uh... i'm gonna try to be as objective as i can here.
some of you may remember i had a serious issue with 3dice that was resolved. i was accused of the same thing not too long ago and i can tell you that it was a very shocking and disappointing experience. The way it started was not a big deal and i assumed it was some kind of misunderstanding. I contacted cs, talked to Karen (always the best) and she was completely perplexed as well (obviously, i have a long, long history at 3dice.)
Everything seemed to be fine until Enzo got involved and basically accused me of moving funds and/or was on the brink of losing control. It was a very personal situation which still confuses me to this day.... (usually he is very professional and i naturally assumed he was having a bad day or something.) I kept thinking: is he confusing me with someone else? The end result was that i offered to pay any or all fees and that the funds could be returned to my qt, etc. Instead, i was told my withdrawal would be processed but that i had to restrict my deposit limits, this was a one time special exception, i was obviously trying to pull something, etc. It was not a feel good moment for me to be accused of these type of things and to be "spoken" to in this manner. Again.... was he confusing me with someone else?
Since i started playing again, i have been up a healthly amount due to some of the rival games. So i had plenty of funds in my qt and plenty of withdrawals as well. I'm still up to this day...but i'm guessing Enzo made some incorrect assumptions and made it a more personal issue than it should have been.
In the end, the issue was resolved and Anna made it clear that it was just an issue that had to be looked into and she did apologize for the way things happened and wished there were no hard feelings. There aren't.
But was i being confused with someone else?
I do have to point out that through the whole thing, i never worried about not being paid or any other such nonsense.... it is 3dice afterall.
In regards to the original issue and post, i have to agree with everyone else that depositing x amount and playing .01 to "test" the waters does not make sense at all. I can easily see how that would be abusive behaviour and something that shouldn't have to be tolerated by a casino, especially if the casino incurs unnecessary fees, etc.
I think Enzo and 3dice were absolutely correct in this situation and it was handled correctly and professionally.
Now... the reason i posted this was to ask: Enzo, how the hell was i lumped into this same category!!!?//