The point isn't that it may or may not work, the point is the that your chance of winning is the same either way. That's not an opinion, it's either right or wrong.
It doesn't matter, that's what we've been saying. No one is trying to tell you how you should play. But we are having the conversation because you argue against anyone who says this.
Everyone has said if you want to play that way, go ahead. The only argument is whether or not it makes a difference. You've said things like "there is such a thing as a cold or dead slot," and "Why would anyone sit endlessly on a slot that is zero fun by doing absolute shit ?" - these make it unclear if you understand or not the fact that what you call a "cold" slot has just as good a chance of hitting a win as it did when you first started playing it. Most people who use terms like "cold slot" don't truly believe that each spin is independent form the last.
If you understand that, then great, we're all agreed and everyone can be happy. So at this point, anything we say would probably just be rehashing the same things over and over, so I'm happy to leave the conversation there.
*(If you want to be technical the variance of two games could be different and slightly affect your chance of winning, but that could be a very small boost or detriment, so we'll call it a wash. If you were choosing a game based on variance, then whether you had won or lost previously is irrelevant.)