Maybe you can post the proof on how KKs system fails so people can make up are own minds as to whether his system is flawed or not, at the moment we only have your word on it,
we are not all mathmatical geniuses but there are alot of intelegent people on this site that will know if what you say is true,
KK has always show that he has great ethics and morals when it comes down to promoting what he does and the way he does it, im sure if you can actually l prove his system is flawed then he would be the first to admit whether its wrong or not,
That's not actually true, zebedy. Whilst your loyalty / faith in KK is admirable, the simple fact is that people have explained the incredibly simple fact that his "strategy" is flawed to him in the past and he plays dumb and refuses to change it. Now, either he's really dumb - like
really dumb - because the people who explained it to him used brilliant junior high school methodology and he still couldn't supposedly understand it.....or (and this is what I believe) he's just playing dumb and knows full well it's flawed and wants to keep it that way.
Either way, you're taking advice off someone who is:
a) unethical enough to intentionally trick you with sub-optimal / flawed strategy
b) not intelligent enough to understand junior high mathematics
So good luck with that if you wish to keep going with the system.
But he shouldn't be allowed to pimp it out to unsuspecting newcomers under the guise of "wanting to assist them". He's not helping them, he's hurting them with that strategy.
--------
I'll break it down for you - it's very simple:
KasinoKing's SlotBeater Strategy said:
Given that what we want is the bonus rounds and that on average they occur once every 130 150 spins, what we do is start with small bets & then gradually increase them the longer we go on. This is on the basis that the longer we go without the feature hitting, the more probable it is.
So we play say 100 spins at our minimum (depending on the slot, the minimum is usually either 2c or 5c per line). Then we increase the bets in small increments every 25 or 50 spins e.g. 2c, 4c, 6c, 8c. If we get past say 250 300 spins with no feature, or the bank has dropped by more than our pre-set limit, we stop & try a different slot. Sometimes we alter the total bet by changing the number of win-lines as well as, or instead of just changing the stake/line. And thats pretty much all there is to it!
Not only is this one of the most stupid pieces of gambling-related writing actually available on the internet - it's so cutely and ironically *worse* for any player who follows it.
Of course, KK's strategy involves using bonuses. Ground-breaking stuff obv! But here's the cute thing - and this is *very* simple logic that clearly so many people (even guys that call themselves "TheGamblingGuru" aren't able to understand that the betting systems that children know are a fallacy such as the Martingale...are a fallacy - what kind of Guru are you RobWin? You're not a GamblingGuru - unless that nickname is tongue-in-cheek, like calling a giant "shorty" or w/e). The earth-shattering secret that junior high students understand yet like 3 people on this entire forum seem to be able to work out:
You only pay the House Advantage 'fine' on actual turnover wagered.
whoa whoa whoa! That's some cool conceptual stuff, isn't it. Really complex!
So when you're clearing a wagering requirement, would it be better to wager the absolute max....or better to wager the tiny minbets with tiny rises after 100 minbets, then starting at minbets again if the machine doesn't hit after 250-300 tiny bets (as KK advises)?
A GOLD STAR to the man (or lady) who was able to circumnavigate this complex dilemma. You Sir (or Ma'am) are correct! It would be the optimal line to wager the absolute max bet every single spin until you clear the WR or Bust.
Bonus Silver Star for anyone who can tell me what the WORST strategy would be? You Sir, in the leather jacket....very good! You are correct. The WORST strategy, which will lose you the most, is very close to what KK is advising - tiny bets, which expose you to greater Wagering Requirement, and greater House Advantage.
Sorry KasinoKing, you failed Grade 9 Maths. You'll have to repeat the Grade next year - yes, Summer School is compulsory. Sorry!
Is there anyone who doesn't understand what I've just explained - or who wants clarification? Feel free to ask - I'm not the greatest teacher in that concepts that are very clear in my head, I sometimes struggle to explain them simply and concisely.
No no no KasinoKing, don't try to slink out now. You don't get off *that* easy. This is not a simple maths mistake, my friend. You fail at logic in ways I have not seen Fail yet in a decade of this industry.
KasinoKing: "This is on the basis that the longer we go without the feature hitting, the more probable it is."
Wow. Go directly to Jail. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200. And may God have mercy on your soul.
I could literally rip that entire trainwreck of a strategy guide apart - it's falsehoods, lies, deceit and pure madness almost from start to finish.
And if you think it's all an innocent mistake from a very uneducated man, I think you are being very insulting to KasinoKing. It's just that the alternative is not great either - that he's intentionally attempting to deceive vulnerable people. Bit like stealing from a blind man's coin tin, if you ask me.
You keep stating this as fact but yet you have miserably FAILED to prove a damn thing, why don't you actually try to prove your theory here if you are capable of actually doing that!
So prove to us all then that you do in fact have an IQ over 110, the last time I had mine tested it was 134 so I think I can hang with you here on this!
Of course you don't, why would you want to converse with someone that can match you wit for wit and at the same or greater intelligence level.
Log out buddy. Take a nap. You're really embarrassing yourself.
I don't get into fights with trolls, especially really uneducated trolls, because you can't win a fight with someone who's incapable of intelligent discourse. This isn't 1999 dude. People don't fall for obsessive trolling like you're attempting anymore - nap it out, big fella. You'll be glad you did when you return, trust me.
To me I think it's all pure luck.
If I had some type of strategy/system and I win win what am I doing here.
It's time to close this thread or prove the proof and move on.
Sorry BingoT - the world of professional gambling is far more complicated than the simple concepts I just explained above. The industry likes to sell the dream of easy money fast - but it's not a game for the faint-hearted. You need to be a world-class geek, then work like an insane obsessed workaholic to compete with those who want it just as bad, then you're in a mix.
I've done it.
I've succeeded.
I really screwed up that decision and lost my youth chasing a fallacy.
Enjoy life instead - money is only valuable to the point where you have enough so that you're not stressed and you can take care of yourself and your family and have a little fun. Everything after that....usually not worth the effort and sacrifices chasing.
Why settle for a surrogate and hypothetical conversation when you could - and still can - communicate directly with the person who's reputation and strategy you are so seriously attacking - thus far without producing concrete evidence - something that you seem to feel is beneath you?
Is there something that's stopping from KasinoKing defending himself? Is he in hospital or otherwise indisposed. Stop being ridiculous please. A number of people have told me they've broached the subject with him and he acts dumb and refuses to change the horribly bad and deceitful SlotBuster strategy article.
What possible good could come from my approaching him privately? Answer my question - I've already asked it of you and others before. You all repeat the same tripe over and over like well-trained little shills whilst the mods ignore my polite questions about why this has been moved to "Off-Topic".
Why am I now not thrilled about having you guys around my places? Frankly, because you appear malicious. You provide no logical arguments that make sense, you don't address the issues at hand, you attack me when I've done nothing to provoke you, you are all attempting the oldest (most pathetic) strategy in the book - it's called 'deflection'. It won't work. Stop trying to tilt me until I'm 50% as rude to you as you've all been to me - at which point, no doubt I'll get banned and the Circus of Scam rolls on.
Obviously, I'm copying all of this by the way. You're all assisting me in creating the greatest indictment one could possibly hope for when setting out to prove a valid point. It's just that getting that proof makes me sad. No there is certainly no celebrating on my part.
I'm going leave it here for awhile pending reply from KasinoKing.
If he's too ashamed to show his face and defend himself, well....sweet sassy molassey...that will (*should*) be pretty embarrassing for him.