external image

QT/ Eco same company

Slotking, do you remember where this was stated as i looked in the T&c and could not find the info.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Im asking as I know they are the same company as ecocard, but i don't have proof, Now if ecocard stays in business i want m money from them. Someones paying, be it QT, Ecocard, DOJ, Im sick of getting screwed. Either im getting cash or ill get my personal satisfaction another way.
 
Slotking, do you remember where this was stated as i looked in the T&c and could not find the info.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Im asking as I know they are the same company as ecocard, but i don't have proof, Now if ecocard stays in business i want m money from them. Someones paying, be it QT, Ecocard, DOJ, Im sick of getting screwed. Either im getting cash or ill get my personal satisfaction another way.

Considering the DOJ was dealing directly with Ecocard, then the QT bank accounts were seized because of those discussions, makes the relationship obvious. The trouble is that they likely separated the money which is why they spun off the U.S. only processors. The UMW/QT terms stated that if they got seized or otherwise failed you were out of luck. I don't think you would have a legal case against Ecocard if the companies were spun off.
 
Just for a comparison...these T&C are from QT and Ecocard...the text is almost identical. :D
Edit: Doesn't show properly...I'll link it to Photobucket for the entire image.
s7.photobucket.com/albums/y273/ergopro/?action=view&current=QT-ECO2.jpg
 

Attachments

  • QT-ECO2.webp
    QT-ECO2.webp
    58.3 KB · Views: 134
Last edited:
Slotking, do you remember where this was stated as i looked in the T&c and could not find the info.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Im asking as I know they are the same company as ecocard, but i don't have proof, Now if ecocard stays in business i want m money from them. Someones paying, be it QT, Ecocard, DOJ, Im sick of getting screwed. Either im getting cash or ill get my personal satisfaction another way.

And how are you going to do that?

Send DOJ an invoice? Threaten them?

I know you're pissed, and I would be too, but saying things like that could get you into trouble if big brother is indeed watching.
 
And how are you going to do that?

Send DOJ an invoice? Threaten them?

I know you're pissed, and I would be too, but saying things like that could get you into trouble if big brother is indeed watching.

What have i said wrong. I did not make any threats. just venting. My Personal satisfaction will be taking an image of QT and pissing on it.

It the DOJ does have the money, i think thats the best chance for it to be returned, but i don't think they have much of it.

This is the thing, the accounts that were seized were just pass thru accounts, QT would send money from there main account, to these other accounts to process withdrawals, there was never much in them, just enough to cover there withdrawals that were requested. From what i know the main account was never hit, the doj did not seize it.
 
What have i said wrong. I did not make any threats. just venting. My Personal satisfaction will be taking an image of QT and pissing on it.

It the DOJ does have the money, i think thats the best chance for it to be returned, but i don't think they have much of it.

This is the thing, the accounts that were seized were just pass thru accounts, QT would send money from there main account, to these other accounts to process withdrawals, there was never much in them, just enough to cover there withdrawals that were requested. From what i know the main account was never hit, the doj did not seize it.

Make sure you post the pic :D
 
What have i said wrong. I did not make any threats. just venting. My Personal satisfaction will be taking an image of QT and pissing on it.

It the DOJ does have the money, i think thats the best chance for it to be returned, but i don't think they have much of it.

This is the thing, the accounts that were seized were just pass thru accounts, QT would send money from there main account, to these other accounts to process withdrawals, there was never much in them, just enough to cover there withdrawals that were requested. From what i know the main account was never hit, the doj did not seize it.

I really think that all US monies would have been kept separate from ECO card money ... if they didn't they were fools, and making QT a separate entity was pointless. This is why we were cordoned off in the first place.

As to whether this separation will prevent the DOJ from freezing ECO money elsewhere... who knows? Personally, I doubt it. The big fat ugly gorilla eats and sleeps and poops where it wants.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top