Guts/Yits True or Untrue?

Status
Not open for further replies.
You're missing the main point of my argument.

This will be last thing I will say about it. As said, good luck with your quest but I think you are on a lost course and I was trying to save you some money.

Your missing my point if I go that route I intend to know in advance that it won't cost me a red cent
 
Be careful with Bonuses!
It is  crucial  that you understand and agree to the terms and conditions of any bonus that you accept. Most of the complaints that come through our arbitration service are bonus related; it would be safe to say that there are tens of thousands of players who have never complained because they realized after the fact that they did not understand or had never read the terms. Nothing in a casino is free – so whenever you see “free” being used, there are stipulations. It is important for you to understand that.

Please check out our Bonus Section that lists the offers given by our Accredited Casinos. No deposit bonuses, welcome bonuses (AKA sign up bonuses [SUBs]), exclusive bonuses, reload bonuses, free spin bonuses...all this and more!
Hi,

(I have only read OPs post, so this may be out of context.)

Don't get me wrong, I'm no ethical expert, but if I were in OPs shoes, I would be offended by that comment as well.
At the very least the comment should be backed up; that's the acceptable way of doing it before making potentially harmful claims.

Afaik, there's a rule here on CM that players are not allowed to make potentially damaging comments about casinos without some reasonable amount of evidence to back it up, this should hold true for what casinos say about players as well.

On the bright side, I'm sure the casino rep didn't intend any harm.
 
Guys , calm down with the PAB. I doing this for a very specific reason.I have a year window to sue for libel which is mid march this year. I've been involved in plenty of court actions over the years but actually not done one for libel before and they are uncommon ground for me.Its 20k through the door right at the start and you have to be covered for 100k to see it through and i had to take some advice on this one.

You can get insurance to cover those costs and hence my thread as it leaves my options open. Should GIG decide to say no, we have no concrete evidence then i'm covered day one its a straightforward penalty kick, insurance granted. Should they say they have, well i know that it is erroneous and the fact they admit to having it means they have to produce it right away with the first solicitors letter from me.As it will be erroneous (i did nothing wrong) i will again be covered with insurance no problem and the first solicitors letter to get to that point is only a negligible cost.

Option 3 is the thread which is if they are asked and don't respond at all what other choice did i have but to go to Court in which case in the unlikely event i was not successful i can still get insurance on my costs, they gave me no choice but to sue them and did nothing to mitigate their position.

Option 4 was obviously to work something out with them, they didn't want to know and i'm not letting something like this go unchecked but i wish to cover my bases in relation to costs.They have had every opportunity to talk to me via phone/skype/email etc

Regardless of all that why would i need to PAB to ask a straightforward question of an accredited casino rep , surely the PAB service is busy and max can only ask the exact same question i'm asking? If reps/casino's can just "shut down" after making accusations like this it does not say much.If the answer to that question creates a liability for them then they caused it by saying what they said, not me, its not my fault they find the question and answer difficult.

I state again for absolute clarity there is no Court Action currently , not one solicitors letter has passed between the parties. This thread may well be a precursor to that but the fact that it might does not detract from its validity, for it to be closed would be denying me the advantage of option 3.

You are missing my point: you have two choices - either submit a PAB or submit a PAB. You threatened the casino group with a lawsuit earlier, and as far as I know, they have made the decision to cease discussing the issue in the public fora. So all this is right now is another blustery agenda laden thread.

We have rules in this forum concerning agendas, and this has been pointed out a number of times. Do not test my patience unless you do not value your membership here.
 
I haven't decided what to do about it yet, i have up to a year for libel.

You have to think about it logically; it's not worth your time, money, and effort to sue.

Why not PAB? Max is a smart guy he will look into it for you.
 
So i have one simple question for this Group: Do you have concrete proof that my account was linked to other accounts to maximise the use of available bonuses?...
Ok, it's been confirmed that they have told you that they will not discuss this issue in public. You are using this thread to harass them when you know that this is true.

Thread upgraded to closed. And you are being provided with a holiday for a couple of days to preserve what is left of my weekend. When you return, try to act a bit more reasonable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Click here for Red Cherry Casino

Meister Ratings

Back
Top