Well I do not agree with that. I think it is nothing more than a case of a VERY, VERY freakish super-rare sequence of events rather than being a "sign" that it is a compensated slot. I will 100% accept that the sequence that Lincoln experienced is extremely unlikely/extremely improbable.
But is it IMPOSSIBLE? NO.
For me, Bonanza is just the latest in a long line of medium to high variance slots that can demonstrate an extremely volatile range of results.
I do not believe for one second that Bonanza is compensated. Because if I did, I would stop playing it in a heartbeat.
If you want to agree with snorky's point of view, then that's fine. I have no problem with that.
But I point blank refuse to buy into this BS narrative that he seems determined to shove down our throats at literally every opportunity.
He used the words "the best
proof that I have ever seen that slots are not random". Well I don't see any "proof".
All I see is the latest insinuation (or should I say "theory"?
) made by a paranoid, top-tier tinfoiler and sore loser who needs to point the finger of blame at someone, anyone, for his numerous sub-optimal, losing Bonanza experiences. And what's it based on?
Mere "gut feelings" and perhaps more importantly, frustration at his ever-increasing quantity of losing sessions.
Yeah, we can always depend on a frustrated, losing player to provide an objective analysis, can't we?
I'm not EVER going to take seriously the utter drivel that comes from someone who, in this thread alone, has said he...
- thinks the game is rigged
- thinks the game is broken
- thinks the game is compensated
- thinks the game is "unfair" (ie "not letting him win")
- thinks the game is undeserving of being passed as fair and legitimate
- thinks the game has been changed because he hasn't hit 250x in over a month and only had two plus fives in that month (yeah that one really made me laugh - oh I haven't hit anything decent in a month, so it must be rigged/changed yeah? And since when does getting a plus five actually carry that much importance anyway, given that some people see it as more of a bad sign of things to come than a good one?)
- thinks the game had its maths checked post-testing by fucking Stevie Wonder
- thinks the game is clearly not random
and yet, while thinking
all of the above THEN also decides to do the following (these are frankly the two cherries on the top of this tinfoiling cake)....
- suggest there is something "well dodgy" about a slot, then goes ahead and plays it with his own money!
- suggest that we should all boycott the game, then promptly goes ahead and plays it himself!
In all seriousness, WHO in their right mind would say ALL OF THE ABOVE about ANY slot and then CONTINUE to play the damn thing?
Someone please tell me, I'd really like to know.
It's getting beyond the joke now. Every time I read one of his posts, I find myself laughing my arse off at the sheer stupidity of them.
Tinfoil hatter? Jesus Christ, he hasn't only got the tinfoil hat, he's got the tinfoil tie, tinfoil shirt, tinfoil shoes and tinfoil three-piece suit to go with it.
I'll give him this much, at least he wears them with pride.
And this person thinks he is qualified to pass off his numerous theories and opinions as FACTS?
Gimme a break, for crying out loud. All I see are a collection of mini-rants from a problem gambler who lacks the maturity to accept his losses and the willpower to stay away from a game that he thinks is more bent than a nine bob note.
Frankly, it's getting beyond pathetic.