greasemonkey
Banned User - flaming
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2010
- Location
- USA
I wanted to avoid any derail of the inetbet Nightmare thread but I did want to address a topic that was brought up in that thread. The questioning of Gambling Grumbles integrity was way out of line.
There have been a few posters that were up in arms over Gambling Grumbles listing Virtual Group casinos. I don't see them linking to any of these casinos however. I see that they list a few times these casinos but they have skull/crossbones next to them and they don't link to them. They also list inetbet but they do not link to them either.
My point is that questioning the Gambling Grumbles integrity over listing casinos that they don't actually even link to is wrong. Heck, CM lists all of them also and doesn't link to them either.
Of all the casinos silver oak is the only linking casino but when I check them out I am not sure if they are part of the virtual group? It doesn't actually appear so and the affiliate program is not the same either.
Cool cat, VIP Lounge, Club player, virtual and wild vegas all have no working links however that I could find. Regardless, I think the criticism was wrong obviously.
There have been a few posters that were up in arms over Gambling Grumbles listing Virtual Group casinos. I don't see them linking to any of these casinos however. I see that they list a few times these casinos but they have skull/crossbones next to them and they don't link to them. They also list inetbet but they do not link to them either.
My point is that questioning the Gambling Grumbles integrity over listing casinos that they don't actually even link to is wrong. Heck, CM lists all of them also and doesn't link to them either.
Of all the casinos silver oak is the only linking casino but when I check them out I am not sure if they are part of the virtual group? It doesn't actually appear so and the affiliate program is not the same either.
Cool cat, VIP Lounge, Club player, virtual and wild vegas all have no working links however that I could find. Regardless, I think the criticism was wrong obviously.