since the start of December and not once have I managed to get above my starting balance - ok I know I don't do well there at the best of times but this, for me, has to be the worst result ever across any site :(
 
Last edited:
I always seemed to get the bonus rounds in close succession when the wins were not worth the bother, got two retriggers the last time I played making for 22 spins and most of them were dead - what is the point?

I am absolutely baffled by my game play on Videoslots, thousands and thousands of spins on Bonanza since the start of December and not once have I managed to get above my starting balance - ok I know I don't do well there at the best of times but this, for me, has to be the worst result ever across any site :(
I think Videoslots need to send you a Bonanza shirt, signed by Dan and the team. It's only fair :cool:
 
OK, I'll try to be as neutral as possible. :D

As you all know I have been playing this slot very regularly and had both, great times and bad times and as well as the real ugly times.

However, we seem to be all fixated on the statement from BTG that bonus rounds happen on average 1x in 450 spins only because they pay on average over 100x bet. Hence, we do expect that every bonus round should go up to x20 multiplier and produce some big wins leading to a daily killer screenshot.

But what we forget and to keep the maths simple, if one bonus round ends with a 1,000x bet win that means there have to be 10 rounds with very low results. Nothing different as with other slots. How many times have we gone 500+ spins on DOA, TS2, IR or other favorites without a bonus round and then finally hitting it only to be served a 2x - 5x bet "win".

I don't have access to the details how the RTP is distributed on BTG slots, only got Netent sheets. e.g. to keep it comparable I took NRVNA which has as well only Free Spins plus rather high base game pays and no other features just like Bonanza.

Capture 1206.webp


Please remember, that this is the theoretical distribution which has been established by the math model and probably a few billion test spins. Deviations in both directions are absolutely normal, otherwise it wouldn't be a random game.

Hence, it doesn't ring any alarms when I see somebody doing 1,000 spins on Bonanza and ends up with a 73% RTP or has a few bonus rounds in succession with measly returns far below 100x bet. I had those periods too, just like anyone else.

Meanwhile, I have restarted more than half a dozen times the trophies for Bonanza at VS, plus hammered it considerably at Rizk and Betat, yet I do not see any big difference to other slots. In contrary, I get more often longer sessions with my balance on Bonanza, even without a bonus round, than on other slots, e.g. BoD or DOA.

Bonanza can be a beast or an ATM in a matter of hours and the long waiting time for a bonus round is designed to appeal on the gambler's mind, e.g. "I played it so long, it must hit now soon". Hence, we are chasing that GOLD with a vengeance, only to be mostly deeply disappointed and then come onto CM to vent our frustration. Myself, I went in excess of 3,500 spins once to hit the bonus round, losing a ton in the process and getting a meager return after the 12 spins finished rather quickly.

Getting hooked up on that GOLD is dangerous and anyone prone to that should set a limit of spins before leaving the game and trying their luck on another slot, damn'it VS has over 2,000 available, yet we all stick to maybe 10 - 12 all the time, whereas 2 - 3 from those are getting the main share. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Well I always said if things didn't improve by the end of March I would hang up my slotting hat for good and that is exactly what I have done.

Yes, I had two wins amounting to £343 in months of play, £100 back out in comps and to Glassheart and the slots have become dead for me again - I even tried new ones I had never played before but all I got was dead spins so it's time to call it a day for me so there will be no more chasing Bonanza, or any other slot come to that.
 
I do agree the allure of the GOLD is what gets people chasing, I simply believe from experience playing this game with a typical low roller balance is foolhardy.

There's a popular myth that the base game sustains small balances, that is completely detached from reality. You'll lose £20 on it, think "Hmmm, this is unlike Bonanza", redeposit another five or six times and still not guarantee a bonus.

I don't believe there to be anything remotely natural about the flow of the gameplay, and this includes those one in twenty strangely good sessions where the bonuses won't stop. Still, the amount of times I've obtained a high multiplier with 8-10 spins left, only to see them all fall flat is unreal.

That's not to say you can't ever have a holly jolly time on it from time to time, by golly when that happens drop everything because it might not happen again for a while. It's just that if you were to look up the word 'compensated', you'd have a picture of a gold D staring back at you :cool:
 
The figures for base game/bonus round RTP distribution were posted here - My online slots videos (plus UK AWPs)

It's 74% in the base game and just 22% in the bonus rounds. (So the illustrative figures Harry used above are pretty much bang on! :) )

There are quite a few other comments in that thread about the slot that folks may find useful. I also had several people leave comments on my Bonanza video on YouTube to say that they successfully use the slot for meeting WRs as so much of the RTP is in the base game, but you still have a chance of hitting something big in a bonus round.

Honestly, I'd consider using the slot to grind a WR myself. (Although IMO that's about all it's good for as I find it so boring to play.) 96% RTP is solid, there's a lot of RTP in the base game, and the bonus rounds can hit big. (I had an 818x stake a couple of nights ago. Screenshot and video in the April 2008 Winners Screenshots thread.)
 
Don't think I've ever observed or heard both DOA and Bonanza described as low variance twice in one week.

I need to lie down for a bit.

Simple logic behind it:

Even when in a very foul mood both DoA and Bonanza usually still spit out a base game RTP of 50%+, which is why I call them low variance
What I call high variance is something like Book of Dead, when that is in a foul mood the base game RTP easily drops to the wrong side of 20%.
 
Simple logic behind it:

Even when in a very foul mood both DoA and Bonanza usually still spit out a base game RTP of 50%+, which is why I call them low variance
What I call high variance is something like Book of Dead, when that is in a foul mood the base game RTP easily drops to the wrong side of 20%.
I don't know about calling 50% low variance. Medium to high, still.

Comparatively, BoD is just very high variance.
 
I've been playing Bonanza, DOA and Reactoonz/Multifruit81 nearly solely since the start of the year. 1000x pluses on the last two several times but barely, if any, on Bonanza. I like playing it so i will continue to do so but i'm really not convinced personally of it - the fact that people are ecstatic to hit 500 x sometimes tells a story. Maybe we all just expect more in life in general ;)
 
i Dont think its dumb at all , lets see the odds of this happening , penny for your thoughts , compensated rings a bell here.

Well I do not agree with that. I think it is nothing more than a case of a VERY, VERY freakish super-rare sequence of events rather than being a "sign" that it is a compensated slot. I will 100% accept that the sequence that Lincoln experienced is extremely unlikely/extremely improbable.

But is it IMPOSSIBLE? NO.

For me, Bonanza is just the latest in a long line of medium to high variance slots that can demonstrate an extremely volatile range of results.
I do not believe for one second that Bonanza is compensated. Because if I did, I would stop playing it in a heartbeat.

If you want to agree with snorky's point of view, then that's fine. I have no problem with that.

But I point blank refuse to buy into this BS narrative that he seems determined to shove down our throats at literally every opportunity.
He used the words "the best proof that I have ever seen that slots are not random". Well I don't see any "proof".
All I see is the latest insinuation (or should I say "theory"? :laugh:) made by a paranoid, top-tier tinfoiler and sore loser who needs to point the finger of blame at someone, anyone, for his numerous sub-optimal, losing Bonanza experiences. And what's it based on?
Mere "gut feelings" and perhaps more importantly, frustration at his ever-increasing quantity of losing sessions.
Yeah, we can always depend on a frustrated, losing player to provide an objective analysis, can't we? :rolleyes:

I'm not EVER going to take seriously the utter drivel that comes from someone who, in this thread alone, has said he...

- thinks the game is rigged
- thinks the game is broken
- thinks the game is compensated
- thinks the game is "unfair" (ie "not letting him win")
- thinks the game is undeserving of being passed as fair and legitimate
- thinks the game has been changed because he hasn't hit 250x in over a month and only had two plus fives in that month (yeah that one really made me laugh - oh I haven't hit anything decent in a month, so it must be rigged/changed yeah? And since when does getting a plus five actually carry that much importance anyway, given that some people see it as more of a bad sign of things to come than a good one?)
- thinks the game had its maths checked post-testing by fucking Stevie Wonder
- thinks the game is clearly not random

and yet, while thinking all of the above THEN also decides to do the following (these are frankly the two cherries on the top of this tinfoiling cake)....

- suggest there is something "well dodgy" about a slot, then goes ahead and plays it with his own money!
- suggest that we should all boycott the game, then promptly goes ahead and plays it himself!

In all seriousness, WHO in their right mind would say ALL OF THE ABOVE about ANY slot and then CONTINUE to play the damn thing?
Someone please tell me, I'd really like to know.

It's getting beyond the joke now. Every time I read one of his posts, I find myself laughing my arse off at the sheer stupidity of them.
Tinfoil hatter? Jesus Christ, he hasn't only got the tinfoil hat, he's got the tinfoil tie, tinfoil shirt, tinfoil shoes and tinfoil three-piece suit to go with it.
I'll give him this much, at least he wears them with pride.

And this person thinks he is qualified to pass off his numerous theories and opinions as FACTS?
Gimme a break, for crying out loud. All I see are a collection of mini-rants from a problem gambler who lacks the maturity to accept his losses and the willpower to stay away from a game that he thinks is more bent than a nine bob note.

Frankly, it's getting beyond pathetic.
 
I always seemed to get the bonus rounds in close succession when the wins were not worth the bother, got two retriggers the last time I played making for 22 spins and most of them were dead - what is the point?

I am absolutely baffled by my game play on Videoslots, thousands and thousands of spins on Bonanza since the start of December and not once have I managed to get above my starting balance - ok I know I don't do well there at the best of times but this, for me, has to be the worst result ever across any site :(
I have the same problem at slots millions every deposit chewed up in minutes.No bonus rounds hardly(if I get 1 it pays x10 or less)I have given up on them after checking deposit history.Just lately though all my bonus rounds anywhere seem to be ridiculously low.I had 4 scatters on BoaW last night and it paid X1.5!!!!!!!Ten or so spins later triggered it again(3 scatters)thought I might get some compensation only for it to pay x4.Really starting wonder if it's worth bothering.
 
Think you're being harsh on him Mcgameboy. One of reasons I have stopped(again), is becuase it feels like it's a slot you put funds in then pays you so much back after a while. I might be wrong
Well I do not agree with that. I think it is nothing more than a case of a VERY, VERY freakish super-rare sequence of events rather than being a "sign" that it is a compensated slot. I will 100% accept that the sequence that Lincoln experienced is extremely unlikely/extremely improbable.

But is it IMPOSSIBLE? NO.

For me, Bonanza is just the latest in a long line of medium to high variance slots that can demonstrate an extremely volatile range of results.
I do not believe for one second that Bonanza is compensated. Because if I did, I would stop playing it in a heartbeat.

If you want to agree with snorky's point of view, then that's fine. I have no problem with that.

But I point blank refuse to buy into this BS narrative that he seems determined to shove down our throats at literally every opportunity.
He used the words "the best proof that I have ever seen that slots are not random". Well I don't see any "proof".
All I see is the latest insinuation (or should I say "theory"? :laugh:) made by a paranoid, top-tier tinfoiler and sore loser who needs to point the finger of blame at someone, anyone, for his numerous sub-optimal, losing Bonanza experiences. And what's it based on?
Mere "gut feelings" and perhaps more importantly, frustration at his ever-increasing quantity of losing sessions.
Yeah, we can always depend on a frustrated, losing player to provide an objective analysis, can't we? :rolleyes:

I'm not EVER going to take seriously the utter drivel that comes from someone who, in this thread alone, has said he...

- thinks the game is rigged
- thinks the game is broken
- thinks the game is compensated
- thinks the game is "unfair" (ie "not letting him win")
- thinks the game is undeserving of being passed as fair and legitimate
- thinks the game has been changed because he hasn't hit 250x in over a month and only had two plus fives in that month (yeah that one really made me laugh - oh I haven't hit anything decent in a month, so it must be rigged/changed yeah? And since when does getting a plus five actually carry that much importance anyway, given that some people see it as more of a bad sign of things to come than a good one?)
- thinks the game had its maths checked post-testing by fucking Stevie Wonder
- thinks the game is clearly not random

and yet, while thinking all of the above THEN also decides to do the following (these are frankly the two cherries on the top of this tinfoiling cake)....

- suggest there is something "well dodgy" about a slot, then goes ahead and plays it with his own money!
- suggest that we should all boycott the game, then promptly goes ahead and plays it himself!

In all seriousness, WHO in their right mind would say ALL OF THE ABOVE about ANY slot and then CONTINUE to play the damn thing?
Someone please tell me, I'd really like to know.

It's getting beyond the joke now. Every time I read one of his posts, I find myself laughing my arse off at the sheer stupidity of them.
Tinfoil hatter? Jesus Christ, he hasn't only got the tinfoil hat, he's got the tinfoil tie, tinfoil shirt, tinfoil shoes and tinfoil three-piece suit to go with it.
I'll give him this much, at least he wears them with pride.

And this person thinks he is qualified to pass off his numerous theories and opinions as FACTS?
Gimme a break, for crying out loud. All I see are a collection of mini-rants from a problem gambler who lacks the maturity to accept his losses and the willpower to stay away from a game that he thinks is more bent than a nine bob note.

Frankly, it's getting beyond pathetic.

Given the abuse and aggression in this post, I think it's you who has the issues not Snorky.
 
Well I do not agree with that. I think it is nothing more than a case of a VERY, VERY freakish super-rare sequence of events rather than being a "sign" that it is a compensated slot. I will 100% accept that the sequence that Lincoln experienced is extremely unlikely/extremely improbable.

But is it IMPOSSIBLE? NO.

For me, Bonanza is just the latest in a long line of medium to high variance slots that can demonstrate an extremely volatile range of results.
I do not believe for one second that Bonanza is compensated. Because if I did, I would stop playing it in a heartbeat.

If you want to agree with snorky's point of view, then that's fine. I have no problem with that.

But I point blank refuse to buy into this BS narrative that he seems determined to shove down our throats at literally every opportunity.
He used the words "the best proof that I have ever seen that slots are not random". Well I don't see any "proof".
All I see is the latest insinuation (or should I say "theory"? :laugh:) made by a paranoid, top-tier tinfoiler and sore loser who needs to point the finger of blame at someone, anyone, for his numerous sub-optimal, losing Bonanza experiences. And what's it based on?
Mere "gut feelings" and perhaps more importantly, frustration at his ever-increasing quantity of losing sessions.
Yeah, we can always depend on a frustrated, losing player to provide an objective analysis, can't we? :rolleyes:

I'm not EVER going to take seriously the utter drivel that comes from someone who, in this thread alone, has said he...

- thinks the game is rigged
- thinks the game is broken
- thinks the game is compensated
- thinks the game is "unfair" (ie "not letting him win")
- thinks the game is undeserving of being passed as fair and legitimate
- thinks the game has been changed because he hasn't hit 250x in over a month and only had two plus fives in that month (yeah that one really made me laugh - oh I haven't hit anything decent in a month, so it must be rigged/changed yeah? And since when does getting a plus five actually carry that much importance anyway, given that some people see it as more of a bad sign of things to come than a good one?)
- thinks the game had its maths checked post-testing by fucking Stevie Wonder
- thinks the game is clearly not random

and yet, while thinking all of the above THEN also decides to do the following (these are frankly the two cherries on the top of this tinfoiling cake)....

- suggest there is something "well dodgy" about a slot, then goes ahead and plays it with his own money!
- suggest that we should all boycott the game, then promptly goes ahead and plays it himself!

In all seriousness, WHO in their right mind would say ALL OF THE ABOVE about ANY slot and then CONTINUE to play the damn thing?
Someone please tell me, I'd really like to know.

It's getting beyond the joke now. Every time I read one of his posts, I find myself laughing my arse off at the sheer stupidity of them.
Tinfoil hatter? Jesus Christ, he hasn't only got the tinfoil hat, he's got the tinfoil tie, tinfoil shirt, tinfoil shoes and tinfoil three-piece suit to go with it.
I'll give him this much, at least he wears them with pride.

And this person thinks he is qualified to pass off his numerous theories and opinions as FACTS?
Gimme a break, for crying out loud. All I see are a collection of mini-rants from a problem gambler who lacks the maturity to accept his losses and the willpower to stay away from a game that he thinks is more bent than a nine bob note.

Frankly, it's getting beyond pathetic.
Thank you for your reply.Just wondered if you could be a bit more specific as I am not sure if you agree with me or not.
 
I think it's only fair to question the validity of this slot, especially given how players are told to shut up and carry on at every turn.

Bonanza is a simple case of players noticing very strange re-occurences, and them simply calling it out. No one's imagining the constant losses on it.

Most do give it the benefit of the doubt, only to end up seeing the slot for what it is. A glorified AWP :cool:
 
I have played Bonanza a lot and am probably way down on on it,but never have I felt it was rigged.It is full of randomness,
I never know if It going to give me a run for the money, crucify me or drop the big one.
White Rabbit on the other hand feels very rigged but not compensated.
 
oh dear i only asked for a penny worth of thoughts not a pounds worth :laugh: mcgameboy :thumbsup:

Upshot is i don't play the game that often , but you know what when some classic players here say there is something not right about i do listen i listen to many members these guys have gone with great lengths & found the slot to be lacking.

I to be fair couldn't really give a toss about the game, but im not going to slam these players what moan about it either , i still don't see why his question was dumb , i shall bow out of bothering to waste my time on typing in future ) :cheers:

Ps what you don't like that i said compensated slot , it won't be the first time neither the last this has been done ! most slots came from this to start with , whos to say servers do not work like this.
 
Since Mcgameboy states it's not rigged or a compensated slot, and the rest of us are dumb and addicts to think otherwise. I will go back to playing it now.........well when my deposit limits reset in 4 weeks :laugh::laugh::laugh:
The worst part being, with all of those points raised, I've done all of them over the last 200 pages myself :laugh:

:oops:
 
Last edited:
Brutal raping on this slot last two weeks.

£6000 down (william hill) playing at £5 / £10 / £20 stakes.

Indeed it took and I am not joking £2000 of deposits to trigger the first bonus.
This paid me back about £1500, so "only" about £500 down! That is when I should of walked.

The chase / greed factor then kicked in, It then paid another bonus pretty quickly on a £10 stake which paid a paltry £300.
I continued to play at tilt stakes and it sucked approx £4000 of me, It did give a bonus on £5 which paid minimal about £150.

I closed the game down and set a deposit limit in place.

Went to slots million, £4000 yes £4000 total deposits, high stakes again £5 / £10 / £20 stakes.

It took again £2000 approx to get a bonus (£5 stake) it paid peanuts.
I upped the bet to £10, the bonus dropped pretty quickly after the first about 20 spins (this paid about £800.

So from being overall up about £8000 on different sites, it has sucked it all back.

Moral is for me, when your ahead or well ahead as I was, walk run take the money get the bloody hell off it (it remembers dont you know)

IP address tracking / winning too much / email address / username / etc etc etc.

Of course, all tinfoil / conspiracy theories..................
 
Brutal raping on this slot last two weeks.

£6000 down (william hill) playing at £5 / £10 / £20 stakes.

Indeed it took and I am not joking £2000 of deposits to trigger the first bonus.
This paid me back about £1500, so "only" about £500 down! That is when I should of walked.

The chase / greed factor then kicked in, It then paid another bonus pretty quickly on a £10 stake which paid a paltry £300.
I continued to play at tilt stakes and it sucked approx £4000 of me, It did give a bonus on £5 which paid minimal about £150.

I closed the game down and set a deposit limit in place.

Went to slots million, £4000 yes £4000 total deposits, high stakes again £5 / £10 / £20 stakes.

It took again £2000 approx to get a bonus (£5 stake) it paid peanuts.
I upped the bet to £10, the bonus dropped pretty quickly after the first about 20 spins (this paid about £800.

So from being overall up about £8000 on different sites, it has sucked it all back.

Moral is for me, when your ahead or well ahead as I was, walk run take the money get the bloody hell off it (it remembers dont you know)

IP address tracking / winning too much / email address / username / etc etc etc.

Of course, all tinfoil / conspiracy theories..................
Given the fact you can easily wait 1000 spins and more for the feature you actually triggered it relatively quickly.Blows your mind to think at an average of your stakes that could be in the region of £12,000 before it triggers.NOT for the faint hearted.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Accredited Casinos

    Read about our rating system and how it's done.
    Back
    Top