New Grey Zone Casino Review Jackpotter Casino, comments welcomed

[Webzcas]

Yes you have read the thread title correctly, Jackpotter Casino is the latest casino to be reviewed here on Casinomeister, with them landing within the Grey Zone.

Comments from Max are appropriate so here we are:

Now let’s talk about Jackpotter on Casinomeister: starting sometime around mid-2025, Jackpotter apparently discovered Casinomeister and started spamming the forums. To make a long story short, they were very persistent, ignored everything we said, and spammed the site with a determination that we haven’t seen for many, many years.

Literally dozens and dozens of attempts over the course of the next several months, spanning multiple accounts. It became a game of whack-a-mole of epic proportions, so bad that we had to blacklist the word “jackpotter” from the site in order to gain some control over the situation. Eventually, it tapered off and relative peace returned.

They would have been considerably better served just approaching Sales like every other casino. But here we are, and it seems they may have learned to behave respectfully, so let’s see how it goes

 

[dunover]

A new low for CM.

A Jack-a-Mole aka Crackpipers ran an orchestrated campaign by giving their unfortunate players incentives of bonus chips or free spins in order they infest various gambling forums will shill posts.

This is indicative of low-budget amateur outfit that uses the lowest common denominator i.e. Faecebook and other social media to peddle their wares.

In fact, before I was sacked from staff, the ban hammer got so hot it almost melted with the continual cascade of shite their marks were trying to pollute this forum with.

Now, a matter of months later (not the decision of the forum staff I hasten to add!) they somehow procure a promotional slot here with a rating of 7.4. This remarkable considering:

1. They are unlicensed - Anjouan is NOT a genuine licensing authority, simply the creation of some opportunists making money by marketing it as one. It's the equivalent of one of us inventing a 'Lundy Island Licence' (FYI an uninhabited nature reserve island in the Bristol Channel) and renting it to low-budget opportunists.

2. Bravo Entertainment Ltd. is actually a genuine UK events and venues company for those who may be confused by the name.

3. Go to their site from the UK IPs and yes, you guessed it, unlicensed gambling is available, only they redirect you to some shitehouse called ****spinpolo44.com/en - the very pattern of scammy behaviour there are already NUMEROUS CM WARNINGS about from @Nate and @maxd.

*Does no-one check this before promotion???

4. Check them out (spinpolo44) with scamadvisor and more especially Tr*stP*l*t and EVERY single review is a player, majority from UK, being scammed.

So, as of July 2026 Casinomeister is taking cash from and actively directing players to fraudulent gambling sites.

Why not just have a CM special 'not on Gamstop' section and cut to the chase?

Play at this site and you need psychiatric counselling.

 

[maxd]

To all the membership reading this: please DO NOT hesitate to chip in on this topic.

If Jackpotter is up to dirty tricks and/or shabby treatment of players then they deserve to be down-graded.
If everything is fine now and players are seeing it then there’s no need for that.

As ever, your input will be heavily factored into whatever decisions of this nature are to be made.

- Max

 

[SCATT3R]

These guys non stop infested pretty much any casino related site a few months back and still do where they can and that's an alarm bell ringing if I ever heard one.

 

[maxd]

Yeah, the question is whether that is just a grossly over-enthusiastic marketing team OR are they up to other dirty tricks. Dunover has alluded to some items of particular concern.

 

[SYPlayer95]

Thought my eyes had deceived me. Nope, a review of a shilled casino. .

Its like watching an episode of Jeremy Kyle nowadays on here. (Jerry Springer for the American audience)

So much has changed. What happened to morals? Directing traffic to scam sites and being paid for it!!

Nevermind eh. Just hope some poor bastards doesn't get taken to the cleaners.

EDIT - Just realised the rating is 7.4. Absolutely outrageous

 

[SYPlayer95]

This is how these shitters work. (Attached)

Spam every fucker possible for 2 XRP. A mere £1.60!!!

Actually disappointed in CM at this point.

Appreciate it's not the forum staff, but Gentoo Media are a disgrace.

 

[dunover]

This is how these shitters work. (Attached)

Spam every fucker possible for 2 XRP. A mere £1.60!!!

Actually disappointed in CM at this point.

Appreciate it's not the forum staff, but Gentoo Media are a disgrace.

That explains the filth we saw going on here and depths these shysters will sink to.

 

[maxd]

This is how these shitters work. (Attached) ...

Thanks for the heads-up on that. Bit scummy that they’ve been doing this after their debacle on the forums. Hey ho, we’ve warned them off now.

 

[SYPlayer95]

Thanks for the heads-up on that. Bit scummy that they’ve been doing this after their debacle on the forums. Hey ho, we’ve warned them off now.

Agreed, but a 7.4 rating is immoral.

 

[maxd]

Agreed, but a 7.4 rating is immoral.

Yes, I’m a little taken aback by that myself. Hopefully we’ll soon have some first-hand evidence here to justify having that reevaluated.

 

[Webzcas]

Have to say I was dismayed when I saw this casino had been reviewed and also the score it had attained.

Your comments are very welcomed,

 

[mcgameboy]

Yes, I’m a little taken aback by that myself. Hopefully we’ll soon have some first-hand evidence here to justify having that reevaluated.

With respect Max, the first-hand evidence is here already.

What precisely is it going to take for the 7.4 rating to be re-evaluated downgraded?
One CM member being the victim of their shilling, scamming ways? Two? Ten? Fifty? A hundred?

FORGET putting this shithole casino in the Grey Zone, they belong in the Rogue Pit.

Bryan would have said "adios dickweeds" to this shower and you and Dave damn well know it.

 

[Webzcas]

Bryan would have said "adios dickweeds" to this shower and you and Dave damn well know it.

100%

 

[maxd]

Bryan would have said "adios dickweeds" to this shower and you and Dave damn well know it.

Not to put too fine a point on it but that was then and this is now.

Bryan had a strong site that basically promoted itself and that gave him the positioning he needed to take the high road on pretty much everything. Those were the golden years and it built the site into the juggernaut it was.

That happy situation started to erode around 2018-19 and by the time of sale to Gentoo there were seriously dark clouds forming on the horizon in terms of both the industry at large and Casinomeister's place in it.

The "golden years” scene has died and in it’s place we have a situation where Casinomeister is much less prominent than it was, the rivers of money in the industry have pretty much dried up, and we are now in a fight to redefine ourselves to both stay viable and maintain as much of that “high road” position that we inherited from Bryan as we possibly can.

The bottom line is that the site needs to make money and that’s a lot harder today than it was a decade ago. I believe there is an outstanding team both here on site and behind the scenes in Gentoo at large. That collective effort is working to make the best site we can in the current climate. Scoff at that if you wish but denying reality is not a viable strategy.

So yeah, our laundry is going to get a little dirtier than may have been the case in the past. What you’ll see is us trying to make the best of that that we can. Bryan has absolutely not been forgotten and his legacy is something we take very seriously. If the forum team is still here in a year then that’ll probably mean we are doing a reasonable job of it. If not we’ll know we gave it our best shot and need to apologise to no one.

 

[mcgameboy]

That happy situation started to erode around 2018-19 and by the time of sale to Gentoo there were seriously dark clouds forming on the horizon in terms of both the industry at large and Casinomeister's place in it.

The "golden years” scene has died and in it’s place we have a situation where Casinomeister is much less prominent than it was, the rivers of money in the industry have pretty much dried up, and we are now in a fight to redefine ourselves to both stay viable and maintain as much of that “high road” position that we inherited from Bryan as we possibly can.

The bottom line is that the site needs to make money and that’s a lot harder today than it was a decade ago. I believe there is an outstanding team both here on site and behind the scenes in Gentoo at large. That collective effort is working to make the best site we can in the current climate. Scoff at that if you wish but denying reality is not a viable strategy.

So yeah, our laundry is going to get a little dirtier than may have been the case in the past. What you’ll see is us trying to make the best of that that we can. Bryan has absolutely not been forgotten and his legacy is something we take very seriously. If the forum team is still here in a year then that’ll probably mean we are doing a reasonable job of it. If not we’ll know we gave it our best shot and need to apologise to no one.

I was not aware that things were "deteriorating" as far back as THAT, Max.
I appreciate the clarification though, sincerely.

But as dunover said in post #2...."a new low for CM". That concerns me greatly.
It makes me worry that things round these parts could get even worse before they start to get better.
IF indeed they ever do get better.
I would hate it if this forum became like something akin to "AG2.0"....or worse.

I hope you understand/realise that the last sentence in my post wasn't me "having a go" at you or Dave, because I wasn't.

If I worded it badly enough that you felt that I was, then I'll hold my hands up and say mea culpa.

 

[maxd]

No worries, no problem, and no offence taken. Hand to heart, I’d rather have you guys flag stuff you’re concerned with than have it pass without comment and silently written off as damage done.

As to things getting better we all know that the proof is in the results. I’m fortunate in that I can see all the great work and excellent people behind the curtain as it were, but I have no doubt that their efforts will become known to all soon enough. There literally is a small army of people — Designers, Content, SEO, Product Management, Sales, even C-Levels — throwing their shoulders into making Casinomeister better, profitable, and the market leader we all know it was and can be again.

We have some road to cover, obviously, but IMO the signs are (almost) all pointing in the right direction. Stay tuned and I believe you’ll see for yourself the good things happening with Casinomeister.

 

[dunover]

In one simple analogy, CM has turned from policeman to rent boy.

The absolute irony here is that not long ago the staff put up some excellent and informative warning articles such as :

Scam Spotters Thread 'Black Hole Casinos: The New Face of Online Gambling Scams'

Dec 23, 2025

Something disturbing is emerging in the online gambling world: a new breed of scam casino that makes traditional rogue operations look almost respectable. We call them "Black Hole Casinos" — sites that swallow your money and vanish into the void, leaving no trace and no recourse for players who've been robbed.

WHAT MAKES BLACK HOLE CASINOS DIFFERENT?​

Traditional rogue casinos might slow-pay you, make excuses, or hide behind Terms and Conditions to avoid paying out. Black Hole Casinos don't bother with any of that. They just take your money and...

• Nate
• black hole casinos casino skullduggery scam casinos scamspotters
• Replies: 29
• Forum: Casinomeister News and Info

• 
• 
• 

and:

WARNING Thread 'Lava Entertainment Casino Network'

Mar 3, 2026

We've received a growing number of complaints about casinos operating under the Lava Entertainment network, and the pattern is impossible to ignore:

• Withdrawals that never arrive. Players are waiting weeks, months — in some cases over 3 months — for payouts that simply never come. Casinos either stop responding entirely or string players along with endless "wait another 21 days" replies until they give up.
• Accounts disabled or winnings confiscated without explanation. Players have reported having their accounts shut down after...

• Nate
• lava entertainment rogue casinos
• Replies: 8
• Forum: Casinomeister Warnings

• 
• 
• 

The former refers in part to disappearing 'casinos' with temporary throwaway domains, the latter mentions the main 'legit' looking site redirecting to those scammy casino urls when you have certain IPs.

So, as of this July 2026 CM is promoting a casino that does exactly what the staff saw fit to issue multiple RED WARNING threads about, notwithstanding those scam sites forming a significant proportion of the PAB cases the team is dealing with.

To boot, the shithole gets a 7.4, not far from what several trusted casinos have on here. A kick in the nads for those as well as endangering the membership.

You couldn't make this shit up. In fact, I took delivery of a new freezer yesterday so I will go and stick my head in it for ten minutes to see if this goes away afterwards.

No, it hasn't.

I get that the affiliate landscape has changed, indeed desperation has crept in among the bigger businesses. The measure now for these sites is the degree of shithousery they will exercise.

So, a brief summation: Jack-a-mole have the unique distinction of simultaneously being promoted while fitting into several CM warning categories. It's batshit.

 

[SYPlayer95]

Policeman to Rent boy

 

[maxd]

dunover, you know the drill better than most: with proof of

• JP pulling the black-hole casino tricks.
• JP being part of a rogue casino network.

we can take action against them for any or all of that. Without proof it’s hearsay and you well know our policy on that.

Seriously though, bring it on! Anyone else for that matter too. With first hand proof we’ll have the justification to kick them down the Ratings ladder.

However, without proof — and “I know a guy” ain't going to cut it — this is all sturm and drang. I understand the urge to vent and grab the pitchforks but that alone is not a good case for punitive action.

 

[dunover]

Yes, perhaps I should have videoed my investigation yesterday, UK IP and it popped up a button and redirected me to xxxx//spinpolo44.com/en?reg_tz=gmt_1&aff plus more strings of nonsense.

Naturally, it doesn't do this as of today, I wonder why???

It does however, with no license, present the site to me (should be blocked to UK) and offers me the sign-up portal.

Yes, I should know I wouldn't be trusted, and made it all up. Video lesson learnt.

 

[SYPlayer95]

Does proof not count as all the other complaints plastered all over the Internet?

Otherwise there's a massive flaw in the way reviews are done, surely?

Everyone in the world gets ripped off by a casino, but because none of the complaints have come through the CM channels means you turn a blind eye and say no known complaints against said casino, therefore good to go. Here's a nice rating of X.

Any casino offering incentives for a review should be treated as proceed with caution. After all, if the outfit was a good one, indeed genuine reviews would show that.

This whole situation here is an absolute shambles.

 

[paul7388]

Yes, perhaps I should have videoed my investigation yesterday, UK IP and it popped up a button and redirected me to xxxx//spinpolo44.com/en?reg_tz=gmt_1&aff plus more strings of nonsense.

Naturally, it doesn't do this as of today, I wonder why???

It does however, with no license, present the site to me (should be blocked to UK) and offers me the sign-up portal.

Yes, I should know I wouldn't be trusted, and made it all up. Video lesson learnt.

And if you just hit the button that says one click you are now free to deposit. Just says not added email so if you forget your user name you will be unable to relocate your account.

And if you then hit money button opens up so you can deposit with card and even says UK at top.

So basically you can play there using a debit card without even filling in your name address and D.O.B.

Suppose giving the ease of signing up and being able to deposit should increase their CM score from .7.4 to about 9.

 

[SYPlayer95]

Suppose giving the ease of signing up and being able to deposit should increase their CM score from .7.4 to about 9.

Might as well make them accredited along with the man from Del Monte.

 

[maxd]

… Everyone in the world gets ripped off by a casino, but because none of the complaints have come through the CM channels means you turn a blind eye and say no known complaints against said casino, therefore good to go. Here's a nice rating of X. ...

Nice try but look at the Max’s Desk on this one:

Now let’s talk about Jackpotter on Casinomeister: starting sometime around mid-2025, Jackpotter apparently discovered Casinomeister and started spamming the forums. To make a long story short, they were very persistent, ignored everything we said, and spammed the site with a determination that we haven’t seen for many, many years.

Literally dozens and dozens of attempts over the course of the next several months, spanning multiple accounts. It became a game of whack-a-mole of epic proportions, so bad that we had to blacklist the word “jackpotter” from the site in order to gain some control over the situation. Eventually, it tapered off and relative peace returned.

They would have been considerably better served just approaching Sales like every other casino.

If that reads like "therefore good to go” to you then I’d have to say "that’s a you problem”.

Do the problems published around the internet mean we should copy and say the same? My stance for many years has been “no” and my reasons are:

• we report on what we know to be true, typically meaning first-hand evidence only. I’d rather be cautious and flag someone later that others might’ve than flag them quickly and be wrong. Be cautious or be untrustworthy? I’ll take the former.
• if a casino is shit we’ll know about it in due course. Again, being cautious.
• if we invite people to give us their first hand experience and over an extended period nothing comes of it then maybe the problem didn’t really exist, or was a passing thing, or got blown out of proportion. Again, cautious.

So no, I don’t think us forgoing internet chatter as a basis for our Ratings is a bad thing. That said, it doesn’t hurt to mention what’s out there and note that it’s something everyone should keep an eye on.

Yes, I should know I wouldn't be trusted, and made it all up.

The world’s smallest violin is playing a sad song for the rare and delicate flowers of the world.

 

[dunover]

The world’s smallest violin is playing a sad song for the rare and delicate flowers of the world.

Save it for the players they will shaft/have shafted instead.

 

[maxd]

Save it for the players they will shaft/have shafted instead.

And when that happens they are most welcome to report it to us and we’ll do what I’ve repeated many times here that we would do: kick JP down the ladder because they’ve done something to deserve it.

So far all we know first-hand that they’ve done is some stupidly aggressive self-promotion which we’ve made clear and frequent mention of. You guys are alluding to legions of abused players which so far we’ve seen no trace of. If they exist send them here, let them file their PABs and we’ll dig into it. In fact we’ll happily waive any of the Player Arbitration Policies and Procedures that would normally block their case for having been handled elsewhere or in public. Bring it on!

Failing that this is turning into a pitch-fork party which is not on my agenda for today.

 

[SYPlayer95]

Can I please ask why I'm receiving a warning for my comments on a post stating comments welcome?

Cheers

 

[maxd]

You know full well that there are constructive comments and there are purposefully destructive comments. I wasn’t aware that you needed your hand held and the difference explained to you.

Constructive = "This is how these shitters work. (Attached)”. Makes it clear and something to work with, which we did BTW. Thank you for that.

Destructive = "Might as well make them accredited along with the man from Del Monte.” Destructive because you know damn well that we curb-stomped DelOro for a lot more than the shilling JP perpetrated. Lying to everyone’s face (multiple times), blaming non-existent staff members, creating multiple accounts to sock-puppet each other, ignoring jurisdiction restrictions (multiple times), etc etc etc. Not even close to the same scenario and you implying that we’d Accredit either of them is simply trolling.