Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
Bet it Up said:2 Questions
1. Why is no one willing to name the casino?
2. WHERE CAN I BET THIS MUCH? I would love to be able to play $25 coin VP

Casinomeister said:Still waiting for the word.
And I be waitin' for the Press Release![]()

bb1webs said:sorry for being so dense. But did the player ever actually get the money in hand?
I read where they claimed the money had been sent and were waiting for the bank to confirm it had been received; but that was the end of it.
Congratulations if you did receive it btw.

winbig72 said:Gonna go out on a limb and say he actually agreed to the commercial
Glad he got his $![]()
bb1webs said:like I said; all things considered.
that's a chunk of money all at once and I imagine any casino would have taken a step back and been wondering if there was more to the win than meets the eye.
Yes they've been too long, and more importantly they've been too quiet but you must imagine that this probably had to reach the top to put the kind of funds together to meet the cash-in, ... while at the same time they're busting their hunches to make sure everything is jake (that the wins were totally honorable situations): because as nearly everyone here admits; it is a huge win of very unusual circumstances.
I would think it would involve contacting the creators of the software and all sorts of checkpoints that common sense would demand you go through... because this is not an ordinary big win. but rather 3 big wins at same casino inside a week... which makes things look extremely suspicious ...
so while this is all going on ... nobody takes the proper steps to insure the player they will get paid (basically staying in contact) and though I'm certainly no software expert I would bet there is a lot of stuff to check before the final okay is given to pay the player.
so a lot of time gets past.
I never said they deserved a ticker tape parade but come on... are you telling me then that you'd say you won't play at that casino if/after they've paid the player?
I would be thinking if they can weather this kind of hit and still be floating that they would be able to pay me anything I won.
heck its probably a casino I can't stand. But even if it is; I'll have to give them credit for coming thru in the end.
And to be more frank; the more of a "small-time" casino that it turns out to be; the more I'll be impressed WHEN they pay.
I've been privy to the screenshots - it's no hoax.kingfile64 said:The inability at this stage to name the casino raises a lot of red flags. I will give this thread one more week. If it still remains unnamed, I will consider the whole thing a hoax.

Casinomeister said:Geeze, it's taking a while for this big announcement from the casino. What's the deal with that?![]()

jonevegas said:Waiting.....tap.....tap....tap
I guess they forgot about us once the money came thru.


Casinomeister said:Well, the casino isn't listed here. And it probably never will be, at least not in the "Accredited Casinos" section![]()

What's your trip kingfile? It's up to Cipher whether he wants to name the casino or not. Nevertheless, I can vouch for what happened since I was privy to the correspondence between player and casino. Believe me - it happened.kingfile64 said:Another week has gone by. No casino named yet. I am finished with this thread. A big hoax with screenshots as far as I am concerned.
Casinomeister said:What's your trip kingfile? It's up to Cipher whether he wants to name the casino or not. Nevertheless, I can vouch for what happened since I was privy to the correspondence between player and casino. Believe me - it happened.
Casinomeister said:It's up to Cipher whether he wants to name the casino or not.
caruso said:Since it was the posting at Casinomeister that resulted in the resolution, I consider it an extreme discourtesy to the Casinomeister members to not pass on this information. It's the members that make this site what it is. Without them, there would be no site, no resolution, and no...whatever.
Noted for future reference.
caruso said:Since it was the posting at Casinomeister that resulted in the resolution, I consider it an extreme discourtesy to the Casinomeister members to not pass on this information...
Sure - pretty much agreed upon but you would be surprised at how many people never bother to visit the forum - and how many PABs never make it here either. Casinomeister's a big site - lots of stuff going on.caruso said:It's the members that make this site what it is. Without them, there would be no site, no resolution, and no...whatever.


ximo said:Do you think this is an extremely case?
I know one pending to pay $1.500.000 and paying the player 2k weekly.
jetset said:Would you be prepared to say at which casino that happened, Ximo? MGS, 888 and Crypto pay out in one cash tranche when these big progressives are hit, and Playtech claims it does too. Not sure about RTG. It would be interesting to see factual evidence to the contrary.
jetset said:For clarity: you're saying this was a $1.5 million win on BJ?
ximo said:this is not a common case.

nafanny29 said:Im suprised the casino hasnt made a big thing of the win. In Vegas pictures of slot jackpot winners = $$$ of slot revinue doesnt it![]()

spearmaster said:At one time Starluck did NOT deal normal VP games - they were like slots. So this is quite an interesting story... either it indicates that they finally fixed the software to deal random cards and just did a bad job setting the limits... or else they tried to fix the machines and made a hash of it![]()
caruso said:Thanks for putting this one definitively to bed.
Amazing isn't it? Party Poker / Starluck an another group on the UK stock market, yet they apparently consider it perfectly acceptable business practice to try to deny a quarter million dollar payment - a payment which in context really isn't all that large, just 1500 $500 units.
It just flabbergasts me the way everyone in this industry seems to regard us all with utter contempt. Sure we can deny this payment - just a dumb gambler, right? So what we're on the UK AIM? What's that got to do with paying our customers? Pay dumb gamblers?? - get outta there.
Just beyond belief.

Given the documented behaviour of this software (https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/iglobalmedia-video-poker-software-glitch.6691/) I wouldn't be particularly suprised if the same pat royal was dealt three hands in a rownektar4d said:Is there also any amazing screenshot available ?!?![]()

