Official Hi! We are Nolimit City!

[Jono777]

I'd at least smile and maybe run a £10 remarkable thread comp

 

[FAZI1]

They officialy realsed level 92% RTP shame for this company so dirty to catch all this new players playing in curacao licensed sites who not check rtp % of slots ( beacouse 3/4 new players not check ) So from now official This company offered 3 ? or 4 levels rtp% lowest is 92% lowest - medium is 94% and highiest is 96% - They will be focues wth 92% lowest level rtp% under several curacao licensed sites . - No Limit City ! Need more players money !

So be aware of them they starts play dirty . We waiting for 90% RTP% and hidden rtp% info in playtable same like do playngo ;d will be perfect for all Players playing under curacao licensed sites - They not make enough money in in Bigest crypto curency sites where higest bets are unlocked so they dicedied relased new 92% RTP LEVEL for their curacao licensed sites - so be aware this company turnining in greedy dirty rubish slots provider. ( same is hacksaw gamings lowest rtp is 92% ? or is lower avalivble im dont understant how pople can just accept this slots providers steal money from Part of players ( beacouse runnig slots under 92% is steal moeny ) .

 

[L&L-Jan]

@FAZI1 That is not to blame Nolimit for. Its the result of the requests from their clients that they make games with variable RTP. From there it is up to the casino to decide on which RTP they want to release the game. Nolimit is doing only what their customers are asking.

 

[justdoit]

That's cool! But what a uneventful maxwin meh.

looks like they had auto clicker on

 

[satchnz]

@FAZI1 That is not to blame Nolimit for. Its the result of the requests from their clients that they make games with variable RTP. From there it is up to the casino to decide on which RTP they want to release the game. Nolimit is doing only what their customers are asking.

That’s probably a fair comment @L&L-Jan.

But then you have the likes of Elk Studios who only offer one, sub par, RTP on their latest releases - 94%. That’s enabling the slippery slope to get even more lubricant. What’s next for them? 92%? Then 90%? And so on. Other Providers will surely follow…

 

[bamberfishcake]

hacksaw gamings lowest rtp is 92% ? or is lower avalivble

Hacksaw Gaming do an encouraging 88% maths model of their latest slots now It's party time for casinos with these low RTP versions. It will take some time for players to wise up and start snubbing them.

 

[bamberfishcake]

@FAZI1 That is not to blame Nolimit for. Its the result of the requests from their clients that they make games with variable RTP. From there it is up to the casino to decide on which RTP they want to release the game. Nolimit is doing only what their customers are asking.

That's an interesting point Jan. And I see what you are saying. But, there have been signs of developers such as Play'n GO and Pragmatic Play encouraging casinos to switch to lower-paying versions.

I wonder why Big Time Gaming doesn't do it, PG Soft and a few others. There must be some serious demand. Perhaps they want their slots to provide a more pleasurable experience than what the lower models offer. Playing these low versions is noticeable for those that are familiar with the max models.

 

[toms596]

A developer that size surely could say no? They know everyone wants to play their games so a casino is hardly going to stop taking their releases

 

[satchnz]

Hacksaw Gaming do an encouraging 88% maths model of their latest slots now It's party time for casinos with these low RTP versions. It will take some time for players to wise up and start snubbing them.

Let me know when you’re ready for some “far away” recommendations to try

 

[bamberfishcake]

Thinking on, Big Time Gaming are in a great position where they can licence their mechanic and let the partners offer the lower paying RTP models, whilst keeping the good name of the brand. I play more BTG now than ever before because of the mixed bag of RTP versions out there from everyone else.

Talking about Elk Studios' unique approach, I prefer it. Their games are the same wherever you choose to play. They are not taking advantage of players lack of knowledge.

 

[satchnz]

Talking about Elk Studios' unique approach, I prefer it. Their games are the same wherever you choose to play. They are not taking advantage of players lack of knowledge.

Yes, but they are also creating a dangerous (for the player) precedent. At least most other providers still offer a higher RTP version of their games so we at least have access to them one way or another.

 

[FAZI1]

@FAZI1 That is not to blame Nolimit for. Its the result of the requests from their clients that they make games with variable RTP. From there it is up to the casino to decide on which RTP they want to release the game. Nolimit is doing only what their customers are asking.

But thats your point of viev like a person workings for casinos but is completly different viev of this for players - Lets say not all players can play in MGA licensed sites part of players can play only in curacao licensed sites : Next point is from this group players who played under Curacao how many new players know abaout this mess and unethical practice with offered same slots with several rtp% versions ? Not to many .....

Not to many / how many of this new players check deep in playtable RTP% set ups slots beafore they starts play in game mayby 10% -20% so 80% customers play in their favorite or new realsed slots and they even dont know their are victims of greedy slots provider - and their winnings in some point dont depend from their luck in game if they play in slots version 92% RTP . or lower

Playngo provider even decided hidden their RTP% set ups in their games for curacao licensed sites ( so this company is perfect example of unethical bissnes practice not only offered several low rtp% version but even hidden acces to simple check of curently version of rtp% player play in casinos under curacao licensions . ) = they shoud recived some penality $ for this .

You say this is not fold of slots providers just casinos ask them to realsed more Low RTP% Versions and slots companies say Yes why not
But they same can say No beacouse this can make damage for slots company reputations if they starts relased slots with several low rtp% models .

This is same like somone open illegal small landbasing shop with few slots machine and owner set up rtp% for his slots machines very low to make as much money as possible in short period . so unethical bisnes practice to make profits .

And in the end casino cant lower RTP% of slots but provider can so if Providers are dirty and greedy ( as you say casino ask providers to realsed RTP% Versions 92% and Below - then provider say yess prerfect idea lets do this ( cheting some groups customers ) " since 3/4 of them not check playtable looking for rtp% versions so easy money for both of us ." - IM called this Scam

. And Playngo company who not even offered several rtp% models but intentionally hidden informations of version of rtp% currently used in games im can caled theifs - and this company shoud go penalyty for unethical bisnes practice

 

[bamberfishcake]

@FAZI1 That is not to blame Nolimit for. Its the result of the requests from their clients that they make games with variable RTP. From there it is up to the casino to decide on which RTP they want to release the game. Nolimit is doing only what their customers are asking.

Have to mention also mate, that it's not as one-sided as you suggest because game developers get extra revenue from lower-paying RTP models.

Anyway, you would think NLC would pop in to answer some queries.

I guess only they know if they did it due to casino demand (though I doubt anyone would dare to drop their games), or to simply make more money from players

 

[satchnz]

Have to mention also mate, that it's not as one-sided as you suggest because game developers get extra revenue from lower-paying RTP models.

Anyway, you would think NLC would pop in to answer some queries.

I guess only they know if they did it due to casino demand (though I doubt anyone would dare to drop their games), or to simply make more money from players

Good point about the provider getting benefit of this too. And I doubt we’ll see the NLC reps in here again after most ripped them apart over the Gulag game last year. I think we hurt their feelings

 

[incrediblestuff]

i dont mate, didnt make it, i do like the music Pretty sure our player is happy and im happy for him, or her, or it, or they, or them - you never know these days.

Fucking love that tune! Even more 80's than.....well, 80's music!
You can say w/e you want about NoLimit but they do have the sound design down to a T...

 

[bamberfishcake]

Fucking love that tune! Even more 80's than.....well, 80's music!
You can say w/e you want about NoLimit but they do have the sound design down to a T...

Their execution of a theme is up there with the best.

For me personally, Elk Studios are there with them when it comes to audiovisuals. They probably just edge it with their latest releases. I think Peter & Sons is pretty cool when it comes to art and music also.

 

[Kroffe]

Did someone say 80's?
I know its a bit off-topic but any excuse to post this masterpiece.

 

[bamberfishcake]

Did someone say 80's?
I know its a bit off-topic but any excuse to post this masterpiece.

But that's Millenial Hoff, you need the real 80s version

 

[TamingTheBeast]

NLC really does make great art / visuals / audio and the themes are really well executed but man I wonder if they smoke crack before coming up with these dark themed games. Im waiting for an 80s style slot that doesnt include some twisted doctor torturing to death people

 

[L&L-Jan]

This happened yesterday at All British Casino, again

 

[The Viking]

This happened yesterday at All British Casino, again

Super hit but this game is a weird one to understand
thos 50k hits looks more like a progressive jackpot hits except this one is very undramatic

 

[slot_zombie]

Really odd the way this one does its max win, just 4 gravestones showing up and a wild.

 

[Don't be rigged now]

Why do your releases always follow the pattern of giving decent wins in the first few weeks of release then stop paying completely? Road rage is a fine example - pay’s absolutely nothing these days with common 5-10x bonus’

 

[Flyingslotsman]

Why do your releases always follow the pattern of giving decent wins in the first few weeks of release then stop paying completely? Road rage is a fine example - pay’s absolutely nothing these days with common 5-10x bonus’

I'm no expert but that surely must fall under the fact that many many people will be playing them, so the odds of hitting a better outcome is improved as there are more spins being put through the slot.

 

[ChopleyIOM]

I don't really follow NLC's output these days and haven't done for a while, I used to check their affiliate site regularly to see what new games they had coming up, but sometime around the Mental/Evil Goblins/Punk Toilet era I just stopped caring. (Did everyone who made Punk Rocker, or Wixx, or East Coast vs West Coast just leave the company or something?)

Anyway, I thought I'd have a little nosey this morning and their latest slot is called 'Nine To Five', and like all of NLC's output has been for quite some time now, it's entirely constructed around the bonus buys with a basegame that'll quickly make you want to go and do something more enjoyable, such as finding the largest object in your house that you can insert sideways into your rectum without dying.

The first two bonus buy options didn't raise much of an eyebrow with me, 75x and 200x respectively, actually rather tame by NLC's standards.



And there's the 'lottery' option as well, for those who like to gamble their gamble whilst gambling. (And we wonder why organisations like BACTA tend to thrash out.)



But this is the one that really caught my attention, you literally pay 1370x stake to get a straight 1 in 6.7 chance to hit the top prize of 9217x, on a single spin of a mega symbol that either lands or doesn't land. It takes about two seconds to play out.




And this is the whole thing, two seconds might be a slightly generous measurement of the time it takes to play out.

This is a losing spin.



And then, on average, once every 6-7 spins, this happens:




If you don't get that, you can easily lose 10,000x in under 30 seconds.

Remember folks, gambling should be fun, and gamble responsibly!

NOTE - I had a search on the forums and couldn't find this mentioned anywhere else except in the Winners Screenshots thread where it sort of got lost in the posts, so I thought it was worth flagging up here in the NLC thread.

Winners Screenshots- November 2023 - Page 4 - Casinomeister Forum