What??
Aha...stupid me. Is this what people mean by super affiliate?
They didn't own it?
Well, I am not kidding now. I thought that casinos like Vegas Regal, Tradition, Dendera, Tropica etc. had separate owners but paid for website, support and payout system because it was cheaper.
I have always thought that Pantasia was Bonne Chance own casino though.
Explain please!
"super affiliate" is simply a company of such size that it can cut special deals with the brands it promotes. It can also mean affiliate companies that run HUNDREDS, if not THOUSANDS, of websites. This is distinct from many "regular" affiliates that operate from their bedroom/living room/office etc, and run a small number of websites for "pocket money".
In the other case, Vanguard and Slots Power, a very similar course of events took place, and the "owners" of these two casinos turned out to be "marketing partners" who also promoted other casinos. A REAL owner would NOT be promoting THEIR COMPETITORS, even if from different website.
It seems closing down a Rival "white label" casino is as simple as "handing in the keys" to Bonne Chance, with NO lasting obligation or responsibility to players or affiliates. This is NOT what happens when a REAL owner gets rid of a casino. They either SELL it, or allow it to be rescued in the best way possible.
This is NOT what is happening here. It seems these three have been happy to hand over everything to Bonne Chance, even their PLAYERS, yet cling on to the WEBSITE
, even though this is no good once the casino it fronted ceased to exist. WHY have they clung to the website, rather than pass it over to Bonne Chance along with the players for a TRULY seamless exit from the operation.
Clearly, we are NOT getting the FULL story here.
In all cases, no PROMISES have been made, only statements along the lines of "we
HOPE that Rival will continue to honour commitments to......."