Whining about who has or who has not been banned from this forum

Sodax77

Dormant account
dickens1298 said:
The initial post said a 100% bonus UP TO $50... yet you received a bonus of $100?
lanidar post > Nostalgia (up to $300)

Initial post > Vegas Towers Casino (up to $50)
and Nostalgia link, because i saw this kind of bonus in there first.

Both Casinos offer "100%, no wagering requirements, no game exclusions" bonus.
 
Last edited:

dickens1298

Dormant account
Sodax77 said:
lanidar post > Nostalgia (up to $300)

Initial post > Vegas Towers Casino (up to $50)
and Nostalgia link, because i saw this kind of bonus in there first.

Both Casinos offer "100%, no wagering requirements, no game exclusions" bonus.
Mea culpa...I misread Lanidar's initial response.
 

dickens1298

Dormant account
bethug said:
dickens, most all of casiomeister casinos that he has on his site are good,

i will give casino 365, bodog and inetbetcasino thumbs up too.

casino365 gives out a easy 40 bucks every month that you can pay at any game you like, inetbetcasino has many bonus( not very big, but they offor them every month) and bodog has 10% reload bonus and you can play on any games.

you will not have a problem playing at any of them three casinos.

landiar, whatever you smoking dont pass me some :eek2:
Thanks, bethug. I know we've (almost) butted heads in the past, but I appreciate the counsel. Props.
 

City Streets

Banned User
A question for the casinomeister:

You previously referred to Damian Dunlap/bethug as ' one of the biggest clowns on the internet'.... And then banned him from posting on your forum.

As it's obvious that he continues to annoy and irritate posters, which is his standard forum protocol, why was he ever allowed back in the first place?

Just curious, since you've banned others for far less reasons. :confused:
 

Casinomeister

Forum Cheermeister
Staff member
Banning

City Streets said:
A question for the casinomeister:

You previously referred to Damian Dunlap/bethug as ' one of the biggest clowns on the internet'.... And then banned him from posting on your forum.

As it's obvious that he continues to annoy and irritate posters, which is his standard forum protocol, why was he ever allowed back in the first place?
Damian was never banned, but Damian and I had our moments. About a year and a half ago his account was "deleted" from this forum. We corresponded about this and this is what I wrote:
You are not blocked from Casinomeister's forum. I merely deleted your account. If you want to set a new one, go ahead. Just don't go ape shit.

Since then he has behaved himself. I don't have a problem with him and I think the majority of the members here have no problem either. No one has ever complained in the past year or so of Bethug's postings.

City Streets said:
Just curious, since you've banned others for far less reasons.
Bullshit. There are 2400 members of this forum (1000 new members since Dec 2003) and there are four permantly banned accounts. Crudebar, Rainfall, Mr.Racetrack, and the CPA's. These individuals have no business wasting my bandwidth with their venomous spewings. They have other places they can dwell.

Spammers are banned 7 to 30 days - it depends on the level of spam, then they are welcome back only if they behave.

amandajm said:
Let's just ban everyone for everything and anything.
Maybe I should start banning members who consistantly derail threads?
 

jetset

RIP Brian
CAG
Taking a guess on the City Streets pseudonym, I don't know why you bother wasting time in even answering this nonsense, Bryan - it is pure s*** stirring.
 

City Streets

Banned User
jetset said:
Taking a guess on the City Streets pseudonym, I don't know why you bother wasting time in even answering this nonsense, Bryan - it is pure s*** stirring.
Jetset, I have not addressed anything towards you. If you have something to say to me, or about me, then state it. No one is interested in your guesses.

Seem to me like you are the one attempting to s*** stir.
 

bethug

Banned User - Winner of the "<a href="http://www.c
city streets, this tread was suppose to help answer a player question. I dont know who you are and why you trying to stir crap with me and others(keep your crap at your forum). But you can meet me anytime and get what every you have against me off your chest. This has been taken way over board and what for. Plain hate city streets , how much money i made u lose or did i cut you off while u was driving. If i did any of those things sorry, but if u still have a problem with me come to my face and tell me.

"As it's obvious that he continues to annoy and irritate posters, which is his standard forum protocol, why was he ever allowed back in the first place?"

Tell me what i do, report slow pays, show screen shots, help the people, that i can help and ask a few questions. That it. Everybody not going to like another person style of posting, but i dont go around attacking people for no reason. All i want is a fair game and quick pay out and talk to a few people about casinos :rolleyes: What do you want?
 

Sodax77

Dormant account
Here is instruction to create thread:

press "New thread",
write your question or comment,
then submit your text.

After this you have good chance to get good answer.
Then next 30-400 replies is about "inside-talk",
and if you are lucky, you see some "drama" here,
and if you are very very lucky, you see good fighting here!

Enjoy! :D

It's open 24/7

Regards
Off-topic-team
 

dickens1298

Dormant account
ahhh... enough drama for the weekday afternoon crowds... :)

Whenever someone like City Streets rears his head, the situation always strikes me as ironic. We're posting on a forum maintained by Casinomeister, who is also kind enough to inform us of casinos with marginal reputations and to champion our causes, yet there are always elements who wish to criticize him. Talking about a thankless job...

And no, I'm not attempting to ingratiate myself. I realize that the Casinomeister has faults (like everyone else), and am sure that at times his policies may seem inconsistent and personal. Personally, I have not borne witness to any such transgressions, but am simply pointing out inevitabilities due to the fact that he IS only human, and would be subject to the same vagaries that we are. But even with such faults, Casinomeister has accomplished an amazing feat.

Sodax77 said:
Here is instruction to create thread:

press "New thread",
write your question or comment,
then submit your text.

After this you have good chance to get good answer.
Then next 30-400 replies is about "inside-talk",
and if you are lucky, you see some "drama" here,
and if you are very very lucky, you see good fighting here!

Enjoy! :D

It's open 24/7

Regards
Off-topic-team
 

dominique

Dormant account
Regardless of past conduct, I find bethug's posts useful and I always like his choices of casinos.

Citystreets is here to cause waves - being not permitted to do so at b2g and wol anymore, I guess Bryan's place is one of the last popular places left to try to derail.

Will be interesting to see who gets attacked next. Jetset is a good bet, as is Rowmare. Mary if she drops in. Of course Bryan himself - but then, that would speed up the banning and preclude all the fun citystreets is planning to have here.
 

City Streets

Banned User
Citystreets is here to cause waves - being not permitted to do so at b2g and wol anymore
Annette, as with most things you state as 'fact'... you once again are incorrect. I am a member in good standing on Winneronline, and have never been a member of Bet2Gamble.

Everything I previously posted in this thread has been factual and accurate.

You, or anyone else, certainly are free to disagree or argue, but I should have the right to state my thoughts and opinions.

That I have done.... much to the dismay of a select few. :rolleyes:
 

dominique

Dormant account
I don't think I offered you the use of my first name. I reserve this for friends, not people who are scared to divulge their identity.
 

City Streets

Banned User
I don't think I offered you the use of my first name.
Sorry!! Would you prefer one of the other references that I've seen used to refer to you? :p

I thought it acceptable using your name, due to the fact that you feel comfortable sending me your newsletter each month... although I never opted in for it. :rolleyes:
 

rowmare

Dormant account
A bit of advice, everyone.

Tempting as it is to put this person in her place, it just feeds the fire.

The only way to deal with this sort of person is to ignore them.
Confronting them only gives them the conflict they thrive on.

(Ever notice that just when things seem to go smoothly, people like this will do or say something to rock the boat? It's a need they have, and any time wasted on them is time well wasted indeed)

Just ignore her.
 

dominique

Dormant account
City Streets said:
Sorry!! Would you prefer one of the other references that I've seen used to refer to you? :p

I thought it acceptable using your name, due to the fact that you feel comfortable sending me your newsletter each month... although I never opted in for it. :rolleyes:
How odd is that! :eek:

It is completely double optin and hasn't been sent out in months. When it does go out it goes out once or twice a week.

You are right rowmare, I think we should leave her to her fabrications. No point talking to someone who is scared to sign her name under her words.
 
Last edited:

Black21Jack

Dormant account
bethug said:
Tell me what i do, report slow pays, show screen shots, help the people, that i can help and ask a few questions. That it. Everybody not going to like another person style of posting, but i dont go around attacking people for no reason. All i want is a fair game and quick pay out and talk to a few people about casinos :rolleyes: What do you want?
I totally agree. I like hearing about how much he wins. We seem to think the same as a good number of his questions, and reports of slow pays answer questions that I have wanted to post. Why are people so bloody negative. I have gone through all of his posts and not one is annoying, or negative towards anyone. Grow up!
 
Last edited:
Top