PLAYTECH is, in my opinion, undeniably BENT .... AVOID people - it's bad news.
The lag on the spins in unbelievable. Frankie dettori is a frustrating son of a gun slot in itself, even worse with these 5 second spins.
Was the same for me playing The Sopranos slot, would freeze during the spin, then the result of the spin would appear, then if I had won anything it would then freeze on the count up.
Yep, checked it out a couple of days ago and this is, I might suggest, a BIG mistake by Ladbrokes. Idiotic wagering requirement + the (in my opinion) distinctly dodgy Playtech "behaviour" of the Roulette games = a big NO NO.
They've set the bonuses on Marvel Roulette to pay ridiculously rarely and ridiculously lowly when it DOES actually come up.
I write this as an erstwhile fanboy of Playtech via it's WH incarnations, but I've seen the light now. PLAYTECH is, in my opinion, undeniably BENT .... AVOID people - it's bad news.
As someone else said here earlier - stick to the MG aspect of Ladbrokes. You know it makes sense!
Yup. It destroys the experience of what is foremostly meant to be an entertainment
People have mentioned on here that they like to go for a celebratory coffee if they hit a free spins round
but that's the first time I've ever gone for a coffee DURING a Great Blue free spins round
Never had such consistently unplayable slowness on a name brand Playtech casino
Interesting comment as are the ones re the reels continually spinning and taking an age to come to a conclusion.
I recently joined Ladbrooks, for the IGT slots really and TBH the IGT slots on here do spin for ages. I thought things may be better on the Vegas side of the casino and so took the £25 bonus, noting the wagering requirements! Needless to say I soon busted out. So I took the first deposit bonus of 100% depositing £100. I thought the WR was harsh, but nevertheless a big win may be possible. Well, no, my £200 (played only on the Fantastic 4 slot) soon went to zero, so I, pretty stupidly, went for another £150 with 50% second deposit bonus. This soon went the same way as the previous deposits, again on the Fantastic 4 slot. This happens, but what was significant was that on a total of £425 deposits (including the bonuses) were played through on one slot on relatively small wagers with not one bonus being triggered!! Not good.
Will I be taking the 125% third deposit bonus? Errrr no!
As for the reel spins, not great, pretty slow, about 5-10 seconds on average before a result including 3 re boots when I just couldn't be bothered to wait any longer.
You may have seen my moans about William Hill's slots payouts on a separate thread, but it seems to me that the big UK high street bookies on line casinos performance and customer service could be better!
Reading the posts above I think I can see quite a big problem. Playtech make a lot of higher variance slots while the bookies get a lot of players that don't understand variance, many perhaps new to slots online. When they are running Microgaming and IGT games this is less of an issue as the games are generally medium variance at worst - with a few exceptions obviously - but unlike Playtech, high variance is the exception with IGT/MGS, not the norm.
The bookies don't provide the player with any education on that afaik which is a big oversight IMO. They could learn from 3Dice there or customers could leave and not only that but disillusioned with the brand too. Slot players ideally need to understand variance and how to identify it in games they play.
At long last got my slots RTP figure from Ladbrokes. It was over weeks of play, not just the odd session- 52%............
what slots you been playing out of interest ? ?
In the main Monopoly Plus, Cleopatra, both Star Trek slots, Fantastic 4
At long last got my slots RTP figure from Ladbrokes. It was over weeks of play, not just the odd session- 52%............
Doesn't really mean anything without:
1. Number of spins
2. Average bet (or usual bet)
"weeks of play" might mean a few hundred in deposits and a few hundred or thousand spins....which is nothing at all.
52% seems EXTREMELY low...I would be asking them to double check that figure and make sure they are working it out properly.