King Billy casino 3x wagering requirement for withdrawal without bonus

[Nate]

To look a bit better, all they need to do is change their terms to the ones N1 has:

N1 casino
Money deposited in the casino must be used for gaming activity. Due to this, all deposits need to be wagered at least 1 time. If a player is suspected of money laundering or other fraudulent actions, the casino has the right to request that the deposits need to be wagered at least 3 times.


Otherwise, KingBilly Casino is not recommended and, simply a place to avoid, from the player's point of view.

The casino has the right to request 3 x Wagering if they suspect money laundering .

So if we think you are laundering money, hey it's OK. You just need to play it 3 x more than other players. We would love to get our share.

 

[Guntis]

The casino has the right to request 3 x Wagering if they suspect money laundering .

So if we think you are laundering money, hey it's OK. You just need to play it 3 x more than other players. We would love to get our share.

Yeah, sounds shite, still, it's better than to start wagering your deposit 3 times right from the start .

Its hard to win anything these days and hey they make you wager your own money LOL

 

[Eliot85]

1x for me is okej and i would never complain about it.. But 3x is to much and even vorse is that if u pay a ”fee” its okej to cashout.

 

[Eliot85]

Dear @Rs.Kingbilly

Like @colinsunderland asked (you seem to have missed that question)
Could @Rs.Kingbilly link to which AML rules they are following that state they have to do this?

To clarify: its the 3x wagering/deposit link.

Woow what an answer... King—no—Billy-yes?

 

[pinnit2014]

The casino has the right to request 3 x Wagering if they suspect money laundering .

So if we think you are laundering money, hey it's OK. You just need to play it 3 x more than other players. We would love to get our share.

Obviously that casino has the keenest legal minds supporting them.

I think it's only right that money launderers should be punished to the fullest extent by the law:

By making them wager x3

That'll show'em!

 

[CasinoNinja]

1x is generally fine, which also prevents players to cash out does wager free spins tied to a deposit bonus easily and make basically free money with no risk.

Anything above 1x is stupid.

 

[chuchu59]

I rarely take bonuses nowadays and practically all casinos I patronise require me to complete 3x wagering. I dont mind except for one ie bitstarz who accused me of only playing 3x on table games and then cashout. I guess you dont have the freedom to choose the games you like without being harassed.

 

[pinnit2014]

I rarely take bonuses nowadays and practically all casinos I patronise require me to complete 3x wagering. I dont mind except for one ie bitstarz who accused me of only playing 3x on table games and then cashout. I guess you dont have the freedom to choose the games you like without being harassed.

Quite right - it was totally out of order for you to not play it x10 and lose all your money.



Now x3 on the nose isn't enough?

Go the whole hog - 'You must wager all your cash until you have nothing left'

 

[Mouse75]

1.17 Once deposited, all monies become the property of C*ntsRusCasino. It is a requirement that all deposits are wagered a minimum of 10 times. In the event you manage to keep any balance, withdrawals will be subject to a randomly determined fee of between 20% and 80%.
Any Jackpot win, will be automatically subject to a 25% Admin fee.

 

[The Dude]

Dear Forumers,

I don't plan to justify somehow our T&C here and 3x wagering, I stated in my previous reply " it is mainly meant for AML Policy". Our current T&C are based on the recommendations from the platform provider. I am here just to confirm or deny some of the conditions we adhere to.
As soon as the topic is so hot here, I will raise the issue before the management and see what is possible to do about it. Once I have some updates, I will share it in the thread.

And much appreciated. This is why having reps in this forum is so important, there are plenty of opportunities to make changes. I hope you can convince the powers that be that 1x is plenty x enough.

And this is another reason why we don't beat up on reps here. Some of you folks need to chill out about that. You know who you are.

 

[chuchu59]

And much appreciated. This is why having reps in this forum is so important, there are plenty of opportunities to make changes. I hope you can convince the powers that be that 1x is plenty x enough.

And this is another reason why we don't beat up on reps here. Some of you folks need to chill out about that. You know who you are.

I need to chill too. Its hot over here in Hong Komg.35degrees celsius.

 

[Rs.Kingbilly]

Yes but u have the same shitty rules... 3x wagger on my own money.. Lets say i deposit 500 again.. U wont me to wagger 1500 on my own money... Ridicilus

Hey Eliot,

Nothing ridiculous about 3x wagering, we had in the above a post from the Meister, where you can see that the industry applies from 1 to 5% wager to deposits.

We are currently somewhere in the middle, however, we will see if it is possible to improve it .

I will keep you posted.

 

[The Dude]

Well just to add - that 5x was years ago and the casino was lambasted for it. I will try to look for the thread later. And most every casino that I have found is at 1x. So to say you're in the middle isn't quite there.

 

[The Dude]

Yes but u have the same shitty rules... 3x wagger on my own money.. Lets say i deposit 500 again.. U wont me to wagger 1500 on my own money... Ridicilus

Could you chill out like I asked earlier? I know English is not your native language, but you are posting with an aggressive tone. Don't do it.

 

[Eliot85]

Your site your rules and ofcorse i will respect that. i enjoy beeing here. But i dont know what i did or said aggresive. I was frustated on that moment when i write, it was after my experiens on N1 casinos. But if somone got sad or feelt that i was aggresive... Then i apologise

 

[The Dude]

Your site your rules and ofcorse i will respect that. i enjoy beeing here. But i dont know what i did or said aggresive. I was frustated on that moment when i write, it was after my experiens on N1 casinos. But if somone got sad or feelt that i was aggresive... Then i apologise

Using expletives when criticizing is aggressive. No one got sad, I am just explaining something to you. Since you are not a native English speaker, you should avoid using colourful language since you don't have the ability to really understand when it can be used properly.

If you were at the live tables in Vegas and went on about "shitty" rules towards their pitboss, you'd probably be escorted out of the building.

 

[dec2008mcl]

It is mainly meant for adequate affiliates you are not related to.

It is mainly meant to showcase yous for the wankers that you are

 

[Kroffe]

You are lucky you are not a native english speaker or Meister would be upset with you.

 

[bamberfishcake]

You are lucky you are not a native english speaker or Meister would be upset with you.

Yes, what King Billy does with his own right hand is neither here nor there.

 

[dec2008mcl]

You are lucky you are not a native english speaker or Meister would be upset with you.

Let's have it right here. The way slots are playing at the mo and with the decreasing rtp asking a player to deposit and play through it 3 times before the casino considers it your money is a joke.
How it could be envisaged that it is OK for an accredited casino to do this is beyond me.
Perhaps put a warning that 'players must play through their money 3 times before the casino considers it their money'
Or maybe hold a vote on the forum that decides if playing through 3x your own money, warrants a casino being accredited?

 

[pinnit2014]

Yes, what King Billy does with his own right hand is neither here nor there.

King Billy - Northern Ireland/Ulster - Red Hands: makes sense now.

 

[pmhcfc]

Dear Bunbu,

If you are so smart or try to be the one, you are welcome to open your casino project and operate without any wagering requirements for deposits.
And, then we will see you comments afterwards...
Sitting upright in the armchair and bullshitting on the forum - it is another part of the story.

Personally I wouldn't deposit at this casino simply based on this aggressive, rude and sarcastic reply from a Rep none-the-less.

The fact that x3 wagering my own money before I could withdraw is complete nonsense. I deposited £50 the other day, hit a bonus early on (for a £1 stake) and won over £400 on said bonus. The fact I'd need to playthrough another £140 odd is just unfair.

 

[colinsunderland]

Think some people should chill a little. I think everyone agrees 3x wagering is a bit of a piss take, but the level of abuse aimed at the rep/casino is out of order. It's no wonder some reps don't participate in the forum anymore.
If you can't offer constructive criticism, rather than name calling, then maybe shut up.

 

[Guntis]

In my opinion, any casino that wishes to be accredited here, need to tweak its site terms at least a bit towards the players, otherwise, they will get pecked and this will carry on endlessly.

 

[The Dude]

Let's have it right here. The way slots are playing at the mo and with the decreasing rtp asking a player to deposit and play through it 3 times before the casino considers it your money is a joke.
How it could be envisaged that it is OK for an accredited casino to do this is beyond me.
Perhaps put a warning that 'players must play through their money 3 times before the casino considers it their money'
Or maybe hold a vote on the forum that decides if playing through 3x your own money, warrants a casino being accredited?

You may have some points, but calling the rep a wanker won't advance your agenda. This is why I requested for everyone to be cool. Colinsunderland is correct when stating that reps will feel less inclined to participate, thus negating the power this forum can have - all because you needed to have your juvenile dig. Don't do it.