Criticizing past Presidents or Kamala doesn't make someone a Trump supporter by default, hard though it may be to comprehend, especially at a point in history where everyone has to pick 'sides'.
I'd be just as concerned at a presidential nominee using her ethnic background to gain political capital when it suits. Many have mixed heritage, yet her Southern- accented speech was quite the stretch for a woman claiming her Indian heritage for years, with almost no mention of her Jamaican roots.
And yet it's ok for her to culturally appropriate a way of talking to the attendees suddenly, and no more's said about it.
Lest we forget, in amongst her 20-minute speech, she even quoted "Don't talk the talk if you ain't gotst the walk"
JFK's "Ich bin ein Berliner" it certainly wasn't
She worked the crowd, stating she'd fix border controls (that she bonkled), some form of universal healthcare (unworkable) and tightening gun controls with enhanced background checks.
Also featured was curbing inflation and limiting landlords' powers, all fine in principle, but not particularly grounded in any sense of realism. The only thing she was spot-on with was abortion rights, albeit some may still favour states' individual autonomy to rule on this matter, which some *could* argue is equally just.
Then some Megan Thee Stallion, some twerking and that's all she wrote.
Not 'going back' to conservative values is one thing, but fronting about debating Trump 'anywhere, anytime' and then deciding she's busy that night doesn't exactly smack of trustworthiness, and amounts to basically hot air.
One'd think politicians are liars or something!
