Screen Shots that Suck!

rainbow riches

won big on rainbow riches, unfortunately played low stakes, does the 'machine' know what stakes you play and how do I add photos of my 'wins' thanks
 
it cost me 50 bucks to get and this is all it paid
16 dead spins
shit.webp
 
If it had landed on reel 4, the bat would have been a 3x wild, not a 2x.

So 4 x 5OAKs of Sarah at 6x (doubling wild and 3x bat wild) on a 60p bet = 4 x £10 x 6 = £240.

Then there's the 5OAK of Qs at 6x = £15

And the double 5OAK of 9s at 6x = £24

So that's £279 I reckon. 465x bet.
 
If you people see the last video on my channel, the top one posted a few days ago, you'll witness a 5-scatter 17 spin trigger that will even have lockinlove feeling good. I think it's a Bonanza record for crapness until somebody proves otherwise.

I hold the TFTUT record for the worst-ever 4-scatter trigger, 0.45x stake (in screenshots that suck somewhere) and I'm pretty sure I now have the Bonanza equivalent for a 5-scatter trigger. :mad:
 
If you people see the last video on my channel, the top one posted a few days ago, you'll witness a 5-scatter 17 spin trigger that will even have lockinlove feeling good. I think it's a Bonanza record for crapness until somebody proves otherwise.

I hold the TFTUT record for the worst-ever 4-scatter trigger, 0.45x stake (in screenshots that suck somewhere) and I'm pretty sure I now have the Bonanza equivalent for a 5-scatter trigger. :mad:

4 scatter paying 0 accept the original £6 for the trigger, some where hiden on my computer
 
If you people see the last video on my channel, the top one posted a few days ago, you'll witness a 5-scatter 17 spin trigger that will even have lockinlove feeling good. I think it's a Bonanza record for crapness until somebody proves otherwise.

I hold the TFTUT record for the worst-ever 4-scatter trigger, 0.45x stake (in screenshots that suck somewhere) and I'm pretty sure I now have the Bonanza equivalent for a 5-scatter trigger. :mad:

You mean the 11x bet one? It sucks big time, but it can be worst. I just had a 3x (12 spins) and yours was already at 4x after 12th spin. Another time I had a 0.33x (12 spins) at fun mode and a 65x (22 spins) with real money.
Also there is that in Bonanza thread

5.webp

https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/bonanza-by-big-time-gaming.76428/?highlight=HAHAHAH

0x win (12 spins). Not 100% sure if a worst than 11x 5-scatter has already been posted here, but I bet a 0x 5-scatter will be .... soon
 
If you people see the last video on my channel, the top one posted a few days ago, you'll witness a 5-scatter 17 spin trigger that will even have lockinlove feeling good. I think it's a Bonanza record for crapness until somebody proves otherwise.

I hold the TFTUT record for the worst-ever 4-scatter trigger, 0.45x stake (in screenshots that suck somewhere) and I'm pretty sure I now have the Bonanza equivalent for a 5-scatter trigger. :mad:

These are the kinds of bonuses that made me want to build a pool just to throw my laptop in it, give it the finger and walk away. This game is the biggest mind f**k of all time. I admit, out of all my spins I never had this bad, I mean very close but not like that. That is truly unreal but nothing surprises me with this slot. Nothing at all. If someone posted tomorrow it took them 15,000 spins to hit the bonus my response would be, seems normal.

The thing that makes it worse than most 12 spin dead feature, is the 17 spins is really rare to get. We do need to take into factor how long it took to trigger features and base game losses until it drops. I mean if you do 2000 spins finally get 12 freespins and it pays zero, that would be just wow. Or if you are a long time player of the game.

Truly a game where I could see myself meeting BTG and pouring a drink on their head.
 
You mean the 11x bet one? It sucks big time, but it can be worst. I just had a 3x (12 spins) and yours was already at 4x after 12th spin. Another time I had a 0.33x (12 spins) at fun mode and a 65x (22 spins) with real money.
Also there is that in Bonanza thread

View attachment 79633

https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/bonanza-by-big-time-gaming.76428/?highlight=HAHAHAH

0x win (12 spins). Not 100% sure if a worst than 11x 5-scatter has already been posted here, but I bet a 0x 5-scatter will be .... soon

The multiplier I was on after 12 spins is NOT relevant here, it's the final outcome that is. I could get 12 ways of diamonds on a 3x multiplier and it would be huge, but I could get 3x10's every time on a 8x and it would be abysmal overall. I want to see if anyone can ever exceed the dunover shit-luck-in-summer-2017 run by getting less than 11x bet for a 5-scatter Bonanza trigger. I doubt it - nobody has come close to my TFTUT 4-scatter hall of shame result, and this will likely be the same. :mad:
 
If it had landed on reel 4, the bat would have been a 3x wild, not a 2x.

So 4 x 5OAKs of Sarah at 6x (doubling wild and 3x bat wild) on a 60p bet = 4 x £10 x 6 = £240.

Then there's the 5OAK of Qs at 6x = £15

And the double 5OAK of 9s at 6x = £24

So that's £279 I reckon. 465x bet.

Except you would have had 8 x 5OAKS of Sarah at 6x. ;)

1 reel 1 - 2 ways reel 2 - 2 ways reel 3 - 3x reel 4 - reel 5 2 ways

You see all 8 ways must have had a 2x and 3x in them.

Unless you mean that we LOSE the 2x Bat and not get that but the 3x instead? If so, I've pissed him off even more because that would have been huge had both Huginn and Muninn appeared....

Durst thou question dunover, the all-seeing eye of the slots?
 
Except you would have had 8 x 5OAKS of Sarah at 6x. ;)

1 reel 1 - 2 ways reel 2 - 2 ways reel 3 - 3x reel 4 - reel 5 2 ways

You see all 8 ways must have had a 2x and 3x in them.

Durst thou question dunover, the all-seeing eye of the slots?

Toph asked "how much would i pay if it landed on 4th"? I was assuming (perhaps wrongly) that the "it" he was referring to was the 2x bat wild.

My answer was based purely on the bat wild landing on Reel 4 instead of Reel 3, not as well as. I hope that clears up any misunderstanding. :)
 
bonus needs to be on winning line sadly.

Yes, you see it's NOT a 27-way game, but 17 lines and unfortunately this was on one of the 10 lines not covered. Please don't let him e-mail CS and make an ass of himself.......:thumbsup:
 
Yes, you see it's NOT a 27-way game, but 17 lines and unfortunately this was on one of the 10 lines not covered. Please don't let him e-mail CS and make an ass of himself.......:thumbsup:

Given the standard of today's CS plus the ability to manipulate the newer slots, there should be no problem in getting the missing bonus round credited manually :p :rolleyes:
 
Just 1 diamond on reel 1 would have been nice :mad:

But also, what's the point of having 117649 ways, if on the rare occasions you reach that maximum, it almost always pays absolutely nothing, not even a tiny win

bandicam 2017-06-25 04-35-47-393.webp
 
If it had landed on reel 4, the bat would have been a 3x wild, not a 2x.

So 4 x 5OAKs of Sarah at 6x (doubling wild and 3x bat wild) on a 60p bet = 4 x £10 x 6 = £240.

Then there's the 5OAK of Qs at 6x = £15

And the double 5OAK of 9s at 6x = £24

So that's £279 I reckon. 465x bet.

I never realised that bats landing on real 4 are always 3x.

And can they ever land on real 1 or 5?
 
MG has dished out some big wins for me on low bets. Im spending the next day deciding on shutting down every MG casino. I have done 400 bonus on $6 and above bet and over 300 of them paid under 20x and only 1 paid 101x

I did 400 bonuses on .90 same games etc. just under 100 bonuses paid 100x and only 30 or so paid 20x or under. Which is absolute huge difference in bet levels

While I love some MG slots, I need to make the decision if I know something is dishonest should I still support it by playing or should I stop and boycott them

I had 399 features recorded. This was my 400th. $13.50 bet. Paid not even 1x. 0.5x win.

I believe that MG has something installed on their software that allows their bet sizes to go through different servers and I believe that they do this to protect themselves from players winning big and possibly causing financial problems for the casino or to deter hit and runners.

I did most of this on bonus money so I wouldnt lose my own. I have a $500 freechip on my account from a promo I won and am ending it with $6 IR romance bets. So far I have had 2 bonuses and 1 wild desire. 0x 6x 3x. Strange no?

Really tinfoil hat stuff right there? Well what else am I supposed to think?

Capture.webp
 
MG has dished out some big wins for me on low bets. Im spending the next day deciding on shutting down every MG casino. I have done 400 bonus on $6 and above bet and over 300 of them paid under 20x and only 1 paid 101x

I did 400 bonuses on .90 same games etc. just under 100 bonuses paid 100x and only 30 or so paid 20x or under. Which is absolute huge difference in bet levels

While I love some MG slots, I need to make the decision if I know something is dishonest should I still support it by playing or should I stop and boycott them

I had 399 features recorded. This was my 400th. $13.50 bet. Paid not even 1x. 0.5x win.

I believe that MG has something installed on their software that allows their bet sizes to go through different servers and I believe that they do this to protect themselves from players winning big and possibly causing financial problems for the casino or to deter hit and runners.

I did most of this on bonus money so I wouldnt lose my own. I have a $500 freechip on my account from a promo I won and am ending it with $6 IR romance bets. So far I have had 2 bonuses and 1 wild desire. 0x 6x 3x. Strange no?

Really tinfoil hat stuff right there? Well what else am I supposed to think?

what can i say today £800 in video slots @ £4 per spin not one feature, had a little run over the weekend there for 2,8k withdrawn gave them it back in last two days. today again no one feature & slots are random yer right.;);)
 
I never realised that bats landing on real 4 are always 3x.

And can they ever land on real 1 or 5?

No.

Reel 2 is always 2x
Reel 3 can be 2x or 3x (or both!)
Reel 4 is always 3x

I think there should be a super, duper MF'er bitch of all bat bitches which can land of reel 5 (x5) but sadly there isn't :p
 
what can i say today £800 in video slots @ £4 per spin not one feature, had a little run over the weekend there for 2,8k withdrawn gave them it back in last two days. today again no one feature & slots are random yer right.;);)

Here is the results of my $6 spins. 2 bonuses paid under 10x and wild desire 0x. It was a freebie so I dont care and so is most of my high betting using deposit bonuses til I go down to my deposit amount. But its quite clear to me and anyone else who does big bets on microgaming slots they have software installed to change the game when betting big. It pays out like you are doing small bets.

Again. Not one win of 20x on these bet sizes....in 271 spins lol
Capture.webp
 
Very, VERY rare I get to stray from my 0.30 - 0.60p bets but have to agree with AK and LIL. I'd go as far to say that the 'other servers' or "compensators" kick in as low as £1.50 bets.

Upped to these sort of bets (£1.5/£1.8) when a slot is throwing in the features a few times over my slotting years only for the scatters to dissolve and the win frequency drop to that of a Halley's comet sighting. :rolleyes:

Regardless of foil hatting and the "Defenders of the Slotting Galaxy" rubbishing my comments lol (neither of us has any proof so lets just shake on that one, agree to disagree and all that!) there HAS to be some sort of safeguards in place for the reasons you mention, above and beyond the house edge and WR etc, etc, etc.
 
not even me worth bothering stating it either , you already know ;)

I played IM today @ £4 & £4.80 a spin i had 13 chances of a feature i didnt get it , ive played it on & off all weekend from bets of £3 quid & still havnt had a feature now at 267 spin from £3 per spin onwards. Elk slots im down £800 quid without a feature again all £4 per spin onwards even the light side of elk seems to be poor. im really thinking of giving it up to be honest , if i had not had that hit on blue print over the weekend & could afford to do some more testing at higher stakes,i would of called it a day today & moved on back to bricks & mortar.

I like video slots super fast payers but their loyalty is shockingly shite to be honest.
 
Very, VERY rare I get to stray from my 0.30 - 0.60p bets but have to agree with AK and LIL. I'd go as far to say that the 'other servers' or "compensators" kick in as low as £1.50 bets.

Upped to these sort of bets (£1.5/£1.8) when a slot is throwing in the features a few times over my slotting years only for the scatters to dissolve and the win frequency drop to that of a Halley's comet sighting. :rolleyes:

Regardless of foil hatting and the "Defenders of the Slotting Galaxy" rubbishing my comments lol (neither of us has any proof so lets just shake on that one, agree to disagree and all that!) there HAS to be some sort of safeguards in place for the reasons you mention, above and beyond the house edge and WR etc, etc, etc.

There is absolutely, its not even a question for me at all. Im up a few thousands the last week or two so i dont have sour grapes or any reason to exaggerate or any of that. I have kept track of my stats back when I noticed things paid way different on different bet sizes once you go big. There is absolutely no question in my mind they have it safe guarded. Non whatsoever. You do the same amount spins and bonuses on the same games. The small bet size has 98 100x win. The large bets has 1 win of 100x. Plus all the times I never kept track. Come on.

I could have helped my case to make graphs to show the actual stats instead of just saying it. But why bother. It will be "too small sample size"

That $13 bonus on jurassic has me on crazy tilt, it just cemented every other session of big bets for me. Then took the $500 chip and did it again. Why? Im not wagering $500 50x on .90 lol. So I need to let the tilt subside and tomorrow see if I still want to close my MG accounts out of principal. I almost did it right after the bonus I was just like AGAIN so fed up with it. But Im doing my best to give it some time to cool down.

Time to go play bonanza....




j/k
 
Time to go play bonanza....

j/k

No more than $1 a spin...promise?? :p

FWIW, I would not close any accounts just cool off and maybe TAB. This only affects us in the UK (for now) but I am convinced it will cause longer term problems and have been boring people and banging on about if for years now, long before the UKGC and their book of bullshit reared its ugly head, other countries will only follow suit, that I am sure of.
 
not even me worth bothering stating it either , you already know ;)

I played IM today @ £4 & £4.80 a spin i had 13 chances of a feature i didnt get it , ive played it on & off all weekend from bets of £3 quid & still havnt had a feature now at 267 spin from £3 per spin onwards. Elk slots im down £800 quid without a feature again all £4 per spin onwards even the light side of elk seems to be poor. im really thinking of giving it up to be honest , if i had not had that hit on blue print over the weekend & could afford to do some more testing at higher stakes,i would of called it a day today & moved on back to bricks & mortar.

I like video slots super fast payers but their loyalty is shockingly shite to be honest.

im so tilted I could quit it all after those 2 BS sessions. I dont know why, because I already knew the outcome and its been the same this entire time of doing these bets. A 13 DOLLAR BET NOT EVEN 1X. What kind of...

Im finding videoslots loyalty to be horrendous too. I asked vip for a deposit bonus last week to switch things up and try and achieve some wager...and I was told no. There was even some back and forth and I was still told no. Deposits $15,000 in 5 months and down $1,850. There freespin battles are a complete pile of garbage. Unless you play a sick amount, rake and cashback is nothing either. BUT OH its wager free.

Someone give me some meds, I need them lmao

No more than $1 a spin...promise?? :p

The tilt is so bad and bonanza owes me I seriously might go deposit and play it and hope to hit the 43,000x it owes me.
 
im so tilted I could quit it all after those 2 BS sessions. I dont know why, because I already knew the outcome and its been the same this entire time of doing these bets. A 13 DOLLAR BET NOT EVEN 1X. What kind of...

Im finding videoslots loyalty to be horrendous too. I asked vip for a deposit bonus last week to switch things up and try and achieve some wager...and I was told no. There was even some back and forth and I was still told no. Deposits $15,000 in 5 months and down $1,850. There freespin battles are a complete pile of garbage. Unless you play a sick amount, rake and cashback is nothing either. BUT OH its wager free.

Someone give me some meds, I need them lmao



The tilt is so bad and bonanza owes me I seriously might go deposit and play it and hope to hit the 43,000x it owes me.

Don't play Bonanza on VS - oh and what happened to never playing that game again? :D

VS has the customer base now so they don't need to make their rewards worthwhile to keep them coming back.
 
im so tilted I could quit it all after those 2 BS sessions. I dont know why, because I already knew the outcome and its been the same this entire time of doing these bets. A 13 DOLLAR BET NOT EVEN 1X. What kind of...

Im finding videoslots loyalty to be horrendous too. I asked vip for a deposit bonus last week to switch things up and try and achieve some wager...and I was told no. There was even some back and forth and I was still told no. Deposits $15,000 in 5 months and down $1,850. There freespin battles are a complete pile of garbage. Unless you play a sick amount, rake and cashback is nothing either. BUT OH its wager free.

Someone give me some meds, I need them lmao

I will share what ever meds you can get :)

VS loyalty has hit the pan big time and the RTP is outrageous, many have stated this in the last few weeks

I have been saying for a long time the bets do matter, been playing 30p on the 243 ways for years but soon as switch me bets to 60p things change. I see hits you nether see on 30p, good or bad but talking about the reel layouts. Also the hits you get, had some nice x over a few days and nether seen them on 30p, yes I have had some ok hits on 30p but 60p is a different game
 
Don't play Bonanza on VS - oh and what happened to never playing that game again? :D

VS has the customer base now so they don't need to make their rewards worthwhile to keep them coming back.

Nah im just kidding I prob wont play it...but tilt makes you want to play games you think owes you
 
You already know something just doesn't seem right & your not alone same with premier roulette from micro gaming it just adjusts to miss your numbers on any bet over £25 straight up , seen it far to much over the years never once has that game ever paid me £1500 hundred or more & thats in some years i can tell you.
 
MG has dished out some big wins for me on low bets. Im spending the next day deciding on shutting down every MG casino. I have done 400 bonus on $6 and above bet and over 300 of them paid under 20x and only 1 paid 101x

I did 400 bonuses on .90 same games etc. just under 100 bonuses paid 100x and only 30 or so paid 20x or under. Which is absolute huge difference in bet levels

While I love some MG slots, I need to make the decision if I know something is dishonest should I still support it by playing or should I stop and boycott them

I had 399 features recorded. This was my 400th. $13.50 bet. Paid not even 1x. 0.5x win.

I believe that MG has something installed on their software that allows their bet sizes to go through different servers and I believe that they do this to protect themselves from players winning big and possibly causing financial problems for the casino or to deter hit and runners.

I did most of this on bonus money so I wouldnt lose my own. I have a $500 freechip on my account from a promo I won and am ending it with $6 IR romance bets. So far I have had 2 bonuses and 1 wild desire. 0x 6x 3x. Strange no?

Really tinfoil hat stuff right there? Well what else am I supposed to think?

View attachment 79711
i play microgaming only and i noticed that the features and wild desires win according to your current rtp
if your rtp is shit, wild desire will pay next to nothing
if your rtp is great, the wild desire will pay up
as for the bonus it is affected by your rtp but not by alot
meaning you can still win big during free spins if your rtp is bad
 
With my $50 freechip built it up to $376. Went to jurrasic and have had 17 bonuses in 566 spins

What a fu&^ng joke. How do you get all those bonuses and t rex features and be down $260

All my bonuses were on .90 aside from last 5. $1.20 $2.70 and $3

0x
3x
3x
4x
9x
11x
13x
13x
13x
15x
19x
20x
21x
2x


And just got another $3 bonus. Will post that shitty screenshot when its done too. FFS

Wow what a goddamn joke. $13.50 on $3 bet.

And just got another bonus. This game must be broken Like 20 freespins in less than 600 spins
Capture.webp
 
I'm no mathematician, but if we take:

1.The average MG bonus round to be 150 spins to achieve, what are the chances of 20 in 600 spins.

2. Couple this with this the exceptionally low x stake achieved across all these bonuses round compared to this link illustrating a 100 bonus round sample rounds: https://www.casinomeister.com/forum...igns-agreement-for-jurassic-park-slots.60773/

Surely the odds of both events happening must be in the 100,000s to 1 or more? The thing is, most regular players have all experienced similar runs on other MG slots numerous times. I've seen similar personally on Immortal Romance, TS2 and as well as Jurassic Park. Surely if its truly random with no weighting, the deviation of results would be far far wider and the above experience would be a once in a lifetime event, if that.

3. On a separate note, if the games are truly random but the results pass on to the casino and then to player, what's to stop the casino having a built in script at server end to bin the high yielding results, wait for a low result to be returned and then pass this on to the player? And if this is possible, to tailor the results to the clients playing style/betsize and deposit amounts, giving an rtp tailored around spins/historic amounts wagered on that slot by the player rather than a direct rng result from the server?
 
I'm no mathematician, but if we take:

1.The average MG bonus round to be 150 spins to achieve, what are the chances of 20 in 600 spins.

2. Couple this with this the exceptionally low x stake achieved across all these bonuses round compared to this link illustrating a 100 bonus round sample rounds: https://www.casinomeister.com/forum...igns-agreement-for-jurassic-park-slots.60773/

Surely the odds of both events happening must be in the 100,000s to 1 or more? The thing is, most regular players have all experienced similar runs on other MG slots numerous times. I've seen similar personally on Immortal Romance, TS2 and as well as Jurassic Park. Surely if its truly random with no weighting, the deviation of results would be far far wider and the above experience would be a once in a lifetime event, if that.

3. On a separate note, if the games are truly random but the results pass on to the casino and then to player, what's to stop the casino having a built in script at server end to bin the high yielding results, wait for a low result to be returned and then pass this on to the player? And if this is possible, to tailor the results to the clients playing style/betsize and deposit amounts, giving an rtp tailored around spins/historic amounts wagered on that slot by the player rather than a direct rng result from the server?


I think that would make the games lag. You would probably get disconnections and "Game Error" messages. Balances might dissapear from view and reappear, Glitchy graphics as the reels spin for minutes at a time & wins not registering straight away but showing maybe minutes after the event.

We NEVER see any of that ..Do we ?
 
I'm no mathematician, but if we take:

1.The average MG bonus round to be 150 spins to achieve, what are the chances of 20 in 600 spins.

2. Couple this with this the exceptionally low x stake achieved across all these bonuses round compared to this link illustrating a 100 bonus round sample rounds: https://www.casinomeister.com/forum...igns-agreement-for-jurassic-park-slots.60773/

Surely the odds of both events happening must be in the 100,000s to 1 or more? The thing is, most regular players have all experienced similar runs on other MG slots numerous times. I've seen similar personally on Immortal Romance, TS2 and as well as Jurassic Park. Surely if its truly random with no weighting, the deviation of results would be far far wider and the above experience would be a once in a lifetime event, if that.

3. On a separate note, if the games are truly random but the results pass on to the casino and then to player, what's to stop the casino having a built in script at server end to bin the high yielding results, wait for a low result to be returned and then pass this on to the player? And if this is possible, to tailor the results to the clients playing style/betsize and deposit amounts, giving an rtp tailored around spins/historic amounts wagered on that slot by the player rather than a direct rng result from the server?

I have never ever seen anything like that in my life. And I just quit posting but I had about 8 more bonuses in another 400 spins and about 6 TREX features. The most shocking thing out of 28 bonuses only 1 paid 100x+. I would say 25 of them paid under 20x.

This is the same casino that yesterday I lost $3300 in on one day. I have played slots on here all day and have had well over 100 bonuses in a few thousand spins. I truly feel like they are trying to make of for yesterday. Every single slot I am hitting bonuses on in short periods of time.

yea pretty funny claim but its crazy
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top