One thing I'm not clear on - did that 700 include winnings as well as bonus funds, or was it really made up of 14 50 monthly match credits.
I was just wondering because it occurred to me that Intercasino might have a problem voiding a bonus when the WR hasn't been met. As I understand, Intercasino will let you withdraw your original deposit after losing the bonus, without meeting the WR (can someone confirm this? Never tried it myself). Surely that means the bonus is played first, and any winnings are dervied from bonus funds.
Imagine I deposit 50 and get a 50 bonus. I turn the 100 starting balance into, say, 300 - but I don't meet the WR. I then somehow fail to play again within 90 days. What happens?
Can my winnings be taken too as they are bonus funds? If so, this seems unfair on the player. On the other hand, if they just take back the 50 bonus, would I still have to meet the wagering requirements? If not, that seems unfair on the casino. The only fair thing I can think of is that you lose the 50 bonus, but can keep any winnings provided you still meet the original WR. Does that seem fair? Does anyone know what they'd do in that situation?
Just brought this up as I was curious about it. Apologies if it's not relevant to this player's case. But I find it hard to believe you can build up 700 of bonuses in one account - 14 months' worth of bonuses. How come some of this money wasn't already voided months ago?
I was just wondering because it occurred to me that Intercasino might have a problem voiding a bonus when the WR hasn't been met. As I understand, Intercasino will let you withdraw your original deposit after losing the bonus, without meeting the WR (can someone confirm this? Never tried it myself). Surely that means the bonus is played first, and any winnings are dervied from bonus funds.
Imagine I deposit 50 and get a 50 bonus. I turn the 100 starting balance into, say, 300 - but I don't meet the WR. I then somehow fail to play again within 90 days. What happens?
Can my winnings be taken too as they are bonus funds? If so, this seems unfair on the player. On the other hand, if they just take back the 50 bonus, would I still have to meet the wagering requirements? If not, that seems unfair on the casino. The only fair thing I can think of is that you lose the 50 bonus, but can keep any winnings provided you still meet the original WR. Does that seem fair? Does anyone know what they'd do in that situation?
Just brought this up as I was curious about it. Apologies if it's not relevant to this player's case. But I find it hard to believe you can build up 700 of bonuses in one account - 14 months' worth of bonuses. How come some of this money wasn't already voided months ago?