I'm not disagreeing with this result - but why do so many (as in most!) casinos have contradictory and confusing terms and conditions?
If the term 'winnings .... will be removed at the time of a cash-out request. ' actually has no effect at all, because you will always use the other term 'Wagering on restricted games may void all winnings won on this promotion' then why have it in the terms at all?
Any why say 'may void' when you actually mean 'will void'?
All it is doing is confusing people and making the terms harder to read and understand. (although that possibly answers the question...).
If the term 'winnings .... will be removed at the time of a cash-out request. ' actually has no effect at all, because you will always use the other term 'Wagering on restricted games may void all winnings won on this promotion' then why have it in the terms at all?
Any why say 'may void' when you actually mean 'will void'?
All it is doing is confusing people and making the terms harder to read and understand. (although that possibly answers the question...).