QT/ Eco same company

lnspin

Senior Member
webmeister
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Location
WorldWide
Is there any way to prove that eco own qt.

Guess what im asking is if theres concrete proof anywhere that ecocard is the owner of usemywallet/quicktender.
 

SlotKing

New Member
PABnonaccred
Joined
Jun 18, 2006
Location
Kentucky, ya'll...
There was... before the QT site was taken down. If you had looked at the T&C's of QT, you would have seen that Eco owned them. Ecocard ceased to be an option for US players when UIGEA passed, but they brought QT out not too far after.
 

lnspin

Senior Member
webmeister
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Location
WorldWide
Slotking, do you remember where this was stated as i looked in the T&c and could not find the info.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Im asking as I know they are the same company as ecocard, but i don't have proof, Now if ecocard stays in business i want m money from them. Someones paying, be it QT, Ecocard, DOJ, Im sick of getting screwed. Either im getting cash or ill get my personal satisfaction another way.
 

chuchu59

gambling addict
PABnonaccred
CAG
Joined
Sep 26, 2004
Location
SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
not sure if this means anything but ecocard is no longer a banking option at several rival casinos eg vegas regal whereas its still there at inet(rtg) and red flush(mg).
 

pokeraddict

Webmaster
Joined
Aug 3, 2002
Location
Las Vegas
Slotking, do you remember where this was stated as i looked in the T&c and could not find the info.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Im asking as I know they are the same company as ecocard, but i don't have proof, Now if ecocard stays in business i want m money from them. Someones paying, be it QT, Ecocard, DOJ, Im sick of getting screwed. Either im getting cash or ill get my personal satisfaction another way.

Considering the DOJ was dealing directly with Ecocard, then the QT bank accounts were seized because of those discussions, makes the relationship obvious. The trouble is that they likely separated the money which is why they spun off the U.S. only processors. The UMW/QT terms stated that if they got seized or otherwise failed you were out of luck. I don't think you would have a legal case against Ecocard if the companies were spun off.
 

ergopro

Experienced Member
PABnononaccred
Joined
Apr 29, 2004
Just for a comparison...these T&C are from QT and Ecocard...the text is almost identical. :D
Edit: Doesn't show properly...I'll link it to Photobucket for the entire image.
s7.photobucket.com/albums/y273/ergopro/?action=view&current=QT-ECO2.jpg
 

Attachments

  • QT-ECO2.jpg
    QT-ECO2.jpg
    53.5 KB · Views: 85
Last edited:

Nifty29

Dormant account
Joined
Jun 20, 2001
Location
Turn right, then right. then right again
Slotking, do you remember where this was stated as i looked in the T&c and could not find the info.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Im asking as I know they are the same company as ecocard, but i don't have proof, Now if ecocard stays in business i want m money from them. Someones paying, be it QT, Ecocard, DOJ, Im sick of getting screwed. Either im getting cash or ill get my personal satisfaction another way.

And how are you going to do that?

Send DOJ an invoice? Threaten them?

I know you're pissed, and I would be too, but saying things like that could get you into trouble if big brother is indeed watching.
 

lnspin

Senior Member
webmeister
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Location
WorldWide
And how are you going to do that?

Send DOJ an invoice? Threaten them?

I know you're pissed, and I would be too, but saying things like that could get you into trouble if big brother is indeed watching.

What have i said wrong. I did not make any threats. just venting. My Personal satisfaction will be taking an image of QT and pissing on it.

It the DOJ does have the money, i think thats the best chance for it to be returned, but i don't think they have much of it.

This is the thing, the accounts that were seized were just pass thru accounts, QT would send money from there main account, to these other accounts to process withdrawals, there was never much in them, just enough to cover there withdrawals that were requested. From what i know the main account was never hit, the doj did not seize it.
 

Nifty29

Dormant account
Joined
Jun 20, 2001
Location
Turn right, then right. then right again
What have i said wrong. I did not make any threats. just venting. My Personal satisfaction will be taking an image of QT and pissing on it.

It the DOJ does have the money, i think thats the best chance for it to be returned, but i don't think they have much of it.

This is the thing, the accounts that were seized were just pass thru accounts, QT would send money from there main account, to these other accounts to process withdrawals, there was never much in them, just enough to cover there withdrawals that were requested. From what i know the main account was never hit, the doj did not seize it.

Make sure you post the pic :D
 

Mousey

Ueber Meister Mouse
Joined
Sep 12, 2004
Location
Up$hitCreek
What have i said wrong. I did not make any threats. just venting. My Personal satisfaction will be taking an image of QT and pissing on it.

It the DOJ does have the money, i think thats the best chance for it to be returned, but i don't think they have much of it.

This is the thing, the accounts that were seized were just pass thru accounts, QT would send money from there main account, to these other accounts to process withdrawals, there was never much in them, just enough to cover there withdrawals that were requested. From what i know the main account was never hit, the doj did not seize it.

I really think that all US monies would have been kept separate from ECO card money ... if they didn't they were fools, and making QT a separate entity was pointless. This is why we were cordoned off in the first place.

As to whether this separation will prevent the DOJ from freezing ECO money elsewhere... who knows? Personally, I doubt it. The big fat ugly gorilla eats and sleeps and poops where it wants.
 
Top