- Joined
- May 22, 2012
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
Make the distinction between desperate people who are forced to flee their country and criminals/terrorists who have this single-minded determination to destroy as much as they can and bring harm to society.Yes, this will play into the hands of Merkelbach's right-wing critics who say these threats are the result of her open door policy for Syrian and other refugees.
The truck bore Polish licence plates and it is not yet known who exactly is behind this terrorist attack; it much resembles the horrific Nice attack by a Tunisian nutcase who had help from a couple of Albanians and more French-Tunisians with criminal records.
But why this link to the Syrian refugees? This right-wing fear mongering should stop here and now. It makes matters only worse by implying that [all] Syrian refugees are terrorists, that's plain ridiculousMake the distinction between desperate people who are forced to flee their country and criminals/terrorists who have this single-minded determination to destroy as much as they can and bring harm to society.
Yes it was deliberate. The owner of the truck think it was hijacked. One person was arrested and another person that was in the truck was killed. They also found another body near the scene so I am guessing that person must have been the original driver. I guess terrorists stick to what works and its very hard to stop these kinds of attacks since they are simple and easy to carry out. Scary stuff.Dont know why, I just thought this was a sort of 'anniversary' thread from the last time a truck was used as a deadly weapon, Its not been reported on sky news website at all!,
How awful, do we know if it is deliberate
They are saying that Islamic State is taking the credit for it, also they took credit for the attack in Nice too. We also have no idea of the background of some of the Syrian refugees, they could be criminal who knows. When people travel without papers it's kinda hard to check. So the distinction can be hard to make and you cannot help Europeans becoming more suspicious and wary due to all the attacks that have taken place in the last few years in Europe.
There have been terrorist attacks before any influx of refugees, but there always have to be scapecoats, we simply cannot live without them, can we?![]()
Consider this when you equate refugees with terrorists: It's exactly what the Islamic State wants.
The very same refugees entering Europe are often the very same civilians who face the indiscriminate violence and cruel injustice in lands controlled by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. Globally, studies have shown that Muslims tend to make up the largest proportion of terror victims, with countries such as Syria and Iraq registering the highest toll.
Its a good damn thing that Trump became president. He wont allow this garbage over here like Hilary was going to do.
I dont really know how the people of Germany feel overall, I mean ive read alot of comments where they are disgusted with her and the people are tired of being killed by these pieces of crap but if it was alot, whats germanys rule to get rid of her? I mean, to me it seems she letting these syrians do as they please to the germans by letting them just flood in
So not all of the refugees coming into Europe are victims some of them or terrorists and it is impossible to tell since many of them do not have papers. This is also want Islamic State wants and what they have planned. Plant terrorists among the refugees. I can't remember where I read this but it was in an intelligence report issued a couple of years ago.
It's laughable to blame Merkel for this. If Terrorists want to hurt a Country, there is no way to hinder them. And thats a fact. There will never be a 100%-safe Scenario for anyone in any Country of the World. So please don't accuse Refugees for the Problems which arise from that bullshit system called capitalism.
With a policy, which is restrictive towards Refugees you don't win anything you're just masking the symptoms instead of fighting the cause.
Also consider that till now, no one knows for sure, if this was a political or religious assault.
As german citizen, I can assure you, that most of our educated citizens are pro refugees and contra those right-winged assholes who try to use those (terror)-attacks (no one still knows the background) for their purposes.
So it is better to let million innocent people die, because of one million refugees, there is the chance that a very small percentage might be a islamistic terrorists ? Sorry, no words for this.
Let's put some things into perspective: According to a review by theYou do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.: of the approximately 2,400 terrorist attacks on U.S. soil it was determined that approximately 60 were carried out by Muslims.
In other words, approximately 2.5% of all terrorist attacks on U.S. soil between 1970 and 2012 were carried out by Muslims. This is a tiny proportion of all attacks.
Why go back to 1970? Run the numbers in the last couple of decades. Must be close to 100%.
25,000 americans have been murdered in the name of Islam since 2001
(dont really know why you have copied a list of murder victims when we are talking about terrorist attacks, there is a difference)
It always surprises me when numbers are quoted at the amnesia many have to just how many civilians in the middle east were slaughtered because of an illegal invasion, no matter how much we want to block it out or deny it, it is us who have nurtured the growth of this 'terrorism' through our own supposedly moral actions.
Bush is one of the biggest war criminals in history aided and abetted by Blair.
As for letting people 'flood' into countries unchecked and its connections to terrorist attacks and think you will want to look a little deeper into that issue.
and who knows Trump may just build a wall around America save you all
(dont really know why you have copied a list of murder victims when we are talking about terrorist attacks, there is a difference)
It always surprises me when numbers are quoted at the amnesia many have to just how many civilians in the middle east were slaughtered because of an illegal invasion, no matter how much we want to block it out or deny it, it is us who have neutered the growth of this 'terrorism' through our own supposedly moral actions.
Bush is one of the biggest war criminals in history aided and abetted by Blair.
As for letting people 'flood' into countries unchecked and its connections to terrorist attacks and think you will want to look a little deeper into that issue.
and who knows Trump may just build a wall around America save you all
Why go back to 1970? Run the numbers in the last couple of decades. Must be close to 100%.
25,000 americans have been murdered in the name of Islam since 2001
(dont really know why you have copied a list of murder victims when we are talking about terrorist attacks, there is a difference)
It always surprises me when numbers are quoted at the amnesia many have to just how many civilians in the middle east were slaughtered because of an illegal invasion, no matter how much we want to block it out or deny it, it is us who have neutered the growth of this 'terrorism' through our own supposedly moral actions.
Bush is one of the biggest war criminals in history aided and abetted by Blair.
As for letting people 'flood' into countries unchecked and its connections to terrorist attacks and think you will want to look a little deeper into that issue.
and who knows Trump may just build a wall around America save you all
Thank you very much for this post!
The constant blending out of the real reasons for terrorism is just staggering.
- UK - Israel/Palestine disaster
- UK - useless Falkland war
- US - Vietnam, Korea, Cambodia disasters
- US - feeding Taliban with weapons against Russia in the 80's, now fighting them
- US - 2 Middle east campaigns, this time Mr. Blair jumped on the bandwagon
- US/UK/France - Libya disaster
-....list by far not complete
Offficial Reason: All in the name of the "GREATER GOOD", fighting communism, terrorism and evil dictators
Real Reason: securing access to oil, territorial presence, enforce own interests
Real Victims: local civilians and victims of the war and "terrorist" attacks.
Question remaining: Who is really the bigger terrorist in this world??? I know the answer.![]()
.
Bush is one of the biggest war criminals in history aided and abetted by Blair.
Also just want to add I dont really have a problem with what Bush did. Alot of conspiracy theorists yell oil etc. Bush refused to take the oil in the end. Saddam made an agreement from the first war the Americans were allowed to inspect for nukes etc. Saddam broke that agreement and kicked inspectors out. This just after 9/11 attacks. USA was never going to risk anything more. Hence why that administration made the assumption Saddam was building and hiding weapons.
The real idiot was Tony Blair. I dont even think that guy looked into it, he just followed along like a clueless sheep.
The USA tries to pry its nose into too many affairs. Especially the democrats Obama and Hilary. How the secretary of state doesnt answer over 300 calls/emails from the ambassador in benghazi is beyond me. And what happens? American soldiers and the ambassador dragged into the streets and killed.
Then this same crew with the Libya garbage..Again Hilary Clinton had a huge part in this.
Glad to see these people no longer in office in a few weeks.
The best thing I heard from Trump was "Why does the USA need to be the policeman of the world. We dont. We need to take care of our own country and affairs"
really? near a quarter of a million innocent people slaughtered certainly makes me have sleepless nights
IMO you should be blaming Saddam for that. Hes the one that allowed it to happen when all he had to do was follow the agreement that was made. What a time to try and take a tough stance on America. Right around 9/11. Not the sharpest tool in the shed.
Not only did he refuse, he insulted and enticed the Americans. Calling them weak and saying he would destroy them.
Honestly you just cant see the wood for the trees, blaming everyone else but the people who perpetrated these acts, maybe a good starting point would be researching just who was going to make money from the Iraq illegal invasion, always follow the money
So breaking an agreement, threatening america with weapons of mass destruction, is me making excuses?
Saddam Husseins words on or after 9/11
"t is possible to turn to biological attack, where a small can, not bigger than the size of a hand, can be used to release viruses that affect everything..."
Babil, September 20, 2001 (State-controlled newspaper)
"The United States must get a taste of its own poison..."
Babil, October 8, 2001
"If the attacks of September 11 cost the lives of 3,000 civilians, how much will the size of losses in 50 states within 100 cities if it were attacked in the same way in which New York and Washington were? What would happen if hundreds of planes attacked American cities?"
Al-Rafidayn, September 11, 2002 (State-controlled newspaper)
"The real perpetrators [of September 11] are within the collapsed buildings."
Alif-Ba, September 11, 2002 (State-controlled newspaper)
Im sorry but you say these things to a country that was just attacked what do you expect. Then when the USA responds he says he has weapons of mass destruction and will kill all americans.
Thats not wood trees forest jungle whatever. Thats idiocy.
To blame Bush is ill informed imo

you speak like one American life is worth more than one Iraqi life.
Bush was eager to invade Iraq during the year 2000 when Saddam changed its required currency for oil trade from USD to the Euro,
Sadaam threatening the world was not a 'new' tactic that took place post 911, why did Bush go after Sadaam when Bin Laden was blamed for 9/11, now that is the sticking point here, the USA just used the excuse of 9/11 to go back to Iraq and carry on what his father failed to finish. They knew there were no weapons of mass destruction it was a false flag and that has been proven, funny you Blame Blair for being a sheep, but being a sheep for what exactly? for following Bush into an illegal war
Isis was born out of the Iraqi war and for that Bush is responsible for.
You need to think outside the box to see it for exactly what it is.
lol I dont care either way. Its just facts im using. You are using an ill informed opinion.
Half of what you say are one liners that dont even make sense. I speak like one life is more than another what? Where did I say that?
Who said anything about Saddam threatening the world was new? I said he insulted, baited and threatened america with weapons after 9/11.
What do you mean why did Bush go after Saddam? Because he threatened america with chemical warfare etc after 9/11.
Blair is a sheep because he was the leader of a country and instead of doing what was best for his country, he followed america into war.
You accuse Bush of oil theft. The reason why Isis grew like it did was because Bush left the oil alone. So which is it here? Bush stole oil and Isis wasnt his fault or he didnt steal oil and Isis is still his fault? Just blame Bush for everything.
What his father failed to finish? LMAO. So you think a well known dangerous dictator should be allowed to threaten america with chemical warfare and terror attacks?
You need to think outside the box instead of listening to the news because all your one liners are exactly whats found on CNN clips or conspiracy clips. And its exactly what has poisoned alot of society.
Just to chime in, the Gulf War was a coalition of quite a few nations - not just the US - and was sanctioned by the UN. We were only there to push the Iraqis out of Kuwait - which was done swiftly and effectively....the USA just used the excuse of 9/11 to go back to Iraq and carry on what his father failed to finish...


Just to chime in, the Gulf War was a coalition of quite a few nations - not just the US - and was sanctioned by the UN. We were only there to push the Iraqis out of Kuwait - which was done swiftly and effectively.
It was decided to leave Saddam in charge but contained. I'm sure some folks hoped that his own people would overthrow him, but we saw how that went.

The 3 stages of destruction of the European peoples and cultures ...
You seem quite dramatic. Relax.
I am pretty well informed on some of this, my other halfs relatives are German and their entire family is from there and half still live there and they disagree with everything you wrote. They despise Merkel. I asked them the questions I asked here and they said the area they live in Merkel is very hated but then you have the other side that loves them. Basically like here Liberal vs
I also think the comment you made about if terrorists want to do something, they will. Wrong. Many countries do not allow refugees in, have a very tight border and vet people. They are enemies of many of these terrorist groups and they yet to be attacked. But when you open your borders and let them pour in, Im sorry thats not protecting your country. In my opinion she should be jailed.
To your last part. Its not a small percentage. One terrorists can kill tens of thousands. Many terrorists have already caused death and rape In germany.
And btw, there are many very educated right wing "assholes" in your country. And I bet they say the same about you left wing people too. Lets not pretend everyone who disagrees with you is an idiot.
There was this big case on last new-years-eve in Cologne, and beside that a few weeks ago a Girl was killed by a Refugee. You've got criminals in every country and every group. 
Merkel is 100% to blame for this, encouraging millions of Muslims to enter Europe unchecked...Islam will never be with western values, the Koran teaches to kill the non believer etc.
The right wing view point has pointed out for the last twenty years that multiculturalsim does not work, now you are seeing the evidence of that.
I find it hard to discuss with you as my english is limited and I can't hold a proper discussing-language. Therefore I'm out![]()

@nachhaltig, there is absolutely nothing wrong with your English and I agree with all of your points, well put!Merkel is 100% to blame for this
@nachhaltig, there is absolutely nothing wrong with your English and I agree with all of your points, well put!
Another political thread - goodie
I will say I am disgusted with what I'm seeing on the news, having been born in Berlin, and I can say with 100% certainty that this would not have occured had Germany not allowed hundreds of thousands of u n v e t t e d Syrians and other nationalities in from the Middle East.
To suggest otherwise is naiive,oblivious and apologist for the actions of these individuals (mostly of fighting age, I hasten to add) and can await the day when their country is ruined thanks to the whims of a career politician.
Merkel should be tried for treason truth be told.
Socrates has a dog.
A dog bit someone.
Therefore Socrates has blood on his hands.
Sloppy, dangerous thinking Dunover. And it's exactly that kind of crap that helped precipitate one of the worst genocides in human history.
Hopefully when the next right wing nutter murders someone in the street of some UK community you'll see that you have blood on your hands for propagating that kind of irresponsible drivel. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Socrates has a dog.
A dog bit someone.
Therefore Socrates has blood on his hands.
Sloppy, dangerous thinking Dunover. And it's exactly that kind of crap that helped precipitate one of the worst genocides in human history.
Hopefully when the next right wing nutter murders someone in the street of some UK community you'll see that you have blood on your hands for propagating that kind of irresponsible drivel. You should be ashamed of yourself.
My opinion vs. their opinion. But please tell me how a single politician can be blamed for the whole refugee-policy of the EU. The EU failed as a whole in this case.
Terrorism isn't something which refugees invented. There was Terrorism before the Islamistic Scene. Sorry, but there is no 100% safety and there will never be a 100% safety.
But "caused death and rape" doesn't sounds dramatic ?There was this big case on last new-years-eve in Cologne, and beside that a few weeks ago a Girl was killed by a Refugee. You've got criminals in every country and every group.
I wouldn't consider myself "left-winged", I just had history and I know what happens when populism meets fear. Lesson learned, maybe you won't understand as you're not that sensitized like us germans.
I am sorry if I am sounding rude, I don't mean it that way, blame my english for it.
Last thing I want to add:
I admit, that the EU as whole handled the entire Refugee-Thing in a really bad way. They could have done it better (more control, take fingerprints and so on). But to blame Merkel and/or the Refugees for Terrrorism is nothing more then political propaganda.
I find it hard to discuss with you as my english is limited and I can't hold a proper discussing-language. Therefore I'm out![]()

I dont understand how you cannot say Merkel is not to blame. She stood on podium and announced she will have open borders and all syrians are welcome.
BTW you claim not to be left wing, your entire opinion is left. I remember in class discussing this. One side was Democrat the other republican. Liberal views vs conservatives. Your view was that of theirs.
I did not, did you read the Bible? It's all about the exegesis of this texts.Have you ever read the Quran?
When you have a large group of people who believe in this and act on it and then invite them into your country with a completely different belief system, you are asking for serious problems.
Merkel could do as other countries do and close the borders. She is to blame without question
No one said there is 100% safety. But you can take precautions and deter these attacks. See Canada's system. The refugees are vetted and for the most part have been no attacks.
).So it is better to let million innocent people die, because there is the chance that from one million refugees, 100 might be terrorists? Sorry, no words for this.
Okay, since I have no money left to play with, I try to answer you
It's interesting that everyone outside of Germany thinks, that Merkel made a kind of "Invitation". As I stated before, the whole EU failed in that case. Thats a huge and complicated topic, which isn't that easy to discuss. As I wrote in my previous post, I admit that mistakes were made. My Impression is, that in the early moments our politicians didn't realized how big the Number of potential Refugees is. As a Result all borders were overwhelmed with the amount of Refugees. I don't know if you kept Track of the efforts of Hungary to keep their borders closed. They also failed. Merkel didn't had any chance to make another decision (it was already to late) and believe me or not, I am the opposite of a Merkel-Fan.
I don't know exactly how the power is divided in the USA, Canada or UK, but in Germany the chancellor can't decide isolated. Most of the Parliament stood behind this decision. To go further, in the German party spectrum, the CDU (Merkels party) is far away from the left side, the CDU is by far the most popular conservative party here in Germany.
I wouldn't call myself left. I am just against populism, Rascism and Fascism. Yeah okay, my view about economics is left, but thats not the point in this discussion.
I did not, did you read the Bible? It's all about the exegesis of this texts.
I can only speak for myself. I have had contact on several occasions with Refugees and didn't had any problems. Most of them are really glad that they have the possibility to be here and to be alive. In every bigger Group are people who behave like scum. It's unfair to judge a whole Group by the misbehaviour of some individuals.
Before a refugee is able to come to germany they have to cross Greece/Turkey - Bulgaria/Serbia - Hungary and Austria. So you are blaming the country at the very end of the chain? If the other countrys would have kept their borders closed, then how were the refugees supposed to come to germany?
If I had to leave my country because people want to kill me there, i would be really glad if there would be a country like germany which would give me opportunity to begin a new life.
And to speak about those terrorists. We already have enough of them in our Country. And most of them were born in Germany. There is a reason why people believe the shit, a preacher of hate is telling them. They don't see any future and are hoping for a better live in paradise as a martyr. You could tell me that in paradise would 300 virgins wait for me, I wouldnt care. And why? Because I have everything I could ask for (okay except monster hits like you had).

. But the perception of "threat" differs and some feel a little uncomfortable with all these guys around - especially young women. You can't blame them and can't ignore them.My final question would be, how many deaths have been caused by any right extremist group and how many have been caused by radical islamic groups and /or terrorists over the past let's say 10 years.
Both groups preach hate and see violence as a valid act toward fellow human beings.
