New Slot Announcement Big Time Gaming - Who Wants To Be A Millionaire

Big Time Gaming is reviewed by Casinomeister - read our review and comment here in this forum thread.
might as well have 25% on every button if correct button to press could have written on it 1% and without being able to reverse the game state to go on an choose the 1% 'correct answer' we are stepping backwards into the old 1-12 awp higher or lower techniques .

With extra chilli in your mind it is 50/50 i might win i might lose but ill gamble it . This slot appears to be trying to give you an edge that doesn't exist . I'd like to see someone - perhaps @dunover - could do a video and see how many times selecting the 3rd highest % chance wins the gamble ? would be interesting to see how many times it tells you the highest % was the winner when not selected .
 
Here we go... Another "not random" post from someone who clearly doesn't understand how they work.

The bonuses won't be predetermined because they can have no idea whether you will gamble or not...


But don't forget Trance these slots can read your mind - they are like cars which adjust automatically the OBC to your driving style. The game will change the pool of RNG outcomes accordingly as it 'gets to know you'.....;) and that's even without the input from your MAC address.
 
Utter crap trance you know it !
bollocks are any online games 100% random, you mean now you producer's can hide behind billions of spins. It gives you somewhere tp hide. Every game if you play it long enough shows patterns & maths which are exact, that cannot be random.

Average bonuses can be produced so no need for it to know wether your going to gamble or not.

Of course it needs to know if you're going to gamble... And no I am not getting involved with another rigged debate with someone who quite clearly wouldn't change their mind even if categorical evidence were placed in front of them. Plus there are so many other threads like this ...

You can love or hate the game... But one thing BTG can't afford to do is anything dodgy. The spotlight is on them .... They certainly won't be doing anything underhand...
 
might as well have 25% on every button if correct button to press could have written on it 1% and without being able to reverse the game state to go on an choose the 1% 'correct answer' we are stepping backwards into the old 1-12 awp higher or lower techniques .

With extra chilli in your mind it is 50/50 i might win i might lose but ill gamble it . This slot appears to be trying to give you an edge that doesn't exist . I'd like to see someone - perhaps @dunover - could do a video and see how many times selecting the 3rd highest % chance wins the gamble ? would be interesting to see how many times it tells you the highest % was the winner when not selected .

My guess is that the chance they are showing you is the actual chance of that selection being correct. I can't see how else this would have been certified.
 
But don't forget Trance these slots can read your mind - they are like cars which adjust automatically the OBC to your driving style. The game will change the pool of RNG outcomes accordingly as it 'gets to know you'.....;) and that's even without the input from your MAC address.

I swear to God slots know when I go for a shit and leave them on autoplay... Never seem to come back to a feature ..
 
My guess is that the chance they are showing you is the actual chance of that selection being correct. I can't see how else this would have been certified.

It is going to really mess with people and their state of mind . appears to me that they didn't really know what to do with replacing questions and selecting an answer for the gamble and what to do with the lifelines - a gambler is likely to ignore low % numbers and click on the higher % number . might as well just have said "select an answer" "a , b , c or d" and not take a persons eye away from the possibility of selecting a different answer than the one you're saying is the better choice .

if that makes sense . it's entirely random but guess what ? we are going to stick some numbers in there that make you think you might be making a better choice :laugh:. not saying it's rigged but rather flawed .
 
I honestly don't get why people spend time and energy to hate on a slot that they don't like. There's like 20,000 other slots to play, there's no need to play that one if you don't like it. If you think it's rigged just play the next one. It's like everyone feel like they need to have a strong opinion on any BTG slot? Why?

After watching dunover's video: I really like the colors, game sounds/music are OK as well. I expressed doubts about the theme earlier in the thread but I think they somewhat pulled it off. That said, no one in their right mind would (or should) gamble to 50 spins. I find the 20 spins floor a little low, it's still less than the maximum number of spins on Extra Chilli.

Not a big fan of the 8 spins "base" feature but that's the price to pay to trigger it with 3 scatters instead of 4.

@dunover : you said in the video that they are using a new engine for the Megaways, what does that mean for the player?
 
Last edited:
I honestly don't get why people spend time and energy to hate on a slot that they don't like. There's like 20,000 other slots to play, there's no need to play that one if you don't like it. If you think it's rigged just play the next one. It's like everyone feel like they need to have a strong opinion on any BTG slot? Why?

After watching dunover's video: I really like the colors, game sounds/music are OK as well. I expressed doubts about the theme earlier in the thread but I think they somewhat pulled it off. That said, no one in their right mind would (or should) gamble to 50 spins. I find the 20 spins floor a little low, it's still less than the maximum number of spins on Extra Chilli.

Not a big fan of the 8 spins "base" feature but that's the price to pay to trigger it with 3 scatters instead of 4.

@dunover : you said in the video that they are using a new engine for the Megaways, what does that mean for the player?

It's still the Megaways engine, but remember this can have different maths models and volatility applied as well as feature-base RTP distribution, feature frequency and range etc. In other words, this variant of the Megways is a completely new slot made from the bottom up, and that's straight from the horse's mouth.
I have played it for 12 hours now in demo and can testify it plays significantly different to Bonanza for example. There is a noticeably lesser win frequency in base and FS but more larger wins than you see on Bonanza so the overall longevity of the balance seems around the same and therefore possibly is the RTP for base/bonus.
The bonus is far more volatile IMO.
It's definitely not as tiring as those games mentioned either. Smoother and more pleasant on the eye.
 
I could understand the problem if you got 40 spins and gambled and got none but you don't so what is the problem?

20 spins are a huge difference on games like these. Just think whether you have the standard 12 or 32 on Bonanza.

IMO though, most gambles will be lost on the first level, leaving player with "zero" after hundreds of spins. I am pretty sure players who tried Extra Chilli will mostly try to gamble for more Free Spins because they know they mostly won't get much from 8 spins. And that is where the addict will dig in and play more to get another round to try again and again and again.

The percentages for the correct answers are totally misleading. I had meanwhile dozens of rounds in fun play and in more than 50% I failed to make it to 10 spins. And I took steadily the answer with the highest percentage or in case of 50:50 I took the answer which came first, e.g. with B&D I took B, with A&C I took A.

In essence this is Extra Chilli with higher volatility since a portion of the RTP has to cater for the 30, 40, 50 free spins rounds, which will happen, no doubt, but they will be rare since the win potential is sky high.
 
I still think there is a high chance that the number of spins is a smoke screen and irrelevant. The bonus is predetermined so if you are going to get a bad round and you have a high number of spins a lot of them will be dead and vice versa. Just look at the amount of times 17 and 22 spins on bonanza pay sod all yet you can have big hits with 12. It guarantees nothing. If I am wrong it would be nice if btg could let us know a little bit about how it does works with regards to how achieving more spins heightens your chances of a big win. Apart from the obvious well the more spins you have the higher multiplier you will achieve because that’s only based on potential.
 
After tens of features I have found the 8-10 gamble is successful on the majority of occasions. I had a bad run in the first video at the start, but the success rate is around 2/3 - 3/4 now.

I reached 16 spins on 5 or 6 occasions, once collecting and the rest lost going for 18 spins. Don't forget that's just my experience, one of you guys will probably hit 20 first attempt, that's randomness for you.
 
I still think there is a high chance that the number of spins is a smoke screen and irrelevant. The bonus is predetermined so if you are going to get a bad round and you have a high number of spins a lot of them will be dead and vice versa. Just look at the amount of times 17 and 22 spins on bonanza pay sod all yet you can have big hits with 12. It guarantees nothing. If I am wrong it would be nice if btg could let us know a little bit about how it does works with regards to how achieving more spins heightens your chances of a big win. Apart from the obvious well the more spins you have the higher multiplier you will achieve because that’s only based on potential.
Exactly I had a £450 win from 8 spins on Chilli people are getting too worked up over the 50 spins thing, accept that if you get to 20 you are lucky and be grateful you will get 20 spins guaranteed, if you get more and lose them it isn't the end of the world it's not like winning £500 and withdrawing it and reversing it and losing it all. YOu are likely to get a decent win from 20 spins.

It's supposed to be like the tv show so who expects really to go on Millionaire and reach a million, no one, you are supposed to judge when to say you've had enough and collect if you stupidly gamble £500,000 for a million and lose you take the risk.
 
Last edited:
Well I don't think anyone can be more unlucky than I am! Played bonanza thos morning 107 spins @0.60 and 370 spins yes that's right 370 @0.40 NEVER getting the bonus round! I give up. I also now HATE this game.
 
Think its a terrible game. And BTG just seem to be focussing on in game gambles , so waiting 300 plus spins for a feature then needing to gamble within that to get the chance of a hit, then if you get through that you could be looking at 10 or 20x bet. Sure it can have massive win potential but BTG slots are more and more like playing a lottery. So they are just re-skinning and adding in more volatile features on the gamble making bonanza look like a good bet! I really could not be bothered ever playing this game. Waiting 100s of spins then faced with a gamble that could mean the whole thing is over in seconds. People will loose allot of money on this one like they are chilli , which I suppose is the aim from the game provider. I cant see this game being a success, ironically if it did have a bonus buy feature like x chilli it probably would be a hit. But how many will camp this out just to be hit with the FS gamble ?

good graphics but dire game imo ... no $ from me going this way.
 
I still think there is a high chance that the number of spins is a smoke screen and irrelevant. The bonus is predetermined so if you are going to get a bad round and you have a high number of spins a lot of them will be dead and vice versa. Just look at the amount of times 17 and 22 spins on bonanza pay sod all yet you can have big hits with 12. It guarantees nothing. If I am wrong it would be nice if btg could let us know a little bit about how it does works with regards to how achieving more spins heightens your chances of a big win. Apart from the obvious well the more spins you have the higher multiplier you will achieve because that’s only based on potential.

Of course it's not a smoke screen...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Meister Ratings

Back
Top