external image

Corona virus - Covid 19 discussion

I hope Nige gets cracking, if all this Klaus schwab 'great reset/new normal' stuff turns out to be unpopular then we need political alternatives at the ballot box, too long there has been a cosy arrangement in uk politics when push comes to shove.

Yes dear old Mr Farage has given us so much.

It's hard to choose between 'The Racist Party' and 'The Anti-Science Party' that he's gifted us so far.

Maybe for the hat trick he could form the 'No Votes For Women Party'.
 
Last edited:
David Lammy right on the money.

1604305022754.webp


Oh goody, herd immunity again.

1604305120130.webp


And the saddest, scariest thing of all is that he'll actually get some traction. As if the level of debate around Covid-19 wasn't low enough already.

Ahhhh well, there's always alcohol.

1604305172964.webp
 
I'll say one thing for Nigel, he's nothing if not adaptable.

The EU gravy train has come to a halt, things aren't looking good for his mate Trump, better find a new bandwagon to jump on I suppose.

1604311157394.webp

1604311168781.webp

1604311180236.webp
 
Looks like he has got someone rattled already :p

I think it might have been useful to spare some space for a few of the things he actually wrote in that article back in march rather than simply the headline:

By continuing to allow dozens of airplanes from areas of Italy which have been affected by the disease to land on British soil without even bothering to check those arriving for signs of illness, he and his government are being negligent. They are not carrying out their principal responsibility of keeping their people safe.

It is understood that 17 flights left Milan Malpensa on Sunday alone. Upon arrival in the UK, there were no medical checks of any kind whatsoever, no advice was given to anybody, and not a single passenger was put into quarantine.

Whether the recent collapse of the regional airline Flybe has made the government nervous about the economic effects of travel restrictions remains an open question. It does seem, however, that economic considerations are deemed to be more important than human ones.
[context]

I cannot remember in my lifetime a level of such concern about a public health matter in this country. It is the one topic that everybody is talking about. That is not to say that the British have lost their reserve, or are panicking. It is simply that most people have elderly relatives or friends and because older people are thought to be most at risk of infection, concerns are running high.

--------------

Nige will find his feet on this topic I'm sure, and he is very effective once he knows the lay of the land; if he can apply pressure to the govt that at least stops them deciding everything in secret, it will be a plus.

As the comment piece in the sunday Mail said yesterday:


In a modern democracy, with the huge communication resources provided by the internet, it is perfectly possible for the Government to make a detailed case for its actions to millions in a matter of hours. There is no risk in this.

In the case of the coronavirus, the enemy is not a sophisticated foe with powerful and insidious intelligence services, snooping on our every move and trying to outwit us. It is a senseless virus that has no idea how we are responding to it and would not alter its behaviour if it did in some way know our plans.

So what is the reason for the secrecy about the making of Government policy, the apparent total reliance for advice on a small closed group of experts,
and the unwillingness to discuss policy openly with the many dissenting scientists who have their doubts about it, such as the distinguished Oxford epidemiologist Sunetra Gupta?

And why is it that crucial statistics – on recovery from Covid after hospitalisation, on actual real time occupancy of intensive care beds, on the real meaning of figures in general, are so very hard to obtain?

There have been repeated problems with official figures on this epidemic, especially in the way that deaths are recorded and attributed.
 
Lucky guess is that any political party don't find silver bullet to solve current pandemic issue in UK.

Some wanker closed pubs here last week (restaurants and snack bars open) and made masks outside mandatory, especially last one is bit hard to understand when this island is not too crowded during winter anyway but if it makes somebody happy, can wear it, it just minimize all outdoor activities as it's not really enjoyable to wear that and try to breath at same time, jogging/running is allowed wihtout but walking not so maybe fresh air next year, not sure which one would prefer, one covid or non-air month...

Sure it's not helping this issue:
Malta is at the top of this list, where 29 percent of the population is estimated to have a body mass index of at least 30kg/m2. Close behind is the United Kingdom with 28 percent.


1604327508038.png


edit: 218 new cases today, new record, somebody forgot to inform virus that new restrictions are in place already.... Total cases 6398, total recoveries (what ever that mean) 4397 and 64 people passed away.
 
Last edited:
Seen quite a few elderly people in my local town today, late 70s and mid 80s if not older some looked, Bojo's lockdown has panicked them to go shopping, he seems to have overlooked that many pensioners don't know how to do online shopping or might not even have a modern computer/phone.

One couple in front of me, the lady was using one of those walkers and had one of these flimsy pale blue masks [same as I wear] except she had a nose outside of it.

People on here advocating this lockdown and thinking the govt really cares about the elderly, why haven't they provided every person over 75 say, with some decent masks, and is there any hard evidence they are helping them obtain shopping so they don't need to go out? Any national pensioner's helpline?
 
Last edited:
Mom and I were driving home from groceries and passed the school. We were quite bummed to see so many people out front, kids milling together, parents picking up kids, walking with kids
And nearly nil wearing masks.

Proably did in the school; but poor example, the second you exit the building to take them off when all still shoulder to shoulder and chatting

All rather disheartening when cases are climbing to see people becoming complacent about it all.
It's still all (here) just simple measures to take...step back a bit, wear a mask.
But if people can't be arfed to do those couple simple things, we'll be going back to stricter measures :(
 
Seen quite a few elderly people in my local town today, late 70s and mid 80s if not older some looked, Bojo's lockdown has panicked them to go shopping, he seems to have overlooked that many pensioners don't know how to do online shopping or might not even have a modern computer/phone.

One couple in front of me, the lady was using one of those walkers and had one of these flimsy pale blue masks [same as I wear] except she had a nose outside of it.

People on here advocating this lockdown and thinking the govt really cares about the elderly, why haven't they provided every person over 75 say, with some decent masks, and is there any hard evidence they are helping them obtain shopping so they don't need to go out? Any national pensioner's helpline?
I was a volunteer mack for the nhs upto a great weeks back.
Was only to do some shopping or speak to the elderly folks over the phone.

Joking apart the amount of them that frankly have lost the will to live due to this nonsense is not only saddening it’s frightening.
 
Lockdown should be to stop the virus nothing else.

And now we have Sturgeon saying if money is not going to be available in a few months then maybe have to lockdown now while funding is available.

And they wonder why people are pissed off.

Their are areas in Scotland on the lower tier levels. The country was not going to go into a full lockdown science says not needed here. But if money will not be available later might have too lock down now.

So basically even tho full lockdown is not needed and she admits that she might do it anyway.

Whole thing is just a total farce now.
 
The Toilet roll section was almost stripped bare, and the milk, but other than that the shop looked quite well stocked. A few people wearing those clear visors, I didn't stare but I wondered how good they are with a big gap at the bottom :confused: ...worse than my flimsy mask probably, some bloke steamed past me with what sounded like a bad cough, but could be just a common cold, as unlikely all the other respiratory viruses say 'ay up the corona kid's in town, we'll give it a miss for a while!'
 
I don't know why we couldn't have carried on with the measures we had in place, perhaps with more messages for the elderly to take [or be helped] more precautions, we need to get some separation in the nhs hospitals so patients aren't mixing. I am in favour of requisitioning any spare capacity/facilities/nurses from the private sector.

The PCR test issues are a big part of the figures at the moment, those tests were not used in spring anywhere near the numbers now. They are contaminating the statistics imo along with the 28 day rule for recording covid deaths.
I agree that they should have a combination of exclusive covid hospitals and segregated covid wings in other hospitals where essential medical procedures and testing for other serious illnesses and ailments could be carried out. But given that so much has moved on from the first lock down regarding testing and treatments are concerned and that so much more is known about the virus I think that we have no choice but to give it a month to see how things go.
I will be very interested to see how things play out over this next month.
 
I think depending on whether they are going to be doing mandatory testing of school children, the 'R' rate may not drop enough in order to lift the lockdown.

I said a few months ago, I could imagine Boris lifting a lockdown about 10 days before christmas, in an attempt to bask in PR headlines 'boris saves christmas' or some such shite, before then bringing the lockdown back in january until the vaccine is there.

Going to be easier to convince millions of people to line up for their jab and certificate if the country is stuck in tier 3 rather than 2 or 1.
 
I think depending on whether they are going to be doing mandatory testing of school children, the 'R' rate may not drop enough in order to lift the lockdown.

I said a few months ago, I could imagine Boris lifting a lockdown about 10 days before christmas, in an attempt to bask in PR headlines 'boris saves christmas' or some such shite, before then bringing the lockdown back in january until the vaccine is there.

Going to be easier to convince millions of people to line up for their jab and certificate if the country is stuck in tier 3 rather than 2 or 1.
Said that too, xmas will be saved by the conservatives.

Come January 2nd another return to the nonsense, nothing will change unless you go herd or get a vaccine (which could be forever)
 
Its terrible Borgie, but lockdowns dont work, they dont slow down any spread. Even the March one didnt work, the peak was reached and cases declining before we even locked down. They do no good, dont help with stopping the NHS being swamped, they just cause hardship, depression and mental illness, and store up economic ruin.
Screen Shot 11-02-20 at 09.13 PM.webp
 
Its terrible Borgie, but lockdowns dont work, they dont slow down any spread. Even the March one didnt work, the peak was reached and cases declining before we even locked down. They do no good, dont help with stopping the NHS being swamped, they just cause hardship, depression and mental illness, and store up economic ruin.View attachment 144273

What an absolute load of shite you talk.
The day we went into the first lockdown there were 877 new cases
A month later on the 23rd April there were 4152
How is that a decrease?
 
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.

What about it? A research paper by a computational statistics professor that (as far as I'm aware) hardly anyone else has agreed with.
How about some evidence to back up your claim rather than a research paper published 5 months ago, that is full of statements mentioning 'possible' 'may have' 'might have' blah blah blah.

The FACTS are

The day we went into the first lockdown there were 877 new cases
A month later on the 23rd April there were 4152

Again, how is that a decrease?
 
What about it? A research paper by a computational statistics professor that (as far as I'm aware) hardly anyone else has agreed with.
How about some evidence to back up your claim rather than a research paper published 5 months ago, that is full of statements mentioning 'possible' 'may have' 'might have' blah blah blah.

The FACTS are

The day we went into the first lockdown there were 877 new cases
A month later on the 23rd April there were 4152

Again, how is that a decrease?
Cases? How many are on deaths door on ICU wards? How many have actually went to meet there maker?..

Just like the uni students, wasn’t it over 800?..

How many in a bad way? Pretty sure that’s almost if not zero.

This virus affects the fattys, the bame folks and others with underlying conditions col.

Your everyday person will not have as much as a sniffle.

The ends don’t justify the means, as I’ve said on here many times before there are folks whom don’t need to leave the house for work and are perfectly happy for lockdown after fire break, fire break after a circuit break etc..

But some of us need to be actively out and about to work to pay our bills, this ain’t a dig at anyone whom works from home and earns a crust that way, but If they had there income taken away the last 8 months due to a virus as deadly as a bad curry then I’m sorry people are allowed to be concerned.

Shield those who are vulnerable without question, also let them have some personal responsibility for there lives and actions..

Other people who need to work to provide for there kids and families, pay there fucking bills etc then give them the chance to do so..

This won’t end until you have a vaccine or we try to just get on with it..

In the meantime should people just lose it all? All they worked for years col? Just give it up and hide in a broom cupboard for a bug that won’t even affect them?..

Sorry no, people have every right to oppose this, I firmly do now and no problems saying won’t adhere to the xmas nonsense or this rule of 6...

Not having a go at you col, as you know I respect you.

But it’s so easy for many people to love a lockdown when it doesn’t affect them one bit.

Not saying this about you btw, but don’t see many 9/5 or construction workers etc here wanting to be locked down...
 
Young healthy people have more chance of dying from travelling in a car for 50 miles than from covid, shall we ban all under 40s from entering cars?

Do you understand that those healthy young people can spread Covid to the people who have much higher chance to die?
 
Just to add..

Firstly @colinsunderland my language wasn’t great there so apologise, I just feel strongly about this due to experience, not MSM nor charts nor the so called scientists..

When volunteering I done shopping and spoke to older people, at first they accepted this..

Fast forwards since April and i no longer do this for the NHS, why?

It was heartbreaking, old and vulnerable people asking me if it’s ok for them to go out to see there grand kids, can they drive to the shops etc...

Now obviously there’s no way I can make that call for them, or so I thought..

Past few weeks I’ve kept in touch with many of the old dears and gents I helped, I don’t shop for them no longer but they call me..

The amount saying they are past caring about this virus and just want there life back as they won’t Have long left Anyhow is almost all of them..

They want to enjoy what time they have left, they want to enjoy there grand kids..

Some are saying to me ‘what’s the point in carrying on’ now this isn’t just the odd one or two, this was the majority of those people..

And this is only my experience, no more than say 15... imagine this on a whole.

I’ve wanted to stop the calls as they are honestly heartbreaking and no way would I turn my back, but when I’m asked if they should just break rules to live there lives and be happy and see there grand kids imagine how hard a phone call that is?..

So this isn’t just about me not being offshore on 1500 a week, skint and struggling.

I’ve first hand seen the suffering or decent people almost nightly for months.

Again I’m sorry for my language and attitude previous post, this one should explain why.
 
Cases? How many are on deaths door on ICU wards? How many have actually went to meet there maker?..

Just like the uni students, wasn’t it over 800?..

How many in a bad way? Pretty sure that’s almost if not zero.

This virus affects the fattys, the bame folks and others with underlying conditions col.

Your everyday person will not have as much as a sniffle.

The ends don’t justify the means, as I’ve said on here many times before there are folks whom don’t need to leave the house for work and are perfectly happy for lockdown after fire break, fire break after a circuit break etc..

But some of us need to be actively out and about to work to pay our bills, this ain’t a dig at anyone whom works from home and earns a crust that way, but If they had there income taken away the last 8 months due to a virus as deadly as a bad curry then I’m sorry people are allowed to be concerned.

Shield those who are vulnerable without question, also let them have some personal responsibility for there lives and actions..

Other people who need to work to provide for there kids and families, pay there fucking bills etc then give them the chance to do so..

This won’t end until you have a vaccine or we try to just get on with it..

In the meantime should people just lose it all? All they worked for years col? Just give it up and hide in a broom cupboard for a bug that won’t even affect them?..

Sorry no, people have every right to oppose this, I firmly do now and no problems saying won’t adhere to the xmas nonsense or this rule of 6...

Not having a go at you col, as you know I respect you.

But it’s so easy for many people to love a lockdown when it doesn’t affect them one bit.

Not saying this about you btw, but don’t see many 9/5 or construction workers etc here wanting to be locked down...

You're missing the point Ben, what I take issue with is when people make statements as fact, when they are far from that.

He stated

Even the March one didnt work, the peak was reached and cases declining before we even locked down.

As usual not a single shred of evidence to back up his statements, then doesn't answer questions about his clearly incorrect statements. Just like previous stuff he has posted. He was the one who mentioned cases, all I did was post the actual FACTS, rather than complete shite like he did. Still waiting for him to explain how cases declined before lockdown when the facts say the complete opposite.

It's not about if the lockdown is right or wrong, I have my views on it, as do others, but the simple fact is no one can be 100% sure of what will/won't help. No doubt in years to come we will see what should or shouldn't be done, but at the moment, we simply don't know. posting factually incorrect statements doesn't help anyone though.
 
You're missing the point Ben, what I take issue with is when people make statements as fact, when they are far from that.

He stated

Even the March one didnt work, the peak was reached and cases declining before we even locked down.

As usual not a single shred of evidence to back up his statements, then doesn't answer questions about his clearly incorrect statements. Just like previous stuff he has posted. He was the one who mentioned cases, all I did was post the actual FACTS, rather than complete shite like he did. Still waiting for him to explain how cases declined before lockdown when the facts say the complete opposite.

It's not about if the lockdown is right or wrong, I have my views on it, as do others, but the simple fact is no one can be 100% sure of what will/won't help. No doubt in years to come we will see what should or shouldn't be done, but at the moment, we simply don't know. posting factually incorrect statements doesn't help anyone though.
Fair comment mate.
 
Just a point about lockdown, you can hate lockdown but still agree it's the correct course of action.

Yes, I know I live on the IOM and we're back to normal here, but all my family are back in the UK (mostly up North) and some of them are suffering really badly with it in all sorts of different ways. Personally I'm dreading my nana dying - (she's 95, in poor health and my last surviving grandparent) - during lockdown and I won't be able to go to her funeral.

My brother is in desperation at another lockdown (his WhatsApp messages to me are quite similar to many feelings posted in this thread), and is absolutely pissed off with the whole thing.

It's a complex issue and there are no good answers, but please understand that those of us who support the lockdown as being the correct course of action based on the science, are also fully mindful of how absolutely bloody awful it is for a great many people.

1604357961685.webp
 
Just a point about lockdown, you can hate lockdown but still agree it's the correct course of action.

Yes, I know I live on the IOM and we're back to normal here, but all my family are back in the UK (mostly up North) and some of them are suffering really badly with it in all sorts of different ways. Personally I'm dreading my nana dying - (she's 95, in poor health and my last surviving grandparent) - during lockdown and I won't be able to go to her funeral.

My brother is in desperation at another lockdown (his WhatsApp messages to me are quite similar to many feelings posted in this thread), and is absolutely pissed off with the whole thing.

It's a complex issue and there are no good answers, but please understand that those of us who support the lockdown as being the correct course of action based on the science, are also fully mindful of how absolutely bloody awful it is for a great many people.

View attachment 144284
Fair play chop, good post.

I’m aware it’s not just me who it’s affecting, Iam overly passionate from time to time.

And genuinely wish you the best for your nana and bro, it’s a nightmare for us all.

Politics and opinions aside mate wish you and yours all the best.

Ben
 
Read my latest post. I’m not denying anything mate I promise you.

Just can’t see a way out for some people and it’s not pleasant.

I understand.

Not a black and white issue at all, and every coin and all that.

Certainly not an easy thing do deal with, since this touches up pretty much everyone globally. Lock down or not, people will suffer.
 
Last edited:
yesterday's sunday mail comment:

Fraser Nelson, editor of The Spectator magazine, last week published a number of major disclosures. Hospital numbers now available demolish the belief that the March lockdown was caused by a surge of disease. They also undermine the view that the shutdown was the reason deaths began to drop.

Covid deaths peaked on April 8, 16 days after lockdown. We now know that Covid's infection-to-death time-lag is about four weeks, which suggests that fatal infections peaked well before lockdown began.

They were probably dropping fast before Boris Johnson's proclamation of a national standstill on March 23. The NHS as a whole never came close to capacity. On April 11-12, the peak weekend for Covid cases in hospitals, almost 41 per cent of general acute beds were unoccupied.


-------------

Haven't read the spectator article, but find it strange people who routinely have no trust in Bojo would trust him with everything on this, so he's morphed from an irresponsible bs merchant/opportunist into mr trustworthy. Then when he's talking about brexit he slips back :confused:

The science the govt is relying on needs to be widely shared and examined / scrutinised by the whole UK scientific community, not just their chosen 'experts'. If professors and lifelong scientists are seeing problems with the govt's stats and approach then we should at least listen to what they have to tell us, and then the govt can answer these critics. At the moment they are running scared from disclosure and getting help from the shill media to smear people like sunetra Gupta.

^This is just my opinion folks, If you disagree I don't mind.
 
Mince and dumplings, yes i know it’s far from Michelin star standard presentation wise.

But it’s a traditional winter warmer, a true british dish, the bloody EU would probably try to cancel it if they had there way, thankfully they have been given the boot.

Slow cooked carrots, broccoli and sprouts pan done.

The mash was fresh and infused with horseradish..

Juice as Normal...

Keep safe guys, wash your hands..

Like you would anyways unless your a tad odd, keep 2 metres apart...

Listen to the nonsense and you will be fine!.

Ben and sox View attachment 144225
That looks like one of those pot meals (as we used to call them).

See whats in the left in the cupboards and chuck it all in.

This would normally be at the end of a holiday to use everything up.

Without the Brussels, i would eat that though.
 
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
Stopped reading here

You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.


Readers should therefore be aware that articles on medRxiv have not been finalized by authors, might contain errors, and report information that has not yet been accepted or endorsed in any way by the scientific or medical community.


Again, you get any real evidence to back your claims up?
 
yesterday's sunday mail comment:

Fraser Nelson, editor of The Spectator magazine, last week published a number of major disclosures. Hospital numbers now available demolish the belief that the March lockdown was caused by a surge of disease. They also undermine the view that the shutdown was the reason deaths began to drop.

Covid deaths peaked on April 8, 16 days after lockdown. We now know that Covid's infection-to-death time-lag is about four weeks, which suggests that fatal infections peaked well before lockdown began.

They were probably dropping fast before Boris Johnson's proclamation of a national standstill on March 23. The NHS as a whole never came close to capacity. On April 11-12, the peak weekend for Covid cases in hospitals, almost 41 per cent of general acute beds were unoccupied.


-------------

Haven't read the spectator article, but find it strange people who routinely have no trust in Bojo would trust him with everything on this, so he's morphed from an irresponsible bs merchant/opportunist into mr trustworthy. Then when he's talking about brexit he slips back :confused:

The science the govt is relying on needs to be widely shared and examined / scrutinised by the whole UK scientific community, not just their chosen 'experts'. If professors and lifelong scientists are seeing problems with the govt's stats and approach then we should at least listen to what they have to tell us, and then the govt can answer these critics. At the moment they are running scared from disclosure and getting help from the shill media to smear people like sunetra Gupta.

^This is just my opinion folks, If you disagree I don't mind.
Surely we aren't using the Mail as a source for good scientific information?

Personally I trust SAGE a lot more than I trust Bojo, and their advice was to lockdown 2-3 weeks ago. I certainly don't want a lockdown, I made the best of it last time, but it was red hot and I live a few miles from the coast, which was deserted and safe, so I wasn't stuck in every day, but it did mess my plans up for a few things quite a lot. However, I also don't want loads of old people dying, which if something hadn't been done, would likely be in high numbers over Christmas.

Having said that, this isn't a lockdown like last time. Ben mentions construction workers, they are allowed to work. So are most people, unless they work in leisure (pubs etc) or non essential shops. Schools and Uni's are still open.

I genuinely don't see the point of a lockdown when millions are still going out to work, when millions are going to school, college, and university.

I also can't see it ending on the 2nd December. Last time it took over 5 weeks for the numbers to start to fall (despite the misinformation posted on here), and they didn't stop rising until that point. Surely this time will be slower, as the lockdown isn't anywhere close to as strict. He isn't going to lift restrictions while the numbers are still going up, nor if they are substantially higher than they are today. That will be disastrous for the country, the high street and leisure industry in particular. We will see major pub closures if they don't get to open in December, even if they are allowed to, then they will have massive struggles as office parties etc are already cancelled in most places.

However, you can't blame just the government for this, people need to take it seriously and take responsibility for their actions. 'I'm alright Jack' just doesn't cut it. Crowding together and ignoring the rules was always going to ensure a spike. My daughter was telling me yesterday there are a load of her mates at uni talking about having one last blast out before lockdown, and there are loads of house parties planned for the next couple of days. I mean, how fucking stupid is that?
Seen a few pubs on social media pushing people to go out, and that to save throwing beer away they will be selling it for 95p a pint till it's gone, so 'have one last night of fun before lockdown at the best price you will see'. You can guarantee those pubs will be packed out, then will complain that they are closed longer because the cases kept rising.

It doesn't help that Bojo totally lost it a couple of months ago. Instead of giving clear advise and being decisive the government has totally lost any semblance of control. Local measures that no one understood, the tier system that was easier to understand, but then turned out could be changed county to county. Now a lockdown that isn't a lockdown. I will put money on, come Friday there will be very little difference on the roads, whereas last time they were completely deserted.
 
Last edited:
Surely we aren't using the Mail as a source for good scientific information?

Personally I trust SAGE a lot more than I trust Bojo, and their advice was to lockdown 2-3 weeks ago. I certainly don't want a lockdown, I made the best of it last time, but it was red hot and I live a few miles from the coast, which was deserted and safe, so I wasn't stuck in every day, but it did mess my plans up for a few things quite a lot. However, I also don't want loads of old people dying, which if something hadn't been done, would likely be in high numbers over Christmas.

Having said that, this isn't a lockdown like last time. Ben mentions construction workers, they are allowed to work. So are most people, unless they work in leisure (pubs etc) or non essential shops. Schools and Uni's are still open.

I genuinely don't see the point of a lockdown when millions are still going out to work, when millions are going to school, college, and university.

I also can't see it ending on the 2nd December. Last time it took over 5 weeks for the numbers to start to fall (despite the misinformation posted on here), and they didn't stop rising until that point. Surely this time will be slower, as the lockdown isn't anywhere close to as strict. He isn't going to lift restrictions while the numbers are still going up, nor if they are substantially higher than they are today. That will be disastrous for the country, the high street and leisure industry in particular. We will see major pub closures if they don't get to open in December, even if they are allowed to, then they will have massive struggles as office parties etc are already cancelled in most places.

However, you can't blame just the government for this, people need to take it seriously and take responsibility for their actions. 'I'm alright Jack' just doesn't cut it. Crowding together and ignoring the rules was always going to ensure a spike. My daughter was telling me yesterday there are a load of her mates at uni talking about having one last blast out before lockdown, and there are loads of house parties planned for the next couple of days. I mean, how fucking stupid is that?
Seen a few pubs on social media pushing people to go out, and that to save throwing beer away they will be selling it for 95p a pint till it's gone, so 'have one last night of fun before lockdown at the best price you will see'. You can guarantee those pubs will be packed out, then will complain that they are closed longer because the cases kept rising.

It doesn't help that Bojo totally lost it a couple of months ago. Instead of giving clear advise and being decisive the government has totally lost any semblance of control. Local measures that no one understood, the tier system that was easier to understand, but then turned out could be changed county to county. Now a lockdown that isn't a lockdown. I will put money on, come Friday there will be very little difference on the roads, whereas last time they were completely deserted.

I could restate all of my points, but I'm sure it won't change anyone's mind.

I wish I had other's faith in the Govt's approach, handling and integrity [that includes sage] the PCR tests and hospital stats etc...

However I can't put it into any polite words how I think of Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson and his crony, fake conservative govt.
 
I could restate all of my points, but I'm sure it won't change anyone's mind.

I wish I had other's faith in the Govt's approach, handling and integrity [that includes sage] the PCR tests and hospital stats etc...

However I can't put it into any polite words how I think of Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson and his crony, fake conservative govt.

His full name is enough to know he's full of shit.
 
I wish I had other's faith in the Govt's approach, handling and integrity [that includes sage] the PCR tests and hospital stats etc...

However I can't put it into any polite words how I think of Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson and his crony, fake conservative govt.

Similar to my lockdown post above mack (i.e. one can agree with the policy whilst acknowledging that it's hateful and damaging on many levels), it's also possible to think the government is (belatedly) doing the right thing whilst also believing that Johnson himself is possibly the least-fit person the UK has ever had as its Prime Minister. (And the same goes for nearly the entirety of his nodding dog cabinet.)

Crikey mack, my posts in this and the Brexit thread alone should make my views on that perfectly clear.

They were late last time around and they're late this time around, they kind of do the right-ish thing, eventually, when the only other option is absolute disaster. If they'd have gone for the two week 'circuit-break' when it was originally recommended, (and when Labour advocated for it), the current, longer lockdown could have been avoided.

Also as has been noted above, it's arguable how effective it's going to be anyway, given the exemptions that are in place this time around, and how little patience much of the UK population have left.

I can only repeat myself to an extent, the first lockdown did what it was supposed to in that it drove the rates of infection right down, that played nicely into a warm, hot summer where people could get out and about, where the risks of spreading the virus are much lower.

That gave the government a good, long breathing space to get test, trace and isolate working properly, and they totally fucked it (or rather, their mates at Serco who are £12bn richer out of the public purse fucked it), and now we're back where we are. (There are more complexities than that of course, such as not providing 100% financial support for people required to isolate, but you get the idea.)

Oh yes and we had genius schemes such as 'Eat Out To Help Out' that threw £500m of public money to start seeding the virus and getting it spreading again. (That was also abused fraudulently, of course.)

A terrible government, headed by a terrible Prime Minister.
 
When volunteering I done shopping and spoke to older people, at first they accepted this..

Fast forwards since April and i no longer do this for the NHS, why?

It was heartbreaking, old and vulnerable people asking me if it’s ok for them to go out to see there grand kids, can they drive to the shops etc...

Now obviously there’s no way I can make that call for them, or so I thought..

Past few weeks I’ve kept in touch with many of the old dears and gents I helped, I don’t shop for them no longer but they call me..

The amount saying they are past caring about this virus and just want there life back as they won’t Have long left Anyhow is almost all of them..

They want to enjoy what time they have left, they want to enjoy there grand kids..

Some are saying to me ‘what’s the point in carrying on’ now this isn’t just the odd one or two, this was the majority of those people..

And this is only my experience, no more than say 15... imagine this on a whole.

I’ve wanted to stop the calls as they are honestly heartbreaking and no way would I turn my back, but when I’m asked if they should just break rules to live there lives and be happy and see there grand kids imagine how hard a phone call that is?..

Whatever our disagreements may be on some of this stuff Ben, that's a very decent thing you're doing there.

Hats off to you.
 
What would people say if we didnt have lockdown and the virus runs rampant until xmas overwhelming the nhs,
Best science and logic have to indicate its the only weapon we have that has a chance of making a real difference,track and trace is far from being up to the job.I hate the idea of being isolated for another month,
will be the first time in 20 years I will be totally alone,but things cant get better without the right actions being taken.My biggest gripe is the schools and unis remaining open during the lockdown,they are fueling this second peak, the kids wont behave without constant supervision and teachers cant be expected to watch
what every child is doing all the time while in school
 
Having a national lockdown is like having a war and just carpet bombing a country indiscriminately.

We stopped doing that in wars to prevent killing innocent civilians , however innocent civilians are also now dying from the effects of lockdown, not covid.

It’s like going back to the dark ages.

Also closing gyms and leisure centres ,fitter healthier people are less likely to be affected by covid .Nobody can dispute that fact.

So why close health and fitness facilities ?

Many people don’t have houses or gardens with lots of space for exercise . And going out for regular walks in a wet and windy November ????? Fuck that.
 
Last edited:
Having a national lockdown is an acceptance that everything else has failed. It is the instrument of last resort, it's a terrible answer to a situation that has got badly out of control.
 
Having a national lockdown is like having a war and just carpet bombing a country indiscriminately.

We stopped doing that in wars to prevent killing innocent civilians , however innocent civilians are also now dying from the effects of lockdown, not covid.

It’s like going back to the dark ages.

Also closing gyms and leisure centres ,fitter healthier people are less likely to be affected by covid .Nobody can dispute that fact.

So why close health and fitness facilities ?

Many people don’t have houses or gardens with lots of space for exercise . And going out for regular walks in a wet and windy November ????? Fuck that.

Just out of interest, what solution do you think would work? They have tried local restrictions that everyone just ignores so they are out the question. Heard immunity won't work, so what other option is there?
 
At some point they will have to stop lockdowns . No countries can afford to continually do this , and the poorer countries will have nobody left to get bailouts from ..

And if Scotland leaves the UK and joins the EU then Germany will have even less to give out .

What if the “vaccine” doesn’t do its job ?

There are going to be many different vaccines developed by companies in many countries. All with different formulas.
All with different success rates .

Maybe the virus will always be around and people will always be vulnerable to it.

Maybe governments will accept a certain number of deaths in proportion to the financial hit that they willl take .

And before anyone says that you can’t put a financial price on saving a life , yes you can .
Governments and health services do this all the time . There is a cost calculated with medication and hospital treatments .

How many families do you see that have had to fundraise for treatment for their dying children with leukaemia or cancer ? Or HIV / Aids ? It’s sad but it has always been the case.

If the cost of survival long term is above the cost allocated for treatment then it doesn’t get administered.

It sounds cold but I’m sure there are difficult conversations being had behind closed doors in many governments planning for if the vaccines don’t work.........
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Accredited Casinos

Read about our rating system and how it's done.
Back
Top