- Joined
- Mar 31, 2005
Isabel Oakeshott on point here.
Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
Yes I do, as I was watching it being live streamed at the time, where thuggish morons were setting fire to a commercial refuse bin and trying to get it in through the emergency exit of the hotel.
The man, Peter Lynch was NOT involved in this. He also was not involved in any violence, something that the court also confirmed in his case. Yet he obviously was coerced into pleading guilty.
This aside, yesterday they released over 1,000 career criminals, the majority of which I daresay have committed far worse offences than yelling "scum" at riot police. Indeed one such criminal who was a recipient of this early release, was picked up by his mates driving a Bentley and also a Mercedes G Wagon.
Just so our two tier judicial and policing system can lock up protestors such as Peter Lynch whose only crime was 'stupidity' in being in the wrong place at the wrong time, hurling hurty words at riot police.
The government has got his death on their hands.
#TwoTierKeir
No, you wouldn't. WE, society collectively would take them and subsidise them. Then live through the fallout later on.Another "hero" born and bred in the good old UK..... I would take 100 legal immigrants above this scum any day.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Yes I would , this disgusting piece of shite should be shipped out to Rwanda . He attacked someone who has been granted leave to stay therefore he’s legal , while scumbag stated he went to attack anyone .No, you wouldn't. WE, society collectively would take them and subsidise them. Then live through the fallout later on.
Or do you intend to personally act as a guarantor or employer for your metaphorical new friends?
And I can almost guarantee the immigrant he attacked will make more of a contribution to society than that scum ever did .No, you wouldn't. WE, society collectively would take them and subsidise them. Then live through the fallout later on.
Or do you intend to personally act as a guarantor or employer for your metaphorical new friends?
You really think these immigrants intend to get JOBS?No, you wouldn't. WE, society collectively would take them and subsidise them. Then live through the fallout later on.
Or do you intend to personally act as a guarantor or employer for your metaphorical new friends?
There you go.Labour out to kill growth in business. Raise their overheads and who's going to pay for it?
Shareholders? No
Business leaders? No
Normal employees? Yes, because there will have to be costs cut somewhere to pay for the rise in overheads so it will a freeze on recruitment, "efficiencies" and the ordinary working man will pay for it in the end.
5 more years of this to come, pensions will be decimated next as it will be an easy steal for Labour.
What has this got to do with immigrants? So you think immigration shouldnt happen? Have you ever tried to recruit any workers in this day and age. You are talking absolute nonsense and are sitting waving your St George's flag like someone from Dad's Army.There you go.
The amount raised is, over the term of a 5-year Parliament, approximately equivalent to the (est.) £2-4bn annual cost of accommodating 25-30,000 invaders each year.
(est. because the correct accurate figure is not being released under FoI requests as it's considered too sensitive.)
The first symptom of a failed state is not being able to control its borders. That's your price. The penny is finally dropping for you!
I posted the wrong clip
He's a goner surely, apparently he was threatened, well then you dial the police and tell them you're an MP and have been threatened by a member of the public. You don't start street fighting late at night like a yobbo.
He's a goner surely, apparently he was threatened, well then you dial the police and tell them you're an MP and have been threatened by a member of the public. You don't start street fighting late at night like a yobbo.
).If you get over two years for hurty words and shouting at a dog then how long should that twat get?
Nothing will be done. He is a member of the protected class.
If he has to resort to it, he will play the victim and if anything, HE will end up getting compensated (you know, for things like "negative impact on his mental health").
Meanwhile, the guy he sucker punched will be lucky to get compensated to the tune of anything above 50 quid.
Its at a minimum assault, potentially ABH, has to get at least a suspended sentence, if he doesnt then Keir has a lot to answer for and if the Tories sit back and do nothing for the next 4.5 years they will have a landslide.Nothing will be done. He is a member of the protected class.
If he has to resort to it, he will play the victim and if anything, HE will end up getting compensated (you know, for things like "negative impact on his mental health").
Meanwhile, the guy he sucker punched will be lucky to get compensated to the tune of anything above 50 quid.
The beginning of cutting off rural folk from life alongside killing off farming income via taxing and funding changes. Those who live rurally often rely on their income from the farming community or an ability to travel.Starmer is to remove the Tories' £2 bus fare cap that helps the poorest, rural communities and those who cannot afford cars. Raising it by 50% to £3.
What with Reeves' tax grab we are heading for financial Starmergeddon!
Yep this. I used to make my own eliquid in 2016 when the TPD came in.Makes me laugh the £2.20 per 10ml tax on vaping liquid. Everyone will just mix their own at home, the ingredients are common.
And more stupid hikes on wine and spirits.. same comment as above.. Penny off a pint in a pub? Don't make me laugh, like that is even going to be noticed, or passed on. Right.
Makes me laugh the £2.20 per 10ml tax on vaping liquid. Everyone will just mix their own at home, the ingredients are common.
And more stupid hikes on wine and spirits.. same comment as above.. Penny off a pint in a pub? Don't make me laugh, like that is even going to be noticed, or passed on. Right.

Is that real? Taxing vaping juice? Fuck me, they really are a bunch of c*nts.Makes me laugh the £2.20 per 10ml tax on vaping liquid. Everyone will just mix their own at home, the ingredients are common.
And more stupid hikes on wine and spirits.. same comment as above.. Penny off a pint in a pub? Don't make me laugh, like that is even going to be noticed, or passed on. Right.
Marvellous review which I suspect you wrote with a sneer. May I suggest you reward yourself with some research this evening into journalistic prowess by visiting Raymond's Review Bar which is just a nice stroll away from the meister meet venueYes indeed, a Budget to remember as the Party of Envy stuck to their pledge of pilfering as much of the country's wealth as is feasible in their first of five Budgets.
Doing that commie thing of shaming entrepreneurship, aspiration and self-betterment, Thieves wasted no time in plundering employers' NIs and slapping 20% VAT on private school fees for anyone that dare consider sending their kids to have a better education and subsequent life chances, many of whom aren't even remotely rich and can now kiss that dream goodbye. In line, comrades!
Managing to piss off potential investors, corporations and the less fortunate all in one swoop, the Wicked Witch of the West even had sausage-negotiator Starmer shifting awkwardly during her Budget blitz, as the 'Party of the people' hamstrung smokers into coughing up for her inadequacies, all the while as pensioners get to look forward to freezing to death, always a laugh in anyone's books.
Couple that with workers' rights now far outstripping that of employers', it's going to be a swell time as the latter enact their retribution by hiring less people and effectively stomping any delusions of financial growth Labour may have dreamt up in their utopian bubble, with an increased minimum wage somehow meant to hoodwink the populace!
There is nothing of benefit to anyone in this Budget, other than to of course line the pockets of Labour in pursuit of their ideological vanity projects that no one asked for, let alone needs.
Somewhat amusing hearing her speak of ten-year plans and post-2028/29 mandates when it's quite apparent that they've fumbled the football the first chance they had, and that they'd be lucky to even see out the five years. Yet God loves a trier, and the gulf between being in Opposition and running the country clearly above their pay grade.
Further illustrating just why the country opted for fourteen years of Conservative government over anything Labour has to offer, and why this current shower - by far the most Communist rag-tag bunch of incompetents ever trotted out by Labour - are a curt reminder to the British public that cutting off your nose to spite your face isn't always a good option. But for now, let's enjoy the clown show y'all![]()

Definitely not until I've visited The Blue Oyster first!Marvellous review which I suspect you wrote with a sneer. May I suggest you reward yourself with some research this evening into journalistic prowess by visiting Raymond's Review Bar which is just a nice stroll away from the meister meet venue![]()
Its an awful budget for all the small businesses in the UK that employ around 1/3rd of all working people. The small businesses that have it tight already now have to fork out more with the increase of NI and the reduction of the threshold.Initial reaction to the budget is it's not a bad effort. Bulk of the burden falling on bigger business and wealthy individuals, more borrowing for investment without the bond markets telling them to fuck off - it all seems quite competent.
Given the very limited room for manoeuvre they'd been left by 14 years of Tory corruption and catastrophe, culminating of course in the biblical economic self-immolation of Brexit, this is definitely a step in the right direction.
I don't think anyone can reasonably argue that GB PLC needs investment, and a lot of it, the money had to come from somewhere, this is a solid effort at threading a very narrow needle.
*Notwithstanding the fact that in all its forms and guises, eliquids are just glorified propylene glycol and/or vegetable glycerine with added nicotine.Is that real? Taxing vaping juice? Fuck me, they really are a bunch of c*nts.
If you go to the Blue Oyster first folk will get confused about where the fishy smell is coming from in RaymondsDefinitely not until I've visited The Blue Oyster first!

Is that real? Taxing vaping juice? Fuck me, they really are a bunch of c*nts.
It will come into force in 2026 - By then I will be making my own. Unless they tax propylene glycol and vegetable glycerine, I should be good. Already have a source for the nicotine, which if kept in a fridge should last the 2 years or so it will take to run out*Notwithstanding the fact that in all its forms and guises, eliquids are just glorified propylene glycol and/or vegetable glycerine with added nicotine.
And for argument's sake, the VG variant, oft-used to elicit huge clouds of vapour and to impress one's peers, irritate fellow bus-stop standers and generally favoured by the yoof, of which most will have never actually smoked nor are likely to, the nicotine content is around 3ml, so in effect 'negligible'.
I wonder if those ejuices that have not been nicotine-laden and are also favoured by many vapers will be subject to taxation? Or will they be exempt?![]()

Got to claw back the loss in tax revenue from people giving up smoking.Considering 10ml of juice is around £1-£2.50 depending on brand, this is essentially a 100%-250% tax.
Easily got around though.

Actually thinking about it further, the tax will make a 100ml bottle currently selling for around £12.. well over £30.Got to claw back the loss in tax revenue from people giving up smoking.![]()
