You can condense this argument into Colins words below. The moral side of it is a completely differant argument, but there is clear legal guidelines on refunding player deposits in the UKGC handbook afaik.
“Most casinos don't do that though, the ONLY reason they would keep allowing attempted fraud, is because they are making more money from the SE'd customers who, when caught, don't get their money back. Further than that, there is clear precedent from the UKGC that in cases like this, deposits should be refunded, yet, again, most casinos refuse, again, because they are fully aware that 99% of cases won't get to the UKGC and therefore they will never be forced to refund.”
Only differance is that when push comes to shove the Casinos will and do refund under UKGC guidelines. Its not a pleasant aspect of the industry but its certainly present and happening...
“Most casinos don't do that though, the ONLY reason they would keep allowing attempted fraud, is because they are making more money from the SE'd customers who, when caught, don't get their money back. Further than that, there is clear precedent from the UKGC that in cases like this, deposits should be refunded, yet, again, most casinos refuse, again, because they are fully aware that 99% of cases won't get to the UKGC and therefore they will never be forced to refund.”
Only differance is that when push comes to shove the Casinos will and do refund under UKGC guidelines. Its not a pleasant aspect of the industry but its certainly present and happening...