Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
Quick question, doesn't ever non winning spin make a screen shot that sucks




If you people see the last video on my channel, the top one posted a few days ago, you'll witness a 5-scatter 17 spin trigger that will even have lockinlove feeling good. I think it's a Bonanza record for crapness until somebody proves otherwise.
I hold the TFTUT record for the worst-ever 4-scatter trigger, 0.45x stake (in screenshots that suck somewhere) and I'm pretty sure I now have the Bonanza equivalent for a 5-scatter trigger.![]()
If you people see the last video on my channel, the top one posted a few days ago, you'll witness a 5-scatter 17 spin trigger that will even have lockinlove feeling good. I think it's a Bonanza record for crapness until somebody proves otherwise.
I hold the TFTUT record for the worst-ever 4-scatter trigger, 0.45x stake (in screenshots that suck somewhere) and I'm pretty sure I now have the Bonanza equivalent for a 5-scatter trigger.![]()

If you people see the last video on my channel, the top one posted a few days ago, you'll witness a 5-scatter 17 spin trigger that will even have lockinlove feeling good. I think it's a Bonanza record for crapness until somebody proves otherwise.
I hold the TFTUT record for the worst-ever 4-scatter trigger, 0.45x stake (in screenshots that suck somewhere) and I'm pretty sure I now have the Bonanza equivalent for a 5-scatter trigger.![]()
You mean the 11x bet one? It sucks big time, but it can be worst. I just had a 3x (12 spins) and yours was already at 4x after 12th spin. Another time I had a 0.33x (12 spins) at fun mode and a 65x (22 spins) with real money.
Also there is that in Bonanza thread
View attachment 79633
https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/bonanza-by-big-time-gaming.76428/?highlight=HAHAHAH
0x win (12 spins). Not 100% sure if a worst than 11x 5-scatter has already been posted here, but I bet a 0x 5-scatter will be .... soon

If it had landed on reel 4, the bat would have been a 3x wild, not a 2x.
So 4 x 5OAKs of Sarah at 6x (doubling wild and 3x bat wild) on a 60p bet = 4 x £10 x 6 = £240.
Then there's the 5OAK of Qs at 6x = £15
And the double 5OAK of 9s at 6x = £24
So that's £279 I reckon. 465x bet.

I got the bonus but I didn't? No idea what happened there, mailed support about this spin.
View attachment 79271
Except you would have had 8 x 5OAKS of Sarah at 6x.
1 reel 1 - 2 ways reel 2 - 2 ways reel 3 - 3x reel 4 - reel 5 2 ways
You see all 8 ways must have had a 2x and 3x in them.
Durst thou question dunover, the all-seeing eye of the slots?

bonus needs to be on winning line sadly.
Yes, you see it's NOT a 27-way game, but 17 lines and unfortunately this was on one of the 10 lines not covered. Please don't let him e-mail CS and make an ass of himself.......![]()

If it had landed on reel 4, the bat would have been a 3x wild, not a 2x.
So 4 x 5OAKs of Sarah at 6x (doubling wild and 3x bat wild) on a 60p bet = 4 x £10 x 6 = £240.
Then there's the 5OAK of Qs at 6x = £15
And the double 5OAK of 9s at 6x = £24
So that's £279 I reckon. 465x bet.

MG has dished out some big wins for me on low bets. Im spending the next day deciding on shutting down every MG casino. I have done 400 bonus on $6 and above bet and over 300 of them paid under 20x and only 1 paid 101x
I did 400 bonuses on .90 same games etc. just under 100 bonuses paid 100x and only 30 or so paid 20x or under. Which is absolute huge difference in bet levels
While I love some MG slots, I need to make the decision if I know something is dishonest should I still support it by playing or should I stop and boycott them
I had 399 features recorded. This was my 400th. $13.50 bet. Paid not even 1x. 0.5x win.
I believe that MG has something installed on their software that allows their bet sizes to go through different servers and I believe that they do this to protect themselves from players winning big and possibly causing financial problems for the casino or to deter hit and runners.
I did most of this on bonus money so I wouldnt lose my own. I have a $500 freechip on my account from a promo I won and am ending it with $6 IR romance bets. So far I have had 2 bonuses and 1 wild desire. 0x 6x 3x. Strange no?
Really tinfoil hat stuff right there? Well what else am I supposed to think?
what can i say today £800 in video slots @ £4 per spin not one feature, had a little run over the weekend there for 2,8k withdrawn gave them it back in last two days. today again no one feature & slots are random yer right.![]()
I never realised that bats landing on real 4 are always 3x.
And can they ever land on real 1 or 5?

what can i say today £800 in video slots @ £4 per spin not one feature, had a little run over the weekend there for 2,8k withdrawn gave them it back in last two days. today again no one feature & slots are random yer right.![]()


Very, VERY rare I get to stray from my 0.30 - 0.60p bets but have to agree with AK and LIL. I'd go as far to say that the 'other servers' or "compensators" kick in as low as £1.50 bets.
Upped to these sort of bets (£1.5/£1.8) when a slot is throwing in the features a few times over my slotting years only for the scatters to dissolve and the win frequency drop to that of a Halley's comet sighting.![]()
Regardless of foil hatting and the "Defenders of the Slotting Galaxy" rubbishing my comments lol (neither of us has any proof so lets just shake on that one, agree to disagree and all that!) there HAS to be some sort of safeguards in place for the reasons you mention, above and beyond the house edge and WR etc, etc, etc.
Time to go play bonanza....
j/k

not even me worth bothering stating it either , you already know
I played IM today @ £4 & £4.80 a spin i had 13 chances of a feature i didnt get it , ive played it on & off all weekend from bets of £3 quid & still havnt had a feature now at 267 spin from £3 per spin onwards. Elk slots im down £800 quid without a feature again all £4 per spin onwards even the light side of elk seems to be poor. im really thinking of giving it up to be honest , if i had not had that hit on blue print over the weekend & could afford to do some more testing at higher stakes,i would of called it a day today & moved on back to bricks & mortar.
I like video slots super fast payers but their loyalty is shockingly shite to be honest.
No more than $1 a spin...promise??![]()
im so tilted I could quit it all after those 2 BS sessions. I dont know why, because I already knew the outcome and its been the same this entire time of doing these bets. A 13 DOLLAR BET NOT EVEN 1X. What kind of...
Im finding videoslots loyalty to be horrendous too. I asked vip for a deposit bonus last week to switch things up and try and achieve some wager...and I was told no. There was even some back and forth and I was still told no. Deposits $15,000 in 5 months and down $1,850. There freespin battles are a complete pile of garbage. Unless you play a sick amount, rake and cashback is nothing either. BUT OH its wager free.
Someone give me some meds, I need them lmao
The tilt is so bad and bonanza owes me I seriously might go deposit and play it and hope to hit the 43,000x it owes me.

im so tilted I could quit it all after those 2 BS sessions. I dont know why, because I already knew the outcome and its been the same this entire time of doing these bets. A 13 DOLLAR BET NOT EVEN 1X. What kind of...
Im finding videoslots loyalty to be horrendous too. I asked vip for a deposit bonus last week to switch things up and try and achieve some wager...and I was told no. There was even some back and forth and I was still told no. Deposits $15,000 in 5 months and down $1,850. There freespin battles are a complete pile of garbage. Unless you play a sick amount, rake and cashback is nothing either. BUT OH its wager free.
Someone give me some meds, I need them lmao

Don't play Bonanza on VS - oh and what happened to never playing that game again?
VS has the customer base now so they don't need to make their rewards worthwhile to keep them coming back.
i play microgaming only and i noticed that the features and wild desires win according to your current rtpMG has dished out some big wins for me on low bets. Im spending the next day deciding on shutting down every MG casino. I have done 400 bonus on $6 and above bet and over 300 of them paid under 20x and only 1 paid 101x
I did 400 bonuses on .90 same games etc. just under 100 bonuses paid 100x and only 30 or so paid 20x or under. Which is absolute huge difference in bet levels
While I love some MG slots, I need to make the decision if I know something is dishonest should I still support it by playing or should I stop and boycott them
I had 399 features recorded. This was my 400th. $13.50 bet. Paid not even 1x. 0.5x win.
I believe that MG has something installed on their software that allows their bet sizes to go through different servers and I believe that they do this to protect themselves from players winning big and possibly causing financial problems for the casino or to deter hit and runners.
I did most of this on bonus money so I wouldnt lose my own. I have a $500 freechip on my account from a promo I won and am ending it with $6 IR romance bets. So far I have had 2 bonuses and 1 wild desire. 0x 6x 3x. Strange no?
Really tinfoil hat stuff right there? Well what else am I supposed to think?
View attachment 79711

I'm no mathematician, but if we take:
1.The average MG bonus round to be 150 spins to achieve, what are the chances of 20 in 600 spins.
2. Couple this with this the exceptionally low x stake achieved across all these bonuses round compared to this link illustrating a 100 bonus round sample rounds: https://www.casinomeister.com/forum...igns-agreement-for-jurassic-park-slots.60773/
Surely the odds of both events happening must be in the 100,000s to 1 or more? The thing is, most regular players have all experienced similar runs on other MG slots numerous times. I've seen similar personally on Immortal Romance, TS2 and as well as Jurassic Park. Surely if its truly random with no weighting, the deviation of results would be far far wider and the above experience would be a once in a lifetime event, if that.
3. On a separate note, if the games are truly random but the results pass on to the casino and then to player, what's to stop the casino having a built in script at server end to bin the high yielding results, wait for a low result to be returned and then pass this on to the player? And if this is possible, to tailor the results to the clients playing style/betsize and deposit amounts, giving an rtp tailored around spins/historic amounts wagered on that slot by the player rather than a direct rng result from the server?
I'm no mathematician, but if we take:
1.The average MG bonus round to be 150 spins to achieve, what are the chances of 20 in 600 spins.
2. Couple this with this the exceptionally low x stake achieved across all these bonuses round compared to this link illustrating a 100 bonus round sample rounds: https://www.casinomeister.com/forum...igns-agreement-for-jurassic-park-slots.60773/
Surely the odds of both events happening must be in the 100,000s to 1 or more? The thing is, most regular players have all experienced similar runs on other MG slots numerous times. I've seen similar personally on Immortal Romance, TS2 and as well as Jurassic Park. Surely if its truly random with no weighting, the deviation of results would be far far wider and the above experience would be a once in a lifetime event, if that.
3. On a separate note, if the games are truly random but the results pass on to the casino and then to player, what's to stop the casino having a built in script at server end to bin the high yielding results, wait for a low result to be returned and then pass this on to the player? And if this is possible, to tailor the results to the clients playing style/betsize and deposit amounts, giving an rtp tailored around spins/historic amounts wagered on that slot by the player rather than a direct rng result from the server?

5x nothing is f**k all.
Never had a losing Glinda feature before, and get this
Old Attachment (Invalid)

