Mr.Bet is rogue of the roguest of all

[mulven]

Funny. Casino guru got them to open it back up, the money returned to my account and I requested a cashout this morning after the casino accepted my documents.

Ah so the hidden recent stuff is actually a positive direction, there were two posts from you in a row so it looked unresolved. Would have saved me making the post haha!

I guess they finally got the specific document they were making their stand on or gave up under pressure from CG. Took longer than expected though as they usually seem to resolve complaints within a few days/week.

I wouldn't call them rogue but they do stretch things to the absolute limit. They make things impossible and lie but if you make a 3rd party complaint, then and only then will they start acting more reasonably, although in your case it looks like that also had a bit of delay.

They are increasing their earnings by:

1. making it nigh-on impossible to get verified
2. those who complain externally will get paid out.
3. those who give up or who are unaware of external complaints will never get past the crap live chat/verification says and never get their money, padding mrbets bottom line.

Because there is a path to getting the money out and they do resolve and engage with complaints I disagree with the rogue label. They are just abusing those who don't complain and keeping their money to maximise profits. Its despicable but not rogue imo.

I wouldn't recommend them to anyone but as someone who is experienced in complaints and casinos, I would still play there if I was still in canada and If I never had an account I would still sign up and play, knowing that an external complaint is just part of the withdrawal process and to make one immediately at the first sign of friction.

 

[lockinlove]

Ah so the hidden recent stuff is actually a positive direction, there were two posts from you in a row so it looked unresolved. Would have saved me making the post haha!

I guess they finally got the specific document they were making their stand on or gave up under pressure from CG. Took longer than expected though as they usually seem to resolve complaints within a few days/week.

I wouldn't call them rogue but they do stretch things to the absolute limit. They make things impossible and lie but if you make a 3rd party complaint, then and only then will they start acting more reasonably, although in your case it looks like that also had a bit of delay.

They are increasing their earnings by:

1. making it nigh-on impossible to get verified
2. those who complain externally will get paid out.
3. those who give up or who are unaware of external complaints will never get past the crap live chat/verification says and never get their money, padding mrbets bottom line.

Because there is a path to getting the money out and they do resolve and engage with complaints I disagree with the rogue label. They are just abusing those who don't complain and keeping their money to maximise profits. Its despicable but not rogue imo.

I wouldn't recommend them to anyone but as someone who is experienced in complaints and casinos, I would still play there if I was still in canada and If I never had an account I would still sign up and play, knowing that an external complaint is just part of the withdrawal process and to make one immediately at the first sign of friction.

Very wreckless comments to make. Encouraging players to play in a casino that will only pay if you wait 4 months and file numerous complaints via 3rd party to be paid is not responsible behavior. There are thousands of casinos to choose from there is literally no reason to ever play in Mr.bet. None.

Looking at trust pilot it is littered with dozens of complaints of non payment and scamming.

Mr.Bet seems to only pay the players they know will file a complaint against them. Funding a casino like this is not wise. Casinos like this rob players. Depositing is funding them and allowing them to exist. This casino should be shut down.

 

[mulven]

Encouraging players to play

I said, verbatim, "I wouldn't recommend them to anyone". The rest of the sentence is saying why I would personally still play there myself, knowing the risks. They are a casino with very bad conduct but but to be considered rogue has certain criteria that hasn't been met in my opinion, i would definitely designate them as "bad" though.

When I did play mrbet in canada, I did have to make a complaint and it took 2 days to resolve the complaint. I did spend a week prior to the complaint tearing my hair out, though.

 

[lockinlove]

I said, verbatim, "I wouldn't recommend them to anyone". The rest of the sentence is saying why I would personally still play there myself, knowing the risks. They are a casino with very bad conduct but but to be considered rogue has certain criteria that hasn't been met in my opinion, i would definitely designate them as "bad" though.

When I did play mrbet in canada, I did have to make a complaint and it took 2 days to resolve the complaint. I did spend a week prior to the complaint tearing my hair out, though.

Well no, it's contradiciton. You said you wouldnt recommend them but went onto to say if people are from Canada they should still play there.

It has been met. I see dozens of complaints of non pay and then what I experienced myself. And then having to fight with the casino and file complaints and wait months to possibly get paid. That is rogue behavior.

 

[mulven]

Well no, it's contradiciton. You said you wouldnt recommend them but went onto to say if people are from Canada they should still play there.

It has been met. I see dozens of complaints of non pay and then what I experienced myself. And then having to fight with the casino and file complaints and wait months to possibly get paid. That is rogue behavior.

No I went on to say that "as someone who is experienced in complaints and casinos" "I would still play there if I was still in canada". Still is the important word here, if you ignore the first quote, If I had said "I would still play there if I was from canada" then it has a different meaning, although due to the qualifier of "someone who is experienced in complaints and casinos" it would still only be a recommendation to players in canada who are experienced in making complaints to casinos, which it wasn't. If you haven't noticed my location says "(Also lived in montreal for a year)" as to give context to why I so much knowledge about canada. You interpreted the sentence incorrectly. That sentence was all about me, and I feel like most people with proper reading comprehension would know that.

Lets not argue about what is rogue and what isn't and agree that they are a casino with awful conduct. I looked at your complaint on CG this morning, saw that it was still unresolved and made a post to try and help you get the money as I know that if you dance the right dance they will pay, I didn't post here to have an argument, I only want to help.

 

[lockinlove]

No I went on to say that "as someone who is experienced in complaints and casinos" "I would still play there if I was still in canada". Still is the important word here, if you ignore the first quote, If I had said "I would still play there if I was from canada" then it has a different meaning, although due to the qualifier of "someone who is experienced in complaints and casinos" it would still only be a recommendation to players in canada who are experienced in making complaints to casinos, which it wasn't. If you haven't noticed my location says "(Also lived in montreal for a year)" as to give context to why I so much knowledge about canada. You interpreted the sentence incorrectly. That sentence was all about me, and I feel like most people with proper reading comprehension would know that.

Lets not argue about what is rogue and what isn't and agree that they are a casino with awful conduct. I looked at your complaint on CG this morning, saw that it was still unresolved and made a post to try and help you get the money as I know that if you dance the right dance they will pay, I didn't post here to have an argument, I only want to help.

If you never had an account you would still sign up and play? Why? Knowing the casino has dozens of non pay complaints against it and other warnings including on this forum by me and many others and the admins here. When there are lots of other casinos to choose from, why would you sign up and play here? Im genuinely confused. There is really no reason to play here at all if you have to file complaint and fight for your money.

Your comment comes across as suggesting it "If I didnt have an account and was from Canada I would play here" This is you suggesting the casino whether its for you or others.

There is no argument of rogue or not rogue. When you do not pay players, that is rogue.

 

[Guntis]

 

[mulven]

If you never had an account you would still sign up and play? Why? Knowing the casino has dozens of non pay complaints against it and other warnings including on this forum by me and many others and the admins here. When there are lots of other casinos to choose from, why would you sign up and play here? Im genuinely confused. There is really no reason to play here at all if you have to file complaint and fight for your money.

I personally don't mind having to make a complaint to get my money, if i know in advance there is a very very high chance that I will. There are lots of casinos to choose from but I might have accounts at many of them already and be sniffing around for new sign up bonuses to play. I didn't tend to stick around at a casino if I wasn't getting bonuses anymore.

Your comment comes across as suggesting it "If I didnt have an account and was from Canada I would play here" This is you suggesting the casino whether its for you or others.

Let me help you out here, bold is my recommendation, underlined is what makes it obvious I'm talking about my personal decisions, italics is talking about my personal decisions. I lived in canada for a while.

I wouldn't recommend them to anyone but as someone who is experienced in complaints and casinos, I would still play there if I was still in canada and If I never had an account I would still sign up and play, knowing that an external complaint is just part of the withdrawal process and to make one immediately at the first sign of friction.

Just to make it clear since the way I wrote that sentence apparently hasn't been understood properly. I don't think anyone should sign up to mr bet when there are hundreds of casinos with better player experiences out there. I personally would choose to take the risk and that is 100% my decision.

There is no argument of rogue or not rogue. When you do not pay players, that is rogue

it's rogue-ish behaviour but I personally would only call casino rogue in this situation if they both didn't react to complaints AND stalled/no payments. Definitely see you next tuesday behaviour.

We obviously have different subjective opinions of what qualifies as fully rogue so lets agree to disagree and not argue about it. I don't come to casinomeister to argue which is why I stopped coming to the politics threads mostly after trying it out on election night

 

[lockinlove]

I personally don't mind having to make a complaint to get my money, if i know in advance there is a very very high chance that I will. There are lots of casinos to choose from but I might have accounts at many of them already and be sniffing around for new sign up bonuses to play. I didn't tend to stick around at a casino if I wasn't getting bonuses anymore.

Let me help you out here, bold is my recommendation, underlined is what makes it obvious I'm talking about my personal decisions, italics is talking about my personal decisions. I lived in canada for a while.

Just to make it clear since the way I wrote that sentence apparently hasn't been understood properly. I don't think anyone should sign up to mr bet when there are hundreds of casinos with better player experiences out there. I personally would choose to take the risk and that is 100% my decision.


it's rogue-ish behaviour but I personally would only call casino rogue in this situation if they both didn't react to complaints AND stalled/no payments. Definitely see you next tuesday behaviour.

We obviously have different subjective opinions of what qualifies as fully rogue so lets agree to disagree and not argue about it. I don't come to casinomeister to argue which is why I stopped coming to the politics threads mostly after trying it out on election night

No No this is where we differ because I do! Im evil. Truly evil!

 

[mulven]

No No this is where we differ because I do! Im evil. Truly evil!

Well I'm glad you got verified in the end and will likely get paid, dr.evil! I saw there is a PAB for MrBet 3 days ago so lets hope that person gains the same outcome with the help of max and Gourd!

 

[geordiecolin]

I have been reliably informed that the CEO of MrBet has been booked in for an op at your hospital on his big toe next Monday. How will you tend to his complaint?

 

[lockinlove]

I have been reliably informed that the CEO of MrBet has been booked in for an op on his big toe next Monday. How will you tend to his complaint?

I will answer this question after paid lol

 

[geordiecolin]

I personally don't mind having to make a complaint to get my money, if i know in advance there is a very very high chance that I will. There are lots of casinos to choose from but I might have accounts at many of them already and be sniffing around for new sign up bonuses to play. I didn't tend to stick around at a casino if I wasn't getting bonuses anymore.

Let me help you out here, bold is my recommendation, underlined is what makes it obvious I'm talking about my personal decisions, italics is talking about my personal decisions. I lived in canada for a while.

Just to make it clear since the way I wrote that sentence apparently hasn't been understood properly. I don't think anyone should sign up to mr bet when there are hundreds of casinos with better player experiences out there. I personally would choose to take the risk and that is 100% my decision.


it's rogue-ish behaviour but I personally would only call casino rogue in this situation if they both didn't react to complaints AND stalled/no payments. Definitely see you next tuesday behaviour.

We obviously have different subjective opinions of what qualifies as fully rogue so lets agree to disagree and not argue about it. I don't come to casinomeister to argue which is why I stopped coming to the politics threads mostly after trying it out on election night

I am of a mind to take heed of advice given in here when it comes to choosing a casino to part with my money rather than opting for the double jeopardy of gaining a withdrawal and getting it.

Tripple jeopardy factor in a bonus at x30- x60. The idea for me in choosing a new casino to deposit at is to limit the risk involved rather than exept that I may have to fight for any withdrawal.
Like many people these days I usually avoid bonuses because the odds on winning are not in my favour and I prefer to withdraw at any time I wish.

 

[Reelsoffun]

Maybe ive dodged a bullet with MrQ.

Last month they wanted a SOW, with me using open banking to grant them access to my main bank account.

I told them they were insane if they think I would let some dodgy 3rd party called "clearstake (probably WEF approved) log into my bank account, and told them to shove their account up their arris (Literally)

Anyone who would agree to open banking is asking for trouble and IMO is a complete idiot, I will never sign up to that even with my own bank let alone letting casinos have it.

The very fact that every company and bank account is constantly pushing it down our throats to go open banking should be a big enough red flag for us all to avoid like the plague.

 

[mulven]

Like many people these days I usually avoid bonuses because the odds on winning are not in my favour and I prefer to withdraw at any time I wish.

I love bonuses as they improve my odds of winning long term (as long as they are played on high RTP, max allowed stake and high volatility). Parachute bonuses tend to be the best of both worlds as you get to play and withdraw with your cash if you want and then have a fallback of a bonus. Some sites impose the rules on the cash part but some sites don't.

With that said I can understand why people don't take them as being locked into wagering can suck, especially when you lose your win in the process.

 

[lockinlove]

I have been reliably informed that the CEO of MrBet has been booked in for an op at your hospital on his big toe next Monday. How will you tend to his complaint?

4 months later and thanks to the help of casino guru I was paid this morning. First time I ever used a complaint service outside of here and Im glad it worked out. The only reason why i did is I have filed so many (legit) PABS lately i didnt want to piss Max off.

So to answer your question. This casino is one of the most scummy casinos I have ever dealt with in the 10+ years of online gaming. I can only imagine how many people this casino group has robbed. They do worry about their public image though. The players who know about the complaints procedure seem to get paid. The players that dont? Robbed.

If they came to me complaining of a big toe? My findings would be their whole leg is infected and off with their leg..actually 2nd leg too just to be safe!

 

[geordiecolin]

4 months later and thanks to the help of casino guru I was paid this morning. First time I ever used a complaint service outside of here and Im glad it worked out. The only reason why i did is I have filed so many (legit) PABS lately i didnt want to piss Max off.

So to answer your question. This casino is one of the most scummy casinos I have ever dealt with in the 10+ years of online gaming. I can only imagine how many people this casino group has robbed. They do worry about their public image though. The players who know about the complaints procedure seem to get paid. The players that dont? Robbed.

If they came to me complaining of a big toe? My findings would be their whole leg is infected and off with their leg..actually 2nd leg too just to be safe!

And maybe their 3rd?

 

[Caravaggio]

I know some of my friends and people I know here play on this casino so this goes out to a warning to all out there.

First, in my defence Ive played here for many many years and been paid. Slow, stalling a bit..but paid. And I know others can say the same @helafast for example I know you play here from posting on the forum.

Im warning you that this casinio can no longer be trusted.

I had $2700 pending withdraw where there was significant stalling. I went to log into today and my account disabled. I asked live chat why and they said

"You havent provided the correct documents so we can invoke term 3.3 and close an account and confiscate the money".

I asked them what they are talking about. I supplied ID, selfie with id, bank statement, proof of address" (I really didnt even need to verify. I just verified with them a few months ago when my license expired) I didnt change payment methods or anything. So stalling red flags started popping up.

They basically said sorry not sufficient enough and because you cant supply what we want, we have the right to terminate your winnings and account and have decided to so.

They then linked me to a term that says if a player cannot provide proper documents we have the right to blah blah blah. Which I assume would be meant if you cannot provide your photo ID and stuff.

So I have no idea what they are doing...well I do know...but looks like they decided it was time to go fully rogue.

And yes, I know there are some members that have been paid. So was I. I was paid $10 000 last year by them. Something has changed for the worse and looks like they are robbing people outright.

This isnt a case of duplicate accounts, or partner playing on their casino too or anything like that. There is one account in my household and only used by me. They just basically said we are taking your money and making up a reason.

I see the dozens of complaints on trustpilot too. So looks like this is now full out rogue.

I feel like this term was recently added although I could be wrong. I dont remember reading such a term nor would I play on a casino who would have this.

rules, 3.3.3 If you do not or cannot provide us with such information or such information is not satisfactory, we may lock or restrict your Member Account until you have provided us with such information, and if we do not receive the required information, or we are otherwise unable to verify your identity, we may terminate these Terms, close your Member Account.
Regrettably, since the suitable documents hadn't been sent during the verification process, your account was closed and the withdrawal will not be procesed.

The company is registered in Cyprus:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Submitting a lawsuit under the European Small Claims Procedure in Cyprus is free:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

The form can be found here:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

Here are the contact details for the competent courts:

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.