I like the concept of most games by Thunderkick they are mainly pretty good with a good variety of models. Most of them also boast high potential in terms of winnings.
HOWEVER apart from the odd one here and there where are the screenshots of anybody achieving anywhere near the said potential.
FWIW. I personally think their games are gimped after a certain period. It’s so noticeable with certain releases.
I like the concept of most games by Thunderkick they are mainly pretty good with a good variety of models. Most of them also boast high potential in terms of winnings.
HOWEVER apart from the odd one here and there where are the screenshots of anybody achieving anywhere near the said potential.
barbershopuncut | medium |
1429unchartedseas | low |
therift | low |
tigerrush | low |
flux | low |
arcader | low |
turningtotems | low |
flamebusters | low |
fullmoonromance | low |
yetibattleofgreenhatpeak | low |
jaguartemple | low |
esqueletoexplosivo | low |
magicious | low |
babushkas | low |
fruitwarp | medium |
thefalconhuntress | low |
wildheistatpeacockmanor | medium |
midasgoldentouch | medium |
swordofkhans | medium |
borktheberserker | low |
tokitime | low |
birdsonawire | ? |
Strange, I think virtually all their slots are low variance. Only a few are medium.
barbershopuncut medium 1429unchartedseas low therift low tigerrush low flux low arcader low turningtotems low flamebusters low fullmoonromance low yetibattleofgreenhatpeak low jaguartemple low esqueletoexplosivo low magicious low babushkas low fruitwarp medium thefalconhuntress low wildheistatpeacockmanor medium midasgoldentouch medium swordofkhans medium borktheberserker low tokitime low birdsonawire ?
Yes, I've gone through all of Thunderkick's files. These are just my own estimates after looking at:Don't know where you got your info from but that is not what Thunderkick says. e.g. This is an excerpt from the Sword of Khans game sheet.
View attachment 118508
Hey that is interesting the vola is square root of variance, should be a more reliable way than these arbitrary ratings people give. Are you sure 9.4 is the actual number for the game and not a rating out of 10 they've rated it as?Don't know where you got your info from but that is not what Thunderkick says. e.g. This is an excerpt from the Sword of Khans game sheet.
View attachment 118508
Yes, I've gone through all of Thunderkick's files. These are just my own estimates after looking at:
1) Thunderkick stated info
2) Features
3) Paytables
4) Hit frequency
5) Playing them
I don't have enough play on each to be sure. They are just my estimates. IMO, Thunderkick and people generally, put to much emphasis on the max win (max exposure). Also, Thunderkick is rating the volatility on their own scale, not on a scale which includes other providers (i.e. this slot may be high volatility on their scale).
What do you think about Birds On A Wire?