It's so sad...just produce more, the manufacturing cost per dose is pennies. It's generic, therefore india etc..can make it freely, unlike the new patented treatments which cost nearly a thousand dollars each course iirc.
Then you woke up from the dream!
I did tell my co-worker that the actual jab is very quick even though you do feel it, it's the time you have to wait that sucks.
Getting a hold of Ivermectin is becoming very difficult but there are alternatives that can be found in health stores quite easily-until they too are removed from market.
Going to buy enough vit d shortly to last till march, get some zinq lozenges as well. I don't want to end up the subject of an msm article, saying i regret listening to anti vaxxers!?
I bought a huge bag of Vit C powder over a year ago that I think I have used twice and I think is out of date because I've kept up with the natural sources
I haven't delved massively into the potential supplements for covid, natural source is probably best if you can integrate it into meals. Flu may be more prevalent this winter, out of the two flu worries me more. They're talking about making a flu jab using mRNA rather than the traditional method, it's cheaper to mass produce but is it better.I bought a huge bag of Vit C powder over a year ago that I think I have used twice and I think is out of date because I've kept up with the natural sources
I listen to both sides and reject a lot of it. There is so much crap from both sides.This is true for me on much more than just the covid issue.
The main thing for me in posting the things to use if you contract covid is the same as I posted about the best things to take maybe 16 months ago- To encourage folk to prepare themselves.
Governments,the media, and the medical industry never have.
Yeah the powers going to her head.
I think it has been criminal that so little has been spoken about preventatives and early self care. So many died needlessly due to stay at home until your lips go blue .By then for many it is too late given the hospitalization protocol's.
I must look up this Joe Rogan because he obviously upsets the narrative on getting vaccinated. It constantly amazes me that folk suck up the narrative from the media and big tech and still think it is a horse drug. One thing I do not believe from the below vid is that the Taliban is rounding up American citizens as hostages or whatever he said. At least not for now.
You wanna direct that at the msm, sage etc...delaying the domestic use passports because they were going to fall on their arse is not good news, scrapping totally yes that would be.
You choose to believe what you want to believe.
' I try to think for myself ' is a more accurate description. Countering msm narrative, which is being force fed to the public, is difficult if you tend to believe and agree with it.
Me neither.
Has there been any talk about Monoclonal antibodies?
Pretty sure thats what they gave Trump, and now recently Joe Rogan was talking about getting it aswell, but seems to mostly have been overlooked since he also took ivermectin (i think Trump only did the monoclonal, no ivermectin)
Maybe it doesnt fit the alternative narrative being pushed.
Yeah, both Joe & Trump used a bunch of different stuff, probably not all available to the average Joe due to costs.
One side has no financial motive, there are other things involved too regarding changes to personal choice and liberty. I could post data and info supportive of Hcq and ivermectin, however it won't change opinion that tends to agree with the msm verdict or big pharma's.
"PRINCIPLE is investigating treatments for people at more risk of serious illness from COVID-19 which can speed up recovery, reduce the severity of symptoms and prevent the need for hospital admission. The study has so far recruited more than 5,000 volunteers from across the UK."
I was wondering briefly today, that whatever happened between them, whether there were some cosy £ grants given or not, the powers that be/establishment might be using that to blackmail boris, he was dead opposed to ID cards before, and believed in personal freedom, choice etc...
Does it not say something abt being open to patients 'up to 14 days from test or diagnosis', I read that somewhere a while back.
" People aged 18 to 64 with certain underlying health conditions or shortness of breath from COVID-19, or aged over 65, are eligible to join the trial within the first 14 days of experiencing COVID-19 symptoms or receiving a positive test."
I think on the day you have symtoms [noticeable to yourself] and can see the doc, or positive test result, I think on average they take 3 days. So my thinking would be ideally 5-7 days max.
Will probably be a pretty wide range of data pouring in, differing in age, time infected before getting ivermectine etc.
Yes, don't mix up the results, where the late treatment could skew the conclusion to 'not effective', with big msm headlines, the point about timing of treatment will be lost. You've already demonstrated a willingness to argue away this relevant point, if you don't mind me saying. The whole thing is turning into a game, just like trump and the culture wars.
I just prefer seeing the whole picture instead of cherrypicking data just because it happens to support ivermectin.
