Hi all,
jstrikes recent post got me wondering, but rather than derail his thread I thought I'd ask the question in here as it's slightly different.
How would you feel about either a bonus up front or a cash back offer on any losses? For example, if you could choose between the following which would you take:
100% deposit bonus, with normal casino rules and wagering requirements.
or
15% cash back on any casino losses every month.
Of course, the amount of bonus funds you get in the second example are considerably lower BUT:
No rollover or wagering requirements
No game restrictions
I'd like to know what you think. Do the numbers need to be moved for either offer to be more attractive to you?
Thanks for any input./feedback.
jstrikes recent post got me wondering, but rather than derail his thread I thought I'd ask the question in here as it's slightly different.
How would you feel about either a bonus up front or a cash back offer on any losses? For example, if you could choose between the following which would you take:
100% deposit bonus, with normal casino rules and wagering requirements.
or
15% cash back on any casino losses every month.
Of course, the amount of bonus funds you get in the second example are considerably lower BUT:
No rollover or wagering requirements
No game restrictions
I'd like to know what you think. Do the numbers need to be moved for either offer to be more attractive to you?
Thanks for any input./feedback.