Golden Goose Winner Screenshots

[Simmo!]

So i cashed out $1,200, played $200 at half-stake, then upped it to double in a good run doubled my stake and went to play out on Wizards. Ooh my word...another $1,600

 

[Bruce Hamilton]

Ooh my word...another $1,600

That's an impressive screen, but the other one should be in the "screenshots that suck" thread. 1400+ spins for five scatters and only an $800 win ain't right.

 

[Simmo!]

That's an impressive screen, but the other one should be in the "screenshots that suck" thread. 1400+ spins for five scatters and only an $800 win ain't right.

Not really Bruce - when you consider the chances are soemthing like 1/10 x 1/10 x 1/0 x 1/10 x 1/10 plus also, because i reckon you make about 95% return on the slot that means you've bet $3,000, recouped $2,750 and then you make $550 profit

 

[gaputernut]

HOW???

Ok, I am usually the first to rant and rave about new slots.....but...The GG games i can hit sh** on...lol
I see all these posts and think...hummmm...i will try again....just to get Nothing again.
I have had one good hit...on totem treasure, 4 eagles 3 times.
so i am both confused...... and in awe..... :notworthy

WTG folks....


Now...they are going to introduce another one end of july. but thank goodness they are also going to get new reg. 9 line bonus ones too...
whoohooo

 

[Simmo!]

Ok, I am usually the first to rant and rave about new slots.....but...The GG games i can hit sh** on...lol
I see all these posts and think...hummmm...i will try again....just to get Nothing again.
I have had one good hit...on totem treasure, 4 eagles 3 times.
so i am both confused...... and in awe..... :notworthy

WTG folks....

Its a patience thing with the GG slots - you need to spend quite a long ime waiting, but the rewrads can be big.

Now...they are going to introduce another one end of july. but thank goodness they are also going to get new reg. 9 line bonus ones too...
whoohooo

Got any details yet G?

 

[jamiester]

are you kidding?

That's an impressive screen, but the other one should be in the "screenshots that suck" thread. 1400+ spins for five scatters and only an $800 win ain't right.

Five scatters that pay 400X (or 320X counting the goose bet) shouldn't come up much more often than once every 40,000 spins. And that would be a 1% return at that level, which is a huge percentage for such a big hit. On most machines, I think, a 400X total bet hit would come up less than once in 100,000 spins and that would still be 0.4%, still quite large. The fact that we are seeing so many posted here is a little disconcerting. They can't be giving out all of these big prizes without nailing you on the little prizes. You guys must be getting LOOOOONG streaks of just about nothing in between these big hits, no?

 

[gaputernut]

New slots

Yes,..Simmo...I will copy and paste what i have into another post....stay tuned!!!!

I did a separate thread....new microgaming slots.
BTW, I know you love fortune.. ..and i have a post on their new one too.

 

[tim5ny]

Five scatters that pay 400X (or 320X counting the goose bet) shouldn't come up much more often than once every 40,000 spins. And that would be a 1% return at that level, which is a huge percentage for such a big hit. On most machines, I think, a 400X total bet hit would come up less than once in 100,000 spins and that would still be 0.4%, still quite large. The fact that we are seeing so many posted here is a little disconcerting. They can't be giving out all of these big prizes without nailing you on the little prizes. You guys must be getting LOOOOONG streaks of just about nothing in between these big hits, no?

Well.... the goose shit on me today, and that's how these guys are getting paid for these great hits they've been getting.

 

[trick]

Same here... Won 5 spins at 3x @ 25 credits a spin.. made a whopping 78 credits on that one!

Chose the egg over the cash and got 9 spins at 1x @ 25 credits... made 140 credits..

Needless to say, I don't like the goose..

 

[Simmo!]

That explains why i had another 5 scatters today at 2c = $1600 Keep feeding it for me while I'm away guys

Seriously though - i think you're looking for the wrong things here. Unlike other slots, the feature isn't really the payday, its the clue! Re-read Spear's post and use the increase/decrease method (and a lot of patience!) in conjunction with this It can take several hours, but Totem Treasure is the most profitable MG slot if you play it right IMHO.

 

[n1stunnor]

Would love to hear some of the amounts won when picking the cash instead of the egg,and bet amounts.

Anybody?

 

[jamiester]

do you have any stats to back this up?

That explains why i had another 5 scatters today at 2c = $1600 Keep feeding it for me while I'm away guys

Seriously though - i think you're looking for the wrong things here. Unlike other slots, the feature isn't really the payday, its the clue! Re-read Spear's post and use the increase/decrease method (and a lot of patience!) in conjunction with this It can take several hours, but Totem Treasure is the most profitable MG slot if you play it right IMHO.

There should be absolutely no relation between spins. If there is, you are playing on one very odd machine. Unless you are questioning the very nature of randomness and whether it actually exists at all (that is the point I think spearmaster was trying to make).
I would love to see some stats if you have them that show a relationship between outcomes, but until I see such stats, I feel I must warn you and other readers not to trust any "systems" to much. It is a good way to go broke (if you start thinking you can predict an outcome if you really can't).

 

[Bruce Hamilton]

Would love to hear some of the amounts won when picking the cash instead of the egg,and bet amounts.

I was using 2 cent coins, won 1000 coins picking cash. Not much, but $20 is $20.

Jamiester, look at the screenies Simmo has posted, he doesn't need stats. :notworthy

 

[Simmo!]

I would love to see some stats if you have them that show a relationship between outcomes, but until I see such stats, I feel I must warn you and other readers not to trust any "systems" to much.

Yes thats good advice. However, i believe MG slots are "weighted" and that in the case of GG, the weight is adjusted in real-time albeit with a normal RNG. I'll pass on the collecting/posting stats - i'm happy with my intuition

5 more scatters this morning. My $200 is now $3k. I'm getting out when it dips to $2k

PS. Just noticed there are 2 scatter symbols in TT on reels 1 & 2.

 

[Bruce Hamilton]

5 more scatters this morning. My $200 is now $3k.

You'd better be carefull before you get yourself banned for being too damn lucky.

 

[spearmaster]

There is no relationship between spins, for sure. There is possibly, however, a correlation between the frequency of good spins and the chances of hitting a big win.

 

[Simmo!]

You'd better be carefull before you get yourself banned for being too damn lucky.

*lucky* = key word...cant see they'd ever ban you for being an "advantage player" on slots

 

[Bruce Hamilton]

...cant see they'd ever ban you for being an "advantage player"...

Read Butlebre's thread re: Connect to Casino, they did just that! He had withdrawn over $10,000 with deposits under $2,000...

 

[Simmo!]

Read Butlebre's thread re: Connect to Casino, they did just that! He had withdrawn over $10,000 with deposits under $2,000...

It pays to know the casinos you play Bruce - Nothing surprises me at ConnectTo

 

[vgyhnji]

FWIW I had started with a 100 balance when playing a mixture of TT and WW.

I managed to reach a total of just over 600 (flipping between games after a decent win) and then dropped back to around 400 with few wins at all (either TT or WW) - all the time playing at the minimum .01 coin value.

Around the 400 bankroll I switched to .02 and continued to drop on WW, switched to TT (don't know at what level) and fell all the way to just under 140 (6800ish coins), a fair losing run, when the goose with the choice of cards gave free spins and 6x multiplier.

Thats when the 120000 coin win fell, frankly during (or rather at the end of) a huge losing run - certainly not flagged up by any previous wins etc.

 

[Simmo!]

when the goose with the choice of cards gave free spins and 6x multiplier....

Thats when the 120000 coin win fell, frankly during (or rather at the end of) a huge losing run - certainly not flagged up by any previous wins etc.

Playing my way, I'd have upped my bet the minute the 6x Goose hit on this strategy. Thats EXACTLY the indicator we are talking about here...a sign of a more generous period of play. A 1x multiplier would have had me decreasing my bet.

But yes it wont always be the case. I've had good hits in unexpected times too. That's randomness for you

 

[jamiester]

Jamiester, look at the screenies Simmo has posted, he doesn't need stats. :notworthy

I am not saying he hasn't been tremendously lucky, only that that luck doesn't prove anything (necessarily). Any betting system would work if the player keeps hitting 5 scatters at 400x total bet!!!

There is no relationship between spins, for sure. There is possibly, however, a correlation between the frequency of good spins and the chances of hitting a big win.

Well of course the fact that a spin is a win increases the probability that it will be a big win. Is that what you are saying? The wins, big and small should all be randomly distributed. The natural tendency of aggregation will mean that there are bunches here and there and yes, the chances that a big hit will be part of a bunch are greater than the chances that a big hit will be an isolated hit (simply because there are more opportunities in each bunch, only one opportunity in an isolated hit). But there is no predicative value in this fact. You don't know how long a cluster will last and the fact that you might consider yourself to be in a cluster of wins in no way means that a future spin is more (or less) likely to be a win (of any size) than a spin after a dry spell. I am sure that if you went back over your wins you would find that the same proportion of big wins were in clusters of wins as your total wins were in clusters.

Yes thats good advice. However, i believe MG slots are "weighted" and that in the case of GG, the weight is adjusted in real-time albeit with a normal RNG. I'll pass on the collecting/posting stats - i'm happy with my intuition

PS. Just noticed there are 2 scatter symbols in TT on reels 1 & 2.

Could you tell me what you mean by "weighted" and "weight adjusted in real-time" and furthermore, how this can be done with a normal RNG. I don't understand how this is possible, but of course I am not sure on what you mean by your terms either. This is a new idea to me...

On your PS., mapping out the reels is a way to go. I have mapped out a few of Aceclub's slots. They wouldn't verify for me if the overall size of the reels, or the sequence or the relative frequency of the symbols was accurate. They wouldn't even confirm for me that the animated reels were indeed the virtual reels! They actually got quite testy when I presented them with this information. I may post it in another thread.... But if you are mapping reels then you are onto something: then you can calculate probabilities of each combo. It doesn't let you predict any better, but it does let you know what odds you are beating with each hit and you can calculate overall payout.

 

[Simmo!]

Could you tell me what you mean by "weighted" and "weight adjusted in real-time" and furthermore, how this can be done with a normal RNG. I don't understand how this is possible, but of course I am not sure on what you mean by your terms either. This is a new idea to me....

Ok, well take a progressive like Tunzamunni for example. A 3 line slot, 30 symbols per reel. By that reckoning, you should get the jackpot lineup once every 30x30x30 spins (2700). At 25p a bet that means for every $675 you stake, you should win the jackpot which starts at $20,000 and often goes up beyond $50,000.

Not logical, unless the symbols are weighted, a normal practice in "pub based" (real world) fruit mahines. On Tunzamunni, you'd need 90 symbols (minimum), assuming one jackpot symbol per reel, per reel to get the stats right

So there's obvious;ly another factor built into MG slots. My guess is symbol weighting.

 

[jamiester]

OK....

Ok, well take a progressive like Tunzamunni for example. A 3 line slot, 30 symbols per reel. By that reckoning, you should get the jackpot lineup once every 30x30x30 spins (2700). At 25p a bet that means for every $675 you stake, you should win the jackpot which starts at $20,000 and often goes up beyond $50,000.

Not logical, unless the symbols are weighted, a normal practice in "pub based" (real world) fruit mahines. On Tunzamunni, you'd need 90 symbols (minimum), assuming one jackpot symbol per reel, per reel to get the stats right

Your math is off (27000) but I get your point.
I understand that definition of weighted but how does that apply to video slots? There is no physical restriction to the size of the reels (in fact the Aceclub slots have different sized reels within the same game!), so the virtual reels are displayed. I thought. and you say they are weighting in real time: You think they are weighting the animated reels differently according to past play? Or are they just changing the weights randomly? And why would they bother? If true, there is no way in the world that that is fair or random: a machine that changes the odds on you constantly?
Furthermore, even if the reels in a five line video slot are weighted (why bother?), the weights should never change and could be discerned by recording relative frequencies of given positions over a large sample. If a machine changes the weights of its reel positions during play (I would think next to impossible, logistically), that machine cheats. I doubt it happens at all.

 

[jamiester]

update reply

So there's obvious;ly another factor built into MG slots. My guess is symbol weighting.

So have you mapped out the reels on these MG slots?

 

[Simmo!]

and you say they are weighting in real time: You think they are weighting the animated reels differently according to past play? Or are they just changing the weights randomly? And why would they bother? If true, there is no way in the world that that is fair or random: a machine that changes the odds on you constantly?

Hi J,

I didn't "say" that, i said i "think" that Its just a hunch.

Randomness - depends on what you term random. If a casino says for every 100 people that come thru our doors, we'll make one rich at random, do you care how? The fact a slot decides how to deliver its wins will ultimately be based on its overall "average payout" setting. If its 95%, its still randomly giving the wins to someone at random.

Anyway, to be honest J (and not meaning to sound dismissive), its a whole maths debate based on a hunch that we've had here before and its all down to opinion. I'll continue to go on my "hunches" for now How others play it is entirely up to them. All i can say is that 7 times out of 10, i can spot a decent win coming a mile off, as i think Spear probably can too

Cheers

Simmo!

 

[spearmaster]

Simmo's definition of weighting ought to look something like this:

Let's assume for sake of ease that there are 3 symbols on each reel, and in the same order (on a three reel machine).

Reels 1 and 2 are evenly weighted - which means each symbol has a 1 in 3 chance of appearing during the course of a single spin.

Reel 3 is weighted 10%/40%/50% which means Symbol 1 has only a 10% chance of appearing during the course of a spin.

Thus, for a Symbol 1 to appear on each reel, the chances are 1/3 x 1/3 x 1/10 - or about 1 in 90 spins. Symbol 2 would be 1/3 x 1/3 x 1/2.5 - or once in 22.5 spins, and Symbol 3 would be 1/3 x 1/3 x 1/2 - or once in 18 spins. All other combinations would be losers if we further assume that you must match three symbols in order to receive a payout.

This is a standard method of weighting used by all video slot machines - though naturally not by mechanical machines unless there is a computer chip controlling the stop position on each reel (also the norm).

The machine, however, is still considered random, because despite the weighting as described above, the RNG still generates a random number which is in no way affected by any external mechanism.

Does this mean slots are rigged? Not exactly, but for all intents and purposes, yes. A machine with a 98% payback will be designed so that the weighting will return 98% of the amount it takes in over time - whether this be in the form of a single cherry paying 2, 2 cherries paying 5, and 3 of a kind paying various amounts, or in the form as described above - no payouts unless you hit three of the same symbol. Or even the ones where all blank positions pay you 2 (and believe it or not the blanks are weighted as well).

Now - getting back to the streakiness - you can take my description above, and then add a roller coaster (sine wave) to it. Basically, this means that the weightings change with every spin of the slots. But the net result will still approach the theoretical payback because a sine wave has two equal phases. If the ('scuse my lack of knowledge of mathematical terms) wave has a long sweeping downward curve, it will have an equivalent long sweeping upward curve. The only thing that can be varied with the sine wave is the cycle during which both phases must be completed.

Hence my post way earlier in this thread - a higher frequency of wins will probably indicate which side of the curve you are currently on - and naturally, the more frequent the wins the higher the likelihood of hitting a bigger win.

There is probably a third variable with regards to progressive jackpots - imagine the value of a jackpot serving as a variable - the higher it gets, the higher the likelihood of it being hit. The question is, is this variable modified by a fixed or variable "weight"? If fixed, a casino could theoretically set this weight very low so as to slowly increase the likelihood of the jackpot being hit, meaning a better chance of a high jackpot. Or they could make this weight very high, meaning more frequent jackpots.

Can this be used to your advantage? *MAYBE*. You will never know for sure which part of the wave you are in, and you will never know what the length of the cycle is. You can, perhaps, notice an increase in frequency, and raise your bet hoping that you're in the middle of a long cycle, and on the positive side of it. Or you could play faster if you are not using autoplay.

I am not a slot machine designer nor a mathematical expert - and thus what I am pointing out above must be taken with a grain of salt - but to the best of what I have learned up to now, I strongly suspect my explanation is more or less correct.

 

[Simmo!]

What Spear said + approx. $10,000 profit (playing at 1c/2c) in 2 weeks

 

[jamiester]

replies...

Randomness - depends on what you term random. If a casino says for every 100 people that come thru our doors, we'll make one rich at random, do you care how? The fact a slot decides how to deliver its wins will ultimately be based on its overall "average payout" setting. If its 95%, its still randomly giving the wins to someone at random.

When I play a slot, I expect to have the exact same odds of hitting all combos on all spins. The RNG regime is not supposed to change at all. If it was, casinos could loosen or tighten up the machines at will. This is not fair. A machine that pays at .75 half the time and 1.15 half the time is a .95 payback machine, but not a fair one, certainly not one that I would play! Each event should be entirely independant and the results should be dictated by a constant RNG regime. IF the wheels are weighted, the weighting should be constant and could easily be determined. Changing weights or RNG regimes are not OK.

The machine, however, is still considered random, because despite the weighting as described above, the RNG still generates a random number which is in no way affected by any external mechanism.

Now - getting back to the streakiness - you can take my description above, and then add a roller coaster (sine wave) to it. Basically, this means that the weightings change with every spin of the slots. But the net result will still approach the theoretical payback because a sine wave has two equal phases. If the ('scuse my lack of knowledge of mathematical terms) wave has a long sweeping downward curve, it will have an equivalent long sweeping upward curve. The only thing that can be varied with the sine wave is the cycle during which both phases must be completed.

Hence my post way earlier in this thread - a higher frequency of wins will probably indicate which side of the curve you are currently on - and naturally, the more frequent the wins the higher the likelihood of hitting a bigger win.

There is probably a third variable with regards to progressive jackpots - imagine the value of a jackpot serving as a variable - the higher it gets, the higher the likelihood of it being hit. The question is, is this variable modified by a fixed or variable "weight"? If fixed, a casino could theoretically set this weight very low so as to slowly increase the likelihood of the jackpot being hit, meaning a better chance of a high jackpot. Or they could make this weight very high, meaning more frequent jackpots.

Can this be used to your advantage? *MAYBE*. You will never know for sure which part of the wave you are in, and you will never know what the length of the cycle is. You can, perhaps, notice an increase in frequency, and raise your bet hoping that you're in the middle of a long cycle, and on the positive side of it. Or you could play faster if you are not using autoplay.

First, I understand weighting. But video slots don't need to weight their symbols because their reels aren't physical. They can simply display the virtual reels (the virtual reel is the physical (or in this case animated) reel multiplied by the weighting of each position)). I am not saying some video slots don't use weighting, only that is unnecessary. For example, in Aceclub's Predator, the first reel has 31 postions, the 2nd has 33, the 3rd 33, the 4th 47 and the 5th 48. On each of these of reels many symbols are repeated in multiple positions, so they are in effect weighted, but each position 1 thru 31 (or 33 or 48) should have an equal chance of occurring.

I have never said that weighting affects randomness. Unless the weighting changes.

I think this sine wave is a figment of your imagination. Even if there was such a pattern that was discernable, it would cycle many many time a second. Do you have any source material for this sine wave theory? Are you questioning the very nature of randomness? I don't get where this is coming from.
Certainly what you say about the weighting changing every spin: this cannot be true: a given range of random numbers is programmed to generate a given result. This range cannot change from spin to spin. The RN regime should be constant. Unless you are trying to say that the EFFECT is that the weighting changes because of cycles in the generation of the RNs themselves. Again even if this is true, the cycles happen so fast that you could not play to them.

The amount of the jackpot should NEVER affect the probability of it being hit. Not in a fair game anyway. I am not saying casinos don't do this, only that if they do, they are using unfair games.

I can spot a big win a mile off as well: that's usually how far away it is

 

[spearmaster]

Let me put it this way.

My imagination is quite vivid. But I am convinced of my theory and whether you believe it or not is up to you - but you are getting carried away with your perfect world of randomness, because video slots are not 100% free-wheeling, random machines and will never be.

If you would like to rebutt in the future, perhaps you should come up with some material to show me that I am wrong, rather than asking me to support a "theory" that I have proposed and already said that said theory should be taken with a grain of salt.

 

[Simmo!]

I can spot a big win a mile off as well: that's usually how far away it is

No offense but this whole "what constitutes random" debate can never be resolved as its just opinion, like mine and Spears Goose theories. Just opinion

 

[jamiester]

Let me put it this way.

My imagination is quite vivid. But I am convinced of my theory and whether you believe it or not is up to you - but you are getting carried away with your perfect world of randomness, because video slots are not 100% free-wheeling, random machines and will never be.

If you would like to rebutt in the future, perhaps you should come up with some material to show me that I am wrong, rather than asking me to support a "theory" that I have proposed and already said that said theory should be taken with a grain of salt.

I'll be the first to admit we all need myths to live by I am just trying to figure out if there is any rational basis for what you are saying, or, really, even, sometimes, what you are saying in the first place. Forgive me if that seems rude. I am trying to learn about slots, too, but I am certainly going to grill anybody I choose to learn from to see if from where they are speaking. I also notice that there tends to be lots of "magical" thinking about slots and all sorts of unsupported theories that can perpetuate ignorance and ultimately cause new and unsophistated players to lose money believing that it is possible to exercise a degree of control that is (probably) not possible. If somebody is posting theories about non-random behavior of slots, I would hope that they would be willing to back it up.
I will start a thread about one of the Aceclub slots, the animated (virtual) reels of which I have mapped out. Perhaps you will see the approach I am taking in analyzing slots. You can respond to me there if you think there is something I am missing.
And, yes, Slots results should exist in "a perfect world of randomness". Ask any casino manager, they will tell you the same. They wouldn't be lying now would they?

 

[jamiester]

I am sorry, too, Simmo!,

No offense but this whole "what constitutes random" debate can never be resolved as its just opinion, like mine and Spears Goose theories. Just opinion

But this simply is NOT true. Randomness can most certainly be tested in any number of scientific ways. What is random is not opinion. Now, I will agree, however, that casinos can employ methods (not showing the actual reels in animation, using very subtle tweaking noticable only over many thousands of events) to make it next to impossible to detect deviations from randomness and furthermore that there is a grey area between random and nonrandom behavior about which we might not be able to draw conclusions, but neither of these facts relegate the assessing of random or nonrandom behavior to the realm of "opinion".

 

[spearmaster]

Let me point to you a page by my friend the Wizard of Odds, from whom at least some of my information was obtained.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

While his information refers to slots in land-based casinos, I will say with a reasonable amount of certainty that at least one online manufacturer's slots follow the descriptions that you will see here.

The Wizard is far more expert than I ever will be in any form of mathematical probability or gambling-related information, most certainly including slots (which he repeatedly tells me not to play except for a very few variations).

 

[jamiester]

yes, I got a lot of my info from him to

Let me point to you a page by my friend the Wizard of Odds, from whom at least some of my information was obtained.

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

While his information refers to slots in land-based casinos, I will say with a reasonable amount of certainty that at least one online manufacturer's slots follow the descriptions that you will see here.

The Wizard is far more expert than I ever will be in any form of mathematical probability or gambling-related information, most certainly including slots (which he repeatedly tells me not to play except for a very few variations).

And here is a quote from the very page you linked that helped form the basis of my approach to analyzing multipayline video slots:

"Multi-line slots, both with physical as well as video display reels usually do not have weighted reels. Otherwise the process is the same as above. In video display slots representations of actual reels are used, which can be quite large, 60 symbols or more."

In other words, the animated reels are the virtual reels.

 

[Simmo!]

Getting back on topic...

I sussed today that on Totem, you can actually get 1,300,000 coins in one hit. And there's two combinations for it too. Basically on Reel 3, the WILD symbol is above the jackpot Eagle symbol. 5 x WILD pays 12,000 and 5 x Eagle pays 5,000 (doubled with a WILD). So assume you get 6x in the Free Spins and land:

Wild middle of Reel 1
Wild middle of Reel 2
Wild Top of Reel 3 (Eagle thus middle of Reel 3)
Wild middle of Reel 4
Wild middle or Reel 5

Playing max coins (10) at $0.01 ($2.50 a spin) , you'd get 120,000 for the 5 Wilds + 100,000 for the 5 Eagles (4 wilds + 1 eagle). Multiply by x6 and you have 1,320,000 coins - or $13,200 dollars at $0.01

If you move Reels 1 & 5 up one and Reel 3 down one in the example above, you get the same result.

Incidentally, a story: I hit 50 spins at 1x today. Being a slow laborious feature to watch, i went for a ciggie while it span them out, and came back to 116,000 coins ($1160) - dunno what fell in tho Also had a 19,000 hit while Free Spinning at 5x ($950)

 

[Webzcas]

Is your winning streak ever going to stop Simmo!!??

 

[Simmo!]

Is your winning streak ever going to stop Simmo!!??

Yeah it took about $2k back before that

 

[Chill]

Well Simmo, i was so close to your calculation, not shure if it should go in screenshots that suck or not

 

[Chill]

One more for the public, a nice free spin run

PS! I did say I was done with GG forever, but I decided to give it a go with $100, glad I did

 

[irebal]

Have any of you managed to get the 50 spins at 3x yet? I've had 50 spins quite a few times, but all I can manage for the multiplier is 1x. I would just like to hear that it can be done

 

[irebal]

Another 1600...i'm up a ton this month on the goose...all at 32red
I keep waiting for it to go cold.

Now if i just could get the dang 50 spins at 3x

 

[Bruce Hamilton]

Something tells me I should join 32Red and play the goose.

 

[tim5ny]

Have any of you managed to get the 50 spins at 3x yet? I've had 50 spins quite a few times, but all I can manage for the multiplier is 1x. I would just like to hear that it can be done

Had the 50 spins lots of times, but only at 1X multiplier only. I have never had a decent turnout with the fifty spins. My best was 10 spins@ 3X for over $600.00 on a $1.00 bet.

 

[tim5ny]

Another 1600...i'm up a ton this month on the goose...all at 32red
I keep waiting for it to go cold.

Now if i just could get the dang 50 spins at 3x

One thing I've noticed about these Goose games is that the big hits will come if your bankroll can survive the dry periods.. You need one hell of a bankroll to survive on $5.00/spin Irebal. After I hit the 5 scatters today on Totem @ $1.00 wager, I had close to $400.00, so I boosted the bet to $2.50/spin, and it disappeared in no time. That's what happens to me on this game every time. I hit a nice one or two on small bets, and then I go to $2.50/spin, and several hundred dollars just disappears in a flash.

 

[vgyhnji]

Simmo

On entering Spin Palace casino the message board there tells of a player having recently won a $10K jackpot at GG Totem Treasure.

Do you know what combination/coinage etc this jackpot might refer to?

 

[Simmo!]

Simmo

On entering Spin Palace casino the message board there tells of a player having recently won a $10K jackpot at GG Totem Treasure.

Do you know what combination/coinage etc this jackpot might refer to?

If its *exactly* 10k then its likely to be 5 eagles with a wild at 10c max coins ($25 a spin) or the same combo in Free Spins at 5x playing 2c max coins ($5) a spins IMHO.

 

[Chill]

wow, $500 on an 80 cent bet

Link Removed ( Old/Invalid)

 

[why0why]

Is it just me, or do the GG slots seem to be playing MUCH tighter than they were? I would be interested to hear feedback from others. I know there are streaks, but I can't hit anything on these for the last week or so. Simmo??? How's it going for you?

 

[spearmaster]

Nice hit Chill! I keep getting close but no dice - and I always play max bet

why0why, it has definitely seemed a bit tighter the last week, I haven't had any of those 80K hits, nor anything of any real size since the last posts I made, but the last day or two it seems to have loosened up a bit - I hit 50 spins (at 1x) three times and cashed out a bit after getting my butt kicked by GG and Jungle Jim.