My slot tracker journey

New Casino Brand!

Race Casino Logo
Fast Pay'n Play Casino from L&L Europe..
Race Casino Review

WillPower505

Newbie member
Joined
Mar 2, 2020
Location
USA
So some people here wanted me to start proving my claims. So I thought id post some slot tracker journey updates. I reinstalled it today and decided to try out a game that didnt have any data tracked yet. legacy of dead. pretty meh game for most people. I dont mind it. First 168 spins in the book. 1$ spins. does this look like a normal start to anyone else?

legacy of dead.png


Casino name is fortunejack, just so everyone knows who to thank for these amazing wins ill be having.
 

Kroffe

เ๓ ค Ŧคภςץ ๒єคг
MM
Joined
Mar 2, 2019
Location
sweden
What are the claims you are trying to prove?
That legacy of egypt has a shitty basegame?
I believe that. =)
 

bamberfishcake

Experienced Member
MM
Joined
Jan 8, 2019
Location
Essex
For me 168 spins is nothing for 99% ive experienced, when considering randomness, volatility or a hot or cold slot.

Tell you what though, I think it would be interesting to see the stats for somebody who played a PlaynGo for the last few years on slot tracker and then continued to play unknowingly following an RTP reduction for a couple of years to see the stats :)

Thinking on @nikantw do you still have stats for Pragmatic battles? Were they at a higher RTP if so?

Disclaimer: I have not had breakfast yet.
 

Harry_BKK

Meister Member
CAG
mm1
Joined
Dec 18, 2014
Location
Balcony
So some people here wanted me to start proving my claims. So I thought id post some slot tracker journey updates. I reinstalled it today and decided to try out a game that didnt have any data tracked yet. legacy of dead. pretty meh game for most people. I dont mind it. First 168 spins in the book. 1$ spins. does this look like a normal start to anyone else?

View attachment 133323

Casino name is fortunejack, just so everyone knows who to thank for these amazing wins ill be having.
LoD has a more than average portion of the RTP attributed to the Free Spins feature, simply because you can retrigger more expanding symbols. The line pays are also reduced compared to BoD, e.g. 5OAK Aces pays only 12x bet not 15x bet. Hence, the base game won't hold your balance unless you hit 5OAKs premiums repeatedly.

Considering that, I don't see a big issue with 29% over 168 spins, not good but on average you will have only about 40-50% without the free spins.
 

Harry_BKK

Meister Member
CAG
mm1
Joined
Dec 18, 2014
Location
Balcony
I also strongly suspect you are playing on the 91.xx% version as FortuneJack does not show the RTP, well, the help file is disabled.
 

Halvor

Experienced Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2018
Location
Malta
Are you honestly trying to prove a point here with a 168 game round sample on a book of clone?

No there's nothing wrong with that rtp, just as a 4000% rtp would also not prove anything wrong with it.
 

WillPower505

Newbie member
Joined
Mar 2, 2020
Location
USA
I also strongly suspect you are playing on the 91.xx% version as FortuneJack does not show the RTP, well, the help file is disabled.
where do you see this because I click around and look at some files while i play there, and just like that one thread that shows you how to find the file, ive seen "custome RTP 96" on the ones I checked, but sounds like bullshit tbh.
 

WillPower505

Newbie member
Joined
Mar 2, 2020
Location
USA
Are you honestly trying to prove a point here with a 168 game round sample on a book of clone?

No there's nothing wrong with that rtp, just as a 4000% rtp would also not prove anything wrong with it.
How many spins would it take to make you believe?
 

Halvor

Experienced Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2018
Location
Malta
If you aim to prove your whack theory of predicting winning sessions and losing sessions is the goal?

Record your gameplay and tell us beforehand how it's gonna go for a extended time period.

If your trying to prove incorrect rtp settings, well then give us a couple million rounds... And even that is far away from enough to give any expected RTP sample.

Game providers simulate billions of rounds... Not a few hundred.
 

WillPower505

Newbie member
Joined
Mar 2, 2020
Location
USA
If you aim to prove your whack theory of predicting winning sessions and losing sessions is the goal?

Record your gameplay and tell us beforehand how it's gonna go for a extended time period.

If your trying to prove incorrect rtp settings, well then give us a couple million rounds... And even that is far away from enough to give any expected RTP sample.

Game providers simulate billions of rounds... Not a few hundred.
I like the video idea. might just do that.
 

Halvor

Experienced Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2018
Location
Malta
Here's my rtp from divine fortune for 2018 on videoslots.

Do anyone at all think this prove I can somewhat predict the game? I sure hope not! Does it mean the game was somewhat broken? Of course not... I got lucky over a very limited time frame.

Screenshot_2020-06-04-06-35-46-138_com.android.chrome.jpg
 

Harry_BKK

Meister Member
CAG
mm1
Joined
Dec 18, 2014
Location
Balcony
where do you see this because I click around and look at some files while i play there, and just like that one thread that shows you how to find the file, ive seen "custome RTP 96" on the ones I checked, but sounds like bullshit tbh.
I said that "I suspect". I don't know it and was too lazy to check around.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top